USDT Volume Hit A Record $4.4 Trillion In Q4 2025, Tether Report Shows

bitcoinistОпубліковано о 2026-02-06Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-06

Анотація

Tether's Q4 2025 report reveals record-breaking growth for USDT, with on-chain transfer volume surging to $4.4 trillion. The number of users grew by 35.2 million, reaching a total of 534.5 million, marking the eighth consecutive quarter of adding over 30 million users. Active users hit an all-time high of 24.8 million. Retail transaction volume also reached a new peak of 2.2 billion, with 88.2% being under $1,000. Despite a bearish crypto market in October, USDT's market cap grew to $187.3 billion, and it outperformed the broader market, gaining 3.5% while major cryptocurrencies declined. Bitcoin was trading around $65,800, down over 9% in 24 hours.

A new report from Tether shows USDT saw growth in several metrics during the last quarter of 2025, including a new record in transfer volume.

Tether’s USDT Set A New Transfer Volume Record In Q4 2025

USDT issuer Tether has released its market report for Q4 2025 and it shows several new records for the largest stablecoin by market cap. First, the number of USDT users increased by 35.2 million during the period, taking the total to 534.5 million.

The quarterly growth in USDT users over the last couple of years | Source: Tether

In this count, Tether has included both the users who have received and used USDT for at least 24 hours on-chain, as well as the estimates of users that have received the stablecoin on centralized platforms like exchanges.

From the above chart, it’s visible that Q4 2025 was the eighth consecutive quarter in which Tether’s stablecoin saw growth of more than 30 million users. In terms of active users, the quarter set a new all-time high (ATH) with an average of 24.8 million users receiving USDT at least once inside a 30-day rolling window. “This accounts for 68.4% of all stablecoin monthly active users,” noted the report.

On-chain transfer volume also set a new ATH in this quarter, hitting a value of $4.4 trillion following a jump of $248.6 billion.

The stablecoin's transaction volume saw a notable rise over the past year | Source: Tether

As displayed in the chart, the USDT transfer volume stood at just $1.7 trillion in Q3 2024, so the sharp jump to $4.4 trillion since then indicates demand for using the stablecoin has seen a notable boost. “Of this $4.4T quarterly total, $2.8T (63.6%) was in transactions where USD₮ was the only asset transferred, and $1.6T (36.4%) was in transactions where multiple assets were transferred (typically in DeFi swaps),” said the report.

There has also been growth in transaction demand among the retail investors, as the number of transfers involving the stablecoin jumped by $313.1 million in Q4 to a new ATH of 2.2 billion. 88.2% of these transactions involved a sum less than $1,000.

The capital invested in the stablecoin itself also saw an increase during the quarter, with the market cap hitting $187.3 billion after inflows of $12.4 billion.

Looks like the token's market cap has seen steady growth | Source: Tether

The growth in the USDT market cap occurred despite the fact that the wider cryptocurrency market saw a bearish transition in October. That said, the downturn still affected the token to some degree as before the market slowdown, its monthly market cap growth rate was sitting at 4.9%, which declined in the aftermath of the liquidation squeeze of October 10th.

Overall, between October 10th and today, USDT has been among the more resilient cryptocurrencies, being up 3.5% while the combined sector has lost more than a third of its market cap. In the same period, USDC, the second largest stablecoin, has seen a drop of 2.6%.

Bitcoin Price

At the time of writing, Bitcoin is trading around $65,800, down more than 9% over the last 24 hours.

The price of the coin seems to have been crashing | Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was the total USDT transfer volume in Q4 2025 according to Tether's report?

AThe total USDT transfer volume in Q4 2025 was $4.4 trillion.

QHow many USDT users were there in total by the end of Q4 2025?

AThere were 534.5 million USDT users by the end of Q4 2025.

QWhat percentage of the $4.4 trillion transfer volume involved transactions where USDT was the only asset transferred?

A63.6% of the $4.4 trillion transfer volume involved transactions where USDT was the only asset transferred.

QHow did the market cap of USDT change during Q4 2025, and what was its final value?

AThe market cap of USDT increased by $12.4 billion during Q4 2025, reaching a final value of $187.3 billion.

QWhat was the Bitcoin price mentioned in the article, and how much did it change in the last 24 hours?

ABitcoin was trading around $65,800 at the time of writing, down more than 9% over the last 24 hours.

