White House: Killing CLARITY Act over stablecoin yield ‘achieves nothing’

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-08Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-08

Анотація

The White House and crypto industry leaders are opposing efforts by the banking lobby to ban stablecoin yields, warning that killing the CLARITY Act over this issue "achieves nothing" and preserves the status quo. Over 125 crypto firms and organizations have urged Congress not to amend the stablecoin law (the GENIUS Act) to favor banks. Ethereum co-founder Joseph Lubin argued that allowing yields reinforces U.S. competitiveness and consumer freedom. Conversely, banks view stablecoin rewards as a risk to deposits and financial stability, citing potential systemic impacts from crypto market shocks. Crypto executives, including Coinbase's Brian Armstrong and Galaxy's Mike Novogratz, maintain that yields are crucial for global competitiveness and won't harm lending. The issue is expected to be contentious during the upcoming markup of the crypto market structure bill on January 15th.

The gloves are off as the crypto and banking lobby escalate their fight for stablecoin rewards ahead of the crypto market structure bill markup.

For the banking industry, the markup of the crypto bill (CLARITY Act) presents the best opportunity to ensure that stablecoin yields are banned, thereby protecting its turf.

Otherwise, it would be forced to seek an amendment of the stablecoin law, the GENIUS Act.

To counter banks, the crypto industry has heightened pressure on lawmakers. And the sector also has the support of the White House.

In a statement, Patrick Witt, Executive Director of the President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets, slammed the stablecoin yield critics.

He warned that they would “preserve the status quo” and “achieve nothing” if the bill fails because of the yield issue.

Crypto leaders defend stablecoin yield

Over 125 crypto firms and organizations had written to the Congress, urging lawmakers not to amend the GENIUS Act to banks’ interests.

Echoing the same, Joseph Lubin, Ethereum co-founder, said that keeping the stablecoin yield would reinforce U.S. competitiveness. He added,

“We shouldn’t undercut this world-changing innovation by restricting consumer freedom to put their money to work. The GENIUS Act was careful not to do that.”

Banks aren’t backing down

The banks, on the other hand, have continued to express strong criticism of stablecoin rewards, viewing them as a risk to deposits and a threat to their financial lifeline.

Additionally, they argued that crypto shocks, such as the October 10 crash, could affect the broader financial system.

On his part, Brian Armstrong, Coinbase CEO, also maintained the ‘national security’ and global competitiveness argument. He downplayed banking sector fears on stablecoin yield and cautioned,

“I worry we are missing the forest through the trees in the U.S. rewards on stablecoins will not change lending one bit – but it does have a big impact on whether U.S. stablecoins are competitive.”

For Mike Novogratz, CEO of Galaxy, reversing the GENIUS Act would be “foolish,” and he urged banks to “toughen up and compete.”

The recent discussion on yield underscores that it will likely be one of the contentious issues during the markup scheduled for the 15th of January.

Along with DeFi regulation and ethics provisions targeting President Donald Trump, these issues could be deal-breakers, according to some policy watchers.


Final Thoughts

  • Stablecoin yield debate puts crypto market structure bill, CLARITY Act, at risk.
  • For crypto supporters, the yield would make the U.S. competitive, but for banks, it would heighten financial risk and dent deposits.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main reason the banking industry wants to ban stablecoin yields according to the article?

AThe banking industry views stablecoin yields as a risk to deposits and a threat to their financial lifeline, and wants to protect its turf.

QWho is Patrick Witt and what was his warning regarding the CLARITY Act?

APatrick Witt is the Executive Director of the President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets. He warned that killing the CLARITY Act over the stablecoin yield issue would 'preserve the status quo' and 'achieve nothing'.

QWhat argument did Joseph Lubin, Ethereum co-founder, use to defend stablecoin yields?

AJoseph Lubin argued that keeping the stablecoin yield would reinforce U.S. competitiveness and that they shouldn't 'undercut this world-changing innovation by restricting consumer freedom to put their money to work'.

QWhat was Brian Armstrong's perspective on the impact of stablecoin rewards on the banking sector?

ABrian Armstrong, Coinbase CEO, downplayed banking sector fears, stating that 'rewards on stablecoins will not change lending one bit' but that it does have a 'big impact on whether U.S. stablecoins are competitive'.

QAccording to the article, what are some of the contentious issues that could be 'deal-breakers' during the markup of the crypto bill?

AAlong with the stablecoin yield debate, issues like DeFi regulation and ethics provisions targeting President Donald Trump could be deal-breakers during the markup.

Пов'язані матеріали

OpenAI Post-Training Engineer Weng Jiayi Proposes a New Paradigm Hypothesis for Agentic AI

OpenAI engineer Weng Jiayi's "Heuristic Learning" experiments propose a new paradigm for Agentic AI, suggesting that intelligent agents can improve not just by training neural networks, but also by autonomously writing and refining code based on environmental feedback. In the experiment, a coding agent (powered by Codex) was tasked with developing and maintaining a programmatic strategy for the Atari game Breakout. Starting from a basic prompt, the agent iteratively wrote code, ran the game, analyzed logs and video replays to identify failures, and then modified the code. Through this engineering loop of "code-run-debug-update," it evolved a pure Python heuristic strategy that achieved a perfect score of 864 in Breakout and performed competitively with deep reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms in MuJoCo control tasks like Ant and HalfCheetah. This approach, termed Heuristic Learning (HL), contrasts with Deep RL. In HL, experience is captured in readable, modifiable code, tests, logs, and configurations—a software system—rather than being encoded solely into opaque neural network weights. This offers potential advantages in explainability, auditability for safety-critical applications, easier integration of regression tests to combat catastrophic forgetting, and more efficient sample use in early learning stages, as demonstrated in broader tests on 57 Atari games. However, the blog acknowledges clear limitations. Programmatic strategies struggle with tasks requiring long-horizon planning or complex perception (e.g., Montezuma's Revenge), areas where neural networks excel. The future vision is a hybrid architecture: specialized neural networks for fast perception (System 1), HL systems for rules, safety, and local recovery (also System 1), and LLM agents providing high-level feedback and learning from the HL system's data (System 2). The core proposition is that in the era of capable coding agents, a significant portion of an AI's learned experience could be maintained as an auditable, evolving software system.

marsbit27 хв тому

OpenAI Post-Training Engineer Weng Jiayi Proposes a New Paradigm Hypothesis for Agentic AI

marsbit27 хв тому

Your Claude Will Dream Tonight, Don't Disturb It

This article explores the recent phenomenon of AI companies increasingly using anthropomorphic language—like "thinking," "memory," "hallucination," and now "dreaming"—to describe machine learning processes. Focusing on Anthropic's newly announced "Dreaming" feature for its Claude Agent platform, the piece explains that this function is essentially an automated, offline batch processing of an agent's operational logs. It analyzes past task sessions to identify patterns, optimize future actions, and consolidate learnings into a persistent memory system, akin to a form of reinforcement learning and self-correction. The article draws parallels to similar features in other AI agent systems like Hermes Agent and OpenClaw, which also implement mechanisms for reviewing historical data, extracting reusable "skills," and strengthening long-term memory. It notes a key difference from human dreaming: these AI "dreams" still consume computational resources and user tokens. Further context is provided by discussing the technical challenges of managing AI "memory" or context, highlighting the computational expense of large context windows and innovations like Subquadratic's new model claiming drastically longer contexts. The core critique argues that this strategic use of human-centric vocabulary does more than market products; it subtly reshapes user perception. By framing algorithms with terms associated with consciousness, companies blur the line between tool and autonomous entity. This linguistic shift can influence user expectations, tolerance for errors, and even perceptions of responsibility when systems fail, potentially diverting scrutiny from the companies and engineers behind the technology. The article concludes by speculating that terms like "daydreaming" for predictive task simulation might be next, continuing this trend of embedding the idea of an "inner life" into computational processes.

marsbit29 хв тому

Your Claude Will Dream Tonight, Don't Disturb It

marsbit29 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси

Популярні статті

Як купити HOUSE

Ласкаво просимо до HTX.com! Ми зробили покупку Housecoin (HOUSE) простою та зручною. Дотримуйтесь нашої покрокової інструкції, щоб розпочати свою криптовалютну подорож.Крок 1: Створіть обліковий запис на HTXВикористовуйте свою електронну пошту або номер телефону, щоб зареєструвати обліковий запис на HTX безплатно. Пройдіть безпроблемну реєстрацію й отримайте доступ до всіх функцій.ЗареєструватисьКрок 2: Перейдіть до розділу Купити крипту і виберіть спосіб оплатиКредитна/дебетова картка: використовуйте вашу картку Visa або Mastercard, щоб миттєво купити Housecoin (HOUSE).Баланс: використовуйте кошти з балансу вашого рахунку HTX для безперешкодної торгівлі.Треті особи: ми додали популярні способи оплати, такі як Google Pay та Apple Pay, щоб підвищити зручність.P2P: Торгуйте безпосередньо з іншими користувачами на HTX.Позабіржова торгівля (OTC): ми пропонуємо індивідуальні послуги та конкурентні обмінні курси для трейдерів.Крок 3: Зберігайте свої Housecoin (HOUSE)Після придбання Housecoin (HOUSE) збережіть його у своєму обліковому записі на HTX. Крім того, ви можете відправити його в інше місце за допомогою блокчейн-переказу або використовувати його для торгівлі іншими криптовалютами.Крок 4: Торгівля Housecoin (HOUSE)Легко торгуйте Housecoin (HOUSE) на спотовому ринку HTX. Просто увійдіть до свого облікового запису, виберіть торгову пару, укладайте угоди та спостерігайте за ними в режимі реального часу. Ми пропонуємо зручний досвід як для початківців, так і для досвідчених трейдерів.

340 переглядів усьогоОпубліковано 2025.04.27Оновлено 2025.04.27

Як купити HOUSE

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни HOUSE (HOUSE).

活动图片