Token Is Completely on Fire, Blockchain Is Heartbroken

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-03-25Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-25

Анотація

Token, a term once central to blockchain's vision of decentralization and economic transformation, has now been popularized by the AI industry as a unit of computation and billing. With the rise of products like OpenAI's ChatGPT and Deepseek, Token has become widely recognized as a measure of API calls and computational power—essentially a "currency for compute." This shift has left the blockchain sector in an ironic position: while it long struggled to explain Token's potential for revolutionizing ownership and community governance, AI has repurposed the term into a practical, everyday concept devoid of cryptographic complexity. The blockchain community once championed "Tokenization of Everything," aiming to convert real-world assets and labor into tradable tokens. Instead, AI achieved a form of tokenization by breaking down text, audio, and video into Tokens for processing—without requiring users to manage private keys or understand consensus mechanisms. This practical adoption contrasts sharply with blockchain’s association with speculation and scandals, as seen in the rise and fall of NFTs and memecoins. Amid a broader crisis of faith in blockchain’s promise—with many innovators expressing disillusionment over the industry’s shift toward speculation—AI’s rapid growth has intensified this sense of irrelevance. However, there are positive signs: traditional assets like U.S. Treasuries and stocks are increasingly being tokenized, attracting major financial institutions lik...

Author: Gu Yu, ChianCatcher

Suddenly, Token has appeared in the public eye with unprecedented frequency. As the billing unit for various AI products, Token has become widely known due to the explosive popularity of products like OpenClaw, ChatGPT, Deepseek, and others.

On March 24, the National Data Bureau officially determined the Chinese translation of Token as "词元" (Cíyuán), and this news quickly spread across social media platforms like WeChat Moments and Douyin.

For practitioners in the blockchain industry, this is undoubtedly a lamentable event. There was a time when we went to great lengths to explain to outsiders what Token is, talking about decentralization, economic models, and consensus mechanisms. Now, large models have used an almost brutal business logic to complete the popularization of this term among the entire population in just one year.

Getting Token accepted by the masses was once the long-cherished wish of all blockchain practitioners. Now, the vision has come true, but it leaves only awkwardness. This is not only because "this Token is not that Token," but also because the "production relationship revolution" once promised by blockchain is陷入一场前所未有的信仰危机 (plunging into an unprecedented crisis of faith).

I. The Evolution of Token's Semantics: From Verification, Asset to "Computing Power Currency"

In the long history of computer science, Token is not a new word.

In the Web2 era or earlier in the code world, Token was a "pass" for login verification. It is an encrypted string you obtain after logging into a server, proving "you are you." It quietly resides in the browser's Cookie or Headers, lacking social attributes but possessing functional attributes.

In the Web3 world, Token has been endowed with an unprecedented grand narrative. It is translated as "代币" (cryptocurrency token) or "通证" (pass). In the context of blockchain, Token is an asset, a vote, ownership, and the adhesive of a community. We attempted to reconstruct the world through Token, believing it could break the monopoly of tech giants.

In the AI era, Token has become the currency of computing power, a unit of measurement for API calls. It is just another way of saying electricity bill: the more you use, the more you pay; the smarter the model and the longer the output, the more terrifying the Token consumption.

II. The Struggle and Confusion of the Crypto Industry

Blockchain practitioners once had a grand ideal: "Tokenization of Everything," hoping to convert real-world assets, credit, and labor into Tokens for free circulation.

Ironically, AI has indeed achieved a certain form of "tokenization of everything," where text, sound, and video are all broken down into Tokens. For the general public, they don't need to understand cryptographic principles, manage private keys, or worry about losing seed phrases. They just need to input a Prompt, and the model will consume Tokens and spit out Tokens.

Getting Token widely accepted by the masses was once the goal pursued by all blockchain industry practitioners. Now, the vision has come true, but it leaves only awkwardness. This is not only because this Token is not that Token, but also because a large number of practitioners no longer believe in this goal and vision themselves.

In recent years, as a token, Token, due to its permissionless and low-threshold nature, once gained traction in various forms like NFTs and memes, but ultimately, with the collapse of prices, it was labeled by the outside world as "speculation" and "fraud."

