Trump's Midterm Election Donors Exposed: From Crypto.com to OpenAI, Crypto and AI Giants Generously Contribute

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-02-04Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-04

Анотація

Donald Trump's midterm election fundraising has reached $429 million, with his super PAC holding $304 million—tens of millions more than Democratic opponents. Significant contributions came from the crypto and AI sectors, including $5 million from Elon Musk, $25 million from OpenAI co-founder Greg Brockman and his wife, and $16 million from SIG co-founder Jeff Yass. Crypto.com donated $30 million, while Blockchain.com and a16z founders Ben Horowitz and Marc Andreessen each contributed. Major donations also poured in from energy, healthcare, and finance industries, such as $10 million from Extremity Care, $12.5 million from energy entrepreneur Kelcy Warren, and $1 million each from figures like NFL Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones and Chevron board member John Hess.

Is Trump's midterm election in jeopardy? ????

——Not sure, but he definitely has more money than his opponents! He has raised a total of $429 million, with his super PAC currently holding $304 million, tens of millions more than the Democratic camp!

In this round of donations, the AI and crypto industries also accounted for a significant proportion:

Elon Musk: $5 million
OpenAI co-founder Greg Brockman and his wife Anna: $25 million
SIG co-founder Jeff Yass: $16 million

Crypto.com: $30 million
Blockchain.com: $5 million
A16Z founder Ben Horowitz: $3 million
A16Z founder Marc Andreessen: $3 million

Funds from the energy, healthcare, and financial industries are also heavily betting:

Extremity Care (medical company) and related parties: $10 million
RAI Services (tobacco company): $3 million

Energy entrepreneur Kelcy Warren: $12.5 million
Private equity investor Konstantin Sokolov: $11 million
Banker Julio Herrera Velutini and his daughter: $3.5 million
NYSE parent company ICE CEO Jeffrey Sprecher: $2.5 million
Food business heir Lynsi Snyder-Ellingson: $2 million
Venture capitalist William E. Ford: $1.25 million
NFL Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones: $1 million
Chevron board member John Hess: $1 million
John Hess's wife Susan Hess: $1 million
Investor Warren Stephens: $1 million
Entrepreneur Jared Isaacman: $1 million

Пов'язані питання

QHow much money did Donald Trump raise for the midterm elections according to the article?

ADonald Trump raised a total of $429 million for the midterm elections.

QWhich AI and crypto industry leaders made significant donations to Trump's campaign, and how much did they contribute?

AElon Musk donated $5 million, OpenAI co-founder Greg Brockman and his wife Anna donated $25 million, and SIG co-founder Jeff Yass donated $16 million. From the crypto industry, Crypto.com donated $30 million, Blockchain.com donated $5 million, and A16Z founders Ben Horowitz and Marc Andreessen each donated $3 million.

QWhat is the amount of money currently available in Trump's super PAC, and how does it compare to the Democratic camp?

ATrump's super PAC currently has $304 million, which is tens of millions more than the Democratic camp.

QBesides AI and crypto, which other industries contributed significantly to Trump's midterm election funds?

ASignificant contributions also came from the energy, healthcare, and financial industries, including donations from Extremity Care ($10 million), RAI Services ($3 million), energy entrepreneur Kelcy Warren ($12.5 million), and others.

QWho are some of the notable individual donors from outside the AI and crypto sectors mentioned in the article?

ANotable individual donors include NYSE parent ICE CEO Jeffrey Sprecher ($2.5 million), NFL Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones ($1 million), Chevron board member John Hess and his wife Susan Hess ($1 million each), and food business heiress Lynsi Snyder-Ellingson ($2 million).

Пов'язані матеріали

Behind HYPE's Repeated Record Highs, the 'Minions' in the Ecosystem Can't Keep Up

While HYPE, the native token of the Hyperliquid ecosystem, surges to new all-time highs above $76 and attracts significant institutional ETF inflows, a starkly different reality unfolds within its HyperEVM application layer. Multiple core DeFi protocols across lending, NFTs, stablecoins, and DEXs have announced shutdowns between May and June. The article argues HYPE functions more like an "application stock" than a traditional ecosystem token. Its value is anchored to the trading fees from Hyperliquid's core perpetual contracts platform (HyperCore), which boasts a diversified revenue stream from crypto, commodities, and indices. Approximately 97% of protocol fees fund buybacks and burns of HYPE. This means HYPE's price is largely decoupled from the health of projects built on HyperEVM. The closures of significant projects like lending protocol HypurrFi (peak TVL >$300M) and NFT marketplace Drip.Trade highlight a structural tension. Hyperliquid's minimalist philosophy offers infrastructure without official grants, liquidity support, or marketing coordination for HyperEVM projects. This forces protocols into a fiercely competitive environment from day one. Furthermore, the success of HyperCore creates a liquidity vacuum, and mechanisms like HIP-3 (allowing direct perpetual market deployment) divert user attention and capital away from application-layer projects. The stronger the core perpetual trading business becomes, the more difficult it is for peripheral "DeFi lego" projects to survive and capture value, despite the flagship token's rising price.

Foresight News8 хв тому

Behind HYPE's Repeated Record Highs, the 'Minions' in the Ecosystem Can't Keep Up

Foresight News8 хв тому

Conversation with Arthur Hayes: AI Has Drained Market Liquidity, BTC Will Be Below 100k by Year-End

In this June 2026 podcast interview, BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes explains his decision to sell his major crypto holdings (HYPE, NEAR, Worldcoin, Zcash). His rationale is based on a macro view linking oil prices, the Iran conflict, US politics, and an impending AI bubble burst. Hayes argues that high oil prices, driven by the ongoing war, will pressure domestic US inflation. To salvage the Republican Party's chances in the midterm elections, he believes Donald Trump may pivot to a populist, anti-AI stance—advocating for taxes and regulation—which would deflate the AI investment narrative. He sees the AI sector, particularly massive capital expenditure on data centers, as having absorbed nearly all excess market liquidity (around $1.5 trillion in debt issuance since 2025), starving other assets like Bitcoin. He highlights the upcoming SpaceX IPO at a ~$1.8 trillion valuation and 100x price-to-sales ratio as a potential tipping point. If these hyped IPOs underperform, it could shatter market confidence in AI. In such a scenario, all risk assets, including crypto, would fall together as correlations converge to 1 during a broad correction. Hayes has moved his portfolio into Treasuries and energy stocks (like ExxonMobil), predicting Bitcoin will be below $100k by year-end. He sees a potential crypto bull market only after the AI frenzy cools, liquidity stops flowing exclusively into AI, and possibly after a significant market downturn prompts new monetary stimulus.

marsbit19 хв тому

Conversation with Arthur Hayes: AI Has Drained Market Liquidity, BTC Will Be Below 100k by Year-End

marsbit19 хв тому

Bitcoin Decouples From Global M2 Liquidity As Money Supply Hits Record High

Bitcoin is diverging from a record-high global M2 money supply (over $135 trillion), challenging the historical assumption that rising liquidity directly lifts BTC prices. While a bullish view suggests Bitcoin is merely lagging and will eventually catch up as capital rotates into riskier assets, a more cautious "regime-change" argument posits that factors like spot ETFs, institutional flows, and a stronger dollar may have weakened the direct correlation. For traders, this divergence presents a clear macro question to monitor: whether Bitcoin's price will confirm a delayed rally or signal a lasting change in its relationship with global liquidity. The outcome will shape how future liquidity data is interpreted.

bitcoinist1 год тому

Bitcoin Decouples From Global M2 Liquidity As Money Supply Hits Record High

bitcoinist1 год тому

Fed's Internal Doves Flock to Hawkish Stance, Warsh's Debut "Between a Rock and a Hard Place"

U.S. Federal Reserve officials who previously advocated for rate cuts, including Governor Christopher Waller, have recently shifted their stance, with many now not ruling out the possibility of future rate hikes. This sets a challenging stage for new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh's first policy meeting. Appointed by President Trump based on his dovish views, Warsh now faces a committee where the debate has pivoted from "when to cut" to "whether to hike," driven by persistent inflation above 3%, a strong labor market, and supply-side pressures from AI infrastructure demands and geopolitical tensions. Key figures illustrate the shift. Governor Waller, once concerned about employment, now says data has pushed him toward considering rate increases. Even moderate voices like Governor Lisa Cook, while expecting inflation to ease, have indicated readiness to hike if it fails to do so. Long-time hawks such as regional Fed presidents Beth Hammack, Lorie Logan, and Neel Kashkari have grown more vocal, arguing that the real policy rate is effectively falling and that action may soon be needed. The upcoming Fed meeting is expected to keep rates steady but will likely remove the "easing bias" from its statement, signaling a neutral stance between cuts and hikes. The quarterly "dot plot" is anticipated to show most officials projecting no cuts this year, with some potentially indicating hikes. Chair Warsh, a critic of the Fed's reliance on forward guidance like the dot plot, must navigate communicating this pivot using tools he has questioned, all while steering policy in a direction counter to the preferences of the president who appointed him. The consensus suggests the Fed's next move could well be a rate increase.

marsbit1 год тому

Fed's Internal Doves Flock to Hawkish Stance, Warsh's Debut "Between a Rock and a Hard Place"

marsbit1 год тому

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

The article analyzes the three leading Chinese optical module companies, collectively nicknamed "Yi Zhong Tian": Xinyisheng, Zhongji Innolight, and TFC Optical Communication. It evaluates their "cost-performance" not by current stock price, but through three lenses: PEG ratio (growth vs. valuation), earnings quality, and premium/discount for certainty. Xinyisheng shows the most attractive PEG ratio and high profitability, but its valuation reflects discounts for risks like high customer concentration and reliance on overseas markets. Zhongji Innolight, the most expensive, commands a premium for its market leadership, dominant share in key products like 800G/1.6T modules, and higher earnings certainty, though it faces geopolitical risks. TFC Optical, as an upstream component supplier ("water seller"), has the highest gross margin and bets on the long-term CPO/NPO architecture trend, but trades at a high valuation with more stable, less explosive growth. The core argument is that while these companies dominate module assembly, the true profit pool and technological moat lie upstream in laser and switch chips, currently controlled by U.S. firms like Lumentum and Coherent. The long-term "cost-performance" for these Chinese leaders hinges on whether the domestic industry, exemplified by companies like Yuanjie Technology, can successfully move up the value chain into high-power laser chips. Otherwise, their high growth may remain confined to the lower-margin assembly segment.

marsbit1 год тому

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси