Which Way the Fish Head Points, There's Also Shandong-Style Learning in the Crypto World

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-01-08Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-08

Анотація

The article "Where the Fish Head Points: The 'Shandong Rule' in Crypto" uses the metaphor of a Shandong dining custom — where the fish head is oriented towards the guest of honor — to critique the culture of influence and favor-seeking in the crypto industry, particularly around Binance. It highlights how a casual New Year’s tweet by Binance co-founder He Yi, saying “我踏马来了” (I’ve arrived), quickly led to the creation and listing of a meme token with the same name on Binance Alpha — without any direct instruction from her. The author argues that this reflects a deeper cultural issue: instead of transparent, rule-based processes, success increasingly depends on anticipating and pleasing key decision-makers. The piece contrasts this with sectors like AI, where technical merit drives advancement, and suggests that crypto’s reliance on insider access and social signaling — rather than innovation — may signal industry decline. While He Yi may not be directly involved, the system incentivizes sycophancy and information asymmetry, making “reading the room” more valuable than building value.

Written by: Curry, Deep Tide TechFlow

There's a rule at Shandong banquet tables: when the fish is served, the head must point toward the seat of honor.

Whoever it points to is the main guest and must drink first. This isn't written down anywhere, but everyone in Shandong knows it. No one teaches it; you just pick it up.

Recently, someone drew a picture called "Crypto Circle Shandong-Style Learning." A group of people sit around a table eating fish, with Yi He in the seat of honor, and KOLs, the listing team, and editors gathered on either side.

The caption: When Binance lists a coin, the fish head must point toward Yi He.

On January 1, Yi He posted a New Year's tweet. Riding a white horse by the sea, with a caption:

I'm fucking coming.

A fine New Year's greeting—"fucking coming," the Year of the Horse, with a bit of homophonic wit.

Today, Binance Alpha listed a new coin called "I'm Fucking Coming." It was community-made, with no direct connection to Yi He.

But look at this chain: Sister Yi posts a tweet, the community creates a coin, Alpha lists it.

No one needs to give any orders in between.

Last year, Binance was chased and criticized over "girlfriend coins," accused of shady listing practices and利益输送 (interest transfer). Yi He responded several times, saying they were reflecting, adjusting, and even created Alpha as a screening pool.

In December, she also tweeted saying, don't try to find angles in our official tweets, we won't pay attention to these kinds of Memes anymore.

Twenty-eight days later, her New Year's tweet became a new coin on Alpha.

What was the problem with girlfriend coins? It was about backdoor deals, favoritism,利益输送 (interest transfer).

These require evidence, a trail, a specific "girlfriend."

But "I'm Fucking Coming" doesn't need any of that.

No backdoor, no favoritism, no利益输送. Sister Yi posted a picture, and the people below just started moving on their own.

This perhaps touches on the essence of Shandong-style learning: The leader doesn't need to say anything; you have to figure it out yourself.

Some in the community commented that Alpha is now just a tool for currying favor, its purpose is to make Sister Yi happy.

Crude wording, but it describes an atmosphere.

When a platform's direction starts revolving around someone's social media, when "which coin to list" becomes "guess what she likes," rules cease to matter.

What matters is揣摩 (speculation/figuring out).

Some put it more harshly: If you want to know if an industry has a future, ask one question—In this industry, do people who are good at flattery succeed more easily than people who are good at doing things?

If the answer is "yes," then this industry is on the decline.

In the crypto world, this trick really works. And the most successful ones, everyone knows who the flattery should be directed toward.

The core resources in the AI circle are technology and products; you have to deliver. Jensen Huang won't give you GPUs just because you call him daddy every day.

The core resources in the crypto circle are listing rights, traffic, who knows the news first. These things aren't in the code; they're in people's hands.

Things in people's hands must be obtained through human methods.

The more prevalent Shandong-style learning is, the more it relies on connections and information asymmetry, not innovation and technology.

Yi He might not even know about this. A small MEME worth a few million market cap isn't enough to bother the Co-CEO.

But that's precisely the problem.

She doesn't need to know. The fish head will turn by itself.

This is really much more efficient than girlfriend coins.

Girlfriend coins at least required a girlfriend. Shandong-style learning only requires an atmosphere.

And those who see through this set of rules and implement them thoroughly are, in a sense, also talented.

After all, in this society, people laugh at the poor, not the prostitute.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the core concept of 'Shandong Study' in the crypto world as described in the article?

