Two Senators Propose Exempting Trump from Crypto Business Taxes

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2026-08-07Востаннє оновлено о 2026-08-07

Анотація

Two U.S. Senators, Republican Thom Tillis and Democrat Ruben Gallego, have proposed an amendment that could exempt former President Donald Trump from taxes on his crypto business income for many years, potentially saving him millions. The amendment would allow Trump to avoid capital gains tax if he reinvests proceeds from asset sales and holds them until death. Trump reported $1.4 billion in income from cryptocurrency and meme coin projects for 2025. Without the deferral, he would face an immediate 20% tax on gains. As president, he is not required to divest income-generating assets. Uncertainty over an "ethical aspect," demanded by Democratic congressmen, has delayed Senate consideration of the CLARITY bill before the recess. Senate Republican leader John Thune did not file a cloture motion by August 7 to advance the vote, citing protracted negotiations with the administration. The Senate is on recess until September 14, with few sessions scheduled before the midterm elections on November 3. Reports conflict on whether Trump agreed to the ethical provisions in late July meetings with senators. Meanwhile, in early August, Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer introduced a bill to create an independent anti-corruption bureau with the power to hold the U.S. president and officials accountable for illicit funds, including from cryptocurrencies.

The initiative was put forward by Republican Senator Thom Tillis and Democrat Ruben Gallego. The new amendment would allow Trump to be exempt from taxes for many years, and in some cases avoid them altogether, saving the president millions of dollars. If, after selling his assets, Trump reinvests the proceeds into new investments and holds them until the end of his life, he will not have to pay capital gains tax, according to the authors of the amendment.

For 2025, Trump reported an income of $1.4 billion from projects related to cryptocurrencies and memecoins. Without the deferral, Trump would have to immediately pay a tax of 20% on the difference between the purchase and sale price of the assets. While serving as president, Trump is not required to divest from income-generating assets.

Uncertainty regarding the "ethical aspect," insisted upon by Democratic congressmen, has become one of the main reasons preventing the Senate from considering CLARITY before the recess. Senate Republican Leader John Thune did not file a motion for cloture until August 7th—a document necessary to begin voting. The senator explained this as due to prolonged negotiations with the presidential administration, during which they literally "went through every line" of the document.

According to the Senate's 2026 calendar, the recess will last until September 14th. Additionally, there will be a long period in October with practically no sessions—until the midterm elections on November 3rd.

At the end of July, Trump met with senators and, according to some sources, agreed, while according to others, did not agree to the "ethical aspect."

In early August, U.S. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer introduced a bill to create an independent anti-corruption bureau that could hold the U.S. president and high-ranking officials accountable for illegally obtained funds, including from cryptocurrencies.

end-content

Пов'язані питання

QWho proposed the amendment to exempt Trump from crypto-related taxes, and what are their political affiliations?

AThe amendment was proposed by Republican Senator Thom Tillis and Democratic Senator Ruben Gallego.

QAccording to the article, how could Trump potentially avoid paying capital gains taxes on his crypto assets under the proposed amendment?

AIf Trump reinvests the proceeds from selling his assets into new investments and holds them until his death, he would not have to pay capital gains tax.

QWhat is one of the main reasons cited for the Senate's delay in considering the CLARITY bill before the recess?

AOne of the main reasons is uncertainty surrounding the 'ethical aspect' insisted upon by Democratic congressmen.

QWhat did Democratic Senate Leader Chuck Schumer introduce in early August, as mentioned in the article?

AIn early August, Chuck Schumer introduced a bill to create an independent anti-corruption bureau that could hold the U.S. President and high-ranking officials accountable for illegally obtained funds, including from cryptocurrencies.

QWhat was Trump's reported income from cryptocurrency and memecoin projects for 2025?

ATrump reported an income of $1.4 billion from projects related to cryptocurrencies and memecoins for 2025.

Пов'язані матеріали

Wall Street Begins to Question Tech Giants' AI Narrative

Wall Street Questions the AI Narrative of Tech Giants Wall Street is shifting its focus from the hype surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) to a rigorous financial reality check. Following strong earnings reports from companies like Google and a massive $500 billion financing initiative from Nvidia for AI infrastructure, the market reaction has been mixed and skeptical. The core concern revolves around the massive capital expenditure (CapEx) required for AI development—building data centers and acquiring chips—and whether future cash flows can justify these upfront costs. Investors are now scrutinizing free cash flow (FCF), which measures the cash left after operational expenses and capital investments. A negative FCF, as seen recently with Alphabet (Google's parent company), signals heavy immediate spending, even if profits are growing. The divergent stock reactions highlight this new scrutiny. Microsoft's stock surged after its earnings, supported by strong operating cash flow, growing cloud revenue (Azure), and a large backlog of committed business. In contrast, Alphabet's stock fell despite profit growth because its capital spending caused FCF to turn negative for the first time. Similarly, Nvidia's announcement of a $500 billion financing platform, while potentially expanding its market, raised questions about whether AI build-out has become too expensive for tech companies to fund internally. Analysts are moving beyond simply asking if there is AI demand—which cloud revenue growth confirms—to deeper questions: the speed at which AI investments translate into revenue, profit, and ultimately, cash returns. The market is evaluating the "return on invested capital" (ROIC) over the long term, considering factors like rapid chip obsolescence, energy costs, and future competition. In summary, Wall Street's AI narrative is evolving from grand vision to a detailed financial and operational examination. The key question is no longer if AI is transformative, but whether companies can generate cash returns fast enough to outpace the immense costs of building it. Free cash flow has become a critical first filter in this reassessment.

marsbit42 хв тому

Wall Street Begins to Question Tech Giants' AI Narrative

marsbit42 хв тому

An Unexpected Player Enters the Lithography Machine Arena

In the spring of 2026, Elon Musk unveiled the TeraFab chip manufacturing plan, aiming to meet the immense computing power needs of SpaceX and Tesla. He subsequently signaled a move into the photolithography machine market, with speculation centering on a Free Electron Laser (FEL) approach to challenge the dominance of traditional EUV technology. Currently, ASML, utilizing Laser-Produced Plasma (LPP) EUV光源, holds a near-monopoly. However, LPP faces bottlenecks in energy conversion efficiency, tin debris contamination, and a power ceiling. In contrast, FEL technology, pursued by companies like xLight (where former Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger serves as executive chairman), offers a different path. It generates EUV light by accelerating electrons, potentially providing higher power without plasma conversion and its associated contamination, targeting the sub-13.5nm "beyond-EUV" wavelength range. The photolithography landscape shows three main trajectories: ASML's incremental evolution (like High-NA EUV),光源革新 like FEL targeting ASML's core component, and non-EUV alternatives like Nanoimprint Lithography (NIL) or Electron Beam Lithography (EBL). While ASML remains the dominant player with strong financials and产能 expansion plans, new entrants are challenging the status quo. xLight claims its FEL could boost productivity by 50-100%. Other paths include Substrate's particle-accelerator-based X-ray lithography and Chinese research into LPP alternatives. Musk's TeraFab is a high-stakes bet that FEL can move from lab to fab, that "plug-and-play"光源 replacement can circumvent ASML's ecosystem, and that massive future compute demand justifies a new supply chain. His public endorsement of FEL signifies that the photolithography business is no longer ASML's game alone.

marsbit42 хв тому

An Unexpected Player Enters the Lithography Machine Arena

marsbit42 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片