Where Will DeFi Go Next?

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-01-12Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-12

Анотація

The DeFi sector has approached its previous all-time high in Total Value Locked (TVL), reaching $225 billion in late 2025, yet growth has stagnated with only a 10% increase over four years. This indicates that the current user base—largely crypto-native—may have reached saturation. The next phase of growth must come from attracting mainstream users. Stablecoins have seen significant expansion, with USDT and USDC surpassing $260 billion in combined market cap, exceeding the entire DeFi TVL. The rise of yield-bearing stablecoins and Real-World Assets (RWA), now over $20 billion, reflects strong demand for on-chain yield. However, these products remain largely confined to crypto-savvy users. Compared to the fintech sector, which manages over $2 trillion in customer assets, DeFi remains a niche. To break through, DeFi must prioritize simple, secure, and收益-focused products that appeal to ordinary users, rather than complex financial structures or speculative mechanisms. Embedded DeFi integrations within fintech apps could help bridge this gap, but consumer-facing protocols that simplify access to yield will be key to capturing the next wave of adoption.

Editor's Note: DeFi is once again approaching its historical high but has failed to break through significantly, revealing not a lack of products but a bottleneck in user growth. The expansion of stablecoins, yield-bearing stablecoins, and RWA indicates that the demand for moving funds on-chain and earning yields remains strong, yet it has not been truly brought to the mass market.

This article argues that the next step for DeFi lies not in more complex structures or speculative designs, but in simple, secure, yield-focused products, along with user-friendly access and distribution methods for ordinary users. Only when DeFi begins to target fintech users, rather than solely serving crypto-native audiences, can a new growth cycle truly begin.

Below is the original text:

Current Situation

In 2025, DeFi's total value locked (TVL) reached a new historical high, but it did not significantly exceed the peak of 2021. As the market gradually cools, a question worth revisiting is: where will the next wave of capital and users come from?

Driven by DeFi Summer, TVL climbed to $204 billion by the end of 2021. Subsequently, following the collapse of events like FTX and the market entering a bear phase, the capital scale declined steadily. Later, DeFi struggled to recover, reaching $225 billion in October 2025. However, a mere 10% growth over four years can hardly be considered explosive. The earliest participants in DeFi—primarily crypto-native users and traders—may have nearly reached the "ceiling."

The proximity of these two peaks is indeed cause for caution, but it does not yet constitute a "survival crisis." The current user base—though highly engaged and loyal—is not large enough to propel DeFi to the next level on its own.

To achieve a breakthrough, DeFi needs to reach a larger audience. The good news is that such an audience does exist—it is still on the sidelines, waiting to be properly "onboarded" with the right tools and products.

A Glimmer of Hope

Over the past year, the stablecoin market has been one of the biggest beneficiaries. The amount of USD on-chain has reached a historical high, more than ever before. USDT and USDC have continued to grow steadily, with their combined market capitalization exceeding $260 billion—meaning that the scale of stablecoins alone is already larger than the entire DeFi market.

Even without parabolic growth in DeFi, people continue to mint stablecoins, indicating that the demand for moving funds on-chain remains strong. At the same time, an increasing number of users are beginning to access the yields provided by DeFi, and the growth in this area points to where the next breakthrough may come from.

The rise of yield-bearing stablecoins and RWA (real-world assets) further confirms this trend. According to @stablewatchHQ data, the scale of yield-bearing stablecoins has exceeded $20 billion, with products like sUSDS and sUSDe gaining significant adoption over the past year or so. Parallel to yield-bearing stablecoins, RWA has also made progress on-chain: these products, backed by traditional assets such as treasury bonds, offer real yields and are growing rapidly.

The problem is that they currently primarily cater to crypto-native users and large on-chain holders. As long as this remains the case, their potential will be underestimated. If they can be productized and packaged in a way that is more accessible to everyday users, yield-bearing stablecoins and RWA present enormous opportunities in the mass market.

Retail Has Not Yet Arrived

To understand the scale of this opportunity, it is helpful to compare DeFi with fintech. Currently, the entire DeFi TVL is approximately $164 billion. In contrast, global mobile fintech apps manage over $2 trillion in customer assets; the top 100 neobanks alone have assets totaling $2.4 trillion. By comparison, DeFi is currently almost a negligible fraction.

The notion that "if you build it, they will come" can only drive limited growth. If DeFi wants to continue expanding, it must compete for the ordinary users that have made fintech so vast.

In 2025, the success of protocols like Aave, Ethena, and Pendle has demonstrated a strong demand for yield among market participants. They were the highlights of the year, attracting significant capital and attention. If such products can be delivered to the masses in a clear, understandable, and low-barrier manner, the potential encompasses (literally) trillions of dollars in capital and tens of millions of potential users.

The Path Forward

The real test for DeFi in the coming year is whether it can make yield opportunities easily and safely accessible to ordinary people. Growth will not come from more complex financial structures, the 100th liquidity mining pool, the 100th perpetual futures DEX, or the millionth airdrop. Growth will come from simple, reliable products—built on decentralized protocols—that solve real problems for ordinary people. And yield should be center stage (ahem, Aave App, ahem).

Today, hundreds of millions of people use banking and fintech apps daily, already accustomed to managing their funds on their phones. If DeFi can capture even a small share of this, it will be enough to trigger a new wave of growth, and it will not once again stall at the $200 billion TVL level.

Embedded DeFi will play a crucial role in this—fintech companies and neobanks integrating on-chain yield capabilities directly into their products. But teams should not stop there. The protocols that are truly consumer-facing and at the forefront will capture the greatest upside; those that continue to optimize only for crypto-native users will ultimately be competing for a pie that may no longer be expanding.

