Why 21Shares believes ‘passive strategies’ for crypto ETFs are outdated

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-03-26Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-26

Анотація

21Shares President Duncan Moir argues that passive 'HODL' strategies for crypto ETFs are becoming outdated. Instead, the firm advocates for active management to capture yield and diversification opportunities in the growing asset class. Key strategies include yield-generating products like a preferred stock ETP offering an 11.5% dividend, staking rewards in ETFs, and thematic offerings such as a Bitcoin-and-gold ETP. While U.S. investor interest remains focused on large coins, European institutions are exploring newer assets and application layers. Despite a decline in total crypto ETF AUM to $130 billion, active strategies aim to drive future demand.

For most Bitcoin OGs in the space, the main crypto investment strategy has always been ‘HODL,’ which has been enough to outperform most assets in certain periods.

Early asset managers who entered the sector also adopted a similar passive strategy for their respective crypto ETFs (exchange-traded funds). They have been holding the crypto assets in the hope that, in three, six, or 12 months, their value would appreciate.

According to 21Shares president Duncan Moir, however, crypto ETFs are transitioning from passive management to active strategies. Moir noted that the sector was a ‘nascent’ and ‘growing asset class’ that fits perfectly with active management.

At the core of this new strategy is scaling yield streams and extra earning opportunities beyond just holding the crypto assets. From a regional crypto ETF demand, Moir said,

The interest is still concentrated in the larger coins in the US. In Europe, institutional clients are more interested in newer assets and the application layer beyond the Layer-1.

Source: CoinShares

In fact, on a year-to-date (YTD) basis, the U.S. leads with $638 million in crypto inflows, followed closely by Germany at $377 million and Switzerland at $233 million.

Crypto ETFs evolution and diversification

For Moir, the mature investor base in Europe, who already hold Bitcoin and Ethereum, is looking to expand their crypto allocation with better offerings.

This led to 21Shares launching an ETP tied to Strategy’s preferred stock, Stretch (STRC), which offers an annual dividend yield of up to 11.5% payable monthly. This is one of the Strategy’s ways of raising capital for Bitcoin buys.

Moir noted that the product has been an instant success across several regions, underscoring a strong appetite for yield-bearing assets that are feasibly accessible via traditional platforms.

Additionally, crypto ETF staking rewards have become another active strategy to maximize investors’ returns.

Grayscale and BlackRock’s push for staking rewards in their respective Spot ETH ETFs is one example of asset managers seeking more opportunities for investors.

Finally, Moir said they also look for major thematic trends or future shifts that can be maximized. The approach informed the launch of 21Shares’ Bitcoin-and-gold ETP, based on the rising demand for safe havens amid debasement trade and rising U.S. fiscal debt.

It remains to be seen how the new active strategy will drive demand into crypto ETFs. As of writing, the total crypto ETF assets under management (AUM) were about $130 billion, down from nearly $240 billion at the peak of 2025.

Source: Blockworks

Final Summary

  • 21Shares’ Duncan Moir said that active strategies will be at the center of the next crypto ETF management.
  • Yield-focused wrappers and staking rewards are some active strategies asset managers are deploying for investors.

Пов'язані питання

QAccording to 21Shares president Duncan Moir, why are crypto ETFs transitioning from passive to active strategies?

ABecause crypto sector is a 'nascent' and 'growing asset class' that fits perfectly with active management, focusing on scaling yield streams and extra earning opportunities beyond just holding crypto assets.

QWhat regional differences in crypto ETF demand does Duncan Moir highlight between the US and Europe?

AIn the US, interest is concentrated in larger coins, while in Europe, institutional clients are more interested in newer assets and the application layer beyond Layer-1.

QWhat are two specific active strategies mentioned that asset managers are using to maximize investor returns?

AYield-focused wrappers (like the ETP tied to Stretch offering 11.5% annual dividend) and staking rewards in crypto ETFs.

QWhat was the rationale behind 21Shares launching a Bitcoin-and-gold ETP?

AIt was based on the rising demand for safe havens amid debasement trade and rising U.S. fiscal debt, capitalizing on major thematic trends.

QWhat is the current total assets under management (AUM) for crypto ETFs as mentioned in the article?

AAbout $130 billion, down from nearly $240 billion at the peak of 2025.

