Who is Making Money in the AI Era? The Must-See Investment List for HALO Asset Trading

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-03-06Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-06

Анотація

The article examines who profits in the AI era, revisiting Daniel Gross's 2024 questions on AI's impact. It finds value is concentrated in infrastructure: Nvidia, with a $3.2 trillion market cap increase, captured most profits, while cloud providers like Microsoft saw modest gains. Energy emerged as a critical bottleneck, with nuclear and utility stocks surging. Copper demand soared due to data centers, while coal saw mixed results. Geopolitically, the US leads in AI investment and model development. API costs plummeted 50x, driving deflation in knowledge production, but overall SaaS revenues grew. Key bottlenecks include chip packaging and power transformers. The piece also discusses AI's uneven impact on employment, regional real estate, and the fragile balance in semiconductor supply chains, particularly on Taiwan.

Editor's Note: In early 2024, AI was still in a phase of both fervor and uncertainty. At that time, Daniel Gross raised 18 questions on a single page: Where will value flow? Will energy become a bottleneck? Will software engineers be replaced? How will the competitive landscape between nations change?

Looking back two years later, these questions themselves are more enlightening than any specific predictions. AI profits have indeed concentrated at the infrastructure layer—Nvidia emerged as the biggest winner; energy and power quickly became new strategic bottlenecks; API costs plummeted, while computing power, capital, and geopolitical risks continued to amplify.

This article revisits the key questions Gross raised at the time and examines them against the reality of the past two years. It is not only a review of AI investment logic but also a roadmap for observing how the technological revolution is reshaping market structures, industry chains, and the global power landscape.

Below is the original text:

In January 2024, Daniel Gross, then CEO of Safe Superintelligence and now Head of AI at Meta, published an article titled "AGI Trades."


The article was just one page long, listing a series of questions about the potential impacts of AI progress. Looking back over two years later, these questions appear remarkably prescient, even though no definitive conclusions were drawn for each question at the time. Below, we review each of the 18 questions he raised.

Markets

In a post-AGI world, where will value flow?


Currently, value is indeed concentrated at the infrastructure layer—chips, packaging, power, and other areas. Nvidia has captured over 100% of the profits from the AI boom, as many companies are still operating at a loss. This is also clearly reflected in market capitalization changes: Nvidia's market cap increased by $3.2 trillion, rising from $1.2 trillion to $4.4 trillion; in comparison, the gains for cloud platforms have been much more modest (Microsoft up 4%, Amazon up 30%).

In the private market, the valuation growth of OpenAI, Anthropic, and xAI has also been astonishing, but their combined total value increase of $1.4 trillion is still lower than the market cap added by Nvidia during the same period.


This was a critical question at the very beginning of 2024.

What will happen to Nvidia and Microsoft?


Nvidia has performed exceptionally strongly. Its revenue grew from $60.9 billion in fiscal year 2024 to $215.9 billion in fiscal year 2026, nearly tripling.

Microsoft, however, has been less dominant. Azure's growth did accelerate to a 40% year-over-year rate, but from January 2024 to March 2026, Microsoft's stock price rose by only 4%. The market has questioned its annual AI capital expenditure of over $80 billion—when will these investments translate into returns remains unclear.

In this AI "gold rush" of "selling shovels and picks," Nvidia is clearly the biggest winner, while Microsoft's bets on infrastructure have yet to deliver obvious returns to shareholders.

Is copper mispriced?


It was severely undervalued. In January 2024, the price of copper was $3.75 per pound; two years later, it reached a record high of $6.61 per pound.

AI's demand for copper is enormous. For example:

Nvidia's GB200 NVL72 server rack uses over 5,000 copper wires

If fully straightened, the total length exceeds 2 miles

A 100MW data center requires approximately 3,000 tons of copper

Overall, data centers may consume 500,000 tons of copper annually. Some have thus called "copper the new oil." Of course, many other things have also been called "the new oil," as AI infrastructure construction is extremely complex, with bottlenecks at almost every stage. So this analogy should be viewed with caution.

Real Estate

If AI can write all software, will San Francisco become the new Detroit?

It depends on what is meant by "the new Detroit."

AI actually saved San Francisco from becoming a declining city like Detroit. San Francisco is still thriving:

· Office vacancy rates dropped from 36.9% to 33.5%

· OpenAI occupies 1 million square feet of office space

· Anthropic owns a 25-story office building

· Sierra signed a lease for 300,000 square feet of office space

In the first half of 2025, 78% of U.S. AI venture funding flowed to the Bay Area

Of course, there is another side: overall employment in San Francisco remains below pre-pandemic levels, but housing prices remain strong. Thus, it is far from a "shell city." The urban environment has also become cleaner.

How will AI affect wealth inequality?

It is still too early to draw conclusions, as data changes are not yet significant, but some studies are worth noting.

A 2025 IMF study suggested: AI may reduce wage inequality (by automating high-income jobs) but could exacerbate wealth inequality (as gains concentrate among tech company owners).

An OECD study found: Low-skilled jobs saw the fastest wage growth (assemblers +11.6%), while high-skilled jobs saw the slowest (CEOs +2.7%). However, this may reflect minimum wage policies more than AI itself.

In capital markets, concentration is also increasing: The "Magnificent Seven" (Mag7) account for about 32% of the S&P 500's market cap and contributed about 42% of total returns in 2025; meanwhile, massive funding rounds for AI startups (OpenAI $110 billion, Anthropic $30 billion) have also created enormous private wealth for a small number of founders and investors.

Energy & Data Centers

If AI becomes an energy competition, how should one invest?

This assessment is completely correct. AI has indeed become an energy game.

Those who caught this trade made significant profits. For example:

Vistra: +321%, the second-largest gain in the S&P in 2024 (after Palantir)

Constellation Energy: Stock price tripled since ChatGPT's release

NRG Energy: Rose about 95% in 2025 alone

Oklo: Up over 700% in 12 months

Nuclear energy saw a boom:

· Microsoft signed a $16 billion, 20-year PPA to restart the Three Mile Island nuclear plant

· Google signed a 500MW small modular reactor (SMR) agreement with Kairos Power

· Meta signed 6.6GW power contracts with multiple nuclear energy companies

Energy has become one of the most successful investment themes of the AI era.

In the entire data center supply chain, which parts are the hardest to scale 10x?

The bottleneck in the chip industry is CoWoS packaging technology (TSMC's Chip-on-Wafer-on-Substrate).

In the data center field, the biggest bottleneck may be power transformers.

· Delivery lead times approach 3 years

· A 30% supply gap emerged in 2025

· Costs have risen 150% since 2020

This 100-year-old technology has become a key constraint on the speed at which data centers can connect to the grid.

Is coal undervalued?

To some extent, yes, but far less so than copper. Coal prices actually fell about 22% in 2025, with some recovery by early 2026.

Coal companies performed decently:

· Peabody Energy: +34%

· CONSOL Energy: +37%

Meanwhile, U.S. coal-fired power generation increased by 13% by September 2025.

This was particularly evident in states with rapid data center growth:

· Ohio: +23%

· Oklahoma: +58%

Nations

Who are the winners and losers?

The clear winner is the United States.

2024 U.S. private AI investment: $109 billion (China only $9.3 billion)

Cumulative investment since 2013: $470 billion, more than the rest of the world combined

40 significant AI models released by the U.S. in 2024, compared to 15 from China

The game is not over, but for now, the U.S. is the center of AI competition.

What will happen to India's $250 billion GDP export dependency on GPT-4 tokens?

Signs are beginning to show, but it's still early. Hiring in India's IT outsourcing industry has noticeably declined. Between 2024–2025, large IT companies cut about 58,000 jobs, whereas the industry had added 360,000 employees between 2021–2023.

Will software engineers be replaced like typists in history?

Software engineers haven't moved to blue-collar jobs yet, but the career structure is already diverging:

Demand for AI engineers grew 143%

Entry-level hiring at large tech companies fell 25%

Internship positions decreased by 30%

The future choice might be: either move up to become "managers of AI agents" or shift to fields like manufacturing—after all, many factories need people who understand software to automate production lines.

Will there be a large-scale employment program similar to the "New Deal"?

Not yet.

In July 2025, the Trump administration launched the "American AI Action Plan," including:

An AI education executive order

Skills training programs

A $84 million Labor Department apprenticeship grant

But U.S. workforce training spending is only 0.1% of GDP, among the lowest in OECD countries. No plan has yet reached the scale of the original WPA (which employed 8.5 million people).

Is lifelong learning worth investing in?

This is a very abstract and personal question. But my answer is: Yes.

Inflation

If AI is truly deflationary, how would we see the signals first?

The best indicator might be AI API prices.

GPT-4 level inference cost:

Late 2022: $20 per million tokens

December 2025: $0.40 per million tokens

A 50x decrease in three years. This pace even exceeds the decline in PC computing costs or internet bandwidth costs. This is likely to be a leading indicator of service price deflation.

If demand for knowledge products keeps growing while production costs fall, how should we understand deflation?

Although AI API prices have plummeted, AI company incomes are soaring. Price decrease → usage explosion → total spending increases. Meanwhile, SaaS companies are adding 20%–37% "AI taxes" at renewal. Thus, even as the cost of producing software approaches zero, SaaS revenues are still growing.

This is similar to the computing industry in the Moore's Law era: individual products become cheaper, but the overall market size expands.

Geopolitics

Is interconnect really important?

Extremely important.

In large GPU clusters:

30%–50% of training time is spent on communication between GPUs

not on computation

For example:

Google TPUv7 Ironwood uses a 3D torus topology to connect 9,216 chips

Nvidia NVL72 connects 72 GPUs

Thus, interconnect networks are crucial for AI scaling.

If a country has more energy, can it achieve AGI with落后制程 (落后制程 - older process technology)?

Currently, it seems unlikely.

All leading AI chips use 4nm or 3nm processes:

Nvidia Blackwell

Google TPUv7

AWS Trainium3

China's Huawei Ascend 910C (SMIC 7nm) is competitive in inference but requires more chips and more energy for training. Simply increasing energy consumption to bridge the technology gap will eventually run into economic cost limitations.

What is the most likely "Taiwan event"?

The most likely is a blockade of the Taiwan Strait.

Tensions are escalating:

2024: China conducted "Joint Sword-2024B" exercises

2025: "Righteous Mission 2025" deployed over 100 aircraft and 13 warships

27 rockets launched from Fujian, with 10 falling into Taiwan's contiguous zone

Meanwhile, China's 2026–2030 five-year plan began separating the表述 of "peaceful unification" and "unification."

TSMC is also planning ahead: Eight fabs are under construction in Arizona, potentially handling 30% of advanced chip capacity in the future.

But the entire system remains in an extremely fragile balance.

Трендові криптовалюти

Пов'язані питання

QAccording to the article, which company has been the biggest winner in the AI boom and why?

ANvidia has been the biggest winner. The article states that Nvidia captured over 100% of the profits from the AI boom, as many other companies were still losing money. Its market capitalization increased by $3.2 trillion, from $1.2T to $4.4T, a gain that was larger than the combined valuation growth of OpenAI, Anthropic, and xAI.

QWhat is identified as the new strategic bottleneck for the AI era, and which investments performed well as a result?

AEnergy and power are identified as the new strategic bottleneck. Investments in energy companies performed exceptionally well. Examples given include Vistra (+321%), Constellation Energy (tripled since ChatGPT's release), NRG Energy (+~95% in 2025), and Oklo (+700% in 12 months). The article also highlights a major resurgence in nuclear power to meet AI's energy demands.

QHow has the cost of AI API inference changed, and what is its significance?

AThe cost of GPT-4 level inference has plummeted, falling from $20 per million tokens in late 2022 to $0.40 per million tokens by December 2025, a 50x decrease in three years. This rapid deflation in the cost of a key knowledge product is described as a leading indicator for deflation in service prices more broadly.

QWhat was the impact of AI on the city of San Francisco, according to the article?

AContrary to fears that AI might cause its decline, the article states that AI 'saved San Francisco' from becoming a declining city like Detroit. Office vacancy rates dropped from 36.9% to 33.5%, and AI companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Sierra signed leases for massive amounts of office space. Furthermore, 78% of U.S. AI venture funding in the first half of 2025 went to the Bay Area.

QWhich nation is identified as the clear winner in the AI competition so far, and what evidence is provided?

AThe United States is identified as the clear winner. The evidence provided is that the U.S. had $109 billion in private AI investment in 2024 (compared to China's $93 billion), has invested a cumulative $470 billion since 2013 (more than all other countries combined), and produced 40 significant AI models in 2024 (compared to China's 15).

Пов'язані матеріали

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报42 хв тому

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报42 хв тому

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News59 хв тому

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News59 хв тому

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit1 год тому

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот

Популярні статті

Як купити ERA

Ласкаво просимо до HTX.com! Ми зробили покупку Caldera (ERA) простою та зручною. Дотримуйтесь нашої покрокової інструкції, щоб розпочати свою криптовалютну подорож.Крок 1: Створіть обліковий запис на HTXВикористовуйте свою електронну пошту або номер телефону, щоб зареєструвати обліковий запис на HTX безплатно. Пройдіть безпроблемну реєстрацію й отримайте доступ до всіх функцій.ЗареєструватисьКрок 2: Перейдіть до розділу Купити крипту і виберіть спосіб оплатиКредитна/дебетова картка: використовуйте вашу картку Visa або Mastercard, щоб миттєво купити Caldera (ERA).Баланс: використовуйте кошти з балансу вашого рахунку HTX для безперешкодної торгівлі.Треті особи: ми додали популярні способи оплати, такі як Google Pay та Apple Pay, щоб підвищити зручність.P2P: Торгуйте безпосередньо з іншими користувачами на HTX.Позабіржова торгівля (OTC): ми пропонуємо індивідуальні послуги та конкурентні обмінні курси для трейдерів.Крок 3: Зберігайте свої Caldera (ERA)Після придбання Caldera (ERA) збережіть його у своєму обліковому записі на HTX. Крім того, ви можете відправити його в інше місце за допомогою блокчейн-переказу або використовувати його для торгівлі іншими криптовалютами.Крок 4: Торгівля Caldera (ERA)Легко торгуйте Caldera (ERA) на спотовому ринку HTX. Просто увійдіть до свого облікового запису, виберіть торгову пару, укладайте угоди та спостерігайте за ними в режимі реального часу. Ми пропонуємо зручний досвід як для початківців, так і для досвідчених трейдерів.

501 переглядів усьогоОпубліковано 2025.07.17Оновлено 2026.06.02

Як купити ERA

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни ERA (ERA).

活动图片