Visa creates stablecoin advisory team as onchain dollars go mainstream

cointelegraphОпубліковано о 2025-12-15Востаннє оновлено о 2025-12-15

Анотація

Visa has launched a global Stablecoins Advisory Practice to assist banks, merchants, and fintechs in designing and managing stablecoin products. The initiative focuses on enhancing payment efficiency through training, market analysis, and technical integration support. This move reflects the growing significance of onchain dollar transactions, with Visa already processing billions in USDC settlements annually. The trend highlights a broader industry shift toward stablecoins for faster, cheaper payments, as seen with companies like Stripe and PayPal. This evolution is reshaping Bitcoin’s role, positioning it more as a store of value rather than a medium for everyday transactions.

Visa has launched a global Stablecoins Advisory Practice, a new unit that will help banks, merchants, and fintechs design, roll out, and manage stablecoin products.

The payments giant said Monday that the new advisory arm will focus on practical questions that traditional players struggle with, and offer stablecoin training and market trends programs, go-to-market planning, and technology enablement for stablecoin integration.

“Stablecoins may represent an opportunity to enhance speed and lower cost in payments, so with the support of Visa, we are evaluating how this technology could fit into our broader strategy to deliver meaningful value to our 15 million members worldwide,” Matt Freedman, senior vice president, Navy Federal Credit Union, said.

The move indicates that onchain dollars are now significant enough to warrant their own dedicated business line within one of the world’s largest payment networks, and it’s not a greenfield bet.

With the Stablecoins Advisory Practice, Visa is wrapping a consultancy around infrastructure it has been building out quietly for several years, including more than 130 stablecoin‐linked card programs across 40‐plus countries and billions of dollars in annualized USDC (USDC) settlement volume on its network.

*Visa has launched a global Stablecoins Advisory Practice. Source: Visa*

Related: Visa doubles down on stablecoins in Europe, Middle East, Africa with new partnership

A broader pivot toward stablecoin rails

The timing fits a broader pivot in how mainstream firms approach crypto. Stablecoins, rather than volatile assets like Bitcoin (BTC), are becoming the default way to use blockchains for payments.

Stripe has rolled out stablecoin payouts and accounts, pitching them as faster, cheaper options for global creators and platforms.

PayPal is pushing its PayPal USD (PYUSD) dollar token deeper into its own ecosystem, including YouTube creator payouts in the United States, and JPMorgan’s JPM Coin continues to expand as an institutional settlement rail.

Related: Spark integrates PayPal USD into its stablecoin lending markets

What this means for Bitcoin’s role

That rise of onchain dollars is starting to eat into narratives that once belonged to Bitcoin. In November, ARK Invest CEO Cathie Wood trimmed her 2030 Bitcoin price target from $1.5 million to $1.2 million, explicitly citing stablecoins taking over some of the functions she once expected Bitcoin to fulfill in payments and emerging markets.

The change doesn’t kill her long‐term “digital gold” thesis for BTC, but it does acknowledge that, in practice, the asset people want to spend or use to escape broken local banking systems is often a dollar on a blockchain rather than a volatile bearer asset.

Visa’s new stablecoin advisory business underlines this shift. Household‐name processors are now coaching banks and fintechs on stablecoin strategy, which means they’re betting that stablecoins will dominate the transactional “money” use case. At the same time, Bitcoin is settling into a more defined role as macro collateral and a long-term store of value.

Пов'язані матеріали

How Likely is it for TradeXYZ to Go Solo from Hyperliquid?

The article analyzes the possibility of TradeXYZ, a dominant project on Hyperliquid's HIP-3 real-world asset (RWA) perpetual contracts market, splitting off to build its own independent trading platform. With TradeXYZ commanding over 90% of HIP-3 volume and over 35% of Hyperliquid's total open interest, its leverage and influence are significant. The primary motive for a split is seen as capturing the underlying protocol fees, of which TradeXYZ currently receives only half. However, several factors strongly discourage such a move. First, replicating Hyperliquid's high-performance infrastructure would be challenging and could degrade TradeXYZ's product quality. Second, Hyperliquid serves as a crucial distribution channel, with most users accessing TradeXYZ's liquidity through its frontend. Third, the close, trusting relationship between the founders of both projects makes a hostile "betrayal" unlikely. The conclusion is that a split would likely result in a lose-lose scenario. Hyperliquid would lose its main growth narrative and see its valuation impacted, while TradeXYZ would face immense technical hurdles, lose its primary user channel, and damage its reputation. Instead of a full separation, the more probable path is for TradeXYZ to negotiate better terms while deepening integration, focusing on enhancing its own brand and user ownership.

marsbit4 хв тому

How Likely is it for TradeXYZ to Go Solo from Hyperliquid?

marsbit4 хв тому

"Teletubbies" Robot Cleaning Service, $30/Hour, Pure·Manual·Intelligence

Anthropomorphic "Teletubby" robot offers cleaning services in San Francisco at $30/hour, but it's entirely remote-controlled. The robot, created by startup Tau Robotics, can perform household tasks like washing hands, mopping floors, and taking out trash. While the initial demo videos appear impressive and are notably shown at normal speed (unlike many sped-up robot demos), the company reveals the actions are performed via human teleoperation, not autonomous AI. Tau Robotics, founded in 2024, argues this "cheat" is a strategic way to bridge the current capability gap, ensure task completion, and collect real-world home data to eventually train autonomous systems. Their service features three robot models: Chelsea for kitchens/bathrooms, Elon for regular tidying with memory, and Tony for deep cleaning. Priced at $30 per hour, it's cheaper than average human cleaners in the US. The article discusses the broader challenge of deploying humanoid robots in homes, comparing Tau's approach to others like China's Ziliang and the US's 1X Neo, which also use teleoperation. A key reason for choosing a humanoid form is to make remote control more intuitive for human operators. The piece also notes the potential "emotional value" of having a humanoid servant. The service is currently invite-only in San Francisco.

marsbit19 хв тому

"Teletubbies" Robot Cleaning Service, $30/Hour, Pure·Manual·Intelligence

marsbit19 хв тому

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

AI is reshaping the labor market's value proposition. The traditional four-year college degree is losing its appeal as a guaranteed career path, while skilled blue-collar trades like electricians, welders, and plumbers are experiencing historic demand and wage premiums. This shift is driven by dual pressures: AI's displacement of certain white-collar roles and a booming need for physical infrastructure and data center construction. Data confirms the trend. In the U.S., vocational school revenue surged, and a significant portion of recent layoffs are AI-related. Surveys show a majority of Gen Z adults plan to pursue blue-collar work, citing better job security against AI automation. Vocational education interest has exploded recently. Experts cite a psychological shift as younger generations seek tangible, AI-resistant careers and avoid high student debt. In many cases, salaries for skilled trades now match or exceed those requiring a bachelor's degree. In South Korea, semiconductor vocational high schools boast near-total employment, with graduates securing high-paying roles at companies like Samsung. The shortage is structural, exacerbated by a retiring baby boomer workforce and massive infrastructure projects. Companies like JPMorgan Chase, Meta, and Lowe's are investing heavily in training programs. However, overcoming historical stigma and a "perception gap" around trade careers remains a key challenge to closing the talent gap.

marsbit1 год тому

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

marsbit1 год тому

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

Qualcomm reported its Q3 FY2026 results (ending June 2026), with revenue of $9.95B, down 4% YoY but above expectations. Gross margin declined to 53.1%, pressured by rising costs across manufacturing and memory. Key business segments showed mixed performance: Handset revenue fell 19.6% YoY to $5.09B, dragged by an 11% decline in non-Apple Android shipments and weaker high-end mix. Conversely, Automotive revenue surged 61% to $1.59B, and IoT grew 9% to $1.83B. Core operating profit dropped 41% YoY due to margin compression and higher expenses. Management's Q4 FY2026 guidance projects revenue of $9.7B-$10.5B, in line with consensus, but Non-GAAP EPS guidance of $2.05-$2.25 fell short of expectations. Amidst persistent weakness in its core handset market, Qualcomm is pursuing growth in AI, focusing on Edge AI (smartphones, PCs, automotive) and Data Center AI. Its data center strategy includes four pillars: AI accelerators (e.g., AI200), commercial CPUs (Dragonfly C1000), custom silicon, and connectivity solutions. While these initiatives initially boosted its stock, concerns over AI capital expenditure sustainability have since erased those gains. The company targets $5B in data center revenue for FY2027 and $15B for FY2029. The report concludes that with the traditional handset business still under pressure, the data center opportunity is currently viewed as a longer-term option, and a more conservative valuation based on core operations may be warranted until AI contributions materialize.

marsbit1 год тому

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

marsbit1 год тому

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

At the 2026 YC Startup School, Jeff Dean outlined his vision for AI's next phase, shifting focus from simply scaling models to building intelligent, autonomous systems. He believes AI's progress is no longer just about creating smarter models, but about integrating them into systems capable of long-term, iterative work, automated experimentation, and continuous learning. This evolution moves the competition from "who has the bigger model" to "who can best organize intelligence." Dean suggests AI capabilities are now comparable to a junior engineer, enabling the automation of complex workflows. However, the true challenge and opportunity lie in managing these AI "workers" at scale. He emphasizes the importance of **context engineering**—structuring tools, memory, and feedback loops—over raw model power. For startups, this means building deep expertise in niche domains where general models currently fail (near 0-1% success rates), leveraging proprietary data, specialized tools, and domain-specific evaluators. A recurring theme is re-examining fundamental constraints. Dean's past work, like moving Google's search index to memory or creating the TPU, stemmed from questioning outdated assumptions about hardware and cost. He sees similar inflection points today, particularly in **specialized inference hardware** to drastically reduce latency and energy consumption for real-time Agent operation. Notably, he points out that in modern AI systems, the dominant cost is often not computation but **data movement**. Reliable, long-running Agents require robust system design, borrowing concepts from distributed computing like checkpointing, state management, and parallel exploration to handle failures and maintain progress over days or weeks. As AI automates execution, the scarcest human skills will shift to **defining clear specifications**, **judging what problems are worth solving** (taste), and designing effective feedback loops. Ultimately, Dean's framework prioritizes understanding the problem deeply, identifying the true bottlenecks, and systematically building closed-loop systems where AI can not only perform tasks but also improve AI itself.

marsbit1 год тому

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот