Weekly Funding Roundup | 4 Projects Secured Funding, Total Amount Reached $27.7 Million (12.22-12.28)

marsbitОпубліковано о 2025-12-29Востаннє оновлено о 2025-12-29

Анотація

According to incomplete statistics from Odaily Planet Daily, from December 22 to December 28, 2025, four financing events were disclosed in the global blockchain sector, a significant decrease from the previous week's 11. The total financing amount was $27.7 million, also a sharp drop from the previous week's $301 million, potentially due to the Christmas holiday period. The largest single financing round was secured by the decentralized social ecosystem Crypto Life, which announced a $20 million institutional round. Following that, stablecoin payment infrastructure project Coinbax completed a $4.2 million seed round. Other notable financings include easy.fun, which raised $2 million in seed funding to build an on-chain trading arena on Hyperliquid, and the prediction market aggregator Rocket, which secured $1.5 million in a pre-seed round.

According to incomplete statistics from Odaily Planet Daily, from December 22 to December 28, 2025, a total of 4 funding events were disclosed in the global blockchain field, a significant decrease from the previous week's 11 events. The total funding amount was $27.7 million, also a substantial drop compared to the previous week's $301 million, possibly due to the Christmas holiday period this week.

The largest single funding round this week was secured by the decentralized social ecosystem Crypto Life, which announced the completion of a $20 million institutional round. The second largest was stablecoin payment infrastructure Coinbax, which announced the completion of a $4.2 million seed round.

Below are the specific funding events (Note: 1. Sorted by the announced amount size; 2. * indicates "traditional" field companies with partial business involving blockchain):

Web3.0 Social Platform Crypto Life Completes $20 Million Funding, Aims to Reshape Data Sovereignty and Social Value Distribution

On December 24, the next-generation decentralized social ecosystem Crypto Life announced the completion of a $20 million institutional round. This round saw participation from multiple investment institutions including Bluemount Foundation, VEGA-Ventures, Infinite Alliance, ChainPulse Capital, UZ Capital, and others.

Stablecoin Payment Infrastructure Coinbax Completes $4.2 Million Seed Round Led by BankTech Ventures

On December 22, Coinbax, a stablecoin payment infrastructure built on Base and Solana, announced the completion of a $4.2 million seed round led by BankTech Ventures, with participation from Connecticut Innovations, Paxos, SpringTime Ventures, and others. The new funds will support the development of custody, policy enforcement, and programmable settlement features for digital assets, as well as integration with custody and wallet infrastructure providers.

easy.fun Completes $2 Million Seed Round Led by Mirana Ventures

On December 24, easy.fun announced the completion of a $2 million seed round led by Mirana Ventures, with participation from some strategic angel investors. The project's main business is building an on-chain trading arena on Hyperliquid, transforming on-chain trading into a skill-based competitive sport by introducing gaming mechanics. This round of funding will be used for product development, team expansion, and launching global trading competitions.

Rocket, a Prediction Market Aggregator Backed by Jsquare, Completes $1.5 Million Pre-seed Round

On December 24, according to official news, the prediction market aggregator Rocket completed a $1.5 million pre-seed round led by Electric Capital, with follow-on investments from VCs including Jsquare, bodhi ventures, Tangent, and Amber group.

Rocket is the first prediction market based on the correctness of judgment for continuous profit distribution. It features a non-binary betting structure, no liquidation mechanism, and the profit ceiling is completely opened at the protocol level. Users can reuse the same capital to deploy in multiple predictions concurrently.

Пов'язані питання

QHow many blockchain financing events were disclosed globally from December 22 to December 28, 2025, and what was the total funding raised?

AThere were 4 blockchain financing events disclosed, with a total funding amount of $27.7 million.

QWhich project received the largest single investment during this week, and how much was it?

AThe decentralized social ecosystem Crypto Life received the largest single investment of $20 million.

QWhat is the primary business of easy.fun, and who led its seed funding round?

Aeasy.fun is building an on-chain trading arena on Hyperliquid, turning on-chain trading into a skill-based competitive sport. Its $2 million seed round was led by Mirana Ventures.

QWhich company is focused on stablecoin payment infrastructure, and how much did it raise in its seed round?

ACoinbax, a stablecoin payment infrastructure built on Base and Solana, raised $4.2 million in a seed round led by BankTech Ventures.

QWhat is the unique feature of the prediction market aggregator Rocket that completed a pre-seed round?

ARocket is the first prediction market that offers continuous profit distribution based on the correctness of judgments, featuring a non-binary betting structure, no liquidation mechanism, and allowing users to deploy the same capital across multiple predictions in parallel.

Пов'язані матеріали

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit1 год тому

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit1 год тому

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit1 год тому

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit1 год тому

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit2 год тому

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit2 год тому

Hyperliquid ETF Claim Draws Attention As HYPE Narrative Builds On X

A social media claim has brought attention to Hyperliquid (HYPE) and the growth of its related ETF products. According to a June 20 post on X by AlphaOnChain, three Hyperliquid ETFs launched in May 2026 have collectively amassed $158 million in assets under management, led by a Bitwise fund with $88 million and a 21Shares fund with $66 million. The article notes this claim is from social media and not verified by official issuer data, advising caution. Nonetheless, the report highlights that HYPE is gaining traction as a notable altcoin narrative. Its focus on on-chain perpetual trading and exchange infrastructure places it at the intersection of DeFi and derivatives, attracting traders looking for high-conviction plays beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum. The key takeaway is that while social momentum can influence short-term markets, sustainable growth for HYPE would require confirmed demand, liquidity, and continued ecosystem development.

bitcoinist3 год тому

Hyperliquid ETF Claim Draws Attention As HYPE Narrative Builds On X

bitcoinist3 год тому

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit3 год тому

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit3 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片