Tiger Research: Ten Major Shifts in the Cryptocurrency Market by 2026

marsbitОпубліковано о 2025-12-29Востаннє оновлено о 2025-12-29

Анотація

Tiger Research outlines ten major shifts expected in the cryptocurrency market by 2026. As the industry matures, institutional capital will remain concentrated in Bitcoin and Ethereum, avoiding unproven assets. Projects without real revenue generation will face淘汰, while unsustainable tokenomics will give way to models emphasizing buybacks and burns. Increased M&A activity will drive market consolidation. Emerging trends include the fusion of robotics and crypto-enabled gig economies for decentralized data collection, and media companies adopting prediction markets to boost engagement. Traditional finance will dominate real-world assets (RWA) via private chains, while ETH staking ETFs will accelerate growth in Bitcoin-based financial products (BTCFi). Fintech apps will surpass exchanges as primary entry points for new users. Finally, privacy technology will become essential institutional infrastructure to protect large-scale trading strategies.

This report is authored by Tiger Research. The cryptocurrency industry is entering the mainstream. Institutions have become key players in the market. Capital is flowing to projects that generate real yield. Short-term price fluctuations are no longer important. Sustainable business models have become crucial. Tiger Research predicts ten major shifts in the cryptocurrency market by 2026.

1. Institutional Capital Continues to Stay in Bitcoin

Source: Tiger Research

As institutions dominate the market, capital flows have become more cautious. These investors avoid unverified assets, limiting their scope to Bitcoin and Ethereum. This trend is likely to continue. Market growth will be concentrated only on assets that meet institutional standards.

2. Profitless Projects Face Market Elimination

Source: Tiger Research

85% of new tokens decline in price after TGE, exposing the limitations of narrative-driven growth. Hype-based projects will be replaced by new trends at an increasingly rapid pace. The market will shift towards projects that generate real yield and demonstrate robust fundamentals.

3. Utility Has Failed, Buybacks Are the Only Answer

Source: Tiger Research

Tokenomics focused on utility have failed. Governance voting rights have failed to attract investors. Complex structures are unsustainable. The market now demands clear value returns. Models that provide direct returns through buybacks and burns will survive. Structures where protocol growth directly impacts token price will also survive. New innovative models will emerge from this shift.

4. Increased M&A Opportunities Between Projects

Source: Tiger Research

Web3 is maturing. Competition for market dominance is intensifying. Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are now the fastest way for companies to scale and enhance competitiveness. The winners will drive aggressive M&A activity. The market will be reshaped by businesspeople who create real profits.

5. Robotics and Cryptocurrency Will Usher in a New Era of the Gig Economy

Source: figure.ai

The robotics industry is growing. Real-world data for robot training has become crucial. Traditional centralized methods cannot efficiently collect massive amounts of data. Blockchain-based decentralized crowdsourcing solves this problem. It collects vast amounts of data from individuals globally and provides transparent, instant rewards. A new gig economy centered around robotics will emerge.

6. Media Companies Adopt Prediction Markets

Source: Tiger Research

As traditional revenue models reach their limits, media companies will adopt prediction markets as a survival strategy. Readers will shift from passive consumption to active participation, placing capital bets on news outcomes. This shift will optimize revenue structures while driving deeper audience engagement.

7. Traditional Finance Dominates RWA Through Self-Built Chains

Source: Tiger Research

Traditional financial institutions are the main suppliers in the RWA market. Given the need for asset control and security, the benefits of using third-party platforms are minimal. These companies are likely to build their own chains to maintain market leadership. RWA projects lacking independent asset supplies will lose their competitive advantage and face elimination.

8. ETH Staking ETFs Will Drive BTCFi Growth

Source: Tiger Research

The launch of Ethereum staking ETFs will prompt Bitcoin ETF holders to seek yield. BTCFi fills this gap. As large amounts of capital enter Bitcoin, the demand for asset utility will rise. This pursuit of yield will drive the next wave of BTCFi growth.

9. Fintech Will Surpass Exchanges as the Primary On-Ramp

Source: Tiger Research

As rules become clearer, fintech applications have become the preferred choice for cryptocurrency trading. New users no longer need to use cryptocurrency exchanges. They can buy and sell directly within the applications they use daily. The next wave of growth will be led by these fintech tools.

10. Privacy Technology Becomes Core Institutional Infrastructure

Source: Tiger Research

On-chain transparency exposes trading plans. This is a weakness for large institutions. High-net-worth participants must hide their movements to ensure security. Privacy technology is a key tool for these institutions to enter the market. Large-scale capital will only flow in if transaction data is secure.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat are the two main cryptocurrencies that institutional investors are predicted to continue focusing on by 2026, according to Tiger Research?

AInstitutional investors are predicted to continue focusing primarily on Bitcoin and Ethereum, as they are considered established and meet institutional standards.

QWhy does Tiger Research claim that utility-focused tokenomics has failed, and what model is expected to survive?

AUtility-focused tokenomics has failed because governance voting rights failed to attract investors and complex structures proved unsustainable. The model expected to survive is one that provides direct returns through buybacks and burns, or structures where protocol growth directly impacts the token price.

QHow is the convergence of robotics and cryptocurrency predicted to create a new gig economy era?

AThe convergence is predicted to create a new gig economy era by using blockchain-based decentralized crowdsourcing to efficiently collect the massive amounts of real-world data needed for robot training from individuals globally, offering transparent and instant rewards.

QWhat role are financial technology (fintech) applications expected to play in the future of cryptocurrency onboarding?

AFintech applications are expected to become the primary onboarding channel for new users, surpassing exchanges. Users will be able to buy and sell cryptocurrency directly within the everyday applications they already use.

QWhy is privacy technology considered crucial for large institutional adoption of cryptocurrency?

APrivacy technology is considered crucial because on-chain transparency exposes the trading plans of large institutions, which is a significant weakness. High-net-worth participants must hide their movements for security, making privacy tech a key tool for their market entry. Large-scale capital will only flow in if transaction data is secure.

Пов'язані матеріали

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbit3 год тому

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbit3 год тому

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手3 год тому

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手3 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit5 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit5 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手6 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手6 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit7 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit7 год тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси