US Seizes Nearly $1B in Iranian Crypto Amid Economic Pressure Campaign

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-05-30Востаннє оновлено о 2026-05-30

Анотація

The United States has seized nearly $1 billion worth of Iranian cryptocurrency, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced. He noted some wallet owners may be unaware their funds were confiscated. The action is part of "Operation Economic Fury," a U.S. financial pressure campaign against Iran launched in March 2025, which has also involved freezing bank accounts and seizing properties with European partners. Bessent stated that prior to U.S. intervention, the Iranian regime was allegedly diverting hundreds of millions monthly to a small elite. He described Iran's economy as severely strained, with food rationing, internet outages, and many military personnel going unpaid. The $1 billion seizure figure marks a significant increase from previous totals reported in April.

On Friday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that the US has confiscated around $1 billion worth of Iranian cryptocurrency. He also mentioned that some of the wallet owners may not even be aware that their funds has been confiscated. “I believe that we have seized about a billion dollars of their crypto”, Bessent said during his speech at the Reagan National Economic Forum.

According to Bessent, the seizures are a component of Operation Economic Fury, the United States’ strategy to put financial pressure on Iran. The operation, which began in March 2025 and has since seized crypto, frozen bank accounts, and collaborated with European partners to confiscate properties, has targeted Iranian assets on numerous fronts.

Intensifying Financial Pressure

Before the United States interfered, the regime was allegedly stealing $400–$500 million per month and distributing the money around 80 or so elites, according to the Treasury secretary.

According to him, the Iranian economy is in shambles, with food coupons being handed out, the internet down, and 40 to 50% of the Iranian military being unpaid. Regarding the current talks with Iran, Bessent said that it is difficult to work with a divided leadership structure because of the attacks on key regime members by the US and Israel.

The newly revealed $1 billion figure is significantly higher than the $344 million in cryptocurrency that was frozen after the US Office of Foreign Assets Control sanctioned Iran-linked wallets on April 24. It is also approximately twice as much as the $500 million in Iranian cryptocurrency assets that the Treasury Department announced it had seized in late April.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Crypto VC Funding Slumps in Q1 2026 as Mega Deals Dry Up

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the total value of Iranian cryptocurrency that US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent claims has been seized?

AUS Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent claims that the US has seized about $1 billion worth of Iranian cryptocurrency.

QWhat is the name of the US operation under which these cryptocurrency seizures took place?

AThe seizures are a component of Operation Economic Fury, the United States' strategy to put financial pressure on Iran.

QAccording to the Treasury Secretary, what was the Iranian regime allegedly doing with $400-$500 million per month before US intervention?

AAccording to the Treasury Secretary, the Iranian regime was allegedly stealing $400-$500 million per month and distributing the money to around 80 elites.

QHow does the newly revealed $1 billion seizure figure compare to previous amounts reported?

AThe $1 billion figure is significantly higher than the $344 million frozen in late April and is approximately twice as much as the $500 million in Iranian crypto assets the Treasury Department announced seizing in late April.

QWhat reasons did Bessent give for the difficulty in current talks with Iran?

ABessent said it is difficult to work with Iran's divided leadership structure due to attacks on key regime members by the US and Israel.

Пов'язані матеріали

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

**Title:** The AI PC Battle: Don't Bet on Sides, Bet on the Tollbooth **Summary:** The AI PC competition is moving beyond simple "x86 vs. Arm" narratives. The core investment thesis should focus on identifying which players can sustain margins, cash flow, and pricing power throughout the upgrade cycle, rather than backing a particular architecture. The opportunity is analyzed in three layers: 1. **The Advanced Foundry Tollbooth:** TSMC is positioned to collect "tolls" regardless of which chip designer wins, due to its dominant ~70% share in advanced semiconductor manufacturing, which is essential for high-end AI PC chips. 2. **Compute & Platform Spillover:** AMD represents an offensive in the x86 CPU+GPU space, while NVIDIA leverages its GPU and CUDA software stack dominance. Both benefit from the demand for increased local AI compute. 3. **Architecture Diffusion & Turnaround Plays:** ARM and Intel offer potential for significant upside (elasticity), but investments here require stricter discipline due to higher execution risks and competitive challenges. The industry is transitioning from concept to shipment validation. While short-term forecasts for AI PC adoption have been revised down slightly due to tariffs and procurement delays, the long-term trend towards AI becoming a standard PC feature remains intact. The key driver for upgrade cycles will be whether compelling enterprise applications (e.g., privacy-sensitive computing, low-latency inference) emerge beyond consumer-focused features like meeting summarization. Investment strategy should prioritize companies with platform-level advantages and recurring revenue streams. TSMC offers high certainty as the foundational tollbooth. AMD presents a strong offensive play within the established ecosystem. ARM and Intel are higher-risk, higher-potential-reward turnaround bets. The report cautions against chasing short-term hype and emphasizes a disciplined, long-term approach focused on buying ecosystem strength and cash-flow certainty after market enthusiasm subsides. **Key Risks:** Underwhelming AI PC applications slowing upgrade cycles; slow improvement in Windows on Arm compatibility; macro/tariff impacts on PC demand; potential advanced node supply-demand mismatches affecting TSMC; high overall AI sector valuations making stocks vulnerable to a risk-off shift in markets.

marsbit13 хв тому

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

marsbit13 хв тому

Which Companies Has NVIDIA's "Three-Track Investment Architecture" Invested In?

NVIDIA's investment strategy operates through a "three-track architecture," not just its NVentures venture arm. Corporate Development handles massive strategic bets (e.g., $30B in OpenAI, $10B in Anthropic, $20B in Synopsys). NVentures, a small team, focuses on early-stage, financial investments across sectors like quantum computing (Alice & Bob, PsiQuantum), AI infrastructure (OpenRouter, Tensormesh), and biotech. The NVIDIA Inception accelerator provides non-monetary support. This system allows NVIDIA to nurture startups and lock in strategic partners, creating a vast AI ecosystem. This aggressive capital deployment has drawn scrutiny. Critics like Michael Burry and EU regulators question potential "circular financing," where NVIDIA's equity investments in companies (e.g., CoreWeave, OpenAI) facilitate those companies' purchases of NVIDIA hardware, potentially inflating revenue. Supporters view it as a necessary "virtuous cycle" to secure supply and demand in a compute-scarce market. While NVentures' smaller deals appear like traditional VC, its role within the larger, controversial investment framework remains a point of debate.

marsbit41 хв тому

Which Companies Has NVIDIA's "Three-Track Investment Architecture" Invested In?

marsbit41 хв тому

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

Marvell Technology's stock price surged from under $10 in 2016 to a record $290 in June 2026, fueled not by making GPUs, but by dominating AI infrastructure connectivity. This analysis argues the market misvalues MRVL as merely a smaller Broadcom in custom AI chips, overlooking its true, unique position. Marvell's core strength lies in enabling high-speed data flow for AI clusters through three interconnected businesses. First, it holds a commanding ~70% market share in high-speed optical DSPs (essential for data center light modules), a deep-moat business with accelerating growth. Second, its custom AI chip design business serves hyperscalers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google, with a significant revenue pipeline despite lower margins. Third, stable cash flows come from Ethernet switch chips and enterprise storage controllers. Together, they form a full-stack "AI data movement" platform. CEO Matt Murphy's transformative leadership since 2016, involving strategic divestments, key acquisitions (like Inphi for optical DSPs), and securing long-term agreements with major cloud providers, repositioned the company. A pivotal $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in 2026 underscored Marvell's critical role in the AI ecosystem, particularly through collaborations like NVLink Fusion. While Marvell faces risks—including client concentration (losing the Amazon Trainium3 design), lower-margin business mix, competitive threats, insider selling, and complex supply chains—its fundamentals remain strong. The optical interconnect moat is widening with the acquisition of Celestial AI (photonics fabric), and financial metrics show accelerating revenue growth and operating leverage. With a PEG ratio suggesting undervaluation relative to its growth, the thesis is that the market undervalues Marvell's monopolistic position in AI "plumbing" while overemphasizing its competitive custom chip segment. The story transcends investing, symbolizing how in any complex system—from the internet to AI—the value of "connection" ultimately surpasses that of individual "nodes."

marsbit42 хв тому

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

marsbit42 хв тому

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbit1 год тому

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbit1 год тому

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

In 2026, the crypto industry is undergoing a profound infrastructure-level transformation—TradFi assets are migrating on-chain at an unprecedented pace. According to CoinGecko's Q1 2026 report, the total value locked (TVL) of tokenized real-world assets (RWA) has surpassed $31 billion, a nearly 4x increase from $7.8 billion at the beginning of 2025, with the sector’s aggregate market capitalization reaching $19.3 billion. Among these, the market cap of tokenized stocks surged from $2 million to $486 million, with Q1 spot trading volume reaching $15.1 billion—a single quarter already surpassing the entire second half of 2025. RWA perpetual contract Q1 trading volume reached a staggering $524.8 billion, far exceeding the $313 billion for all of 2025. Meanwhile, BlackRock's BUIDL fund has reached $2.3 billion in scale and has filed for two new tokenized funds, signaling that the world's largest asset manager's tokenization strategy is evolving from pilot to product suite expansion. HTX, as a core participant in the crypto exchange sector, officially launched TradFi perpetual futures products including NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, META, and SPY in 2026, enabling crypto users to gain 24/7 trading access to core U.S. equities. Boston Consulting Group predicts that global tokenized asset scale could reach $16 trillion by 2030, while McKinsey offers a conservative estimate of approximately $2 trillion. The on-chain migration of TradFi assets is no longer a "future narrative" but a structural transformation unfolding in real time, as crypto exchanges evolve from single crypto asset trading platforms toward "multi-asset-class trading infrastructure."

HTX Learn1 год тому

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

HTX Learn1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси