Understanding $UORE in One Article: The V4 Hook Project That Packs Mining, Lottery, and NFTs into a Single Transaction

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-05-08Востаннє оновлено о 2026-05-08

Анотація

The article discusses the emergence of a new Ethereum project, $UORE, which leverages Uniswap V4's "Hook" mechanism to combine multiple DeFi and NFT functions into a single transaction. $UORE integrates on-chain mining, a lottery system, and generative pixel NFTs (called Orelings) directly into its Uniswap V4 liquidity pool. Each whole UORE token held automatically generates an Oreling NFT, with its rarity and a random "Hash" value determining its "Mining Power" for staking rewards. A daily token emission, subject to a 1% decay, is distributed to stakers. The project also includes a "Motherlode" lottery triggered by purchases and a deflationary mechanism with buy/sell taxes funding automatic buybacks and burns. The project is a fork of the earlier uPEG V4 Hook project, incorporating ideas from Solana's ORE. However, it faces challenges including high transaction gas fees (2-3x a normal swap due to multiple contract actions), significant complexity for users, and a potentially narrowing attention window as it is the fourth project in a trending but possibly cooling V4 Hook narrative. The founder's message, "Read the contracts and understand the mechanics before deploying capital," underscores its experimental and high-risk nature.

Curry, Shenchao TechFlow

Still FOMOing over Slonk, the hot Ethereum on-chain project from yesterday? Actually, a new narrative has arrived:

V4 Hook.

Over the past two weeks, Uniswap V4's Hook mechanism suddenly caught fire. SATO used Hooks to create an on-chain bonding curve, pushing its market cap to $40 million. uPEG rode the viral story of an unused Uniswap name draft to over $30 million in two weeks. Slonks crammed an AI model into a smart contract to mimic CryptoPunks, achieving 586 ETH in trading volume six days after launch.

Although these three projects have different playstyles, they all leverage Uniswap's V4 mechanism.

Now the fourth one is here.

The new project is called $UORE, launched just yesterday. In one sentence, what it does is: Packaging on-chain mining, token-buying lottery, pixel NFT auto-generation, and a deflationary burn mechanism all into a single Uniswap V4 trading pool.

Because when you buy tokens in this pool, the contract will execute the aforementioned six things in the background simultaneously, the gas fee for one transaction is two to three times that of a regular swap...

Currently, if you open CT, you'll see everyone complaining about this high gas.

Regarding the token, according to GMGN data at the time of writing, $UORE reached a market cap of $1.2 million within hours of launch, then quickly dropped to $440k. The pool liquidity is only $64k, but the 24-hour trading volume is $1.2 million, meaning the money in the pool has turned over nearly twenty times.

However, there are only 741 holders, with a total supply of less than ten thousand tokens.

Currently, the risk appears extremely high. After some preliminary research, I personally think it's the most complex mechanism-wise among the V4 Hook ecosystem projects (the recent wave of new on-chain plays tends to make their mechanisms hard to understand...).

It is simultaneously a token, an NFT collection, a staking mine, and a lottery system. Moreover, these four things aren't independent; they are welded together.

Four-in-One Mine

For most NFT projects, the token and the NFT are separate things, bought and sold separately.

UORE is different. Its NFT is called Oreling, a 32×32 pixel miner character, embedded directly within the token. For every whole integer UORE token you hold in your wallet, you automatically have one corresponding Oreling.

The contract mints it for you when you buy tokens, burns it when you sell, and the Oreling moves with the token when transferred. You cannot buy an Oreling separately, nor can you detach it from UORE.

The traits of each Oreling are determined by the hash of the next block at the moment of minting. This means you don't know what kind of character you'll get when buying, not even the validators can see the result beforehand.

The differences between these characters aren't just about looks.

Each Oreling has a Class (rarity) and a Hash (a random number from 1 to 100). Multiplying the two gives its Mining Power.

The most common Mortal makes up 60% with a 1x multiplier; the rarest God has only a 1% chance with a 5x multiplier. If you're lucky and mint a God with Hash 100, its power is 500, over ten times that of a common miner.

