Trump Says He Was Not Involved in $500M Abu Dhabi WLFI Deal

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-02-03Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-03

US President Donald Trump has denied any knowledge of a $500 million investment by an Abu Dhabi company in WLFI. The World Liberty Financial is a cryptocurrency firm that has ties to Trump and members of his family. When asked about the matter, Trump claimed he did not know, stating, “My sons are handling that—my family is handling it”.

The Wall Street Journal reported that Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan supports a company called Aryam Investment 1. They signed an agreement in January 2025 to purchase a 49% equity interest in WLFI for $500 million. It happened in about four days prior to Trump’s second inauguration as president. The purchase agreement included payments of $187 million to entities controlled by the Trump family, as well as payments to other companies with ties to WLFI’s founders.

Information about the Abu Dhabi Investment

The acquisition made the UAE-supported company the largest non-controlling shareholder of WLFI, working on asset products such as a dollar-pegged stablecoin. Top officials from related companies joined the board, making the Abu Dhabi group a significant player.

Officials from both World Liberty Financial and the White House have denied that the investment influenced U.S. policy decisions or involved President Trump. Officials have continued to state that Trump was not involved in the investment process and that the investment was a business deal that did not relate to any government actions. World Liberty officials have continued to state that claims of the investment being linked to U.S.-UAE policy actions were “false” and that the company conducts its business on normal terms.

The timing of the investment has raised concerns, as it occurred before the U.S. government announced a framework. The move gives the UAE access to advanced artificial intelligence chips shortly after the investment was reported. However, WLFI and the White House have denied that there is any connection between the investment and the policy decisions.

Political and Regulatory Scrutiny

The investment has also attracted political and regulatory attention, especially as foreign investments continue pouring into sectors. Last year, Democratic senators demanded investigations into reported connections between WLFI’s token sales and addresses associated with sanctioned individuals.

President Trump’s denial of any role in the alleged $500 million Abu Dhabi investment in World Liberty Financial highlights the attempt to distinguish between his public position and his family’s private affairs, as stated by official sources. Although World Liberty and the White House have argued that the investment had no policy impact or conflict of interest, the transaction’s timing and terms have still attracted considerable political and public attention.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Ethereum Treasury Firm BitMine Faces $7B Unrealized Loss Amid Crypto Downturn

Пов'язані питання

QWhat did President Trump claim about his involvement in the $500 million Abu Dhabi investment in WLFI?

APresident Trump denied any knowledge of the investment, stating 'My sons are handling that—my family is handling it' and claimed he was not involved.

QWhich Abu Dhabi company invested in WLFI and what was the nature of the agreement?

ASheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan supports a company called Aryam Investment 1, which signed an agreement to purchase a 49% equity interest in WLFI for $500 million.

QWhat concerns were raised about the timing of this investment?

AThe investment occurred just days before Trump's second inauguration and before the U.S. government announced a framework, raising concerns about potential connections to policy decisions regarding AI chip access for the UAE.

QHow did WLFI and White House officials characterize the nature of this investment?

ABoth WLFI and White House officials denied that the investment influenced U.S. policy decisions, calling claims of such links 'false' and maintaining it was a normal business deal unrelated to government actions.

QWhat political scrutiny has this investment attracted?

AThe investment has drawn political and regulatory attention, with Democratic senators demanding investigations into connections between WLFI's token sales and addresses associated with sanctioned individuals.

Пов'язані матеріали

Weekly Token Unlocks: PYTH Unlocks Tokens Up to 37% of Circulating Supply

This week's major token unlocks feature three notable projects, each releasing a significant number of tokens into circulation. **Pyth Network** is set for the largest unlock, releasing 2.12 billion PYTH tokens valued at approximately $95.24 million. This amount represents a substantial portion of its circulating supply. Pyth is a decentralized oracle network providing real-time financial market data for DeFi applications. **LayerZero** will unlock 25.71 million ZRO tokens, worth around $32.91 million. LayerZero is a full-chain interoperability protocol designed for secure and configurable cross-chain messaging. **Kaito** will release 17.6 million KAI tokens, with an estimated value of $7.78 million. Kaito is an AI-driven platform that aggregates and analyzes fragmented Web3 information from various sources like social media and governance forums. Each project section includes links to their official Twitter and website, along with a chart depicting their specific token release schedule.

marsbit6 хв тому

Weekly Token Unlocks: PYTH Unlocks Tokens Up to 37% of Circulating Supply

marsbit6 хв тому

Vitalik: We Shouldn't Oppose AI, But Create Sanctuaries

Summary: In a podcast, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin discusses the human response to advancing AI. He argues the core risk isn't AI's intelligence, but humanity's passive reliance on centralized systems and AI, which erodes privacy and personal agency. His solution is not to fight AI, but to build "sanctuary technologies"—tools like Ethereum that offer safe, optional spaces where individuals can retain sovereignty and freedom of choice without being forced into a single system. Buterin reflects on his shift from an "autopilot" mode in his youth to actively "piloting" his life and work. He stresses the importance of maintaining "manual mode" activities—like learning actively and performing tasks without AI assistance—to prevent mental atrophy and preserve independent thought. For builders, his advice is to prioritize technologies that protect human agency, avoid outsourcing all strategic thinking, and actively engage in serendipitous, real-world interactions. He repositions Ethereum/crypto not as a fix for legacy systems like the dollar, but as a parallel, voluntary option. In an era of increasing centralization, the freedom to opt-in or opt-out becomes invaluable. The key takeaway is that the AI era demands greater human proactivity; the scarcest resource will remain actively thinking, sovereign individuals.

marsbit26 хв тому

Vitalik: We Shouldn't Oppose AI, But Create Sanctuaries

marsbit26 хв тому

Vitalik: We Need to Create Sanctuaries, Not Fight AI

In a recent interview, Vitalik Buterin, founder of Ethereum, addresses the central anxiety of the AI era. He argues the primary risk isn't AI's intelligence, but human passivity—ceding decisions, privacy, and agency to centralized systems or "super AIs" for a sense of "disempowering safety." His solution is not to fight AI, but to build "sanctuary technologies." These are optional, non-totalizing spaces that protect users while preserving their sovereignty and privacy. Ethereum is presented as a prime example, offering a parallel financial system one can freely choose, not a fix for the old one. Reflecting on his journey from a 19-year-old on "autopilot" to an active "pilot," Vitalik notes the world reinvents itself every 5-10 years. To keep up, individuals must actively pilot their lives, not be passive passengers. He stresses that active learning vastly outperforms passive learning, even with equal time invested. His practical advice for builders and individuals in the AI age includes: periodically forcing oneself to do tasks manually to keep the mind engaged; prioritizing active learning and verification over outsourcing answers; building tools that help retain human agency; not outsourcing all strategic thinking to AI; and preserving serendipity through real-world interactions. Ultimately, Buterin redefines Ethereum/crypto's role: not to win against or fix the old world, but to provide a free, optional alternative. The core message is that as AI grows more powerful, the truly scarce resource will be proactive humans who retain their sovereignty, privacy, and capacity for independent thought. The era demands not less tool use, but more intentional and active use of technology.

链捕手32 хв тому

Vitalik: We Need to Create Sanctuaries, Not Fight AI

链捕手32 хв тому

Conversation with Patagon Founder: Revealing the Inside Story of Anthropic's Secondary Market

**Summary: Inside Anthropic's Massive, Opaque Secondary Market** In a revealing interview, Patagon founder Dio Casares pulls back the curtain on the booming, high-risk secondary market for shares in companies like Anthropic. This private market, fueled by companies staying private longer and massive funding rounds, is estimated to involve hundreds of billions of dollars. Casares distinguishes between two types of "secondary" trading: 1. **Company-approved SPV (Special Purpose Vehicle) sales:** Where new capital flows into the company, often facilitated by select private equity firms. Anthropic supports this to manage liquidity and pre-IPO selling pressure. 2. **The "gray" market:** Platforms like Hive and Forge that match buyers and sellers, often creating pricing confusion and competing with official funding rounds. These intermediaries are widely disliked by companies. The market structure is complex and fragmented, relying heavily on personal connections. Brokers connect buyers and sellers, often layering multiple SPVs to pool capital, with single transaction fees as high as 10%. Strikingly, some finance professionals earn more from this trading than from their primary investment roles. **Key risks highlighted include:** * **High Fraud Rates:** An estimated 10-20% of transactions involve fake stock certificates or sellers who take payment without having the shares. * **Complex, Risky Structures:** Nested SPVs, "forward contracts" on employee equity, and tokenized private equity create layers of opacity. This is exemplified by a recent incident where an xAI employee's shares were revoked after an espionage allegation, leaving buyers empty-handed. * **Post-IPO "Settlement Hell":** After an IPO, delays in distributing shares through multiple SPV layers and decisions by fund managers to hold onto shares could trigger years of lawsuits as downstream investors are locked out. **For small investors** holding positions through tokenized vehicles or layered SPVs, it's often impossible to verify the underlying asset. Casares advises caution: if the investment feels wrong, consider exiting. As the private market now surpasses IPO fundraising, this "wild west" ecosystem faces a looming reckoning. While it will likely professionalize, the post-IPO period for a company like Anthropic could unleash a wave of disputes, exposing the vulnerabilities built into this frenzied, largely unregulated marketplace.

marsbit2 год тому

Conversation with Patagon Founder: Revealing the Inside Story of Anthropic's Secondary Market

marsbit2 год тому

Why Ripple’s XRP Is A Better Transaction Choice Compared To SWIFT

Crypto expert CharuSan argues that Ripple's XRP is superior to SWIFT for cross-border transactions, predicting SWIFT may need to integrate XRP to survive. He highlights XRP's On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) technology as faster and cheaper, freeing up trillions for banks instantly, while SWIFT is described as cumbersome and slow. CharuSan states that banks' main software is already integrated with Ripple, enabling rapid, widespread adoption. He believes SWIFT must adopt XRP as a liquidity layer to remain relevant, rather than staying a simple messaging service. While SWIFT is developing a distributed ledger on Ethereum's Linea with partners, CharuSan dismisses this move, noting Linea handles messaging trials but isn't a liquidity solution and incurs verification costs on Ethereum, making it non-viable for payments. In conclusion, CharuSan asserts that without integrating XRP, SWIFT is "doomed" to fade away. At the time of writing, XRP price was around $1.41.

bitcoinist3 год тому

Why Ripple’s XRP Is A Better Transaction Choice Compared To SWIFT

bitcoinist3 год тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни WLFI (WLFI).