Trump Slams Banks After Coinbase CEO Secretly Met With Him

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-03-05Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-05

Анотація

Donald Trump met privately with Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, as first reported by Politico and confirmed by CoinDesk, shortly before publicly criticizing major banks on his Truth Social platform. In his post, Trump accused banks of trying to undermine the pro-crypto GENIUS Act and urged the advancement of the CLARITY Act to prevent the crypto industry from moving overseas. The key disagreement stalling the digital asset market structure legislation is over interest-bearing stablecoins. Banks, including JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon, argue they threaten deposits and lending capacity and should be regulated like banks. Crypto advocates, including a presidential advisory committee executive, counter that the GENIUS Act already prohibits such lending practices and that stablecoins are not deposits. Following the meeting and Trump's statements, crypto market and related stocks, including Coinbase (COIN), saw significant gains.

Author: CoinDesk

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Introduction: CoinDesk exclusively confirmed a key timeline: Coinbase CEO Armstrong first met privately with Trump, after which Trump publicly criticized banks on Truth Social for obstructing crypto legislation.

This clue directly reveals the lobbying path behind Trump's statement, making the legislative battle between the crypto industry and the banking sector clearer.

Full Text Below:

Key Points:

  • Before publicly accusing banks of undermining the pro-crypto GENIUS Act and calling for the advancement of the CLARITY Act, Trump had a private meeting with Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong.
  • The meeting was first disclosed by Politico and occurred before Trump posted on Truth Social stating that banks "need to make a good deal with the crypto industry" to push forward stalled digital asset legislation on Capitol Hill.
  • This crypto market structure bill has stalled because banks warn that interest-bearing stablecoins could erode deposits and lending capacity, while crypto companies argue that the GENIUS Act reasonably allows consumers to earn rewards from stablecoin holdings.

CoinDesk confirmed that U.S. President Trump held a closed-door meeting with Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, shortly after which Trump posted on Truth Social claiming that banks are trying to undermine the GENIUS Act.

"America needs to complete market structure legislation ASAP. Americans should make more money from their money," Trump wrote in a post. "Major banks are making historic profits, and we won’t let them destroy our strong crypto agenda—if we don’t advance the CLARITY Act, all of this will go to China and other countries."

Politico first reported the meeting between Armstrong and Trump. Since then, Trump has publicly supported Coinbase's stance in the "ongoing lobbying battle with banks," a struggle that has stalled a major crypto bill.

The media cited "two people familiar with the matter" as sources, who spoke anonymously to discuss the closed-door event. The report also noted that it remains unclear what exactly the two discussed during the meeting.

However, the report reiterated that "the meeting took place shortly before Trump posted on social media saying banks 'need to make a good deal with the crypto industry,'" which was a key moment in pushing forward the stalled digital asset legislation on Capitol Hill.

The White House and Coinbase did not respond to CoinDesk's requests for comment.

The market structure bill has been in limbo since it was originally scheduled for debate and vote in the Senate Banking Committee. The core disagreement blocking the bill's passage is: banks believe stablecoin interest rates could impact bank deposits, thereby affecting their lending capacity; crypto exchanges argue that users should have the right to earn rewards from stablecoin holdings, which the GENIUS Act explicitly allows.

JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon said on Tuesday that stablecoin issuers paying interest on customer deposit balances should be regulated like banks. Patrick White, Executive Director of the Presidential Digital Asset Advisory Committee, countered this, stating, "What truly requires bank-like regulation is not the act of paying yields on balances itself, but the act of lending or rehypothecating the underlying dollars that constitute the balances." White also noted that the GENIUS Act "explicitly prohibits stablecoin issuers from engaging in the latter. Stablecoins ≠ deposits."

Crypto-related stocks surged significantly on Wednesday alongside a broad rally in the crypto market, with COIN breaking above $200, reaching its highest price since late January.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat did former President Trump do shortly after his private meeting with Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong?

AHe publicly criticized banks on Truth Social for obstructing the pro-crypto GENIUS Act and called for advancing the CLARITY Act.

QWhat is the core disagreement between banks and the crypto industry regarding the market structure bill?

ABanks warn that interest-bearing stablecoins could erode deposits and lending capacity, while crypto firms argue that the GENIUS Act reasonably allows consumers to earn rewards from stablecoin holdings.

QWhich media outlet first reported the private meeting between Trump and Armstrong?

APolitico first reported the private meeting between Trump and Armstrong.

QWhat did Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan, say about stablecoin issuers paying interest to customers?

AJamie Dimon stated that stablecoin issuers paying interest on customer deposit balances should be regulated like banks.

QHow did crypto-related stocks perform following Trump's public statements and the market reaction?

ACrypto-related stocks surged significantly, with COIN (Coinbase stock) rising above $200, hitting its highest price since late January.

Пов'язані матеріали

What Happens to Ethereum Developer Tools After the Grants Run Out?

