US crypto market structure bill advances as Senate Agriculture Committee approves legislation

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-29Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-29

Анотація

The US Senate Agriculture Committee has approved the Digital Commodities Intermediary Act, advancing the crypto market structure bill after weeks of debate and amendment discussions. The approval, confirmed by Senator Cynthia Lummis, marks a key procedural step, allowing the legislation to move toward full Senate consideration. The committee reviewed amendments covering ethics rules, national security restrictions, consumer protections, and CFTC authority. While Senate passage is not guaranteed, the vote represents significant progress in establishing a regulatory framework for digital commodity intermediaries, particularly in spot market oversight. Further negotiations on jurisdiction and enforcement are expected as the bill proceeds.

The US Senate Agriculture Committee has approved its digital asset market structure legislation, advancing the bill out of committee after weeks of debate over its scope, amendments, and regulatory implications.

US Senator Cynthia Lummis confirmed the development in a post on X, saying the committee’s vote brings the legislation “one step closer” to reaching the president’s desk.

The approval follows a markup session held on Thursday, 29 January, where lawmakers reviewed and voted on a wide-ranging set of amendments to the bill, formally titled the Digital Commodities Intermediary Act.

Committee vote clears procedural hurdle

Clearing the Senate Agriculture Committee marks a significant procedural milestone, allowing the legislation to move toward consideration by the full Senate.

The committee oversees commodities markets and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission [CFTC], placing it at the centre of ongoing debates over how digital assets should be regulated at the federal level.

The bill is designed to establish a clearer framework for digital commodity intermediaries, with an emphasis on spot market oversight.

While committee approval does not guarantee passage in the Senate, it removes a key bottleneck that has stalled previous efforts to reform the crypto market structure in Congress.

Amendments reshaped the bill during markup

As outlined ahead of the vote, the markup process included first-degree amendments that expanded the bill beyond its original focus on market structure.

Proposals debated during the session addressed ethics rules for federal officials, national security restrictions on foreign-adversary jurisdictions, consumer protection measures, and limits on access to emergency federal lending.

Other amendments sought to clarify the CFTC’s authority over registered intermediaries.

The final version approved by the committee reflects the outcome of those amendment votes.

Next steps move to full Senate consideration

Following committee approval, the bill can now be scheduled for debate in the full Senate, where lawmakers may propose additional amendments or seek to reconcile differences with parallel efforts in the House.

Timing remains uncertain, and further negotiations are expected around agency jurisdiction and enforcement authority.

Still, Thursday’s vote places comprehensive US crypto market structure legislation closer to enactment than at any point in recent years.


Final Thoughts

  • Senate Agriculture Committee approval formally advances US crypto market structure legislation toward a full Senate vote.
  • The bill’s ultimate impact will depend on how its amended provisions fare in the next legislative stage.

Пов'язані питання

QWhich US Senate committee has approved the digital asset market structure legislation?

AThe US Senate Agriculture Committee has approved the digital asset market structure legislation.

QWhat is the formal title of the approved crypto market structure bill?

AThe formal title of the bill is the Digital Commodities Intermediary Act.

QWhat is the significance of the bill clearing the Senate Agriculture Committee?

AClearing the Senate Agriculture Committee is a significant procedural milestone that allows the legislation to move toward consideration by the full Senate.

QWhat types of amendments were debated during the markup session for this bill?

AAmendments debated included proposals on ethics rules for federal officials, national security restrictions on foreign-adversary jurisdictions, consumer protection measures, limits on access to emergency federal lending, and clarifications of the CFTC's authority.

QWhat is the next step for the legislation after the committee's approval?

AFollowing committee approval, the bill can now be scheduled for debate in the full Senate, where lawmakers may propose additional amendments or seek to reconcile differences with parallel efforts in the House of Representatives.

Пов'язані матеріали

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手7 год тому

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手7 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit10 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit10 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手11 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手11 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit12 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit12 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片