Пов'язані матеріали

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

Apple Pays Rent Too: The Two-Way Flow of "Traffic Tax" and "AI Capability Rent" Between Tech Giants For over two decades, Google has paid Apple an estimated $20 billion annually to remain the default search engine on Safari, a "traffic tax" for a critical user entry point. However, in 2026, the direction of this cash flow partially reversed. Apple agreed to pay Google roughly $1 billion per year to license its Gemini AI models, as Apple's own models reportedly struggled with complex tasks. This creates a unique dynamic: Apple acts as the "landlord" in the established search ecosystem, collecting rent from Google for access. Simultaneously, in the emerging AI arena, Apple becomes the "tenant," paying Google for access to cutting-edge AI capabilities it cannot currently match internally. While Apple claims its new models are "distilled" from Gemini outputs and contain "not a drop" of Google's original code, core dependencies remain. Its knowledge base is refined using Gemini's outputs, and its most powerful cloud model runs on Google's infrastructure. Apple has structured the deal as non-exclusive, allowing it to theoretically switch AI suppliers—a hedge against over-reliance. The future hinges on whether advanced AI models become a commodity (cheap and abundant) or remain a concentrated, scarce resource (expensive and controlled by few). Apple is betting on the former, leveraging its massive device ecosystem to be a powerful, choosy customer. If the latter proves true, its bargaining power could erode. This power dynamic is extending to developers. Apple, Google, and WeChat are all pushing for apps to expose their core functions as standardized "actions" or "intents" that their respective AI assistants (Siri, Gemini, WeChat AI) can directly call. The new scarce resource is no longer just app store visibility, but "being selected by the AI." The currency of "rent" has changed from a 30% revenue share to ceding control over how users interact with an app's functions.

marsbit42 хв тому

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

marsbit42 хв тому

Missed the SpaceX IPO? WEEX's "First Trade Protection" Lets You Experience US Stock Trading Risk-Free.

With the excitement around SpaceX's recent public listing reigniting interest in the US stock market, Chinese investors face significant challenges accessing compliant and convenient trading channels following regulatory actions against major online brokers. This article explores the available options, highlighting their risks and limitations. Traditional paths for US stock investments remain problematic. Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) and Listed Open-Ended Fund (LOF) products, while compliant, suffer from high fees, significant purchase premiums, and a very limited selection of assets. Small, unregulated offshore brokers pose substantial risks, including potential insolvency. While secure, VIP accounts at banks in Hong Kong or Singapore require high minimum deposits (often 1-2 million RMB) and in-person visits, placing them out of reach for most retail investors. The article positions cryptocurrency exchanges, specifically their TradFi (traditional finance on-chain) offerings, as a compelling alternative. Platforms like WEEX are noted for providing access to a wide range of US stocks and ETFs, including SpaceX (SPCXON), through tokenized assets. This method offers advantages such as a single account for both crypto and traditional assets, USDT-based settlement avoiding fiat complexities, flexible leverage, and robust risk management. To attract users, WEEX is promoting a "First Trade Guarantee" campaign. Running from June 15 to July 8 (UTC+8), it features a $30,000 prize pool. Users who trade $500 worth of US stock contracts can qualify for a guarantee on their first eligible trade: 100% loss coverage up to $30 or a 20% bonus on profits up to $30. The campaign is presented as a low-risk opportunity for both crypto natives and traditional investors to experience US stock trading.

marsbit44 хв тому

Missed the SpaceX IPO? WEEX's "First Trade Protection" Lets You Experience US Stock Trading Risk-Free.

marsbit44 хв тому

How Difficult is Chip Making? A Division Error Costs 475 Million Dollars

How Hard Is It to Make a Chip? A Division Error Cost $475 Million Chip expert Shi Kan, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and a popular tech creator, explains the immense challenges of chip development. Chips are foundational to modern technology, but their creation is extraordinarily difficult. The journey from sand to a functional chip involves complex design and manufacturing, but a critical bottleneck is verification—ensuring the design works flawlessly before costly production. A single, undetected bug can have catastrophic consequences, as illustrated by the infamous 1994 Intel Pentium FDIV bug. A flaw in the floating-point division unit forced a recall costing $475 million. Unlike software, chips cannot be easily patched after manufacture, making "first-time success" paramount. However, industry surveys show only 24% of chip projects achieve this; over three-quarters require at least one costly re-spin due to design flaws. Verification has thus become the dominant phase, consuming up to 70% of the design cycle. The core challenge is a "verification impossible triangle" between high performance, good debuggability, and low cost. Exhaustively verifying a modern CPU core could take 15,000 years with software simulation, or 30 years with advanced hardware emulation—timeframes utterly impractical for development. Despite being essential, verification is often seen as unglamorous "dirty work," receiving less academic attention than fields like AI. Shi and his team are tackling this by developing an agile verification research framework called ENCORE, based on FPGA technology, to improve verification efficiency and debug capability. Beyond research, Shi engages in public science communication through long-form video content, aiming to demystify chip technology, AI, and computer science. He argues for the value of pursuing "hard and long-term" endeavors, whether in the meticulous world of chip verification or in creating substantive educational content, believing such sustained effort is likely the right path forward.

marsbit53 хв тому

How Difficult is Chip Making? A Division Error Costs 475 Million Dollars

marsbit53 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片