U.S. Stocks, Bonds, and Currency Plummet! Danish Pension Fund "Dumps U.S. Assets," Gold Soars

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-01-21Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-21

Анотація

A major financial shock hit US markets on January 20, with stocks, bonds, and the dollar all falling sharply. The Dow dropped 1.76%, the S&P 500 fell 2.06%, and the Nasdaq declined 2.39%. The 10-year Treasury yield surged to 4.3%, and the dollar index fell below 99. European markets also fell, and even Bitcoin dropped below $90,000. The turmoil was triggered by geopolitical tensions after former President Trump expressed interest in acquiring Greenland and threatened tariffs on European countries that opposed the move. In response, the EU considered retaliatory tariffs on $93 billion of US goods. In a significant move, Danish pension fund AkademikerPension announced it would sell all its US Treasury holdings—around $100 million—citing unsustainable US fiscal policies and Trump’s threats toward Greenland. Other Danish pension funds also reduced exposure to US assets. As investors fled dollar assets, gold soared to a record high above $4,800 per ounce, while silver also surged. In contrast, cryptocurrencies fell sharply. Central banks, including Poland’s, are increasing gold reserves as a hedge against uncertainty. Ray Dalio of Bridgewater warned that Trump’s policies are sparking a "capital war," undermining confidence in the dollar’s role as the global reserve currency. Goldman Sachs noted that recent US actions have damaged the perceived safety and predictability of US assets.

Author: Mamengniu, Shenchao TechFlow

An ice-covered island in the Arctic Circle is shaking the foundations of global financial markets.

On January 20, the U.S. market experienced a brutal "triple sell-off" of stocks, bonds, and the dollar. The Dow plummeted 1.76%, the S&P 500 fell 2.06%—its largest single-day drop since last October—and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 2.39%. The yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury note surged to 4.3%, and the U.S. Dollar Index fell below the 99 mark.

European stock markets crashed simultaneously, with British, French, German, and Italian stock indices all falling over 1%. Even Bitcoin followed, dropping below $90,000.

Meanwhile, the safe-haven asset gold broke through $4,800, hitting a new all-time high.

Black swan events are emerging frequently, and the catalyst sounds unbelievable: Trump's territorial ambitions for Greenland and the confrontation between the U.S. and Europe.

Danish Pension Fund "Dumps U.S. Assets"

Greenland, with an area of 2.16 million square kilometers and a population of only 56,000, is an autonomous territory of Denmark and should have no connection to Wall Street.

But Trump has publicly stated that "Greenland is crucial to U.S. national security" and has hinted on multiple occasions that "the U.S. must possess Greenland." When Denmark and other European countries clearly refused, Trump played his most familiar card: imposing tariffs on all European countries that oppose the U.S. acquisition of Greenland.

The EU's response was swift and firm: considering imposing retaliatory tariffs on $93 billion worth of U.S. goods and restricting U.S. companies' access to the EU market.

The latest development is that Europe is directly targeting the lifeline of dollar hegemony: U.S. Treasury bonds.

Danish pension fund AkademikerPension (serving teachers and scholars), which manages $25 billion in assets, announced: it will sell all its holdings of U.S. Treasury bonds by the end of January, amounting to approximately $100 million.

Chief Investment Officer Anders Schelde's reasoning was blunt: "The U.S. overall has poor credit conditions, and the U.S. government's fiscal situation is unsustainable in the long run."

He specifically mentioned that a key factor driving this decision was Trump's threatening remarks about Greenland. Additionally, concerns about fiscal discipline and the weak dollar prompted the fund to reduce its exposure to U.S. assets.

This is not an isolated case. Two other Danish pension funds, PFA (managing about $120 billion) and Laerernes Pension (teachers' pension fund), have also significantly reduced their holdings of U.S. Treasuries this month.

Do not underestimate these numbers. Although the total size of Danish pension funds is not as large as U.S. behemoths, they represent a complete loss of confidence in U.S. credit by European long-term capital.

The market's reaction was immediate and violent: the euro surged to 1.1768 against the dollar, the Swedish krona and Danish krone soared 1% against the dollar, and U.S. Treasuries were frantically sold off. The yield on the 30-year Treasury bond broke through 4.9%, and the 10-year yield reached 4.3%, both hitting new highs since last September.

Gold Hits Another Record High

Amid this financial storm, only one type of asset is celebrating: precious metals like gold and silver.

Spot gold broke through $4,800 per ounce during trading, once again刷新ing the highest price in human history. Silver also rose above $94, with a cumulative increase of over 30% year-to-date. Global capital is casting a vote of no confidence in dollar credit with real money.

In stark contrast, Bitcoin plummeted to below $89,000, with a single-day drop approaching 3%. Losses for mainstream cryptocurrencies like ETH and Solana were even more severe, generally falling 5-8%.

In the face of a real geopolitical crisis, institutional capital chose the hard currency proven over thousands of years. The "digital gold" narrative of cryptocurrencies briefly failed the systemic risk test.

Look at who is buying gold:

The National Bank of Poland just approved a plan to purchase 150 tons of gold, increasing total reserves from 550 tons to 700 tons, propelling it into the global top ten in gold reserves.

Central Bank Governor Adam Glapinski stated bluntly: "We need more hard assets to fight uncertainty."

Bridgewater Associates founder Ray Dalio issued a sharper warning: Trump's policies are triggering a "capital war," with countries and investors reducing their investment in U.S. assets. He recommended gold as an important hedging tool because the current monetary system is collapsing, and the logic behind central banks holding fiat currency and debt has fundamentally changed.

This sentence is worth pondering repeatedly. Dalio is not a doomsayer; he manages a global macro hedge fund with hundreds of billions of dollars. His every word represents the real anxiety of big capital.

Goldman Sachs also rarely admitted that Trump's tariff threats against Europe are "disruptive" and will continue to suppress the dollar this week.

Chief Foreign Exchange Strategist Kamakshya Trivedi said bluntly: "We have encountered disruptive U.S. policies for two consecutive weekends, which has called into question the halo surrounding U.S. assets."

What does "halo called into question" mean? Simply put, the credit of the U.S. dollar as the global reserve currency is unraveling.

Over the past 70 years, dollar hegemony has been built on three pillars:强大的 military power,维护者 of the free trade system, and predictability of rules.

Trump's Greenland ambitions and tariff blackmail are personally dismantling the latter two pillars.

When the U.S. itself begins to threaten allies, tear up rules, and weaponize geopolitics, why should other countries continue to store their wealth in dollar assets?

Пов'язані питання

QWhat triggered the recent 'stock, bond, and currency triple kill' in the US market?

AThe trigger was former President Trump's territorial ambitions for Greenland and the subsequent US-Europe confrontation. Trump publicly stated that 'Greenland is crucial to US national security' and hinted that 'the US must possess Greenland'. When Denmark and other European countries refused, Trump threatened to impose tariffs on all opposing nations. This led to a strong EU response, including considering retaliatory tariffs on $930 billion worth of US goods and restricting US companies' access to the EU market.

QWhich Danish pension fund announced it would sell all its US Treasury holdings, and what was the reason?

AThe Danish pension fund AkademikerPension, which manages $25 billion in assets, announced it would sell all its US Treasury holdings (approximately $100 million) by the end of January. Chief Investment Officer Anders Schelde stated the reason was 'the US's overall poor credit condition' and that 'the US government's fiscal situation is unsustainable in the long run.' He specifically cited Trump's threatening remarks about Greenland as a key factor, along with concerns about fiscal discipline and a weak dollar.

QHow did the price of gold react to the financial turmoil, and what does this signify?

AThe price of gold broke through $4800 per ounce, setting a new all-time high. This surge signifies that global capital is casting a vote of no confidence in the US dollar's credit. In times of genuine geopolitical crisis, institutional capital is choosing proven hard assets like gold, moving away from dollar-denominated assets.

QAccording to the article, what are the three pillars of US dollar hegemony that are being undermined?

AAccording to the article, the three pillars of US dollar hegemony are: 1. Powerful military strength, 2. The role as a defender of the free trade system, and 3. The predictability of rules. The actions of the former US administration, specifically its territorial ambitions for Greenland and tariff threats against allies, are dismantling the latter two pillars.

QWhy did Bitcoin's price fall significantly despite the market turmoil, according to the analysis in the article?

AAccording to the article's analysis, Bitcoin's price fell (dropping below $89,000) because, 'in the face of a real geopolitical crisis, institutional capital chose the hard currency proven over thousands of years.' The 'digital gold' narrative for cryptocurrencies briefly failed this test of systemic risk, as investors flocked to traditional safe-haven assets like physical gold and silver instead.

Пов'язані матеріали

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit9 хв тому

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit9 хв тому

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit24 хв тому

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit24 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片