Visa creates stablecoin advisory team as onchain dollars go mainstream

cointelegraphОпубліковано о 2025-12-15Востаннє оновлено о 2025-12-15

Анотація

Visa has launched a global Stablecoins Advisory Practice to assist banks, merchants, and fintechs in designing and managing stablecoin products. The initiative focuses on enhancing payment efficiency through training, market analysis, and technical integration support. This move reflects the growing significance of onchain dollar transactions, with Visa already processing billions in USDC settlements annually. The trend highlights a broader industry shift toward stablecoins for faster, cheaper payments, as seen with companies like Stripe and PayPal. This evolution is reshaping Bitcoin’s role, positioning it more as a store of value rather than a medium for everyday transactions.

Visa has launched a global Stablecoins Advisory Practice, a new unit that will help banks, merchants, and fintechs design, roll out, and manage stablecoin products.

The payments giant said Monday that the new advisory arm will focus on practical questions that traditional players struggle with, and offer stablecoin training and market trends programs, go-to-market planning, and technology enablement for stablecoin integration.

“Stablecoins may represent an opportunity to enhance speed and lower cost in payments, so with the support of Visa, we are evaluating how this technology could fit into our broader strategy to deliver meaningful value to our 15 million members worldwide,” Matt Freedman, senior vice president, Navy Federal Credit Union, said.

The move indicates that onchain dollars are now significant enough to warrant their own dedicated business line within one of the world’s largest payment networks, and it’s not a greenfield bet.

With the Stablecoins Advisory Practice, Visa is wrapping a consultancy around infrastructure it has been building out quietly for several years, including more than 130 stablecoin‐linked card programs across 40‐plus countries and billions of dollars in annualized USDC (USDC) settlement volume on its network.

Visa has launched a global Stablecoins Advisory Practice. Source: Visa

Related: Visa doubles down on stablecoins in Europe, Middle East, Africa with new partnership

A broader pivot toward stablecoin rails

The timing fits a broader pivot in how mainstream firms approach crypto. Stablecoins, rather than volatile assets like Bitcoin (BTC), are becoming the default way to use blockchains for payments.

Stripe has rolled out stablecoin payouts and accounts, pitching them as faster, cheaper options for global creators and platforms.

PayPal is pushing its PayPal USD (PYUSD) dollar token deeper into its own ecosystem, including YouTube creator payouts in the United States, and JPMorgan’s JPM Coin continues to expand as an institutional settlement rail.

Related: Spark integrates PayPal USD into its stablecoin lending markets

What this means for Bitcoin’s role

That rise of onchain dollars is starting to eat into narratives that once belonged to Bitcoin. In November, ARK Invest CEO Cathie Wood trimmed her 2030 Bitcoin price target from $1.5 million to $1.2 million, explicitly citing stablecoins taking over some of the functions she once expected Bitcoin to fulfill in payments and emerging markets.

The change doesn’t kill her long‐term “digital gold” thesis for BTC, but it does acknowledge that, in practice, the asset people want to spend or use to escape broken local banking systems is often a dollar on a blockchain rather than a volatile bearer asset.

Visa’s new stablecoin advisory business underlines this shift. Household‐name processors are now coaching banks and fintechs on stablecoin strategy, which means they’re betting that stablecoins will dominate the transactional “money” use case. At the same time, Bitcoin is settling into a more defined role as macro collateral and a long-term store of value.

Пов'язані матеріали

Li Fei-Fei's Latest Long-Form Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Call Themselves World Models, We Need a Taxonomy

In a new article, Dr. Fei-Fei Li addresses the widespread and often inconsistent use of the term "world model" in AI. She proposes a clear, functional taxonomy rooted in the classic Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) loop (agent → action → state → observation → agent). According to this framework, current systems called "world models" are different projections of this loop, categorized by their primary output: 1. **Renderers**: Output observations (pixels). Their goal is visual fidelity for human consumption (e.g., video generation models like Sora). They are the most commercially mature but are limited by a focus on appearance over physical accuracy. 2. **Simulators**: Output states (geometric, physical, dynamic representations). They provide a structurally accurate world for both human professionals (e.g., architects) and computational agents (e.g., robots for training). Li argues simulators are the crucial, underappreciated bridge, as they can underpin both rendering and planning. 3. **Planners**: Output actions. Given an observation and a goal, they decide what an agent should do next (e.g., robotic action models). This area is highly promising but remains the least mature for real-world deployment. Li highlights a key trend: the boundaries between these three categories are beginning to blur, as they all rely on a shared underlying understanding of geometry, physics, and dynamics. The logical endpoint is a unified world foundation model capable of switching between rendering, simulation, and planning based on downstream needs. This convergence, she concludes, is central to advancing spatial intelligence—enabling machines not just to talk about the world, but to truly understand, imagine, and interact with it.

marsbit3 год тому

Li Fei-Fei's Latest Long-Form Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Call Themselves World Models, We Need a Taxonomy

marsbit3 год тому

Forbes Feature: Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

A Forbes feature delves into the state of stablecoin-based cross-border payments, noting rapid growth but a key shortfall: while faster and more accessible, they are not yet cheaper. At a recent industry conference in Mexico City, optimism about technology, regulation, and volume was tempered by discussions with practitioners. The core issue is liquidity. Traditional FX brokers charge 60-70 basis points, and stablecoins promise to slash this to 2-5 basis points. However, this theoretical cost advantage cannot be realized until deep liquidity pools are established at scale, requiring significant institutional capital inflow. A major adoption barrier is trust. Businesses often rely on long-standing relationships with traditional brokers, valuing reliability over marginal cost savings. This shift will be gradual. Furthermore, successful companies in the space are not positioning themselves as replacements for legacy systems like SWIFT, but as complements. They leverage stablecoins for speed while using traditional rails for their standardization and reliability in ensuring accurate payment details—a critical factor for supplier payments to avoid customs issues. Companies like Caliza, experiencing high monthly growth, exemplify this hybrid approach. The industry anticipates consolidation, as long-term viability will depend on securing the essential trifecta: proper licensing, robust fiat on/off-ramps, and deep liquidity. Without these, firms risk being mere intermediaries rather than building sustainable businesses.

marsbit3 год тому

Forbes Feature: Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

marsbit3 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片