Vietnam Opens Crypto Exchange Licensing as Pilot Goes Live

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-22Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-22

Анотація

Vietnam has officially opened the licensing process for cryptocurrency exchanges, accepting applications from January 20, 2026, as part of a state-led pilot program to regulate the crypto market. This move, enabled by recent legal frameworks including the Law on the Digital Technology Industry, recognizes crypto as property but not legal tender, maintaining a ban on its use for payments. Despite the launch, no exchanges have been approved yet. About ten securities firms and banks—including SSI Securities, VIX Securities, and major banks like Military Bank—have announced plans to apply but are still preparing infrastructure pending regulatory clearance. Vietnam’s framework is among Asia’s strictest, requiring licensed entities to be Vietnamese-owned with at least $380 million in capital, 65% institutional ownership, and a 49% foreign cap. The regime aims to shift the crypto market toward institutional control but limits entry to well-capitalized players.

Vietnam has officially begun the procedure of accepting applications for licenses to allow the trade of virtual assets, a procedure that has been viewed as a milestone step towards the launch of a long-awaited cryptocurrency market. The State Securities Commission of Vietnam (SSC) confirmed the move on Tuesday, stating that it will accept applications starting Jan. 20, 2026, as part of its wider plan to bring crypto under formal oversight.

The licensing window follows the release of updated administrative procedures under Decision No. 96 from Vietnam’s Ministry of Finance. The decision operationalizes an earlier resolution that laid the groundwork for piloting a regulated crypto asset market over a multi-year timeframe.

Vietnam activates its crypto pilot after years of planning

Vietnam’s new licensing phase also builds on the Law on the Digital Technology Industry, which took effect on Jan. 1, 2026. This law defines digital assets and crypto assets in statute for the first time, giving regulators a clearer legal foundation to supervise exchanges and trading platforms.

However, Vietnam still draws a hard line between recognition and payment use. While the country recognizes crypto assets as property, it does not classify them as legal tender. Regulators also maintain restrictions that prevent crypto from being used as an official payment method, reinforcing the government’s cautious approach.

Banks and brokerages prepare to enter the market

Even though the pilot now has a live licensing process, Vietnam has not yet confirmed any approved exchanges. In October 2025, the Ministry of Finance said no company had applied for participation in the five-year crypto pilot at the time due to strict requirements and high capital thresholds.

Now, with Wednesday’s report in Vietnam News that about 10 securities companies and banks have publicly announced plans to participate once regulators give the word on licensing.

These include SSI Securities, which launched SSI Digital in 2022, and VIX Securities, which invested in its exchange-focused unit VIXEX. Major banks such as Military Bank, Techcombank, and VPBank have also signaled interest.

Importantly, these institutions are not yet operating licensed trading platforms. Instead, they are preparing applications and internal infrastructure, planning to launch only after regulatory clearance.

No exchange approvals yet despite licensing launch

Despite the milestone, Vietnam has not announced that it has received or approved any applications since opening the window. That gap matters because it highlights that Vietnam is still in the early operational phase of the pilot, where paperwork begins, but enforcement and approvals may take time.

This also means market participants cannot yet assume that the licensing process will produce fast results, especially given the government’s cautious stance.

Vietnam enforces one of the region’s strictest frameworks

Vietnam’s crypto licensing framework ranks among the most restrictive in Asia. When the country launched its five-year crypto market pilot in September 2025, it introduced rules that sharply limit what exchanges and platforms can do.

Under the framework, applicants must be Vietnamese entities with a minimum paid-in capital of 10 trillion dong (about $380 million). Institutional shareholders must hold at least 65% of the capital, and foreign ownership cannot exceed 49%.

Vietnam also bans the issuance of digital assets backed by fiat currencies or securities, signaling that regulators want trading activity under strict control and without stablecoin-like structures inside the pilot.

If this regime is implemented by Vietnam successfully, then it has the ability to shift the market from informal participation to institution-led trading; however, the strict bar to licensing ensures that only major players with deep balance sheets can enter.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Strive Targets $150M Raise to Cut Debt and Buy More Bitcoin

TagsCryptoCrypto LawCrypto Marketdigital asset exchangeVietnam

Пов'язані питання

QWhen does Vietnam officially begin accepting applications for cryptocurrency exchange licenses?

AVietnam officially begins accepting applications for cryptocurrency exchange licenses starting January 20, 2026.

QWhat is the minimum paid-in capital requirement for entities applying for a crypto exchange license in Vietnam?

AApplicants must have a minimum paid-in capital of 10 trillion dong (approximately $380 million).

QHow does Vietnam's legal framework classify cryptocurrency assets?

AVietnam recognizes crypto assets as property but does not classify them as legal tender, and their use as an official payment method is restricted.

QWhat are the ownership restrictions for crypto exchanges under Vietnam's new framework?

AInstitutional shareholders must hold at least 65% of the capital, and foreign ownership cannot exceed 49%.

QWhich Vietnamese financial institutions have announced plans to participate in the crypto market pilot?

ASSI Securities (with SSI Digital), VIX Securities (with VIXEX), and major banks such as Military Bank, Techcombank, and VPBank have signaled interest.

Пов'язані матеріали

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手8 год тому

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手8 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit11 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit11 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手12 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手12 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit13 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit13 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片