US Probes Crypto Exchanges For Suspected Sanctions Violations Linked To Iran

bitcoinistОпубліковано о 2026-02-04Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-04

Анотація

U.S. authorities are investigating whether cryptocurrency exchanges have enabled Iranian entities to bypass international sanctions, following a surge in crypto activity linked to Iran. Blockchain data indicates that transaction volumes reached an estimated $8–10 billion over the past year, with both government-linked actors and everyday users increasingly turning to digital assets. Analysts report record inflows into Iranian wallets, reaching $7.8 billion in 2025. The Treasury Department is examining if platforms facilitated sanctions evasion, including moving money offshore or accessing hard currency. Iran’s largest exchange, Nobitex, acknowledged some users transfer funds internationally but stated it employs monitoring systems to detect suspicious activity. Data also shows a gradual movement of assets out of Iranian exchanges, often into self-custodied wallets, rather than abrupt capital flight.

Crypto activity in Iran has expanded rapidly over the past year, drawing renewed attention from US authorities who are now examining whether certain digital asset platforms may have played a role in helping Iranian officials and state‐linked actors bypass international sanctions.

Rising Iran Crypto Volumes

According to a blockchain researcher cited by Reuters, cryptocurrency transaction volumes tied to Iran surged to an estimated range of $8 billion to $10 billion over the past year, as both government‐connected entities and everyday users increasingly turned to digital assets.

Estimates from blockchain analytics firms TRM Labs and Chainalysis show that crypto usage in Iran has grown steadily despite mounting restrictions on the country’s access to the global financial system.

TRM Labs estimates that crypto activity in Iran reached roughly $10 billion last year, compared with $11.4 billion in 2024. Chainalysis reported similar growth, saying wallets linked to Iran received a record $7.8 billion in 2025, up from $7.4 billion in 2024 and $3.17 billion in 2023.

US authorities are now investigating if crypto platforms, which weren’t mentioned in the report, have enabled sanctioned Iranian organizations to move money offshore, access hard cash, or pay for items in ways that circumvent sanctions.

Ari Redbord, global head of policy at TRM Labs, said the US Treasury is actively examining whether digital asset services were used to facilitate sanctions evasion. Redbord said he had direct knowledge of the Treasury Department’s concerns.

A Treasury spokesperson declined to comment directly on the investigation but pointed Reuters to a statement issued in September announcing new measures targeting so‐called “shadow banking” networks that support Iran, including those that officials say rely on cryptocurrencies to avoid sanctions.

What Blockchain Data Shows

Inside Iran, crypto adoption has spread widely among the public. Nobitex, the country’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, told Reuters that industry estimates suggest around 15 million Iranians have some level of exposure to digital assets.

The exchange said it has approximately 11 million customers, with most activity coming from retail users and smaller investors. According to Nobitex, many Iranians use crypto primarily as a way to store value amid the continued decline of the rial.

Data from analytics firm Nansen suggests that some Iranian users moved funds out of Nobitex during 2025. The firm said balances of major cryptocurrencies on the exchange fell sharply from a peak reached around the middle of the year.

Analyst Nicolai Sondergaard said the data indicates that digital assets in Iran have increasingly served as a gradual exit channel rather than a one‐time flight of capital. According to Nansen’s analysis, funds did not leave the crypto ecosystem entirely but instead moved steadily toward platforms outside the country throughout 2025.

Nobitex acknowledged that some customers may use digital assets to move funds internationally, but said it does not track the final destination or purpose of those transactions.

The exchange stated that it employs robust monitoring systems designed to detect potentially suspicious activity and protect user assets. It also said concerns about asset safety following the June hacking incident may have influenced user behavior.

In many cases, Nobitex explained, customers transferred assets to self‐custodied wallets rather than directly to overseas exchanges. The exchange said this approach allows users to secure their holdings temporarily while assessing risks and deciding whether to redeposit funds later.

The 1-D chart shows the drop in the total crypto market cap below $2.6 trillion. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the estimated range of cryptocurrency transaction volumes tied to Iran over the past year, as cited in the article?

AThe estimated range is $8 billion to $10 billion.

QWhich two blockchain analytics firms provided data showing the growth of crypto usage in Iran?

ATRM Labs and Chainalysis.

QAccording to the article, what is the primary reason many Iranians use cryptocurrency, as stated by the Nobitex exchange?

AMany Iranians use crypto primarily as a way to store value amid the continued decline of the rial.

QWhat US government department is actively examining whether digital asset services were used to facilitate sanctions evasion, according to Ari Redbord of TRM Labs?

AThe US Treasury Department.

QWhat did data from analytics firm Nansen suggest about the movement of funds from the Nobitex exchange in 2025?

AThe data suggested that funds did not leave the crypto ecosystem entirely but moved steadily toward platforms outside the country throughout 2025, serving as a gradual exit channel.

Пов'язані матеріали

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

In three days, Google lost two AI legends. On June 18, Noam Shazeer, co-author of the seminal "Attention is All You Need" paper and Gemini co-lead, left for OpenAI. Just 48 hours later, John Jumper, 2024 Nobel laureate and AlphaFold lead, departed DeepMind for Anthropic. This follows Andrej Karpathy joining Anthropic in May. These moves highlight a structural trend: top AI talent is concentrating at mission-driven, pre-IPO firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, while Google becomes a primary source. The exodus stems from a core mission mismatch. Google's ad-centric model often subordinates AI research to product and revenue goals, creating friction for pioneers like Shazeer, who returned in 2024 only to leave again. In contrast, OpenAI and Anthropic offer singular focus on pushing AI boundaries, whether towards AGI or safety-aligned models, which deeply appeals to top researchers like Jumper. Financial incentives amplify the pull. With both OpenAI and Anthropic nearing IPO, employees stand to gain immensely from equity, an upside Google's mature stock cannot match. Furthermore, the 2023 merger of Google Brain and DeepMind, intended to consolidate strength, has instead created cultural tension and slowed the path from research to product, as evidenced by Gemini's pace. This talent redistribution is reshaping the AI landscape. While Google retains vast data and compute resources, its true crisis is the quiet, continuous loss of the people who define the field's future. The real moat in AI is not infrastructure, but the concentration of brilliant minds—a battle Google is currently losing.

marsbit2 год тому

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

marsbit2 год тому

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

Beyond the familiar performance charts like MMLU-Pro and MMMU, which major AI models strive to ace, stands a key "examiner": Chinese-Canadian researcher Wenhu Chen. An assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of TIGERLab, Chen addresses the crucial need for more rigorous AI evaluation. As models like GPT-4 began scoring near-perfect results on older benchmarks like MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. In response, Chen introduced MMLU-Pro in 2024, featuring harder, more reasoning-focused questions with more answer choices, successfully reintroducing meaningful performance gaps. His work extends to multi-modal evaluation with MMMU and its enhanced version, MMMU-Pro. These benchmarks test a model's ability to understand and reason with complex information from images, charts, and text across diverse academic subjects, exposing the significant challenges even top models face in genuine comprehension. Chen's background in complex QA, table reasoning, and his experience at Google DeepMind on projects like Gemini inform his approach. He understands that effective benchmarks must anticipate how models might "cheat" by memorizing data or avoiding visual analysis. His lab also actively researches video understanding and generation models (e.g., UniVideo, Vamba), ensuring his evaluation work is grounded in practical model-building challenges. Now at Meta's Super Intelligence Lab, Chen continues his focus on multi-modal data and evaluation, representing the deep yet often unseen contributions of Chinese talent in shaping the fundamental tools of the AI industry.

marsbit2 год тому

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

marsbit2 год тому

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: On Cursor's $60 Billion Sale Many aspiring founders see massive exits like Cursor's $60B sale and wonder why they can't achieve the same, often concluding opportunities are exhausted. But great companies aren't built in obvious, crowded spaces. Cursor, like Stripe, Figma, and Shopify before it, started with a non-consensus belief about the future. Before ChatGPT, they believed AI would transform knowledge work. They focused on a genuinely exciting domain, became their own customer, and obsessed over power users. Their journey involved years of "glass-chewing" effort before the market was ready. The pattern is consistent: identify a long-term technological shift, find a missed entry point, and execute for years before the trend becomes obvious. First-generation products (PayPal, Adobe, Amazon) prove a market exists. Second-generation winners (Stripe, Figma, Shopify) rebuild that market around new insights, technology, or changing customer behaviors. Founders must identify their phase in the cycle. Early entrants like Coinbase or Cursor focus on making new technology usable for power users. Later entrants find the "yin" to the established "yang"—the blind spots incumbents miss as they grow distant from individual users. The key is deep market immersion. Use every product in your space. Talk to users. Build an audience. Stop looking for ideas and start *seeing* them everywhere. Then, choose one. The idea must offer a 10x improvement or solve a "hair-on-fire" pain point—something severe enough that users are already crafting workarounds. When building, avoid feature bloat. Ask: why would someone switch? Great startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction (e.g., Cursor forked VS Code instead of creating a new editor). Distribution is the underestimated moat. Before product-market fit, achieve distribution-market fit. How do customers discover new tools? Founders like those at Airbnb, Stripe, and Cursor did unscalable, manual work to recruit early users. The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Cursor built for years pre-market, faced rejection, and persisted. So did Airbnb, Nvidia, and Rain (which launched post-FTX collapse). The lesson isn't that these founders were smarter, but that they stayed in the game long enough for their insights to compound. Framework: Spot technological cycles. Cultivate unique insight. Obsess over your market. Talk to customers. Find a hair-on-fire problem. Build the simplest wedge. Win your distribution channel. Above all, don't quit when it gets hard. Most people won't do these things consistently. The few who do build the next generation of great companies. Go build.

marsbit2 год тому

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

marsbit2 год тому

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619): Market Insights & Analysis This weekly digest curates in-depth analysis often lost in the information flow, focusing on key insights across macro trends, investment, and technology. **Macro & Geopolitics:** With the Strait of Hormuz reopening and military conflict shifting to negotiation, markets are pivoting from "war shock" to "supply restoration." Trades include shorting crude risk premiums, longing airlines/tourism, Asian energy importers, and bond duration, while shorting inflation expectations. LNG, fertilizer, and chemical chains are also being repriced. **Investment & VC:** Ray Dalio advises against betting on concentrated AI giants dominating indices, advocating for diversified portfolios of high-quality, low-correlation assets instead. Analysis covers the 4-year crypto cycle, predicting the core surviving product by 2029 will be asset trading markets. Current BTC metrics suggest a potential bottoming zone, presenting a patient accumulation window. SpaceX's high-profile IPO at a $2.1T valuation faces scrutiny over fundamentals, with key watchpoints being its likely inclusion in the Nasdaq index and Q2 earnings. Concerns are raised about potential "gamma squeeze" and systemic risks if its narrative-driven valuation gets amplified by passive index funds. Robinhood (HOOD) is noted for breaking its high correlation with crypto, bolstered by its stock trading and new underwriting business. **Web3 & AI:** A warning highlights ~$1.8T in off-balance-sheet AI infrastructure commitments (purchase commitments, leases) as a potential systemic risk if AI monetization lags. AI models are being used for World Cup predictions, adding a new layer for betting markets. A cost breakdown of a $20 AI subscription reveals the supply chain from model companies to cloud, GPUs, and power. **Prediction Markets:** The emergence of prediction market "concept stocks" is noted, with Robinhood developing its own platform, Rothera, signaling a shift from market competition to a "channel war" for user access. **CeFi & DeFi:** The SpaceX IPO tested perpetual contract mechanisms for pre-IPO assets, highlighting challenges in handling corporate actions like stock splits on-chain. The de-pegging of STRC (Strategy's preferred share) to ~$89 reflects market concerns over MicroStrategy's capital structure and BTC-backed leverage model. BlackRock's covered-call Bitcoin ETF (BITA) offers yield but caps upside, appealing to yield-seeking institutions. **Ethereum:** An opinion piece argues Ethereum's core strength is its vast developer community and composability, solidifying its role as the default operating system for the financial internet. **Weekly Hot Topics:** Include the US-Iran deal reopening the Strait of Hormuz, Fed's hawkish hold, Anthropic restricting model access, SpaceX acquiring Cursor, and a humorous stock surge for "Liuliumei" due to its "LLM" ticker.

marsbit2 год тому

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619)

marsbit2 год тому

Alliance's Co-Founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written on the Occasion of Cursor's $60 Billion Sale

In this letter to entrepreneurs, Alliance reflects on the success of Cursor's $60 billion sale to Elon Musk, using it as a case study to counter the misconception that opportunities in crowded fields like AI or crypto are exhausted. The piece argues that great companies like Cursor, Stripe, Figma, and Shopify are not built by geniuses with perfect ideas, but by founders who start with a non-consensus belief about the future and build for years before that future becomes obvious to everyone. They identify long-term shifts, find overlooked entry points, and execute relentlessly. The framework for success involves: 1. **Identifying your place in the technology cycle**: Early-stage opportunities focus on making new tech usable for power users (e.g., Coinbase, Cursor). Later-stage opportunities involve finding the "yin" to an existing "yang"—the blind spots of first-generation players (e.g., Stripe vs. PayPal, Figma vs. Adobe). 2. **Cultivating unique insights**: Immerse yourself deeply in the market. Use every product, talk to users, and build an audience. Insights will emerge naturally from deep engagement. 3. **Finding a "hair-on-fire" problem**: Look for a 10x improvement or a severe, urgent pain point. The strongest signal is people already building clumsy workarounds. 4. **Building a focused MVP**: Don't just add features because you can. Ask why users would abandon their current tool for yours. The best startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction. 5. **Winning a distribution channel**: Distribution is often the moat. Before product-market fit, achieve channel-market fit. Find where your customers are and build an engine to reach them, even through unscalable, manual efforts initially. 6. **Persistence**: The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Success stories like Cursor, Airbnb, and Nvidia involved years of grinding, rejection, and perseverance when the path forward seemed unclear. The conclusion is that there is no secret. Most people fail to consistently execute these steps over the long term. The few who do build the companies that define the next era. The world is yours to create.

链捕手2 год тому

Alliance's Co-Founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written on the Occasion of Cursor's $60 Billion Sale

链捕手2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片