US Investigates Alleged $90 Million Crypto Theft Linked To Contractor’s Son

bitcoinistОпубліковано о 2026-01-29Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-29

Анотація

U.S. authorities are investigating a potential breach of government-controlled digital-asset wallets, following allegations of a $90 million crypto theft. The probe gained attention after blockchain investigator ZachXBT accused John “Lick” Daghita, son of a contractor working with the DOJ and Defense Department, of controlling wallets containing illicit funds—including assets tied to seized government wallets from the Bitfinex hack. The case emerged from a social media dispute where a hacker inadvertently revealed holdings later traced to $40M in government-seized crypto. Meanwhile, crypto-focused PAC Fairshake raised $193M ahead of midterm elections, as lawmakers debate new crypto regulations.

US authorities have launched an investigation into a potential breach involving government‐controlled cryptocurrency accounts. According to a Reuters report, the US Marshals Service confirmed in an email that it is examining a possible hack of government digital‐asset wallets.

Social Media Drama Unveils Crypto Crime

The investigation gained public attention earlier this week after Patrick Witt, executive director of the President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets, weighed in on social media.

On Monday, Witt responded on social media platform X (previously Twitter) to claims made by blockchain investigator ZachXBT, stating that he was looking into the matter. ZachXBT alleged that a hacker stole more than $60 million in late 2025, including funds traced back to government seizure wallets.

In a series of posts on X, ZachXBT accused John “Lick” Daghita, the son of Dean Daghita, the head of CMDSS, a firm that claims to supply crucial services to the Justice Department (DOJ) and the Department of Defense. The alleged theft came to light during a heated “band for band” dispute on the messaging app Telegram.

During the argument, a young hacker began screen‐sharing his wallets while boasting about his holdings. Investigators later traced those wallets to more than $40 million in seized crypto assets belonging to the government.

ZachXBT’s findings went further, alleging that the individual known as “John Lick” was seen controlling wallets tied to more than $90 million in suspected illicit funds.

Among the assets identified were cryptocurrencies associated with US government seizure addresses linked to the high‐profile Bitfinex hack, adding another layer of seriousness to the allegations.

Midterm Elections Countdown

While questions around government wallet security continue to unfold, the broader political and regulatory environment for crypto in the United States is also intensifying.

CNBC reported on Wednesday that the crypto‐focused political action committee (PAC) Fairshake raised a total of $193 million by the end of last year, positioning it as a major force ahead of the upcoming congressional midterm elections.

The updated figure reflects two significant donations made in the second half of 2025, including $25 million from Ripple and $24 million from venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz’s crypto arm, a16z.

Cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase, another major supporter, contributed $25 million in the first half of last year, shortly before Fairshake announced it had $141 million available.

“With the midterms approaching, we are united behind our mission, with Fairshake continuing to oppose anti‐crypto politicians and support pro‐crypto leaders,” Fairshake spokesperson Josh Vlasto said.

This week, senators are negotiating the crypto market structure bill aimed at setting regulatory standards for the entire crypto sector. One portion of the legislation is expected to receive its first vote Thursday in the Senate Agriculture Committee.

However, the section overseen by the Senate Banking Committee has been delayed after lawmakers called off a planned vote amid ongoing disagreements over the bill’s provisions.

The 1-D chart shows the total crypto market cap inching closer to the $3 trillion milestone. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the alleged amount of cryptocurrency stolen in the hack being investigated by US authorities, and who is the primary suspect?

AThe alleged theft involves more than $90 million in suspected illicit funds, and the primary suspect is John 'Lick' Daghita, the son of the head of a firm that supplies services to the DOJ and Department of Defense.

QHow did the alleged crypto theft initially come to public attention?

AIt came to public attention after blockchain investigator ZachXBT made claims on social media platform X, which were then addressed by Patrick Witt, executive director of the President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets.

QWhat specific incident during a Telegram argument helped investigators trace the stolen funds?

ADuring a heated 'band for band' dispute on Telegram, a young hacker began screen-sharing his wallets while boasting about his holdings, which investigators later traced to over $40 million in seized government crypto assets.

QWhich major crypto-focused political action committee (PAC) was reported to have raised $193 million by the end of last year?

AThe crypto-focused PAC named Fairshake raised a total of $193 million by the end of last year.

QWhat is the connection between the alleged stolen funds and the Bitfinex hack?

AAmong the assets identified in the alleged theft were cryptocurrencies associated with US government seizure addresses that were linked to the high-profile Bitfinex hack.

Пов'язані матеріали

The AI Agent Era Accelerates Its Arrival: Questflow Defines a New Paradigm of Financial Intelligence with On-Chain AI Brokerage

The AI Agent era is accelerating, with the CB Insights AI 100 list highlighting global investment confidence. The focus has shifted from whether AI works to its speed of deployment and ability to manage complex workflows, with autonomous AI Agents driving this transformation. At the forefront is Questflow, a Singapore-based startup redefining financial intelligence through its on-chain AI brokerage. Unlike tools that merely provide data dashboards, Questflow deploys AI Agents that proactively scan markets, form judgments, and execute trades via a conversational interface—operating 24/7 without requiring manual confirmation for each decision. This embodies the new AI paradigm of agents capable of executing multi-step workflows autonomously. Questflow's mission is to democratize institutional-grade trading intelligence. Historically reserved for the ultra-wealthy, this capability is now accessible starting from just $1 through Questflow's "AI Clone + Copy Trade" model. The platform charges only a 1% execution fee, aligning its incentives directly with users and eliminating traditional management or performance fees. The timing is opportune, aligning with key trends identified by CB Insights: the scalable deployment of AI Agents, accelerated AI adoption in financial services, and the maturation of on-chain infrastructure. With robust liquidity on platforms like Hyperliquid and Polymarket, alongside advancements in AI reasoning and non-custodial wallet security, Questflow is positioned to merge the roles of broker, fund, and exchange into a single, accessible platform for millions.

链捕手21 хв тому

The AI Agent Era Accelerates Its Arrival: Questflow Defines a New Paradigm of Financial Intelligence with On-Chain AI Brokerage

链捕手21 хв тому

Why Pricing Social Interactions is Doomed to Fail?

Titled "Why Putting a Price on Social Interaction Is Doomed to Fail," this article critiques attempts to monetize social networks directly through SocialFi models, arguing their inevitable failure stems from a fundamental misunderstanding of media dynamics. Using Marshall McLuhan's theory of "hot" and "cold" media, the author posits that social networks are inherently "cold" media. Their value isn't contained in individual posts but is co-created through user participation, interpretation, and fragmented, ongoing interaction (e.g., replies, shares). This ambiguity and need for user involvement are core to their function. The article asserts that SocialFi projects like Friend.tech failed because introducing real-time, tradable financial pricing (a definitive "hot" signal) into this "cold" environment doesn't add a layer—it replaces the medium's essence. The unambiguous price signal overshadows and nullifies the nuanced, participatory social signal. Users become traders, not participants, and when speculative profits vanish, the underlying social ecosystem—never genuinely cultivated—collapses entirely. This principle extends beyond crypto. The author argues platforms like Twitter have gradually "heated up" through metrics (likes, retweets counts, algorithmically defined value), shifting users from participants to performers and eroding organic engagement. The solution isn't to abandon capital but to manage its entry point. Successful models like Substack, Patreon, or Bandcamp allow capital to "condense" at specific, isolated nodes (e.g., subscriptions, one-time payments) without permeating and "heating" every social interaction. They preserve the core "cold," participatory medium while enabling monetization at designated boundaries. The NFT boom and bust serves as a stark parallel: the ancient "cold" medium of collecting (valued for story, community, gradual accumulation) was rapidly destroyed by platforms that introduced real-time floor prices, rarity scores, and trading dashboards, transforming collectors into speculators and vaporizing cultural value when prices fell. The core lesson: "Liquidity equals heat." Injecting high liquidity and definitive pricing into a "cold" participatory medium doesn't optimize it; it fundamentally alters and destroys its value-creating mechanism. The future lies not in pricing every social gesture but in finding precise, non-invasive points for capital to condense without overheating the entire ecosystem.

marsbit29 хв тому

Why Pricing Social Interactions is Doomed to Fail?

marsbit29 хв тому

Jensen Huang's CMU Speech: In the AI Era, Don't Just Watch, Build

Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA and a first-generation immigrant, delivered the commencement address to Carnegie Mellon University's class of 2026. He shared his personal journey from a humble background to founding NVIDIA, emphasizing resilience, learning from failure, and the responsibility that comes with leadership. Huang framed the present moment as the dawn of the AI revolution, a shift he believes is more profound than previous computing waves. He described AI as fundamentally resetting computing—moving from human-written software to machines that understand, reason, and use tools. This will create a new industry for generating intelligence and transform every sector. While acknowledging AI's potential to automate tasks and displace some jobs, Huang distinguished between the *tasks* of a job and its core *purpose*. He argued AI will augment human capability, not replace humans. The real risk, he stated, is not AI itself, but people being left behind by those who effectively use AI. He presented AI as a generational opportunity for massive infrastructure investment—in chip factories, data centers, energy grids, and advanced manufacturing—that could re-industrialize nations like the U.S. and bridge the digital divide by making computing and intelligent tools accessible to all. Huang called for a balanced approach: advancing AI safely and responsibly, establishing prudent policies, ensuring broad access, and encouraging universal participation. He urged the graduates not to fear the future but to engage with optimism and ambition, reminding them of CMU's motto, "My heart is in the work." His core message was clear: this is their moment to actively build and shape the AI-powered future, not merely observe it.

marsbit1 год тому

Jensen Huang's CMU Speech: In the AI Era, Don't Just Watch, Build

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片