UK tests stablecoins in regulatory sandbox while proposing limits on user holdings

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-02-25Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-25

Анотація

UK regulators are advancing a dual approach to stablecoin regulation, combining live testing within the Financial Conduct Authority’s sandbox with proposed limits on user holdings. The sandbox includes firms like Revolut and Monee Financial Technologies, trialing applications in payments, settlement, and crypto trading under strict supervision. Concurrently, the Bank of England has proposed temporary caps—£20,000 per stablecoin for individuals and £10 million for businesses—to mitigate systemic risks such as bank deposit flight. This cautious "test and contain" strategy aims to foster innovation in pound-denominated stablecoins while preventing rapid scaling until the market matures. The UK’s approach reflects the minor global role of non-dollar stablecoins and focuses on ensuring safe integration into the existing financial system.

UK regulators have begun live testing of stablecoin use cases under a controlled sandbox programme. This comes even as policymakers move to impose limits on the amount of stablecoin users can hold domestically.

The parallel initiatives underscore a cautious regulatory approach: encouraging experimentation with pound-denominated stablecoins while putting guardrails in place to prevent them from becoming systemically significant too quickly.

FCA sandbox moves stablecoin testing into live trials

The testing is taking place under a sandbox run by the Financial Conduct Authority, which allows firms to trial new financial products under regulatory supervision.

The sandbox includes a small group of participants assessing potential applications such as payments, wholesale settlement, and crypto trading. Revolut, Monee Financial Technologies, ReStabilise, and VVTX would be part of the testing.

Work is expected to begin this quarter, with testing conducted in tightly controlled conditions rather than through public rollouts.

Notably, the trials do not include major high-street banks, reflecting the continued caution among large UK lenders toward issuing or distributing stablecoins.

Proposed holding caps signal prudence

Running alongside the sandbox is a separate proposal from the Bank of England to cap the amount of stablecoins that UK users can hold, at least during the early phase of adoption.

Under the proposal, individuals would face limits on holdings of a given systemic stablecoin. At the same time, businesses would be subject to higher thresholds.

Individuals will be allowed up to about £20,000 per coin, while companies will be allowed up to about £10 million per coin.

The measures are intended as temporary safeguards to mitigate risks such as deposit flight from traditional banks and rapid outflows during periods of stress.

The caps would apply only to stablecoins deemed systemic and are designed to be revisited as the market matures.

UK takes a “test and contain” approach

Taken together, the sandbox and holding-limit proposals reflect a regulatory strategy that prioritises learning and containment over rapid scale.

While regulators acknowledge that stablecoins could improve efficiency in areas like payments and settlement, they remain wary of their potential to blur the line between bank deposits and crypto-based instruments.

The Bank of England has previously encouraged banks to focus on tokenised deposits rather than issuing stablecoins directly.

Pound stablecoins remain marginal globally

The UK’s measured stance also reflects the limited global footprint of non-dollar stablecoins.

Industry data shows that pound- and euro-denominated stablecoins account for a fraction of global circulation, with dollar-pegged tokens continuing to dominate volumes.

Against that backdrop, the sandbox is less about accelerating mass adoption and more about determining whether sterling stablecoins can operate safely within the existing financial system.


Final Summary

  • The UK is allowing stablecoin testing to proceed, but only within tightly controlled regulatory boundaries.
  • Proposed holding limits suggest policymakers want to manage systemic risk before stablecoins reach meaningful scale.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the purpose of the UK's regulatory sandbox for stablecoins?

AThe purpose is to allow firms to trial new financial products, including stablecoin use cases for payments, wholesale settlement, and crypto trading, under the supervision of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in a controlled environment.

QWhich companies are mentioned as participants in the FCA's stablecoin sandbox testing?

AThe participants mentioned are Revolut, Monee Financial Technologies, ReStabilise, and VVTX.

QWhat are the proposed holding limits for stablecoins in the UK according to the Bank of England?

AIndividuals would be allowed to hold up to about £20,000 per systemic stablecoin, while companies would be allowed up to about £10 million per coin.

QWhy are UK regulators proposing limits on stablecoin holdings?

AThe limits are proposed as temporary safeguards to mitigate risks such as deposit flight from traditional banks and rapid outflows during periods of stress, managing systemic risk before stablecoins reach a significant scale.

QWhat does the UK's regulatory approach to stablecoins prioritize, according to the article?

AThe regulatory strategy prioritizes learning and containment over rapid scale, encouraging experimentation with pound-denominated stablecoins while implementing guardrails to prevent them from becoming systemically significant too quickly.

Пов'язані матеріали

Should You Buy SpaceX Stock at $1.7 Trillion? Here's What the Market Is Worried About

SpaceX is preparing for a massive IPO aiming to raise around $75 billion at a valuation of approximately $1.75 trillion. While its achievements in reusable rockets and the profitable Starlink satellite internet service are clear, the market is concerned about the aggressive valuation. Key issues include: the current $1.75 trillion valuation, which is about 94 times 2025 revenue, seems to price in not just existing businesses but also unproven future ventures like AI infrastructure and orbital data centers. Financially, while Starlink is profitable, the AI division, bolstered by the acquisition of xAI, is incurring massive losses and consuming the majority of capital expenditures. This acquisition also introduced complex related-party financing arrangements and debt onto SpaceX's balance sheet. Furthermore, corporate governance poses a challenge. SpaceX's dual-class share structure ensures founder Elon Musk retains absolute control, limiting ordinary shareholders' influence over high-risk, long-term strategic decisions. The future success of ambitious projects like the Starship rocket—critical for lowering costs and enabling new services—remains a significant variable for the valuation. In summary, the market's apprehension (FUD) centers not on doubting SpaceX's past technological triumphs but on questioning how much premium public investors should pay for a future that combines proven profits with highly speculative and capital-intensive new ventures, all under a governance structure that offers limited shareholder oversight.

marsbit1 хв тому

Should You Buy SpaceX Stock at $1.7 Trillion? Here's What the Market Is Worried About

marsbit1 хв тому

Breaking the DeFi Cascading Liquidation Curse: Vitalik Proposes a New Solution

Vitalik Buterin has proposed a new DeFi design to eliminate the automatic liquidation mechanism that causes market instability during sharp downturns. The current system, used by protocols like Aave, triggers forced sales when collateral value falls below a threshold, often exacerbating price drops and creating systemic selling pressure. Buterin's alternative model is based on splitting an asset like ETH into two synthetic option-like tokens, P and N, pegged to a price index. Their combined value always equals one ETH. Instead of sudden liquidation, a position's value gradually drifts from its target peg if the market moves. Users must proactively rebalance their holdings to maintain their desired exposure, transferring the management burden from the protocol to the user or automated tools. A key advantage is the reduced reliance on real-time oracles. Pricing decisions are deferred until contract expiry, allowing for more robust, fault-tolerant oracle designs. This removes a clear liquidation threshold that speculators can target for manipulation or MEV extraction. However, significant challenges remain. Frequent rebalancing could incur high slippage and transaction costs, necessitating new liquidity provider models. The design is better suited for hedging instruments than for stablecoins requiring a rigid 1:1 peg. While not an immediate replacement for existing systems, the proposal challenges the foundational assumption that instantaneous forced liquidation is an unavoidable necessity in DeFi, opening the door for fundamentally different risk management architectures.

marsbit6 хв тому

Breaking the DeFi Cascading Liquidation Curse: Vitalik Proposes a New Solution

marsbit6 хв тому

The End of Single-Factor Cryptography

The article "The End of Single-Factor Crypto" posits a fundamental shift in the cryptocurrency ecosystem. It argues the era where crypto asset valuations were predominantly driven by, and correlated with, Bitcoin's price is ending. The space is bifurcating into two distinct economies: endogenous and exogenous. The endogenous economy represents traditional crypto, where token and project values are directly tied to crypto market prices. The emerging exogenous economy comprises projects and businesses that may utilize blockchain technology or tokens but derive their fundamental value from external, non-crypto factors like consumer demand, subscription revenue, or real-world utility. Examples include AI inference platforms like Venice, fintech lenders using blockchain for efficiency, and stablecoin/payment infrastructure companies acquired by giants like Mastercard and Stripe. This shift means investment analysis must change. For exogenous assets, evaluating traditional business fundamentals—such as revenue streams, unit economics, and competitive moats—becomes more critical than tracking Bitcoin charts. While endogenous assets like Bitcoin remain relevant, the growth of the exogenous category is driven by measurable demand independent of crypto price cycles, paving the way for a new, more diversified market phase. Consequently, crypto is evolving from a single-factor, reflexive asset class into a multifaceted ecosystem with varied drivers and investment theses.

marsbit6 хв тому

The End of Single-Factor Cryptography

marsbit6 хв тому

Morning Post | Bitmine Plans to Raise $300 Million Through Preferred Stock Issuance; Polymarket Accuses Kalshi of Commercial Espionage

ChainCatcher's Daily Crypto Brief: Key developments from the past 24 hours include significant funding moves, regulatory actions, and market predictions. Bitmine announced a $300 million preferred stock fundraising. Polymarket accused rival prediction platform Kalshi of corporate espionage, citing numerous suspicious coincidences in product launches, a claim Kalshi strongly denied. The U.S. Department of Justice, in a joint "Disruption Week" anti-fraud operation with companies like Coinbase and Meta, froze over $3.8 million in cryptocurrency linked to scams. In infrastructure news, Macau completed its integration with the multi-central bank digital currency bridge, mBridge, aiming to build efficient cross-border payment channels. Cosmos Labs acquired the block explorer Mintscan. Market-wise, Geoffrey Kendrick, Standard Chartered's Head of Digital Assets Research, stated Bitcoin is nearing a bottom around $63,000, maintaining a year-end target of $100,000. He noted stability in U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF holdings. Ahead of SpaceX's anticipated IPO, internal insiders at Rocket Lab (RKLB) sold over $18.41 million in stock. In tokenization, Goldman Sachs partnered with Apex and Archax to launch a tokenized real estate fund. The meme token tracker GMGN reported the top trending tokens: on Ethereum, HEX, SHIB, LINK, PEPE, mUSD; on Solana, TROLL, swarms, WORLDCUP, neet, Buttcoin; and on Base, PEPE, toby, ODDS, ELSA, SKI.

链捕手20 хв тому

Morning Post | Bitmine Plans to Raise $300 Million Through Preferred Stock Issuance; Polymarket Accuses Kalshi of Commercial Espionage

链捕手20 хв тому

55TB to 28TB? The Rumor and Panic Behind Rubin's Memory Being Halved

Title: 55TB to 28TB? The Rumor and Panic Behind the Potential Halving of Rubin's Memory. On June 4th, a report from SemiAnalysis suggested NVIDIA's next-gen Vera Rubin NVL72 AI rack may ship with roughly 28TB of SOCAMM DRAM per rack instead of the anticipated 55TB, primarily using 96GB modules. This sparked a market panic, causing Micron's stock to drop over 10% on fears of halved memory demand. However, the article argues this panic is misguided for several key reasons. First, SOCAMM modules are socketed and upgradeable, not soldered. Lower initial configuration doesn't mean permanent demand loss. Second, the primary driver is a severe 2026 LPDDR5X supply shortage, not diminished need. NVIDIA is likely prioritizing rack shipments with available components. Third, with fixed total LPDDR5X supply, using less per rack could allow NVIDIA to ship *more* racks, not necessarily reducing overall memory orders. Micron's sharp drop was also attributed to a broader semiconductor sell-off triggered by Broadcom's earnings, with the SemiAnalysis report providing a convenient narrative for profit-taking after Micron's massive rally. In summary: the report on lower default configurations is likely accurate, but interpreting it as a demand collapse is wrong. The real risk for Micron lies in its reportedly minimal HBM4 share for Rubin, not in potentially flexible SOCAMM demand. The sell-off appears more like a correction amplified by coinciding negative catalysts.

marsbit37 хв тому

55TB to 28TB? The Rumor and Panic Behind Rubin's Memory Being Halved

marsbit37 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片