U.S. government confirms it did not sell Bitcoin seized from Samourai Wallet

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-16Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-16

Анотація

The U.S. government has not sold the Bitcoin seized from Samourai Wallet, according to a confirmation from the Department of Justice (DOJ). The statement refutes earlier claims that the assets were liquidated, which would have violated Executive Order 14233 requiring forfeited Bitcoin to be retained. The DOJ clarified that the Bitcoin remains on the government’s balance sheet as part of a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. On-chain data from Arkham supports this, showing no significant outflows from known U.S. government wallets. The confusion stemmed from historical precedent where seized Bitcoin was auctioned, but current policy under the executive order mandates holding such assets. The U.S. government continues to hold over 328,000 BTC, valued at more than $31 billion.

The U.S. government has confirmed that it did not sell Bitcoin seized from Samourai Wallet. The confirmation addresses earlier claims that the assets had been liquidated in violation of federal policy governing forfeited digital assets.

U.S. DOJ clarification addresses liquidation claims

Patrick Witt, Executive Director of the President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets, said the Department of Justice [DOJ] has confirmed that the seized Bitcoin “have not been liquidated and will not be liquidated”.

He added that the assets will remain on the U.S. government’s balance sheet as part of the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.

The clarification follows reports earlier this month suggesting that prosecutors in the Southern District of New York [SDNY] had sold Bitcoin forfeited by developers associated with Samourai Wallet.

The alleged sale potentially contradicts Executive Order 14233, which mandates that forfeited Bitcoin be retained rather than sold.

According to Witt, the DOJ confirmed that the forfeited digital assets remain in the U.S. government’s possession and comply with the executive order. The statement directly counters claims that the Bitcoin had already been liquidated following the Samourai plea agreement.

The DOJ has not publicly detailed operational handling of the assets beyond confirming they remain on the government’s balance sheet.

However, the confirmation removes uncertainty around whether the seizure resulted in market sales or contributed to recent Bitcoin price movements.

On-chain data aligns with U.S. government statement

Independent blockchain data from Arkham supports the U.S. DOJ’s position. Publicly tracked wallets associated with U.S. government holdings show no material reduction in Bitcoin balances consistent with a sale linked to the Samourai case.

As of mid-January, on-chain analytics indicate the U.S. government continues to hold more than 328,000 BTC, valued at over $31 billion, alongside smaller balances of ether and stablecoins. No abnormal outflows tied to the Samourai forfeiture have been observed.

Why the confusion emerged

Historically, the U.S. government has sold seized Bitcoin through public auctions, particularly in earlier cases such as Silk Road.

That precedent shaped market expectations and led to the assumption that newly forfeited Bitcoin would also be liquidated.

However, Executive Order 14233 represents a policy shift, requiring certain seized Bitcoin to be retained as a strategic asset rather than sold.

The Samourai case appears to fall under this updated framework, marking a departure from earlier forfeiture practices.

For now, the DOJ’s confirmation closes the question of whether Samourai-related Bitcoin entered the market.


Final Thoughts

  • The DOJ’s confirmation resolves claims that Samourai Wallet–related Bitcoin had been liquidated, reinforcing that the assets remain held under current federal policy.
  • The episode highlights how legacy expectations around seized Bitcoin sales continue to clash with the U.S. government’s evolving approach.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat did the U.S. government confirm regarding the Bitcoin seized from Samourai Wallet?

AThe U.S. government confirmed that it did not sell the Bitcoin seized from Samourai Wallet and that the assets will remain on the government's balance sheet as part of the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.

QWhich executive order mandates that forfeited Bitcoin be retained rather than sold?

AExecutive Order 14233 mandates that forfeited Bitcoin be retained rather than sold.

QHow much Bitcoin does the U.S. government currently hold according to on-chain analytics as of mid-January?

AAs of mid-January, the U.S. government holds more than 328,000 BTC, valued at over $31 billion.

QWhy did confusion emerge about the liquidation of the seized Bitcoin from Samourai Wallet?

AConfusion emerged because historically the U.S. government sold seized Bitcoin through public auctions, which shaped market expectations, but Executive Order 14233 represents a policy shift requiring certain Bitcoin to be retained as a strategic asset.

QWhat role did on-chain data from Arkham play in this situation?

AIndependent blockchain data from Arkham supported the U.S. DOJ's position by showing no material reduction in Bitcoin balances in publicly tracked wallets associated with U.S. government holdings, consistent with no sale linked to the Samourai case.

Пов'язані матеріали

MoneyGram: Why Did We Launch Our Own Stablecoin?

MoneyGram, a global leader in cross-border remittances for over 80 years, has launched its own stablecoin, MGUSD. The initiative aims to evolve from single-transaction services to becoming a more integral part of users' financial lives. By allowing customers to hold a stable US dollar balance within the MoneyGram app, MGUSD enables not only remittances but also everyday spending, currency exchange, cash access, and future financial services. Targeting the billions globally who face challenges like currency volatility or lack of bank accounts, MGUSD leverages Stellar blockchain technology with a self-custody wallet architecture. This gives users control over their assets while providing a secure, compliant experience through a trusted brand. The approach focuses on solving existing customer pain points within MoneyGram's established network, rather than competing for broad crypto market liquidity. A key advantage is MoneyGram's hybrid model, combining digital services with the world's largest physical network for crypto-to-cash conversions. The stablecoin also modernizes the company's internal infrastructure, streamlining treasury management and partner settlements, with annual forex volume via stablecoins already reaching $2 billion. The project was delivered in about a year, driven by a reorganization into agile, cross-functional teams that operate with startup-like speed while leveraging decades of institutional expertise. Partners include Stablecoin (issuance), Crossmint (wallet APIs), Fireblocks (enterprise treasury), m0 (smart contracts), and the Stellar network. MoneyGram emphasizes that enhancing direct consumer offerings strengthens its partner ecosystem. The future direction is clear: to provide users worldwide with stable value storage, better financial tools, and greater control over their funds through a trusted, existing network.

