Upbit and Bithumb Report Revenue Decline for the First Six Months of 2026

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2026-08-18Востаннє оновлено о 2026-08-18

Анотація

Major South Korean crypto exchanges Upbit and Bithumb reported their financial results for the first half of 2026. Both saw revenue decline by approximately 50% year-over-year, to $288.9 million for Upbit's parent company Dunamu and $119.5 million for Bithumb, attributed to lower market activity and trading volumes impacting commission income. Despite the revenue drop, both exchanges remained operationally profitable. Dunamu posted an operating profit of $78.9 million (27% margin), while Bithumb's was $10.5 million (8.8% margin). Bithumb significantly cut costs, including sales incentives and advertising. A key divergence emerged in net profit. Dunamu achieved a net profit of $76.7 million. In contrast, Bithumb reported a net loss of $76.9 million, driven by $109.8 million in non-operating expenses, including losses from digital asset disposals, revaluation, and provisions for regulatory proceedings. Both exchanges show high dependence on trading commissions, which constituted about 97% of Dunamu's and nearly 100% of Bithumb's revenue. Client assets on both platforms fell by around 35%. This trend reflects the broader South Korean market, where Q2 2026 trading volume across five major licensed exchanges fell 49.5% year-over-year. Both companies also faced operational challenges, including an investigation into Bithumb's CEO and a hacking incident at Upbit in November 2025.

Major cryptocurrency exchanges in South Korea, Upbit and Bithumb, have reported their financial results for the first six months of 2026. Both companies recorded a revenue drop of about 50%, but their outcomes differed.

Both Dunamu, Upbit's parent company, and Bithumb published their reports on August 14, 2026. They cover the period from January 1 to June 30, 2026, inclusive.

The reports indicate that the first six months of this year were a period of business cooling for both companies. Dunamu's revenue decreased by 49.1% year-on-year to 408.1 billion won ($288.9 million), while Bithumb's revenue fell by 48.7% to 168.8 billion won ($119.5 million).

This is primarily linked to the overall market situation. A decline in investor activity and trading volumes directly impacted the commission income of both platforms.

However, Dunamu maintained an operating profit of 111.5 billion won ($78.9 million) and a net profit of 108.4 billion won ($76.7 million). The operating margin was about 27%, though it had exceeded 68% a year earlier.

Bithumb also remained profitable at the level of its core operations, earning 14.9 billion won ($10.5 million) in operating profit. However, its operating margin declined to approximately 8.8%. Furthermore, the company actively reduced costs.

Sales incentive expenses decreased by about 70%, advertising was also cut, and total operating expenses fell by 35.6%. In Q2, Bithumb's operating margin reached approximately 14%, slightly exceeding Dunamu's figure of 13.5%.

The main difference between the companies manifested below the operating profit level. Bithumb incurred a net loss of 108.7 billion won ($76.9 million). For comparison, in the first half of 2025, the company recorded a net profit of 55 billion won ($38.9 million).

Non-operating expenses amounting to 155.1 billion won ($109.8 million) played a significant role, including 73.4 billion won ($52 million) in losses from the disposal of digital assets and additional losses from their revaluation.

Separately, the company reflected expected expenses related to a regulatory investigation. As a result, the relatively small operating profit was insufficient to compensate for these items.

The financial statements also reveal a common structural problem for both exchanges—an extremely high dependence on trading commissions. For Dunamu, revenues from the trading platform amounted to about 395.5 billion won ($280 million), or approximately 97% of all revenue.

For Bithumb, commission revenue was about 168.7 billion won ($119.4 million), meaning it constituted practically the entire revenue stream. Client funds on both platforms decreased by about 35%.

It is also worth noting that this trend is observed across the South Korean cryptocurrency sector as a whole. According to Bitwatch, the total trading volume on the five fully licensed domestic exchanges—Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax—decreased by 49.5% in Q2 compared to the same period last year, amounting to $146.43 billion.

Besides the decline in financial indicators in the first half of the year, both companies faced other challenges. An investigation is underway in South Korea against Bithumb CEO Lee Jae-won, and Upbit faced another hack in November 2025.

Пов'язані питання

QAccording to the report, what was the primary reason for the revenue decline of both Upbit (Dunamu) and Bithumb in the first half of 2026?

AThe primary reason for the revenue decline was the general market situation. Reduced investor activity and trading volumes directly impacted the commission income of both platforms.

QWhat key financial difference emerged between Dunamu (Upbit) and Bithumb below the operating profit level?

AThe key difference was in net profit/loss. While Dunamu reported a net profit of 108.4 billion won, Bithumb incurred a net loss of 108.7 billion won, largely due to substantial non-operating expenses.

QWhat structural problem is highlighted in the reports of both Dunamu and Bithumb?

ABoth reports highlight an extremely high dependency on trading commissions. For Dunamu, platform trading revenue constituted about 97% of total revenue, while for Bithumb, commission revenue was virtually the entire volume of receipts.

QWhat specific challenges, unrelated to the financial results, did Bithumb and Upbit face according to the article?

ABithumb's CEO Lee Jae-won is under investigation in South Korea, and Upbit faced another hacking incident in November 2025.

QBased on the Bitwatch data mentioned, what was the trend in trading volume across South Korea's five fully licensed crypto exchanges in Q2 2026?

AThe total trading volume on South Korea's five fully licensed exchanges (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, Gopax) in Q2 2026 fell by 49.5% year-on-year to $146.43 billion.

Пов'язані матеріали

The 'Saving U.S. Treasuries' Baton Pass: Bessent Fumbled Last Week, This Week It's Wash's Turn

"Rescuing US Treasuries" Relay: After Bessent's Miss, All Eyes Are on Walsh Last week, US Treasury Secretary Bessent's announcement to at least double long-term Treasury buybacks failed to sustainably lower yields, which quickly rebounded. The market response saw a drop in the dollar alongside surges in gold and Bitcoin, interpreted as a "pressure release valve" for anxiety. The focus now shifts to Fed Chairman Walsh's upcoming Jackson Hole speech. Markets are highly sensitive to his message, seeking clarity on the Fed's policy response to stubborn inflation and worsening fiscal conditions. Analysts warn that a lack of new guidance could disappoint markets and worsen the sell-off in long-dated bonds. Analysts question the scale of Bessent's operations, noting they are too small relative to the overall debt market and do not constitute quantitative easing. A key issue is the Fed's massive holdings of long-term bonds, which distorts the market. With the Fed holding low-yielding short-term bonds that are losing money relative to its policy rate, discussion is growing around a potential Fed-led "Operation Twist." This would involve selling short-term bonds to buy long-term ones, aiming to lower long-end yields without expanding the balance sheet. The upcoming PCE inflation data will set the stage for Walsh's speech. However, the window for action is narrowing amid political pressures. A critical threshold is the 30-year yield at 5%; holding above it could increase stress on the dollar and leveraged sectors. Overall, the article suggests that without coordinated Fed action to anchor inflation expectations, Treasury interventions may ultimately fail, with investors increasingly looking to assets like gold as hedges.

marsbit16 хв тому

The 'Saving U.S. Treasuries' Baton Pass: Bessent Fumbled Last Week, This Week It's Wash's Turn

marsbit16 хв тому

Hyperliquid's Compliance Journey: From Permissionless to Permissioned via HIP-3

Hyperliquid’s Compliance Path: From Permissionless to Permissioned HIP-3 Hyperliquid currently blocks U.S. access because its permissionless, on-chain infrastructure conflicts with U.S. market structure laws, which restrict futures trading to registered exchanges, clearinghouses, and brokers. Through its Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC), the project is advocating for regulatory modernization, proposing that regulated entities be allowed to build products on HyperCore (its exchange and clearing layer) while fulfilling their compliance obligations. The platform’s modular stack separates roles like a traditional exchange (DCM), clearinghouse (DCO), and broker (FCM), but reconstructs them on-chain with code. This enables permissionless access, self-custody, and 24/7 global trading, but clashes with U.S. rules requiring KYC, specific margin models, and custodial arrangements. To resolve this, HPC is engaging with U.S. regulators (CFTC, SEC) to seek clarity that deploying on-chain software does not itself trigger licensing, and to establish exemptions allowing non-custodial wallets to route users to regulated derivatives. Recent political signals suggest openness to this approach. On the technical side, Hyperliquid Labs has introduced permissioned HIP-3 deployers on testnet. These allow regulated entities to launch markets, perform KYC, and whitelist compliant users. While these create separate order books, whitelisted market makers can bridge liquidity between them, ensuring deep, shared liquidity across the same L1. Features like payload-based “PA” permissions enable DEX-level account controls (e.g., reduce-only orders), mirroring traditional broker authorities. The strategy is not to open the native, permissionless front-end to U.S. users, but to position Hyperliquid as neutral infrastructure that U.S. regulated firms can use while meeting their legal duties. This paves a compliant path for U.S. investor access while preserving the protocol’s core, permissionless nature.

