TVL, Trading Volume, Open Interest: How to Use DeFi Data to Find the Next Breakout Project?

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-01-08Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-08

Анотація

Analyzing DeFi projects requires moving beyond hype and narratives to focus on on-chain fundamentals—a revolutionary advantage over traditional finance due to its real-time, transparent data. Key metrics include: - **TVL (Total Value Locked)**: Reflects assets deposited in a protocol, similar to AUM in TradFi, but should be combined with USD net inflows to distinguish actual deposits from price changes. - **Fees, Revenue, and Holder Revenue**: Fees are total user payments (gross revenue), revenue is the protocol’s share (gross income), and holder revenue is what token holders earn via dividends or buybacks. - **Volume**: Tracks trading activity on DEXs and perpetual exchanges, with market share trends often more meaningful than absolute numbers. - **Open Interest**: Measures active derivative positions, indicating liquidity and platform resilience during volatility. - **Stablecoin Market Cap**: Represents real USD capital flowing into a blockchain, a key indicator of ecosystem growth. - **App Revenue & Fees**: The "GDP" of a chain, showing economic activity excluding stablecoins and gas fees. Effective analysis prioritizes sustained growth over time, combines stock metrics (e.g., TVL) with flow metrics (e.g., fees), and accounts for token unlocks and incentives that may cause sell pressure. Platforms like DefiLlama provide real-time data to identify trends early, as seen with Polymarket and Hyperliquid’s growth before they peaked. Mastering these metrics helps cut through n...

Author:Patrick Scott | Dynamo DeFi

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

In the past, the analysis of crypto assets mostly revolved around charts, hype cycles, and narratives. However, as the industry gradually matures, actual performance is more important than empty promises. You need a filter to help you distill truly valuable signals from the vast amount of information.

Fortunately, this filter already exists, and it's called Onchain Fundamentals.

Onchain fundamentals provide DeFi (Decentralized Finance) with a structural advantage over traditional finance (TradFi). This is not only one of the many reasons why "DeFi will win," but also a core concept that everyone who wants to invest in this industry must understand.

Over the past four years, I have been deeply immersed in the study of DeFi metrics, initially as a researcher and later working with the DefiLlama team. This article summarizes some of the most useful analytical frameworks I've learned during this time, hoping to help you start using these tools.

Source: https://defillama.com/?stablecoinsMcap=true&dexsVolume=true

Why are DeFi Metrics Important?

On-chain data is not just a breakthrough in evaluating crypto assets; it's a revolution in the entire field of financial data.

Think about how traditional investors evaluate companies: they have to wait for quarterly financial reports. And now, some are even proposing to change the frequency of financial reports from quarterly to semi-annually.

In contrast, the financial data of DeFi protocols is available in real-time. Websites like DefiLlama update relevant data daily or even hourly. If you want to track revenue by the minute, you can even query the blockchain data directly (although overly granular data might not be very meaningful, you do have that option).

This is undoubtedly a revolutionary breakthrough in transparency. When you buy stock in a listed company, you rely on financial data released by management after being audited by accountants, often with delays of weeks or even months. When you evaluate a DeFi protocol, you directly read the transaction records happening in real-time on an immutable ledger.

Of course, not every crypto project has fundamental data worth tracking. For example, for many "Memecoins" or "vaporware" projects with just a whitepaper and a Telegram group, fundamental analysis isn't very helpful (although other metrics like the number of holders might provide some reference).

But for those protocols that can generate fees, accumulate deposits, and distribute value to token holders, their operations leave a data trail that can be tracked and analyzed, often before market narratives form.

For instance, Polymarket's liquidity has been growing for years, a trend that started long before prediction markets became a hot topic.

Source: https://defillama.com/protocol/polymarket

The explosive price growth of the HYPE token last summer stemmed from its consistently high revenue performance.

Source: https://defillama.com/protocol/hyperliquid?tvl=false&revenue=true&fees=false&groupBy=monthly

These metrics had long hinted at the future direction; you just needed to know where to look.

Core Metrics Explained

Let's start with the core metrics you need to understand for DeFi investing.

TVL (Total Value Locked)

TVL measures the total value of assets deposited into a protocol's smart contracts.

  • For lending platforms, TVL includes collateral and supplied assets.
  • For decentralized exchanges (DEXs), TVL refers to deposits in liquidity pools.
  • For blockchain networks, TVL is the total value locked across all protocols deployed on that network.

Source: https://defillama.com/

In traditional finance (TradFi), TVL is similar to Assets Under Management (AUM). Hedge funds report AUM to show the total amount of money clients have entrusted to them. TVL serves a similar purpose, reflecting the total amount of funds users have deposited into the protocol, indicating the level of trust users have in its smart contracts.

However, TVL has faced considerable criticism over the years, some of it justified.

  • TVL does not measure activity. A protocol might have billions of dollars in TVL but generate almost no fees.
  • TVL is highly correlated with token price. If the price of ETH drops 30%, the TVL of all protocols holding ETH will drop proportionally, even if no actual withdrawals occur.

Since most DeFi deposits are in volatile tokens, TVL is susceptible to price fluctuations. Therefore, savvy observers combine USD Net Inflows with TVL to distinguish between price changes and actual deposit activity. USD Net Inflows are calculated by taking the change in the balance of each asset between two consecutive days (multiplied by the price) and summing them up. For example, a protocol 100% locked in ETH would see its TVL drop 20% if ETH price drops 20%, but its USD Net Inflows would be $0.

Nevertheless, when TVL is presented in both USD and token terms, and combined with activity or productivity metrics, it still holds value. TVL remains an important tool for measuring protocol trust and the scale of the entire DeFi ecosystem. Just don't mistake it for a complete evaluation standard.

Fees, Revenue, and Holders' Revenue

In DeFi, the definitions of these terms differ from traditional accounting and can be confusing.

  • Fees: From the user's perspective, fees are the cost you pay to use the protocol. For example, when you trade on a DEX, you pay a trading fee. This fee might go entirely to liquidity providers or partially to the protocol. Fees represent the total amount paid by users, regardless of where it ultimately goes. In traditional finance, this is equivalent to Gross Revenue.
  • Revenue: Revenue refers to the protocol's share of the earnings. That is, out of all the fees users pay, how much does the protocol actually keep? This revenue might go to the protocol's treasury, team, or token holders. Revenue excludes fees distributed to liquidity providers. Think of it as the protocol's Gross Income.
  • Holders' Revenue: This is a narrower definition, tracking only the portion of revenue distributed to token holders through buybacks, fee burns, or direct staking rewards. In traditional finance, this is similar to a combination of dividends and stock buybacks.

These distinctions are crucial for valuation. Some protocols may generate substantial fees but end up with little revenue because almost all fees are distributed to liquidity providers.

DefiLlama has now released full income statements for many protocols. These statements are automatically updated based on on-chain data, breaking down revenue into different items and redefining these metrics in standard accounting language.

Source: https://defillama.com/protocol/aave

These income statements also come with fund flow visualizations, showing how money flows from users into the protocol and is then distributed to various stakeholders. This information is worth exploring if you want to delve deeper into a specific project's economic model.

Source: https://defillama.com/protocol/aave

Volume

Volume is used to track the scale of trading activity.

  • DEX Volume: Counts all token swaps on decentralized exchanges (DEXs).
  • Perpetuals Volume (Perp Volume): Counts the total trading volume on all perpetual futures trading platforms.

Source: https://defillama.com/pro/97i44ip1zko4f8h

Volume is a key metric for measuring overall participation in the crypto market. When people are actively using digital assets, they trade. Surges in volume are often associated with shifts in market sentiment, whether it's frenzied buying during a bull run or panic selling.

Compared to previous cycles, perpetual futures volume has grown significantly. In 2021, perpetual futures exchanges were barely a presence. Today, platforms like Hyperliquid, Aster, and Lighter handle billions of dollars in daily volume. Due to the rapid growth of this sector, comparing it to historical data is of limited value. For instance, comparing current perpetual volume to 2021 data only shows that the sector has expanded, without providing much valuable insight.