Foresight News4 хв тому

MoneyGram: Why Did We Launch Our Own Stablecoin?

Foresight News4 хв тому

BIP-110 Controversy Intensifies: Bitcoin May Face Its Most Divisive Hard Fork Battle in Years

Bitcoin is approaching a critical block height of 961,632, which could activate the controversial BIP-110 proposal. This proposal aims to restrict the amount of non-financial data, such as inscriptions and other large data payloads, within Bitcoin transactions. Supporters, including some node operators and Bitcoin purists, argue that BIP-110 is necessary to preserve Bitcoin's core function as a monetary settlement layer by reducing network congestion and node operational burdens caused by non-essential data. They frame it as a correction to keep the network true to its original purpose. However, critics, including prominent figures like Blockstream's Adam Back and developer Jameson Lopp, warn that the proposal's implementation mechanism is dangerously flawed. They highlight that its low 55% miner signaling threshold, coupled with a contentious enforcement mechanism allowing nodes to unilaterally reject non-compliant blocks, significantly increases the risk of a chain split. Opponents argue this sets a dangerous precedent for transaction censorship, undermines Bitcoin's protocol neutrality, and creates excessive uncertainty for developers and businesses, especially since the rule is proposed as a temporary one-year measure. Market analysts, such as those from Bitfinex, suggest a full-scale network split is unlikely due to a lack of broad economic consensus. Major mining pools remain neutral, and adoption of the new rules is minimal. They view the situation more as a governance stress test. The primary risk is operational disruption: if a minority chain persists, major exchanges and custodians may need to temporarily suspend Bitcoin deposits and withdrawals to manage security and liquidity, potentially unsettling newer institutional investors. While BIP-110 is not expected to succeed in overtaking the main chain, its approach has ignited a significant debate about Bitcoin's governance, core values, and resilience.

Foresight News41 хв тому

BIP-110 Controversy Intensifies: Bitcoin May Face Its Most Divisive Hard Fork Battle in Years

Foresight News41 хв тому

NEAR to Airdrop 330,000 Tokens, Betting on TVL Reaching $70 Million

On June 11th, NEAR Protocol launched the Near@3.33 Milestone Incentive Program, targeting users of its Confidential Intents privacy cross-chain execution feature. The program will distribute 333,333 milestone tokens when the Confidential Intents Total Value Locked (TVL) reaches $70 million. Users must have conducted Confidential transactions on near.com and maintain a Confidential balance above $100 in any asset to qualify, with a single wallet capped at 2% of the current airdrop pool. The milestone tokens will be locked upon receipt and cannot be sold or transferred. They can only be converted 1:1 to NEAR tokens once NEAR's Volume Weighted Average Price (VWAP) maintains $3.33 or higher for three consecutive trading days. As of the report, Confidential Intents TVL exceeds $20.69 million, needing roughly a 3x increase to trigger the airdrop. Confidential Intents, launched in February 2026, is NEAR's privacy execution layer designed to prevent MEV, front-running, and strategy leaks by building confidentiality directly into the execution environment. Its TVL has grown from zero to approximately $15 million in about three months. NEAR token price, which surged from around $1 in April to a peak of $3.08, currently trades near $2. The program aims to boost user activity for Confidential Intents, with future incentive rounds planned as community engagement increases.

Foresight News2 год тому

NEAR to Airdrop 330,000 Tokens, Betting on TVL Reaching $70 Million

Foresight News2 год тому

Crypto Market Makers Are Collectively Seeking Change as Money Becomes Harder to Earn

**Summary: Crypto Market Makers Adapt as Margins Shrink** Leading crypto market maker GSR exemplifies a broader industry shift, moving beyond traditional market-making to become a full-service "Web3 investment bank." Its recent strategic acquisitions—including an SEC-registered broker-dealer, rebranded as GSR Securities—and purchases of token advisory firms aim to create an integrated platform covering token design, fundraising, listing, liquidity provision, and asset management. This includes launching an ETF and investing in tokenization platforms like Libeara, backed by a strategic investment from Standard Chartered's SC Ventures. This transformation is not unique to GSR. Other major players like Keyrock, B2C2, Wintermute, and DWF Labs are also expanding geographically, pursuing regulatory licenses (especially under frameworks like MiCA in the EU), and diversifying into over-the-counter (OTC) trading, asset management, and real-world asset tokenization. The driving force behind this collective pivot is a rapidly changing market. Profits from traditional altcoin market-making are declining due to fewer viable projects, reduced client budgets, increased competition, and smarter, more demanding clients. Simultaneously, regulatory pressures are mounting, making compliance a baseline cost. Extreme market events further expose teams lacking robust risk controls. Consequently, the crypto market-making business model is evolving from one reliant on information asymmetry and volatility to a more institutionalized, regulated, and service-diverse industry. Survival now depends on building systemic capabilities beyond mere liquidity provision.

marsbit2 год тому

Crypto Market Makers Are Collectively Seeking Change as Money Becomes Harder to Earn

marsbit2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片