Web3 Security Stack Highlights Threat from Malicious NPM Package

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-03-10Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-10

Анотація

Web3 Antivirus has identified a malicious NPM package disguised as an OpenClaw installer that deploys a Remote Access Trojan (RAT) targeting macOS users. The package, once installed, launches a fake CLI installer and prompts for the Keychain password. If provided, it steals sensitive data including seed phrases, browser credentials, wallet information, and SSH keys, sending them to the attacker’s server. Previously, Web3 Antivirus warned about legitimate Chrome extensions—QuickLens and ShotBird—that turned malicious after ownership transfers. These were used to inject malicious scripts and steal user data, including exchange session details and wallet credentials. Looking ahead to 2026, key Web3 security threats include smart contract exploits (due to logic errors and access control issues), phishing, social engineering, wallet drainers, and oracle manipulation. The primary goals of these attacks are data theft and fund draining.

Web3 Antivirus, or Web3 security stack, has highlighted a threat from a malicious NPM package. It earlier flagged a threat from a legitimate Chrome extension. Notably, smart contract exploits and phishing & social engineering are some of the top Web3 security threats to lookout for in 2026.

Web3 Security Issue Flagged

Web3 Antivirus has published a post on X to inform the community that a malicious NPM package was caught deploying a RAT. It was disguised as an OpenClaw installer with the primary objective of stealing macOS credentials. Web3 Antivirus has further briefed the community about how the act was being carried out.

The package launches a fake CLI installer after it is installed normally. Once launched, it seeks macOS Keychain password. It is recommended not to do so because once shared, the malware can extract several pieces of information. This includes seed phrases, browser credentials, crypto wallet data, and SSH & cloud keys.

All the pieces find their way to the attacker’s server. Web3, with this, is seeing different types of threats for users worldwide.

Previously Flagged Threat

Web3 Antivirus previously flagged a threat from a legitimate Chrome extension. It warned that it was turning malicious after the ownership was transferred. This allows attackers to inject codes into web pages and steal the data of a user. The update, according to Web3 security stack, removed security headers and fingerprints before pulling malicious scripts from a remote server.

For the crypto community, such an act can turn into a theft for exchange sessions, compromised wallets, browser credentials, and seed phrase phishing.

It has named two extensions: QuickLens and ShotBird, adding that they have 7,000 and 800 users, respectively.

Top Web3 Security Threats in 2026

Some of the top Web3 security threats in 2026 are smart contract exploits and phishing & social engineering. The former largely pertains to vulnerabilities in code. This refers to infusing logic errors, input validation issues, and access control failures.

The latter, as the name suggests, involves making fake calls or impersonating partners to attack users and developers – even founders on some occasions.

Others on the list are wallet drainers, private key manipulation, and price oracle manipulation. The end goal of malicious actors is to steal data and drain funds or negatively impact the system.

Some of the common vulnerabilities are access control failures, logic errors, and unsigned API queries.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Nasdaq Collaboration Targets Pan-European Tokenized Securities Trading and Settlement

TagsWeb3

Пов'язані питання

QWhat type of malicious software was the NPM package caught deploying, and what was its primary objective?

AThe malicious NPM package was caught deploying a RAT (Remote Access Trojan). Its primary objective was to steal macOS credentials.

QWhat specific user information can the malware extract after obtaining the macOS Keychain password?

AThe malware can extract seed phrases, browser credentials, crypto wallet data, and SSH & cloud keys.

QWhat previously flagged threat did Web3 Antivirus warn about involving a legitimate Chrome extension?

AWeb3 Antivirus warned about a legitimate Chrome extension that turned malicious after ownership was transferred, allowing attackers to inject code into web pages and steal user data.

QWhat are two of the top Web3 security threats highlighted for 2026?

ATwo of the top Web3 security threats for 2026 are smart contract exploits and phishing & social engineering.

QWhat are the names of the two malicious Chrome extensions mentioned, and how many users do they have respectively?

AThe two malicious Chrome extensions are named QuickLens and ShotBird, with 7,000 and 800 users respectively.

Пов'язані матеріали

An Open-Source AI Tool That No One Saw Predicted Kelp DAO's $292 Million Vulnerability 12 Days Ago

An open-source AI security tool flagged critical risks in Kelp DAO’s cross-chain architecture 12 days before a $292 million exploit on April 18, 2026—the largest DeFi incident of the year. The vulnerability was not in the smart contracts but in the configuration of LayerZero’s cross-chain bridge: a 1-of-1 Decentralized Verifier Network (DVN) setup allowed an attacker to forge cross-chain messages with a single compromised node. The tool, which performs AI-assisted architectural risk assessments using public data, identified several unremediated risks, including opaque DVN configuration, single-point-of-failure across 16 chains, unverified cross-chain governance controls, and similarities to historical bridge attacks like Ronin and Harmony. It also noted the absence of an insurance pool, which amplified losses as Aave and other protocols absorbed nearly $300M in bad debt. The attack unfolded over 46 minutes: the attacker minted 116,500 rsETH on Ethereum via a fraudulent message, used it as collateral to borrow WETH on lending platforms, and laundered funds through Tornado Cash. While an emergency pause prevented two subsequent attacks worth ~$200M, the damage was severe. The tool’s report, committed to GitHub on April 6, scored Kelp DAO a medium-risk 72/100—later acknowledged as too lenient. It failed to query on-chain DVN configurations or initiate private disclosure, highlighting gaps in current DeFi security approaches that focus on code audits but miss config-level and governance risks. The incident underscores the need for independent, AI-powered risk assessment tools that evaluate protocol architecture, not just code.

marsbit1 год тому

An Open-Source AI Tool That No One Saw Predicted Kelp DAO's $292 Million Vulnerability 12 Days Ago

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片