U.S. Treasury Sanctions UK Crypto Exchanges for Iran Sanctions Evasion

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-31Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-31

Анотація

The U.S. Treasury, through OFAC, has sanctioned two UK-based crypto exchanges, Zedcex and Zedxion, for allegedly enabling Iran to evade international financial sanctions. This marks the first time OFAC has targeted crypto exchanges for supporting Iran’s financial activities. The exchanges reportedly provided services to sanctioned Iranian entities, facilitating over $389 million in transactions and helping obscure fund flows using digital assets. Seven Iranian individuals, including businessman Babak Zanjani, were also designated. OFAC emphasized that digital assets do not exempt entities from sanctions enforcement and warned crypto platforms to strengthen compliance measures to avoid facilitating illicit finance.

The U.S. Treasury has sanctioned two crypto exchanges in the UK, Zedcex and Zedxion, for allegedly assisting Iran in evading U.S. and international financial sanctions. The sanctions were issued by OFAC, or the Office of Foreign Assets Control, at the U.S. Treasury. This is the first time that OFAC has sanctioned crypto exchanges for their role in Iran’s financial sector.

According to the U.S. Treasury, the two crypto exchanges provided users with access to financial services that supported Iranian individuals and entities who are subject to U.S. sanctions. OFAC further stated that the two crypto exchanges facilitated sanctioned persons in moving their funds through the international financial system using digital assets.

Targeted Individuals and Groups

In addition to the transactions, OFAC designated seven Iranian individuals to the blocklist. Also sanctioned was Babak Zanjani, an Iranian businessman with a past financial conviction record, who was reportedly freed for the sole purpose of facilitating funds for the regime.

According to Treasury officials, the group utilized cryptocurrency infrastructure to obscure the flow of funds and evade traditional banking controls. Blockchain analysis related to the designation reveals that wallet addresses associated with these entities facilitated over $389 million in transactions.

The Treasury emphasized that the use of digital assets does not provide a shield from sanctions enforcement and that crypto-related activities are still subject to US laws and regulations.

Implications for Crypto Compliance

OFAC emphasized that these sanctions are a strong statement about the enforcement of sanctions in the face of evolving financial technology. OFAC warned that crypto platforms that do not follow proper compliance procedures may be facilitating illicit finance and could be subject to enforcement action if they knowingly facilitate sanctioned jurisdictions or persons. The sanctions require U.S. persons to freeze all property and interests in property of the named entities and to prohibit all transactions involving them.

However, Treasury officials emphasized that all exchanges must have strong compliance programs regardless of their base. The actions against Zedcex and Zedxion indicate toughening of U.S. enforcement of evasion facilitated by crypto related to Iran. OFAC’s designation of the exchanges and the individuals involved in the transfer of illicit funds indicates that the digital asset industry is bound by U.S. sanctions laws.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Banking and Crypto Leaders Clash Over CLARITY Act Ahead of White House Policy Talks

TagsCrypto ExchangeIranIran GovernmentOFAC

Пов'язані питання

QWhich UK crypto exchanges were sanctioned by the U.S. Treasury for Iran sanctions evasion?

AZedcex and Zedxion.

QWhich U.S. government agency issued the sanctions against the crypto exchanges?

AThe Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) at the U.S. Treasury.

QWhat was the total value of transactions facilitated by the wallet addresses associated with the sanctioned entities, according to blockchain analysis?

AOver $389 million.

QBesides the crypto exchanges, how many Iranian individuals were designated to the blocklist by OFAC?

ASeven.

QWhat key message did OFAC emphasize regarding digital assets and sanctions enforcement?

AThe use of digital assets does not provide a shield from sanctions enforcement, and crypto-related activities are still subject to U.S. laws and regulations.

Пов'язані матеріали

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: Losses Mount Due to Vulnerable Seed Generation A critical vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets has led to a continued wave of fund thefts. According to Galaxy Research, the total stolen has reached 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $88.6 million) from 4,585 addresses, a significant increase from the initial 594.5 BTC reported on July 30, 2026. Most of the stolen funds remain on the attackers' addresses. The issue is not with the current firmware, which Coinkite has updated, but with seed phrases generated on vulnerable devices between March 2021 and the release of fixed firmware versions. Due to a programmer error, devices switched from using a hardware random number generator to the software-based Yasmarang generator, which was initialized with publicly accessible data like the chip's serial number. This made the seed phrases predictable through offline brute-force attacks, meaning wallets remain at risk until funds are moved to a new wallet generated with the patched firmware. Affected devices include Mk2/Mk3 with firmware 4.0.1–4.1.9 (and up to 5.0.3), Mk4/Mk5 up to version 5.6.0, and Q models up to 1.5.0Q. The only exceptions are seeds created with a high-entropy method like at least 50 independent dice rolls or a strong unique BIP-39 passphrase. All other owners must generate a new seed on the fixed firmware and transfer their assets. A case highlighting the human impact involves a 39-year-old long-term investor who lost 2 BTC (approx. $130,000) in minutes. He had accumulated the Bitcoin over eight years through physical labor, viewing it as a financial lifeline and a retirement plan in a country suffering from hyperinflation. His story underscores that even conservative "buy and hold in cold storage" strategies can be compromised by such underlying technical flaws. From a technical perspective, this incident echoes historical failures where weak random number generators undermined cryptographic security, challenging the assumption that offline storage is automatically foolproof.

cryptonews.ru2 год тому

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

cryptonews.ru2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片