Within a category, the trend in market share change is more important than absolute volume. For example, a perpetual DEX increasing its market share from 5% to 15% indicates an actual gain in market position, even if its absolute volume decreases. DefiLlama's library of custom dashboards offers many market share charts worth checking out.

Open Interest (OI)

Open Interest refers to the total value of derivative contracts that have not been closed or liquidated. For perpetual DEXs, open interest represents all open positions that haven't been closed or liquidated.

Source: https://defillama.com/open-interest

Open Interest is an important metric for measuring the liquidity of derivative platforms. It reflects the total amount of capital deployed in active perpetual positions.

During periods of market volatility, this metric can collapse quickly. A large wave of liquidations can wipe out open interest in a matter of hours. Tracking the recovery after such events can show whether a platform can regain liquidity or if the capital has permanently migrated elsewhere.

Stablecoin Market Cap

For a blockchain network, the stablecoin market cap is the total value of all stablecoins deployed on that network.

Source: https://defillama.com/stablecoins/chains

Stablecoin market cap is a key metric for measuring capital inflows. Unlike TVL, which is affected by token price volatility, stablecoins represent real dollars (or dollar equivalents) that users have actually bridged onto the chain. For example, if the stablecoin market cap on a chain grows from $3 billion to $8 billion, it means $5 billion in real capital has flowed into that ecosystem.

Since October 2023, approximately $180 billion has flowed into the crypto market in the form of stablecoins. A portion of this inevitably enters DeFi, driving TVL growth, increased volume, and fee generation. Stablecoin flows are akin to capital inflows in a national economy; an increase in stablecoin supply signifies new money entering, while a decrease indicates capital outflow.

App Revenue & App Fees

App Revenue and App Fees are chain-level metrics that count the revenue and fees generated by all applications deployed on that chain, excluding stablecoins, liquid staking protocols, and Gas fees.

I consider this the "GDP" of a blockchain, showcasing the scale of actual economic activity happening within its ecosystem.

Revenue metrics are among the hardest data to fake because they require users to actually pay money. This makes them a high-signal indicator for judging the activity level of a DeFi ecosystem.

It's important to note that you cannot base valuation on app revenue, as valuing an asset based on revenue not directly linked to it is meaningless. App Revenue and App Fees are better suited for diagnosing whether a chain is growing, not for assessing its value.

How to Effectively Interpret These Metrics?

Understanding individual metrics is the first step, but to use them effectively, you need an analytical framework. I tend to use the following three-step analysis method:

  1. Prioritize sustained, stable growth.
  2. Track both stock and flow metrics simultaneously.
  3. Consider the impact of token unlocks and incentives.

1. Prioritize Sustained, Stable Growth

Protocols whose revenue charts show a brief spike followed by a rapid crash do not demonstrate sustainable value creation. I've seen countless protocols set weekly revenue records only to disappear a month later.

What truly matters is stable growth over a longer time horizon. For example, a protocol whose monthly revenue gradually grows from $500,000 to $2 million over six months indicates sustainable growth. A protocol whose revenue suddenly spikes to $5 million one week but then quickly drops to $300,000 is likely just a flash in the pan.

In the crypto industry, time passes much quicker than in traditional markets. Here, one month of sustained growth is roughly equivalent to a quarter in traditional markets. If a protocol's revenue grows consistently for six months, consider it akin to a company with six consecutive quarters of earnings growth. That kind of performance is worth paying attention to.

2. Track Both Stock and Flow Metrics Simultaneously

  • Stock Metrics: Such as TVL, Open Interest, Stablecoin Market Cap, Treasury, etc., tell you how much capital is deposited in the protocol.
  • Flow Metrics: Such as Fees, Revenue, Volume, etc., tell you the actual level of activity within the protocol.

Both are equally important.

Activity is easier to fake. For example, a protocol can artificially inflate volume through incentives or wash trading, and such temporary spikes are not uncommon. Liquidity, however, is much harder to manufacture. Getting users to actually deposit funds and keep them there long-term requires real utility or attractive yields from the protocol.

When evaluating any protocol, analyze at least one stock metric and one flow metric. For example:

  • For a perpetual DEX, choose Open Interest and Volume.
  • For a lending protocol, choose TVL and Fees.
  • For a blockchain, choose Stablecoin Market Cap and App Revenue.

If both types of metrics show growth, the protocol is genuinely expanding. If only activity metrics are growing while liquidity stagnates, dig deeper—there might be manipulation. If only liquidity is growing while activity stagnates, it might indicate deposits are coming from a few "whales."

3. Consider Token Unlocks and Incentives

Token unlocks create sell pressure. A portion of the vested tokens released weekly by a protocol will always be sold. If there is no other source of demand to offset this selling, the token price will fall.

Before investing, check the token's unlock schedule. A protocol with 90% of its tokens already in circulation has little future dilution pressure. The investment risk is entirely different for a protocol with only 20% circulating supply facing a large unlock in three months.

Similarly, high revenue looks less impressive if the protocol distributes more in token incentives than it earns from users. DefiLlama tracks this through the "Earnings" metric, which deducts incentive costs from revenue. For example, a protocol might generate $10 million in annual revenue but distribute $15 million in token rewards.

While incentives are an effective strategy for early-stage protocol growth and are often necessary at the beginning of a protocol's lifecycle, they do create sell pressure that needs to be offset by other demand.

Learn More

This article outlines the most common DeFi metrics you'll encounter, but this is just the tip of the iceberg; there's much more to explore by diving deeper.

I've published a full DefiLlama tutorial on YouTube, detailing how to use the platform: screening for undervalued protocols, evaluating blockchains, discovering emerging projects, and avoiding common analytical mistakes. You can watch it by clicking here (link placeholder, original Chinese text had "点击这里观看").

If you want to continuously receive guides on DeFi analysis, portfolio construction, and on-chain research, I regularly post content on my Substack. Welcome to visit newsletter.dynamodefi.com.

The data is right in front of you; the key is whether you will put it to good use.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat are the core DeFi metrics discussed in the article for evaluating projects, and why are they important?

AThe core DeFi metrics discussed are TVL (Total Value Locked), Fees/Revenue/Holder's Revenue, Trading Volume, Open Interest, Stablecoin Market Cap, and App Revenue/Fees. They are important because they provide real-time, transparent financial data that allows for fundamental analysis of protocols, helping investors identify sustainable value creation and trends before market narratives fully form, unlike traditional finance which relies on delayed quarterly reports.

QHow does TVL (Total Value Locked) function as a metric in DeFi, and what are its main limitations?

ATVL measures the total value of assets deposited in a protocol's smart contracts, similar to Assets Under Management (AUM) in TradFi. It indicates user trust and the scale of a protocol. However, its main limitations are that it does not measure activity (a protocol can have high TVL but low fees) and it is highly correlated with token prices, meaning it can decrease due to market downturns even without actual withdrawals.

QWhat is the key difference between 'Fees', 'Revenue', and 'Holder's Revenue' in DeFi accounting?

AFees represent the total amount users pay to use a protocol (gross revenue). Revenue is the portion of fees the protocol actually retains (gross income). Holder's Revenue is a narrower metric that tracks the portion of revenue distributed to token holders through mechanisms like buybacks, burns, or staking rewards, similar to dividends and stock buybacks in traditional finance.

QAccording to the author, what is the three-step analytical framework for effectively interpreting DeFi metrics?

AThe three-step framework is: 1. Prioritize consistent, steady growth over short-term spikes. 2. Track both stock metrics (like TVL, Open Interest) and flow metrics (like Fees, Volume) together to get a complete picture of growth and avoid being misled by manipulated activity. 3. Consider the impact of token unlocks and incentives, as they create sell pressure and can distort the true economic health of a protocol.

QWhy is Stablecoin Market Cap on a blockchain considered a crucial metric for measuring capital flows?

AStablecoin Market Cap on a blockchain measures the total value of all stablecoins deployed on that chain. It is a crucial metric for capital flows because, unlike TVL which is affected by volatile asset prices, stablecoins represent real dollars (or dollar equivalents) that users have bridged onto the chain. An increase indicates genuine capital inflow into the ecosystem, while a decrease signals capital outflow, acting like capital movement in a national economy.

Пов'язані матеріали

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

The cryptocurrency market has just concluded its worst-performing quarter since 2022, with total capitalization dropping 12.6% to $2.1 trillion. All core metrics indicate capital is leaving the sector, not just rotating within it. Bitcoin fell 14.2% and Ethereum dropped 25.4% in Q2, breaking their previous correlation with US tech stocks. A key driver is the reversal in US spot Bitcoin ETF flows, which saw a net outflow of approximately $4.67 billion in Q2, including a record monthly outflow near $4.5 billion in June. While recent data suggests long-term holders are accumulating again, sustained ETF outflows mean continued selling pressure. Market focus is now singularly on the Federal Reserve. The upcoming July FOMC meeting is seen as the most critical event for Q3. A dovish signal could support Bitcoin reclaiming a $68,000-$84,000 range, while a hawkish stance might establish a new trading band around $50,000-$56,000. Additionally, regulatory uncertainty persists, with the progress of the crucial *CLARITY Act* stalling in the Senate, reducing its perceived 2026 passage probability to 40-45%. Despite the broad downturn, a few sectors showed growth. Prediction markets saw nominal volume surge 48.7% year-over-year to $113.8 billion, and tokenized collectibles transaction volume rose 143% quarterly to $1.4 billion. The Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization sector also continued steady growth, now representing ~$28.1 billion in on-chain value. The market's foundation for an extreme crash appears limited, with Bitcoin price hovering near its 200-week moving average. However, the trading paradigm has shifted from narrative-driven speculation to decisions based on price action, policy developments, and interest rate expectations, making a broad sentiment-driven rally unlikely in the near term.

marsbit11 год тому

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

marsbit11 год тому

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

**Crypto & Stock Market Wrap: Bitcoin Tests Resistance, Stocks Retreat After AI Surge** Bitcoin consolidates around $66,000, facing key resistance near $68,000—an area seen as a major psychological and technical hurdle where previous rallies have failed. Analysts note the cryptocurrency is caught between its 200-week moving average (~$63,333) and 200-week EMA (~$68,328). A clear break above $68k is needed to signal a stronger bullish trend, while a rejection could lead to a retest of $63k support. Market sentiment remains cautious, with low futures open interest pointing to a low-liquidity rebound rather than a full bull market. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw another $203 million inflow. US stock futures pointed lower after a strong Tuesday session led by a massive rebound in semiconductors and memory stocks. The rally was fueled by renewed optimism about AI-driven hardware demand, with Micron, SanDisk, and SK Hynix surging. However, those gains reversed in pre-market trading. Super Micro Computer (SMCI) soared over 20% after hours on strong guidance and a record backlog. Other standouts included Rocket Lab and nuclear energy plays Oklo and X-Energy. Rising oil prices (Brent above $91) and climbing Treasury yields (10-year near 4.64%), however, are reigniting inflation concerns and acting as a headwind for equities. In Asia, markets were mixed. South Korea's KOSPI pared early gains to close slightly higher as semiconductor stocks like SK Hynix gave back initial surges. Japan's Nikkei edged lower as the yen hit a fresh 38-year low against the dollar, raising fears of potential market intervention. Key events to watch include the Samsung Galaxy launch, AMD's AI event, and a slew of major tech earnings from Alphabet, Tesla, and IBM after the close on Wednesday, followed by the ECB meeting and Intel's earnings on Thursday.

marsbit11 год тому

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

marsbit11 год тому

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbit12 год тому

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbit12 год тому

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbit12 год тому

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbit12 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片