Tim Scott Signals Breakthrough on Stablecoin Yield Dispute

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-03-18Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-18

Анотація

U.S. Senator Tim Scott has indicated that a breakthrough may be imminent in the dispute over stablecoin yield provisions within the Senate's crypto market structure bill, the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act. He expects to receive the first compromise proposal this week. The bill's progress had stalled due to disagreements on a clause that would ban third parties from offering yields on stablecoins. Traditional bankers argue such yields create a loophole diverting deposits from banks, while crypto advocates view the restriction as anti-competitive. Recent closed-door meetings between banks and crypto lobbyists have aimed to find a middle ground, though no official updates to the legislative calendar have been made.

Tim Scott, a U.S. senator, has revealed that this week banks and crypto lobbyists may compromise regarding stablecoin yield payments. In the current scenario, the Senate’s crypto market structure bill progress is stalled.

Scott attended a crypto lobby event in Washington chaired by the Senate Banking Committee, in which he said that he anticipates having the first proposal in his hands to take a look at. He further added that if that really happens before the end of this week, and I think that it will. I think we are going to be in much better shape.

The bill about which he is talking is the Senate’s crypto market structure legislation, officially known as the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, which was rolled out to define how regulators will look after digital assets and describe the roles of various agencies.

Although progress revolving the legislation came to a standstill after disagreements arose over a provision that would prohibit third parties from providing stablecoin yield payments. Bankers claim that such yield offerings make a loophole that could take deposits away from traditional banks.

The crypto proponents say the limitation is anti-competitive and restricts user incentives. The bill is of concern to the Securities and Exchange Commission as well as the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

The Rigorous Meetings

Senate Banking, which looks after the SEC, indefinitely delayed a markup of the bill in January. Afterward, the Senate Agriculture Committee, which looks after the CFTC, progressed its version to the Senate floor.

In the last weeks, bankers and crypto lobbyists have met in various closed-door meetings to negotiate a middle ground, but the Senate Banking Committee has not yet set any official updates to the legislative calendar.

In the latest comments, House Financial Services Committee chair French Hill mentioned the CLARITY Act can help address some of the unresolved issues associated with stablecoin regulation and wider market structure concerns.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

OKX has Launched a Security-Packed Agentic Wallet

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main breakthrough that Senator Tim Scott signaled regarding stablecoin regulation?

ASenator Tim Scott signaled that banks and crypto lobbyists may compromise on the dispute over stablecoin yield payments, potentially leading to a proposal being reviewed by the end of the week.

QWhich specific bill is being discussed in relation to crypto market structure and stablecoin yields?

AThe bill being discussed is the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, which aims to define regulatory oversight of digital assets and assign roles to various agencies.

QWhy did progress on the crypto market structure bill stall in the Senate?

AProgress stalled due to disagreements over a provision that would prohibit third parties from providing stablecoin yield payments, with bankers arguing it creates a loophole that could divert deposits from traditional banks.

QWhat are the opposing views between bankers and crypto proponents on stablecoin yield payments?

ABankers claim stablecoin yield offerings create a loophole that could take deposits away from traditional banks, while crypto proponents argue the limitation is anti-competitive and restricts user incentives.

QWhich congressional committees are involved in overseeing the crypto market structure legislation?

AThe Senate Banking Committee (overseeing the SEC) and the Senate Agriculture Committee (overseeing the CFTC) are involved, with the House Financial Services Committee also commenting on the CLARITY Act's potential to address regulatory issues.

Пов'язані матеріали

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit2 год тому

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit2 год тому

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit2 год тому

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit2 год тому

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

A critical vulnerability in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, discovered by researcher Taylor Hornby on May 29, 2026, could have allowed an attacker to create an unlimited amount of undetectable counterfeit ZEC. The flaw, involving an under-constrained element in the Orchard circuit, existed from the pool's 2022 activation until an emergency fix was deployed by June 2, 2026. Hornby identified the bug using AI-assisted auditing tools and confirmed its exploitability in a test environment. Due to Orchard's privacy features, which hide transaction amounts and history, there is no cryptographic way to prove whether the vulnerability was exploited before the fix. While Shielded Labs assesses prior exploitation as unlikely, this uncertainty has sparked a debate on proving supply integrity in privacy-preserving systems. In response, Shielded Labs and other developers are exploring a network upgrade, potentially involving a new shielded pool and formal verification of the circuit rules to prevent future vulnerabilities and allow verification of the ZEC supply's integrity. ZEC's price fell nearly 45% following the disclosure.

bitcoinist2 год тому

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

bitcoinist2 год тому

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit3 год тому

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit3 год тому

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit4 год тому

marsbit4 год тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси