White House Renews Stablecoin Rewards Talks

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-02-20Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-20

Анотація

U.S. officials met with banking and crypto industry leaders at the White House to discuss stablecoin rewards—a key issue under the proposed CLARITY Act. Crypto advocates argue rewards promote adoption and competitiveness, while banks warn they blur the line with traditional deposits and pose systemic risks. Lawmakers must decide whether to treat yield-bearing stablecoins as bank deposits or risk regulatory arbitrage. The outcome will significantly impact the digital asset market, influencing innovation, financial stability, and U.S. competitiveness. No agreement was reached, but discussions continue as both industries lobby for a favorable resolution.

U.S. officials met with banking leaders and crypto industry representatives at the White House on Thursday to revisit one of the most divisive issues in digital-asset legislation: stablecoin rewards. Lawmakers continue to debate how to regulate yield or incentive programs tied to dollar-pegged tokens under the proposed CLARITY Act.

The session included administration officials, major lenders, and members of the Crypto Council for Innovation (CCI). Participants aimed to determine whether stablecoin issuers can offer rewards without facing classification as deposit-taking institutions.

Stablecoin Rewards at the Center of Debate

Stablecoin incentives allow token issuers or affiliated platforms to offer yield-like benefits to holders. Crypto companies argue that such rewards increase adoption and strengthen the competitiveness of U.S.-based digital dollar products.

Banks strongly disagree. They also state that the addition of yield on stablecoins will make it difficult to distinguish between payment tokens and traditional interest-bearing bank deposits. Financial institutions believe that such models may disrupt the current banking system and pose systemic risks.

The lawmakers are now at a crossroads. They can choose to regulate reward-bearing stablecoins as bank deposits. This will result in stablecoin issuers being subject to stricter regulations. Alternatively, if lawmakers permit the use of rewards without considering them as deposits, banks may view this as regulatory arbitrage.

CLARITY Act Faces Legislative Hurdles

The CLARITY Act aims to clarify how federal regulators regulate digital assets. However, the dispute over rewards on stablecoins has brought developments to a standstill. Parties involved need to develop a balanced approach that promotes both innovation and financial stability.

CCI Chief Executive Ji Hun Kim called Thursday’s session a constructive one. He stated that all parties continued to work on a framework that safeguards consumers and maintains U.S. competitiveness. He also confirmed that future sessions will take place.

However, no final agreement was reached after the meeting. Legislators have to address the issue of rewards before moving the bill during the current legislative session.

Industry Stakes Remain High

Stablecoins are key to the crypto market. They enable trading, settlement, and international payments. U.S. policymakers are keen to ensure that dollar-denominated stablecoins are governed by a well-defined regulatory framework.

Crypto companies believe that a ban on rewards would stifle innovation and lead to the development of stablecoins abroad. They believe that foreign companies could attract funding if U.S. regulations become too stringent.

Banks are keen on financial stability. They want stable standards that would not allow stablecoin issuers to provide bank-like services without adequate regulation.

The White House has not yet stated the outcome of the meeting. Nevertheless, the fact that the negotiations have resumed indicates that policymakers understand the need for this problem to be solved.

The outcome of the decision on stablecoin rewards will have a significant impact on the digital asset market. If a compromise is reached, the CLARITY Act will be able to move forward and provide a comprehensive framework for the market. If not, the uncertainty surrounding the regulation of the digital asset market in the US may continue.

While the negotiations are ongoing, both the traditional finance industry and the crypto industry are lobbying for a positive outcome. The next few weeks will show whether Congress is able to close the gap and push forward a positive digital asset reform.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Bybit EU Launches USDC and EURC Stablecoin Earn Campaigns Across Europe

TagsClarity ACTCrypto RegulationsDigital AssetstablecoinsWhite House

Трендові криптовалюти

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was the main topic of discussion at the White House meeting between U.S. officials, banking leaders, and crypto industry representatives?

AThe main topic was stablecoin rewards and how to regulate yield or incentive programs tied to dollar-pegged tokens under the proposed CLARITY Act.

QWhy do banks oppose the offering of rewards on stablecoins?

ABanks argue that yield on stablecoins makes it difficult to distinguish them from traditional interest-bearing bank deposits, which could disrupt the banking system and pose systemic risks.

QWhat is the central goal of the CLARITY Act regarding digital assets?

AThe CLARITY Act aims to clarify how federal regulators regulate digital assets and provide a comprehensive framework for the market.

QWhat potential consequence do crypto companies fear if the U.S. bans stablecoin rewards?

ACrypto companies believe a ban would stifle innovation and lead to the development of stablecoins abroad, as foreign companies could attract funding under less stringent regulations.

QWhat was the outcome of the White House meeting regarding stablecoin rewards?

ANo final agreement was reached, but the session was described as constructive, with plans for future meetings to continue working on a framework.

Пов'язані матеріали

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit1 год тому

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit1 год тому

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit1 год тому

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit1 год тому

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit2 год тому

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit2 год тому

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit3 год тому

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit3 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси

Популярні статті

Як купити HOUSE

Ласкаво просимо до HTX.com! Ми зробили покупку Housecoin (HOUSE) простою та зручною. Дотримуйтесь нашої покрокової інструкції, щоб розпочати свою криптовалютну подорож.Крок 1: Створіть обліковий запис на HTXВикористовуйте свою електронну пошту або номер телефону, щоб зареєструвати обліковий запис на HTX безплатно. Пройдіть безпроблемну реєстрацію й отримайте доступ до всіх функцій.ЗареєструватисьКрок 2: Перейдіть до розділу Купити крипту і виберіть спосіб оплатиКредитна/дебетова картка: використовуйте вашу картку Visa або Mastercard, щоб миттєво купити Housecoin (HOUSE).Баланс: використовуйте кошти з балансу вашого рахунку HTX для безперешкодної торгівлі.Треті особи: ми додали популярні способи оплати, такі як Google Pay та Apple Pay, щоб підвищити зручність.P2P: Торгуйте безпосередньо з іншими користувачами на HTX.Позабіржова торгівля (OTC): ми пропонуємо індивідуальні послуги та конкурентні обмінні курси для трейдерів.Крок 3: Зберігайте свої Housecoin (HOUSE)Після придбання Housecoin (HOUSE) збережіть його у своєму обліковому записі на HTX. Крім того, ви можете відправити його в інше місце за допомогою блокчейн-переказу або використовувати його для торгівлі іншими криптовалютами.Крок 4: Торгівля Housecoin (HOUSE)Легко торгуйте Housecoin (HOUSE) на спотовому ринку HTX. Просто увійдіть до свого облікового запису, виберіть торгову пару, укладайте угоди та спостерігайте за ними в режимі реального часу. Ми пропонуємо зручний досвід як для початківців, так і для досвідчених трейдерів.

382 переглядів усьогоОпубліковано 2025.04.27Оновлено 2026.06.02

Як купити HOUSE

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни HOUSE (HOUSE).

活动图片