AThe core concept of 'Shandong Study' in the crypto world refers to an unwritten rule where individuals or groups instinctively align their actions to please key figures in power, such as Binance's He Yi, without explicit instructions. It emphasizes intuition and揣摩 (speculation) over formal rules, particularly in contexts like token approvals on platforms.

QHow did the meme token '我踏马来了' (I'm Coming on Horseback) get listed on Binance Alpha according to the article?

AThe meme token '我踏马来了' was created by the community after He Yi, Binance's co-CEO, posted a New Year's tweet with the phrase '我踏马来了' and an image of herself on a horse. The community independently developed and listed the token on Binance Alpha, without direct involvement or instructions from He Yi, demonstrating the 'Shandong Study' phenomenon.

QWhat criticism does the article level against the crypto industry's reliance on 'Shandong Study' dynamics?

AThe article criticizes that such dynamics prioritize flattery and connections over innovation and technology, suggesting that an industry where 'bootlicking' is more rewarded than actual work is in decline. It highlights how resources like token listing privileges and information asymmetry are controlled by people rather than code, leading to a culture of揣摩 (speculation) rather than merit-based success.

QHow does the 'Shandong Study' approach differ from the previous '闺蜜币' (close-friend coin) issue at Binance?

AThe '闺蜜币' issue involved alleged backdoor dealings and explicit利益输送 (benefit transfers) through personal relationships, requiring evidence of specific connections. In contrast, 'Shandong Study' operates implicitly—no direct orders or relationships are needed; instead, participants intuitively act to align with the preferences of powerful figures like He Yi, creating a self-driven culture of compliance without formal corruption.

QWhat broader implication does the article suggest about power and decision-making in crypto platforms like Binance?

AThe article implies that decision-making in crypto platforms can become overly centralized around key individuals, where informal influence and social media activity shape outcomes like token listings. This shifts focus from transparent, rule-based systems to a culture of揣摩 (speculation) and alignment with personal whims, potentially undermining innovation and fairness in the industry.

Пов'язані матеріали

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

The pre-IPO stock token market is experiencing significant turmoil following strong statements from AI giants Anthropic and OpenAI. Both companies have updated their official policies, declaring that any transfer of their company shares—including sales, transfers, or assignments of share interests—without prior board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized in their corporate records. This means buyers in such unauthorized transactions would not be recognized as shareholders and would have no shareholder rights. A major point of contention is the use of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), which are legal entities commonly used by pre-IPO token platforms to pool investor funds and indirectly acquire shares from employees or early investors. The companies explicitly state they do not permit SPVs to acquire their shares, and any such transfer violates their restrictions. They warn that third parties selling shares through SPVs, direct sales, forward contracts, or stock tokens are likely engaged in fraud or are offering worthless investments due to these transfer limits. This stance directly threatens the core model of many pre-IPO token platforms, which rely on SPV structures. The announcement revealed additional risks within this model, such as complex "SPV-within-SPV" layering that obscures legal transparency, increases management fees, and creates a chain reaction risk of invalidation. Following the news, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). The market reaction highlights a divergence: while asset-backed pre-IPO tokens plummeted, purely speculative pre-IPO futures contracts, which are bilateral bets on future IPO prices with no claim to actual shares, remained relatively stable as they are unaffected by the transfer restrictions. The industry is split on the implications. Some believe the fundamental logic of pre-IPO token trading is broken if leading companies reject SPV-held shares, potentially causing a domino effect. Others, like Rivet founder Nick Abouzeid, argue that buyers of such unofficial tokens always knowingly accepted the risk of non-recognition by the company. The statements serve as a stark risk warning and a corrective measure for a market where valuations for some AI-related pre-IPO tokens had soared to irrational levels, far exceeding recent funding round valuations.