What's the use of mining power? Classic play: staking.

Stake your Oreling into the mine pool, and you start receiving a share of the daily UORE release proportional to your mining power. According to the project's whitepaper, 1000 UORE are released on the first day, then decaying by 1% daily, with a half-life of roughly 69 days. 80% of the release goes to stakers, 20% goes into the Motherlode prize pool.

This decay rate means 97% of the total emissions will be released within a year. The earlier you enter the mining game, the bigger your share of the pie.

There's a noteworthy design when claiming rewards: a 10% "refining tax" is deducted and redistributed to all stakers who haven't claimed yet. The whitepaper calls this the refined-ore boost.

In plain terms, those who claim later eat more of the taxes paid by others. People in a hurry to withdraw are subsidizing the patient ones.

Then there's the Motherlode, which translates to "lode prize".

Every time you buy UORE worth ≥ 0.1 ETH through the official channel, you automatically get a lottery ticket. The winning probability is linked to the purchase amount: 0.1 ETH gives about a 1/600 chance, 0.5 ETH about 1/200, and 1 ETH caps at 1/100. Buying over 1 ETH doesn't increase the probability further, preventing whales from farming chances.

If you win, the prize pool is split in half: 50% goes directly to the buyer, and 50% is randomly distributed to one staker (weighted by mining power). As of writing, there have only been 4 wins historically, with the largest prize being 6.4 UORE.

Finally, the deflationary flywheel.

Buying incurs a 1% tax directly burned, selling incurs a 1% tax sent to a buyback treasury. When the treasury accumulates 0.1 ETH, anyone can trigger an automatic buyback, and the bought-back UORE are all burned. As of writing, 58 buybacks have been executed, cumulatively burning 358 UORE.

Looking at the entire design, it's a minor innovation in token-NFT play, an old trick for creating scarcity, yet another Ponzi in economic model design.

The Project's Code is Forked, Its Playstyle is Frankensteined

UORE wasn't written from scratch.

People in the community looked at the source code and found a folder named `reference/unipeg-hook-source/`. The founder, Noah, didn't hide it either. He directly stated on Twitter that UORE's contracts are forked from uPEG, and that he fixed two known issues with uPEG: duplicate NFT generation and flash loan attacks for farming rarity.

A quick look at this founder's profile shows a bio: "Ethereum dev & BAYC holder". On May 2nd, he tweeted his first post about UORE, saying the project combines the mining concept from Solana's ORE with the V4 Hook architecture of uPEG.

He also proactively @ mentioned Unicurvefun and Openpeg, asking if they could support Orelings trading once their markets go live.

From this public information, UORE's lineage is clear:

Solana ORE provided the "on-chain mining + lottery" gameplay template, uPEG provided the V4 Hook code skeleton, and Noah made improvements and assembled on top of these two.

Forking itself isn't the issue. I think the current problems are:

  1. Gas. There are reports on CT that each UORE transaction requires the Hook to execute six steps, consuming two to three times the gas of a normal swap. Swapping back and forth might leave little to no profit.
  2. Time window. The V4 Hook narrative was affected by uPEG's price drop, and subsequent projects will likely have lower ceilings. UORE is the fourth project in this wave of Hook hype, with the heat from the first three already cooling. The attention window for this sector waits for no one.
  3. Complexity. UORE is probably the most mechanically dense among these four projects. For an average user to understand the whole set of rules—Oreling rarity, mining power calculation, staking decay, refining tax, Motherlode probability, buyback trigger conditions—the barrier is high, and the official website is cryptic.

And the project's whitepaper is also interesting:
Read the contracts and understand the mechanics before deploying capital.

Translated into Chinese, this roughly means "Understand it first, don't blame me if you don't."

Combining insights from previous Hook projects, we can see this wave of on-chain trends features complex mechanism designs + massive information asymmetry. They have alpha potential, but the shelf life of that alpha is getting shorter.

SATO gave you a week, uPEG gave you a few days, and by the time it's UORE's turn, the time you have to understand the rules might be down to just a few hours...

By the time you understand it, the market move might be over.

Трендові криптовалюти

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the core innovation or 'hook' of the $UORE project on Uniswap V4?

AThe $UORE project packages multiple mechanics into a single Uniswap V4 pool transaction. With one buy or sell, the contract simultaneously handles token swapping, NFT (Oreling) minting/burning, staking power calculation, participation in the Motherlode lottery, token buyback for burning, and applying transaction taxes.

QHow does the $UORE project integrate an NFT (Oreling) with its token?

AThe Oreling NFT is directly embedded into the $UORE token. Each whole number of $UORE tokens held in a wallet automatically corresponds to one Oreling. The NFT is minted when tokens are bought and burned when tokens are sold, and it cannot be traded separately from the token.

QWhat is the 'Motherlode' mechanism in $UORE and how does it work?

AThe Motherlode is a lottery prize pool. Buying $UORE through the official pool with ≥ 0.1 ETH automatically grants a lottery ticket. The winning probability scales with purchase amount up to a 1% max chance for 1 ETH purchases. If a buyer wins, 50% of the prize pool goes to them, and the other 50% is randomly distributed to a staker, weighted by their mining power.

QWhat are the main criticisms or potential risks mentioned about the $UORE project?

AThe article highlights several risks: very high gas fees (2-3x a normal swap), a short attention window as it's the fourth V4 Hook project in a fading trend, and high complexity which creates a barrier for understanding. Additionally, its liquidity is low, token distribution is concentrated, and the economic model is described as a Ponzi.

QAccording to the article, what existing projects did $UORE fork or draw inspiration from?

A$UORE's smart contracts are forked from the uPEG project, fixing known issues. Its core 'on-chain mining + lottery' gameplay concept is inspired by the ORE project on Solana. The founder combined these two templates to create $UORE on the Uniswap V4 Hook framework.

Пов'язані матеріали

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit1 хв тому

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit1 хв тому

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit17 хв тому

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit17 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот

Популярні статті

Як купити ONE

Ласкаво просимо до HTX.com! Ми зробили покупку Harmony (ONE) простою та зручною. Дотримуйтесь нашої покрокової інструкції, щоб розпочати свою криптовалютну подорож.Крок 1: Створіть обліковий запис на HTXВикористовуйте свою електронну пошту або номер телефону, щоб зареєструвати обліковий запис на HTX безплатно. Пройдіть безпроблемну реєстрацію й отримайте доступ до всіх функцій.ЗареєструватисьКрок 2: Перейдіть до розділу Купити крипту і виберіть спосіб оплатиКредитна/дебетова картка: використовуйте вашу картку Visa або Mastercard, щоб миттєво купити Harmony (ONE).Баланс: використовуйте кошти з балансу вашого рахунку HTX для безперешкодної торгівлі.Треті особи: ми додали популярні способи оплати, такі як Google Pay та Apple Pay, щоб підвищити зручність.P2P: Торгуйте безпосередньо з іншими користувачами на HTX.Позабіржова торгівля (OTC): ми пропонуємо індивідуальні послуги та конкурентні обмінні курси для трейдерів.Крок 3: Зберігайте свої Harmony (ONE)Після придбання Harmony (ONE) збережіть його у своєму обліковому записі на HTX. Крім того, ви можете відправити його в інше місце за допомогою блокчейн-переказу або використовувати його для торгівлі іншими криптовалютами.Крок 4: Торгівля Harmony (ONE)Легко торгуйте Harmony (ONE) на спотовому ринку HTX. Просто увійдіть до свого облікового запису, виберіть торгову пару, укладайте угоди та спостерігайте за ними в режимі реального часу. Ми пропонуємо зручний досвід як для початківців, так і для досвідчених трейдерів.

428 переглядів усьогоОпубліковано 2024.12.12Оновлено 2026.06.02

Як купити ONE

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни ONE (ONE).

活动图片