marsbit40 хв тому

Hyperliquid's Compliance Journey: From Permissionless to Permissioned via HIP-3

marsbit40 хв тому

Two Funding Rounds in Three Months: The Chinese Version of Palantir is on Fire

Investment Community AI has learned that Beijing Zhongshu Ruizhi Technology Co., Ltd., a domestic industrial-grade causal intelligence and high-reliability decision-making AI company, has recently completed a strategic financing round worth hundreds of millions of RMB. This round saw participation from China Internet Investment Fund, Suzhou Chuangtou National Social Security Fund, Financial Street Capital, ICBC Capital, Kunlun Capital, among others, with existing shareholders also increasing their investment. This follows a Series B funding round in the hundreds of millions completed just three months prior. The rapid succession of two major funding rounds signifies strong market recognition of the company's underlying original technology and scaled commercial implementation. Often referred to as the "Chinese version of Palantir," Zhongshu Ruizhi is entering a new phase of accelerated technological iteration, widespread scenario replication, and scaled performance release, mirroring the explosive growth of China's AI market. Founded in April 2020 by Dr. Han Han, a Tsinghua University Ph.D. and former core drafter of national AI policies, the company is mission-driven to "move AI from the digital world to the physical world." It focuses on the high-reliability, strong-decision industrial AI track and enterprise-grade AI Agent full-stack infrastructure. The team tackles the challenge of applying AI to China's vast and complex industrial and energy systems by developing a new intelligent operating system from scratch. Its core technological breakthrough lies in three proprietary底层 technologies: meta-causal cognitive theory, causal models, and a dynamic ontology engine. These address critical pain points of generative large models in industrial settings—such as AI hallucinations, insufficient reasoning, lack of temporal logic, unverifiable decisions, and multi-source rule conflicts—thereby providing trustworthy, explainable, and executable智能决策 capabilities. Commercially, Zhongshu Ruizhi has achieved scaled deployment, serving over 50 central state-owned enterprises and industrial groups in sectors like power, petroleum, and aerospace, with implementations in more than 800 highly complex production scenarios. The company reported doubled revenue in 2025, demonstrating strong self-sufficiency and a viable business model—a rarity among new-generation AI firms. The latest funds will be allocated towards advancing foundational theoretical research, replicating successful application models to expand market presence (including overseas), and attracting top-tier talent. Lead investor China Internet Investment Fund highlighted that in the current shift from general AI capability contests to deep industrial empowerment, industrial-grade causal intelligence is crucial for building China's modern digital foundation and fostering new quality productive forces. They expressed support for the company's efforts to define decision-making paradigms and trustworthy standards for industrial intelligence, aiming to secure a rule-making voice in the global physical AI arena.

marsbit51 хв тому

Two Funding Rounds in Three Months: The Chinese Version of Palantir is on Fire

marsbit51 хв тому

The Biggest Political Economy Question in the AI Era: As Robots Become More Capable, How Do Humans Share the Value?

In the AI era, the most pressing political economy question is: as machines become increasingly capable, how can humanity share in the value they create? An article originally critiquing China's tech focus has sparked a deeper debate on this global challenge. Historically, industrial progress improved efficiency but still relied on human labor for wealth creation and distribution. AI is fundamentally different—it is now replacing cognitive and knowledge work. As AI and robots take over more tasks, economic growth may continue while direct human participation in value creation shrinks, creating a core tension between productivity gains and widespread income generation. The issue is not unique to China. While leading tech companies amass enormous wealth, labor's share of income is declining globally. The core problem is a broken link: technological innovation and corporate profits are not translating into sufficient consumer income and demand. Three potential paths forward are outlined: a traditional capitalist model where profits primarily go to capital owners; a state-capitalist approach with public investment in AI; and more innovative models like digital sovereign wealth funds, universal shareholding, or AI-era basic income schemes to directly distribute AI-generated value. The future competitive advantage may lie not just in technological supremacy, but in which society can build a new, inclusive distribution system for the intelligent economy. The ultimate challenge is ensuring that as AI creates value, humans have a means to obtain income and share in the resulting widespread social benefits.

marsbit1 год тому

The Biggest Political Economy Question in the AI Era: As Robots Become More Capable, How Do Humans Share the Value?

marsbit1 год тому

Generating Profits for Seven Consecutive Quarters, Emerging Markets Carry Trade Outperforms Everything

For the seventh consecutive quarter, dollar-funded emerging market carry trades have delivered positive returns, marking the longest winning streak since 2008. According to Bloomberg's index, this strategy has gained approximately 22% since late 2024, outperforming U.S. Treasuries, emerging market sovereign, and corporate dollar debt. The core of the trade involves borrowing low-interest currencies like the U.S. dollar, euro, or yen to invest in high-yielding emerging market assets, such as Turkish lira bonds offering over 40% returns. Returns were amplified by favorable currency moves, with the dollar weakening against most emerging market currencies and other traditional funding currencies. For instance, the trade gained 48% on the Colombian peso in the past year. A key test came in August 2024 with a historic joint U.S.-Japan currency intervention, which caused only a modest 1% dip in the carry trade risk premium as investors shifted funding from the yen to the euro and Swiss franc. Looking ahead, the primary risk is the timing of Federal Reserve policy changes. While persistent inflation allows the Fed to hold rates, a rapid rise in long-term U.S. yields could threaten the trade. Another concern is crowding, as massive inflows increase vulnerability to a sudden reversal. High interest rates in regions like Latin America and Eastern Europe, supported by external factors like Middle East tensions and energy prices, continue to sustain the opportunity. Major investors remain engaged, favoring currencies like the Mexican peso, South African rand, and Turkish lira.

marsbit1 год тому

Generating Profits for Seven Consecutive Quarters, Emerging Markets Carry Trade Outperforms Everything

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片