DeFi will win.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main reason DeFi has not experienced explosive growth despite reaching a new TVL high in 2025?

AThe main reason is that DeFi has primarily served crypto-native users and traders, who are nearing their 'ceiling,' and has failed to attract a broader audience of ordinary users.

QWhat evidence suggests that there is still strong demand for moving funds on-chain?

AThe stablecoin market has reached a new all-time high, with USDT and USDC combined市值 exceeding $260 billion, which is larger than the entire DeFi market.

QWhat types of products have shown significant growth and adoption in the past year, indicating potential for broader appeal?

AYield-bearing stablecoins (like sUSDS and sUSDe) and Real World Assets (RWA) have seen substantial growth, offering real yields and attracting significant adoption.

QHow does the size of DeFi's TVL compare to the assets managed by fintech applications and neobanks?

ADeFi's TVL is about $164 billion, while global mobile fintech apps manage over $2 trillion in customer assets, and the top 100 neobanks alone hold $2.4 trillion in assets, making DeFi a negligible fraction in comparison.

QWhat is the key challenge for DeFi to achieve its next growth cycle and attract mainstream users?

AThe key challenge is to create simple, secure, and收益-focused products that are easy for ordinary users to understand and use, rather than developing complex financial structures or relying solely on crypto-native optimizations.

Пов'язані матеріали

You Bet on the News, the Pros Read the Rules: The True Cognitive Gap in Losing Money on Polymarket

The article explains that the key to profiting on Polymarket, a prediction market platform, lies not just predicting real-world events correctly, but in meticulously understanding the specific rules that govern how each market will be resolved. It illustrates this with examples, such as a market on Venezuela's 2026 leader, where the official rules defining "officially holds" the office overruled the intuitive answer of who was in practical control. Other examples include debates over the definition of a "token" or what constitutes an "agreement." The core argument is that a "reality vs. rules" gap creates pricing discrepancies that savvy traders ("车头" or "whales") exploit. The platform has a formal dispute resolution process managed by UMA token holders to settle ambiguous outcomes. This process involves proposal submission, a challenge window, a discussion period, and a final vote. However, the article highlights a critical flaw in this system compared to a traditional court: the lack of separation between the arbiters (UMA voters) and the interested parties (traders with financial stakes in the outcome). This conflict of interest undermines the discussion phase, leads to herd mentality, and results in opaque final decisions without explanatory rulings. Consequently, the system lacks a body of precedent, making it difficult for users to learn from past disputes. The ultimate takeaway is that success on Polymarket requires a lawyer-like scrutiny of the rules to identify and capitalize on the cognitive gap between how events appear and how they are contractually defined for settlement.

marsbit12 хв тому

You Bet on the News, the Pros Read the Rules: The True Cognitive Gap in Losing Money on Polymarket

marsbit12 хв тому

Will the Fed Still Cut Interest Rates? Tonight's Data Is Crucial

The core debate surrounding the Federal Reserve's potential interest rate cuts is intensifying amid geopolitical conflict and rebounding inflation. The key question is whether high energy prices will cause persistent inflation or weaken consumer demand enough to force the Fed to cut rates. Citigroup presents a bullish case for cuts, arguing that oil supply disruptions from the Strait of Hormuz are temporary and will not lead to lasting inflationary pressure. They point to receding bond yields and oil prices as evidence the market is pricing in a short-lived shock. Citi's data also shows tightening financial conditions, a stabilizing labor market, and healthy tax returns, supporting their view that the path to lower rates remains open. Conversely, Deutsche Bank offers a starkly contrasting, more hawkish outlook. They argue the Fed's current policy is already neutral and expect rates to remain unchanged indefinitely. Their view is based on stalled disinflation progress and a shift toward more hawkish rhetoric from key Fed officials like Waller, who cited risks from prolonged Middle East conflict and tariffs. Other officials, including Williams and Hammack, signaled rates would likely stay on hold for a "considerable time." The market pricing has shifted dramatically, now forecasting zero cuts in 2026. The imminent release of the March retail sales "control group" data is highlighted as a critical test. This metric, which excludes gas station sales, will reveal if high gasoline prices are eroding consumer spending in other areas. A weak reading could support the case for imminent rate cuts, while a strong one would bolster the argument for the Fed to hold steady. This data is pivotal for determining the near-term policy path.

marsbit33 хв тому

Will the Fed Still Cut Interest Rates? Tonight's Data Is Crucial

marsbit33 хв тому

The Second Half of Macro Influencer Fu Peng's Career

Fu Peng, a prominent Chinese macroeconomist and former chief economist of Northeast Securities, has joined Hong Kong-based digital asset management firm Bitfire Group (formerly New Huo Group) as its chief economist. This move, announced in April 2026, triggered an 11% surge in Bitfire's stock price. Fu, known for his accessible macroeconomic commentary and large social media following, will focus on integrating digital assets into global asset allocation frameworks, particularly combining FICC (fixed income, currencies, and commodities) with cryptocurrencies for institutional clients. His career includes roles at Lehman Brothers and Solomon International, with significant influence gained through public communication. However, in late 2024, Fu faced temporary social media bans after a controversial private speech at HSBC on China's economic challenges, though he denied regulatory sanctions. He later left Northeast Securities citing health reasons. Bitfire, a licensed virtual asset manager serving high-net-worth clients, seeks to build trust and attract traditional capital through Fu’s expertise and credibility. The partnership represents a strategic shift for both: Fu enters the crypto sector after a traditional finance peak, while Bitfire aims to leverage his macro framework for institutional adoption. Outcomes remain uncertain regarding capital inflows and compatibility within corporate structure.

marsbit1 год тому

The Second Half of Macro Influencer Fu Peng's Career

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片