On February 27th, the Ethereum Foundation (EF) announced Project Odin, a structured sustainability support program designed for a select group of strategic, previously grant-funded teams. Unlike a standard grant, Odin offers a long-term advisory mechanism focused on helping these teams establish credible, sustainable paths within a two-year framework, thereby reducing long-term dependence on single funding sources. The program addresses a critical post-grant challenge: how essential public goods, especially major developer tools, can achieve financial sustainability beyond initial funding. While grants from EF and programs like Gitcoin or RetroPGF remain vital for startups and research, they often fall short for mature, widely-used infrastructure. Tools like compilers, languages, and network stacks are deeply embedded but struggle with monetization, trapped between being too foundational to lose and too public to generate natural revenue. Project Odin provides teams with a dedicated Strategic Advisor to guide them through a three-phase process: 1) analyzing current funding and realistic options, 2) validating potential paths with stakeholders, and 3) executing plans, which may include crafting support contracts, service agreements, or other recurring revenue models. The first pilot participant is Vyper, a critical smart contract language for the EVM, highlighting the need for sustainable models for core infrastructure. The initiative reframes the public goods conversation from "who should be funded" to "how do already-proven teams avoid perpetual funding crises?" It encourages ecosystem participants—protocols and projects that depend on these tools—to view sustainable support not just as charity, but as essential risk management for their own operational supply chains.

marsbit21 хв тому

What Happens to Ethereum Developer Tools After the Grants Run Out?

marsbit21 хв тому

MARA Reports Q1 Revenue Below Expectations, Net Loss of $1.3 Billion, Stock Plunges After Hours

Bitcoin mining firm MARA Holdings reported disappointing Q1 2024 results, causing its stock to erase all daily gains and fall 3.44% in after-hours trading. Revenue dropped 18% year-over-year to $174.6 million, missing Wall Street estimates of $192.7 million. The company posted a net loss of $1.3 billion, a significant increase from a $533.4 million loss a year ago, primarily driven by unrealized losses on its holdings of 38,689 Bitcoin, which depreciated in value during the quarter. MARA also sold over 15,100 BTC in late March to repurchase debt at a discount. The broader mining environment remains challenging due to a 35% decline in Bitcoin's price from its all-time high and a nearly 30% increase in mining difficulty over the past year. MARA's market cap ranking among U.S. miners has slipped to seventh. Critically, the company announced a strategic pivot away from Bitcoin mining expansion. It stated it has no plans to purchase new mining equipment and is fully transitioning toward AI data centers. Its strategy involves retrofitting existing mining sites for AI and high-performance computing (HPC) and leveraging its recent $1.5 billion acquisition of Long Ridge Energy & Power, a gas-fired power plant and data center. This infrastructure could eventually support 600 MW of AI compute capacity, allowing MARA to redeploy up to 90% of its non-custodial mining power for AI and IT workloads.

marsbit22 хв тому

MARA Reports Q1 Revenue Below Expectations, Net Loss of $1.3 Billion, Stock Plunges After Hours

marsbit22 хв тому

The AI Investment Landscape Is Being Reshaped: Beyond the 'Magnificent Seven', What Opportunities Lie in the Semiconductor Supply Chain?

AI Investment Map is Reshaping: Opportunities Beyond the 'Magnificent Seven' Since ChatGPT ignited the AI wave, investment initially focused on the "Magnificent Seven" tech giants dominating cloud infrastructure. However, the rise of DeepSeek and debates on AI capital expenditure effectiveness are shifting this dynamic. Investors now recognize opportunities deeper in the supply chain—the companies providing the essential "picks and shovels." Early concerns about an AI investment "arms race" and potential low returns were partly alleviated by strong Q1 earnings from cloud providers, validating robust compute demand. This has highlighted a more certain investment thesis: regardless of which AI applications ultimately win, massive capital expenditure will first fuel demand for semiconductors and related components. This "pick-and-shovel" logic has driven semiconductor ETFs to record highs. Key beneficiaries include: * **Memory Chipmakers (e.g., SK Hynix, Samsung, Micron)**: High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) is a critical bottleneck for AI training. * **Photonics Companies**: Crucial for high-speed data transfer within AI data centers. * **The Broader "AI-11" Semiconductor Ecosystem**: This encompasses foundries & lithography (TSMC, ASML), logic & custom chips (AMD, Broadcom, Intel, Marvell), and enterprise storage (SanDisk, Western Digital). Every dollar of AI infrastructure spending flows through this chain. While the "Magnificent Seven" remain dominant in market size, their earnings growth premium over the rest of the S&P 500 ("S&P 493") is narrowing. Market attention and marginal investment are shifting towards the expanding semiconductor supply chain. The investment narrative is evolving from "betting on the ultimate AI winner" to "investing in the certainty of the infrastructure build-out." Understanding this shift from the demand side to the supply side is key to identifying future AI investment opportunities.

marsbit51 хв тому

The AI Investment Landscape Is Being Reshaped: Beyond the 'Magnificent Seven', What Opportunities Lie in the Semiconductor Supply Chain?

marsbit51 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片