US crypto market structure bill advances as Senate Agriculture Committee approves legislation

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-29Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-29

Анотація

The US Senate Agriculture Committee has approved the Digital Commodities Intermediary Act, advancing the crypto market structure bill after weeks of debate and amendment discussions. The approval, confirmed by Senator Cynthia Lummis, marks a key procedural step, allowing the legislation to move toward full Senate consideration. The committee reviewed amendments covering ethics rules, national security restrictions, consumer protections, and CFTC authority. While Senate passage is not guaranteed, the vote represents significant progress in establishing a regulatory framework for digital commodity intermediaries, particularly in spot market oversight. Further negotiations on jurisdiction and enforcement are expected as the bill proceeds.

The US Senate Agriculture Committee has approved its digital asset market structure legislation, advancing the bill out of committee after weeks of debate over its scope, amendments, and regulatory implications.

US Senator Cynthia Lummis confirmed the development in a post on X, saying the committee’s vote brings the legislation “one step closer” to reaching the president’s desk.

The approval follows a markup session held on Thursday, 29 January, where lawmakers reviewed and voted on a wide-ranging set of amendments to the bill, formally titled the Digital Commodities Intermediary Act.

Committee vote clears procedural hurdle

Clearing the Senate Agriculture Committee marks a significant procedural milestone, allowing the legislation to move toward consideration by the full Senate.

The committee oversees commodities markets and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission [CFTC], placing it at the centre of ongoing debates over how digital assets should be regulated at the federal level.

The bill is designed to establish a clearer framework for digital commodity intermediaries, with an emphasis on spot market oversight.

While committee approval does not guarantee passage in the Senate, it removes a key bottleneck that has stalled previous efforts to reform the crypto market structure in Congress.

Amendments reshaped the bill during markup

As outlined ahead of the vote, the markup process included first-degree amendments that expanded the bill beyond its original focus on market structure.

Proposals debated during the session addressed ethics rules for federal officials, national security restrictions on foreign-adversary jurisdictions, consumer protection measures, and limits on access to emergency federal lending.

Other amendments sought to clarify the CFTC’s authority over registered intermediaries.

The final version approved by the committee reflects the outcome of those amendment votes.

Next steps move to full Senate consideration

Following committee approval, the bill can now be scheduled for debate in the full Senate, where lawmakers may propose additional amendments or seek to reconcile differences with parallel efforts in the House.

Timing remains uncertain, and further negotiations are expected around agency jurisdiction and enforcement authority.

Still, Thursday’s vote places comprehensive US crypto market structure legislation closer to enactment than at any point in recent years.


Final Thoughts

  • Senate Agriculture Committee approval formally advances US crypto market structure legislation toward a full Senate vote.
  • The bill’s ultimate impact will depend on how its amended provisions fare in the next legislative stage.

Пов'язані питання

QWhich US Senate committee has approved the digital asset market structure legislation?

AThe US Senate Agriculture Committee has approved the digital asset market structure legislation.

QWhat is the formal title of the approved crypto market structure bill?

AThe formal title of the bill is the Digital Commodities Intermediary Act.

QWhat is the significance of the bill clearing the Senate Agriculture Committee?

AClearing the Senate Agriculture Committee is a significant procedural milestone that allows the legislation to move toward consideration by the full Senate.

QWhat types of amendments were debated during the markup session for this bill?

AAmendments debated included proposals on ethics rules for federal officials, national security restrictions on foreign-adversary jurisdictions, consumer protection measures, limits on access to emergency federal lending, and clarifications of the CFTC's authority.

QWhat is the next step for the legislation after the committee's approval?

AFollowing committee approval, the bill can now be scheduled for debate in the full Senate, where lawmakers may propose additional amendments or seek to reconcile differences with parallel efforts in the House of Representatives.

Пов'язані матеріали

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

A sophisticated crypto laundering operation was executed following the $292 million hack of Kelp DAO on April 18. The attack, attributed to the North Korean Lazarus group, began with anonymous infrastructure preparation using Tornado Cash to fund wallets untraceably. The hacker exploited a vulnerability in Kelp’s cross-chain bridge, stealing 116,500 rsETH. To avoid crashing the market, the attacker used Aave and Compound as laundering tools—depositing the stolen rsETH as collateral to borrow $190 million in clean, liquid ETH. This move triggered a bank run on Aave, causing an $8 billion drop in TVL. After consolidating funds, the attacker fragmented them across hundreds of wallets to evade detection. A major breakpoint was THORChain, where over $460 million in volume—30 times its usual activity—was processed in 24 hours, converting ETH into Bitcoin. This shift to Bitcoin’s UTXO model exponentially increased tracing complexity by shattering funds into countless untraceable fragments. The final destination was Tron-based USDT, the primary channel for illicit crypto flows. From there, funds were cashed out via OTC brokers in China and Southeast Asia, using unlicensed underground banks and UnionPay networks outside Western sanctions scope. Ultimately, the laundered money supports North Korea’s weapons programs, which rely heavily on crypto hacking for foreign currency. The incident underscores structural challenges in DeFi: its openness, composability, and lack of central control make such laundering not just possible, but inherently difficult to prevent.

marsbit1 год тому

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

marsbit1 год тому

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

In a span of four days, Amazon announced an additional $25 billion investment, and Google pledged up to $40 billion—both direct competitors pouring over $65 billion into the same AI startup, Anthropic. Rather than a typical venture capital move, this signals the latest escalation in the cloud wars. The core of the deal is not equity but compute pre-orders: Anthropic must spend the majority of these funds on AWS and Google Cloud services and chips, effectively locking in massive future compute consumption. This reflects a shift in cloud market dynamics—enterprises now choose cloud providers based on which hosts the best AI models, not just price or stability. With OpenAI deeply tied to Microsoft, Anthropic’s Claude has become the only viable strategic asset for Google and Amazon to remain competitive. Anthropic’s annualized revenue has surged to $30 billion, and it is expanding into verticals like biotech, positioning itself as a cross-industry AI infrastructure layer. However, this funding comes with constraints: Anthropic’s independence is challenged as it balances two rival investors, its safety-first narrative faces pressure from regulatory scrutiny, and its path to IPO introduces new financial pressures. Globally, this accelerates a "tri-polar" closed-loop structure in AI infrastructure, with Microsoft-OpenAI, Google-Anthropic, and Amazon-Anthropic forming exclusive model-cloud alliances. In contrast, China’s landscape differs—investments like Alibaba and Tencent backing open-source model firm DeepSeek reflect a more decoupled approach, though closed-source models from major cloud providers still dominate. The $65 billion bet is ultimately about securing a seat at the table in an AI-defined future—where missing the model layer means losing the cloud war.

marsbit7 год тому

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

marsbit7 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片