TROVE token’s 97% wipeout: From $11.5 mln presale to rug-pull accusations

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-20Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-20

Анотація

Trove Market's TROVE token experienced a catastrophic 97.5% crash shortly after its launch on January 20, falling from a fully diluted valuation of $20 million to just $500,000. The project had previously raised $11.5 million in a presale but faced immediate backlash after announcing a switch from Hyperliquid to Solana, breaching investor trust. Accusations of a rug pull intensified when it was revealed that funds were allegedly funneled to influencers, casinos, and betting platforms. A key liquidity provider liquidated $12.9 million worth of assets, further destabilizing the project. Most presale investors suffered massive losses, with sentiment remaining extremely bearish and fears of further price declines.

On the 20th of January, the crypto market was stunned when Trove Market launched its native token, TROVE.

Prior to the launch, Trove Market had faced community backlash after the team announced it would abandon the Hyperliquid LI blockchain.

This was a massive breach of its social contracts with investors after raising $11.5 million in an ICO presale, setting the ground for a rough launch.

Trove market accused of rug pull

The TROVE token launched on Trove’s Perp DEX, with a fully diluted valuation of $20 million. Shortly after launch, the token’s FVD plummeted 97.5% to $500k, then rose slightly to $722.8k at press time.

At the same time, its market cap dropped from $612k to $512k, a loss of nearly $100k, indicating capital outflows.

Soon after the TROVE token went live, it dumped 28% in minutes from $0.0006 to $0.00043 before attempting a recovery.

Since then, the altcoin price rose to $0.00078 before slightly retracing to $0.00072, marking an 18% rise on the daily timeframe.

Reasons why TROVE was doomed to fail

In preparation for the token launch, developers ran an ICO on Hyperliquid. The team managed to surpass its $2.5 million target and raised over $11.5 million.

After raising these funds, the team announced it will keep $9.3 million to build its Solana-based Perp DEX. The move was perceived as the first red flag, and the team faced fierce community backlash.

Even worse, the community accused Trove Market of paying KOLs for promotion, with funds flowing to entertainment addresses.

According to Hyperliquid Daily, waleswoosh alone pocketed $8K for pumping and promoting the token. ZachXBT dug up receipts showing ICO money funneled straight to casinos and Polymarket bets.

The last nail in the coffin was driven by the alleged liquidity provider. Days ago, a key liquidity partner lost confidence in the project and liquidated 500k HYPE worth approximately $12.9 million.

The decision to sell these Hype tokens effectively pulled the rug from under Trove’s operational requirements, forcing the team to seek support elsewhere.

With these factors combined, the TROVE token sat as a ticking time bomb, and the launch validated the community’s fears.

Will TROVE see more losses?

TROVE plummeted as negative sentiment had taken hold even before the token launch. As such, earlier buyers rushed to dump, fearing making more losses.

Despite that, most of the presale buyers recorded massive losses. For instance, an earlier buyer argued that his $20k investment should have resulted in $14k in USDC and $6k in TROVE.

However, the buyers received $600, blaming the token’s GIGA nuking. With market sentiment even more bearish, TROVE is at risk of further losses.

If current sentiment persists, the token will plummet to $0.0004. However, if the team can manage to restore community confidence, $0.001 is within reach.


Final Thoughts

  • Trove Market is accused of a rug pull, following a contentious launch of the TROVE token on Solana Perp DEX.
  • TROVE FVD dropped 97.5% from $20 million to $500k, warning of liquidity exit.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was the initial fully diluted valuation (FDV) of the TROVE token at launch and what did it drop to shortly after?

AThe TROVE token launched with a fully diluted valuation (FDV) of $20 million. Shortly after launch, its FDV plummeted 97.5% to $500,000.

QWhat was the first major 'red flag' that caused community backlash against Trove Market before the token launch?

AThe first major red flag was the team's announcement that they would abandon the Hyperliquid blockchain after raising $11.5 million in an ICO presale, which was seen as a massive breach of its social contracts with investors.

QAccording to the article, how did blockchain investigator ZachXBT claim the ICO funds were being misused?

AZachXBT provided receipts showing that ICO money was funneled directly to casinos and bets on Polymarket.

QWhat specific action by a key liquidity partner was described as 'the last nail in the coffin' for the TROVE project?

AA key liquidity partner lost confidence and liquidated 500k HYPE tokens worth approximately $12.9 million, which pulled the rug from under Trove's operational requirements.

QWhat are the two potential price targets mentioned for the TROVE token, depending on market sentiment and team action?

AIf the current bearish sentiment persists, the token could plummet to $0.0004. If the team manages to restore community confidence, the price could rise to $0.001.

Пов'язані матеріали

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit13 хв тому

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit13 хв тому

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit32 хв тому

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit32 хв тому

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit41 хв тому

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit41 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片