marsbit49 хв тому

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

marsbit49 хв тому

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

The pre-IPO token market has been rocked by strong statements from Anthropic and OpenAI. Both AI giants have updated official warnings, declaring that any sale or transfer of their company shares without explicit board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized on their corporate records. This directly targets Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), the common legal structure used by pre-IPO token platforms. These platforms typically use an SPV to acquire shares from employees or early investors, then issue blockchain-based tokens representing a claim on the SPV's economic benefits. Anthropic and OpenAI's position means that if an SPV's share purchase lacked authorization, the underlying asset could be deemed worthless, nullifying the token's value. Anthropic explicitly warned that any third party selling its shares—via direct sales, forwards, or tokens—is likely fraudulent or offering a valueless investment. The crackdown highlights risks in the popular SPV model, including complex multi-layered "Russian doll" SPV structures that obscure legal ownership, add fees, and concentrate risk. If one layer is invalidated, the entire chain could collapse. Following the announcements, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). In contrast, purely speculative pre-IPO prediction contracts remained stable, as they involve no actual share ownership. The move is seen as a corrective measure amid a market frenzy where some pre-IPO token valuations (e.g., Anthropic's token hitting a $1.4 trillion implied valuation) far exceeded recent official funding rounds. Opinions are split: some believe this undermines the core logic of pre-IPO token trading if top companies reject SPVs, while others argue buyers always assumed this legal risk when accessing unofficial channels. The statements serve as a stark warning and a potential catalyst for market de-leveraging and clearer boundaries.

Odaily星球日报52 хв тому

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

Odaily星球日报52 хв тому

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

"AI Membership: The Hidden Cost Pushing Workers Toward 'Poverty'" The widespread corporate push for AI adoption is creating a hidden financial burden for employees. Companies, from giants like Alibaba to small firms, are mandating AI use, often tying token consumption to KPIs, but frequently refuse to cover the costs. Workers are forced to pay for subscriptions out of pocket to stay competitive and avoid being replaced. Front-end developer Long Shen spends up to 2000 RMB monthly on tools like Cursor and ChatGPT Plus, seeing it as a necessary 3% salary investment to handle 90% of his coding tasks. While it boosted his performance and led to promotions, he now faces idle time at work, pretending to be busy. Designer Peng Peng navigates strict company firewalls by using personal devices and accounts for AI image generation tools like Midjourney, spending hundreds monthly without reimbursement, while her boss demands faster, more numerous revisions. The pressure creates workplace anxiety and suspicion. Programmer Li Huahua, after a friend's experience of raised KPIs following AI success, fears being branded a "traitor" for using it yet worries about falling behind if she doesn't. The dynamic allows management to demand results without understanding the tools or covering expenses, treating employees like AI "agents." While some, like entrepreneur Jin Tu, find high value in paid AI, building entire systems and winning competitions, for most, it's a trap. Free tools like Kimi and Doubao are introducing fees, closing off alternatives. The initial efficiency gains individual advantage, but as AI becomes ubiquitous, the personal edge disappears, workloads increase, and a cycle of dependency begins. Workers like Long Shen realize they cannot maintain AI-generated code without AI, making stopping harder than continuing to pay. The tool promising liberation is instead becoming a compulsory, costly chain in the modern workplace.

marsbit1 год тому

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

marsbit1 год тому

SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire: The Successors

"SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire and Its Heirs" explores the unconventional succession narrative within SK Group, South Korea's second-largest conglomerate, following SK Hynix's dramatic market rise. Unlike traditional chaebol scripts prioritizing the eldest son, ownership, and political marriages, Chairman Choi Tae-won's three children from his first marriage are charting distinct paths. The eldest daughter, Choi Yun-jeong, is considered the most visible candidate. With a background in biology, consulting, and a PhD, she holds executive roles at SK Bioscience and SK Inc.'s growth strategy unit, focusing on biopharma and new businesses. Her marriage is to an AI infrastructure entrepreneur, not a traditional chaebol heir. The second daughter, Choi Min-jeong, took a unique route by voluntarily serving as a South Korean naval officer, including a tour in the Gulf of Aden. She later worked on policy and strategy for SK Hynix in Washington D.C. before co-founding an AI-driven healthcare startup in San Francisco. She married a former U.S. Marine Corps officer, connecting the family to U.S. defense and policy networks. The son, Choi In-geun, who has Type 1 diabetes, followed a more classic preparatory path with a physics degree and a stint at SK E&S but left to join McKinsey's Seoul office. He remains publicly silent and holds no SK shares, defying the traditional "crown prince" archetype. Their paths unfold against the backdrop of their parents' high-profile, contentious divorce and a record-setting asset division lawsuit. The article argues that as SK Hynix becomes a geopolitical asset in the AI era, the conventional rules of chaebol inheritance are changing. The heirs are being groomed not simply to take over, but to navigate a complex global landscape defined by AI, biotech, geopolitics, and policy, forging legitimacy through their own expertise and networks rather than birth order alone.

marsbit1 год тому

SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire: The Successors

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片