Пов'язані матеріали

From Survival to Accelerated Growth: The Journey of Zcash's Three-Year Rise as Told by the Founder of ZODL

**From Survival to Accelerated Growth: Zcash Founder Details the 3-Year Rise** Three years ago, Zcash (ZEC) was a struggling pioneer in privacy technology, with a price near $30, low shielded supply (11%), and a community mired in governance disputes. Today, ZEC trades around $600, with over 31% of its supply (~$3B) in user-controlled shielded pools. This transformation resulted from breaking key constraints. First, **governance shackles were removed**. The old model guaranteed funding to two entities (ECC and ZF) regardless of performance, creating a monopoly. In 2024, ECC rejected further direct funding, forcing a change. The NU6 upgrade ended direct funding, allocating 8% to community grants and 12% to a protocol-controlled treasury for retroactive rewards, expiring in 2028 unless renewed by overwhelming consensus. The entities also relinquished their trademark-based veto power, freeing community governance. Second, the **product focus shifted** from pure cryptography to user growth. Previously, engineering excelled at privacy tech but failed to attract users. In early 2024, the team (later ZODL) pivoted to building products users wanted, like the Zodl wallet (default privacy, hardware support, cross-asset swaps). This drove shielded supply to grow over 400% in ZEC terms, with 86.5% of recent transactions being shielded, representing real user adoption. Third, the **narrative evolved** from the limiting "privacy coin" label to "unstoppable private money." This clarified Zcash's value proposition: a Bitcoin-like monetary policy with verifiable private payments via advanced cryptography. This structural narrative—protocol (Zcash), asset (ZEC), gateway (Zodl)—enabled broader exchange listings, institutional interest, and ETF filings. Finally, **organizational constraints were broken**. In early 2026, the ECC team left its non-profit structure after disputes over control, forming Zcash Open Development Lab (ZODL). ZODL raised $25M from top VCs (Paradigm, a16z, etc.), gaining the capital and agility of a startup to scale consumer products. Current metrics show strong momentum: social discussion volume for ZEC surged 15,245% in a year, with 81% positive sentiment. The focus is now on enhancing user experience (Zodl wallet), scalability (Tachyon project targeting Visa-level throughput with 25-second blocks), and post-quantum security (quantum-recoverable wallets coming soon). Zcash is positioned to become faster, more usable, scalable, and quantum-resistant.

marsbit4 хв тому

From Survival to Accelerated Growth: The Journey of Zcash's Three-Year Rise as Told by the Founder of ZODL

marsbit4 хв тому

Five Counterparty Risk Architectures: A Settlement-Layer Methodology for Classifying TradFi Models in Crypto Exchanges

**Summary:** This companion piece reframes the five TradFi-on-crypto exchange architectures, previously classified by "architectural fingerprint," through the lens of counterparty risk. The core question is: whose balance sheet bears the loss first in a stress scenario, and has it historically done so? Each of the five models corresponds to a distinct risk holder with its own documented failure modes. * **Model 1 (Stablecoin-Settled CEX Perpetuals):** Risk is held by the stablecoin issuer (e.g., reserve composition, bank connectivity) and the CEX's own book. History includes Tether's banking disconnections (2017) and reserve misrepresentations (CFTC 2021 Order). * **Model 2 (CFD Brokers):** Risk resides on the broker's balance sheet (B-book model). Regulatory differences (e.g., ESMA's mandatory negative balance protection vs. Mauritius FSC's lack thereof) define loss allocation rules, as seen in the 2015 SNB event (Alpari UK insolvency). * **Model 3 (Off-Chain Custody & Transfer Agent Chain):** Risk lies with the off-chain custodian/platform. User asset recovery depends on Terms of Use and corporate structure, exemplified by the Celsius bankruptcy ruling (2023) where Earn Account assets were deemed property of the estate. * **Model 4 (DEX Perpetual Protocols):** No single balance sheet bears risk. Loss absorption relies on a protocol's insurance fund and Auto-Deleveraging (ADL) mechanism, as demonstrated in the GMX V1 (2022) and dYdX v3 YFI (2023) incidents. * **Model 5 (Regulated CCP - DCM-DCO-FCM):** The most institutionalized model concentrates risk in the Central Counterparty (CCP). However, history shows CCPs can employ non-standard tools under extreme stress, such as mass trade cancellation (LME Nickel, 2022) or enabling negative price settlements (CME WTI, 2020). The report argues that regulatory choices and counterparty risk structures are co-extensive, not in an upstream-downstream relationship. It concludes with five separate observation checklists (not predictions) for monitoring the structural vulnerabilities of each risk model.

marsbit21 хв тому

Five Counterparty Risk Architectures: A Settlement-Layer Methodology for Classifying TradFi Models in Crypto Exchanges

marsbit21 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片