At the same time, the endogenous innovation momentum of the blockchain industry is insufficient. Conceptual projects like DePin, DeSci, AI agents, and RWA are progressing slowly with limited落地场景 (landing scenarios). More and more crypto entrepreneurs are stopping their projects in confusion, either waiting for new opportunities or choosing to embrace the AI field, and capital is doing the same.

"Over time, I felt I lost my direction in the cryptocurrency space. After going all-in, the initial transformative appeal of cryptocurrency gradually faded. I became disappointed with the target audience I was truly fighting for. I completely misunderstood the difference between the actual users of cryptocurrency and those it was promoted to. Cryptocurrency claimed it helps decentralize the financial system, which I fully believed, but in reality, it's just a super system for speculation and gambling, merely a replica of the existing economy." In an article that went viral in the crypto industry a few months ago, a former crypto entrepreneur Ken Chan wrote.

This entrepreneur's thoughts are not uncommon in the crypto industry. The struggle of faith and the loss of ideals have continuously impacted crypto entrepreneurs' psychology during this bear market cycle. Although this is not the first time—similar voices emerge every time the market turns bearish—this time, the强势崛起 (strong rise) of AI has made this crisis of faith particularly glaring.

III. The Second Half of Token

This is perhaps the残酷逻辑 (cruel logic) of technological iteration: what truly changes the world is often not the grandest narrative but the most practical tool. Blockchain赋予 (endowed) Token with ideals; AI赋予 Token with rigid demand; blockchain wanted to change the world; AI first changed life.

When AI's Token becomes the new "digital oil," blockchain can only watch its former dream land in a completely unfamiliar way. This misplaced popularization is a victory for AI and the deepest helplessness for blockchain.

But there is good news. In the Web2 world, assets like U.S. Treasury bonds and stocks have also been rapidly tokenized in the past year, becoming one of the token assets with the highest transaction volume growth due to low transaction thresholds and high convenience. When speculative bubbles burst one after another, when financial giants like BlackRock and Fidelity enter the场 (场 - field/market), Token may be returning to the essence of "value carrier."

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the new Chinese translation for 'Token' officially announced by the National Data Bureau, and why is this significant?

AThe National Data Bureau officially translated 'Token' as '词元' (cí yuán). This is significant because it standardizes the term in Chinese and reflects its growing prominence, especially due to the widespread use of AI products like ChatGPT, which use Token as a billing unit.

QHow has the meaning of 'Token' evolved from Web2 to Web3 and now in the AI era?

AIn Web2, Token was a verification string for login credentials. In Web3, it represented assets, ownership, and community incentives, often translated as '代币' or '通证'. In the AI era, Token has become a unit for measuring computational power and API calls, functioning as a 'currency for compute' where usage directly correlates with cost.

QWhy does the article suggest that blockchain practitioners feel a sense of irony and embarrassment regarding Token's popularity?

ABlockchain practitioners once aimed to popularize Token through concepts like decentralization and economic models, but AI achieved widespread adoption simply by using Token as a practical billing tool. This highlights the gap between blockchain's ambitious narratives and AI's utilitarian approach, causing irony and embarrassment.

QWhat challenges has the blockchain industry faced in recent years, according to the article?

AThe blockchain industry has struggled with issues like being labeled as 'speculative' or 'fraudulent' due to price crashes in NFTs and memecoins. It also faces slow progress in innovations like DePin, DeSci, and RWA, leading to迷茫 (confusion) and a loss of direction among entrepreneurs.

QHow is Token being redefined in terms of 'value carrier' despite the setbacks in blockchain?

ADespite blockchain's challenges, Token is regaining its role as a 'value carrier' through the tokenization of real-world assets like U.S. bonds and stocks. Financial giants like BlackRock and Fidelity are entering the space, promoting Token as a medium for low-cost, high-efficiency transactions beyond mere speculation.

Пов'язані матеріали

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit1 год тому

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit1 год тому

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit1 год тому

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit1 год тому

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit2 год тому

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit2 год тому

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit2 год тому

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片