Three-Year High Smashes Rate-Cut Hopes, Who's Using CPI to Clean Out Whale Holdings?

Foresight NewsОпубліковано о 2026-06-11Востаннє оновлено о 2026-06-11

Анотація

U.S. CPI inflation accelerated to 4.2% year-over-year in May, reaching a three-year high and dampening market expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts in 2026. The surge was primarily driven by a sharp 23.5% annual increase in energy prices, fueled by geopolitical conflicts. While core CPI rose 2.9% year-over-year, showing relative moderation, the hotter-than-expected headline data prompted a repricing in interest rate markets. Traders now overwhelmingly expect the Fed to hold rates steady, with some even pricing in potential rate hikes for late 2026 or 2027. The report triggered declines in major U.S. stock indices and pressured risk assets like Bitcoin, which remained volatile around $61,000-$62,000. Analysts note that while the energy-driven inflation spike is concerning, the controlled core figures provide the Fed room for patience. However, the "higher for longer" interest rate narrative has solidified. For crypto markets, this translates to continued outflows from Bitcoin ETFs, heightened volatility, and a market seemingly in a "capitulation" phase, with leverage reset but sustained demand yet to materialize.


By Ma He, Foresight News


On the evening of June 10th, Beijing time, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics officially released the Consumer Price Index (CPI) data for May 2026. The report showed that driven by a significant surge in energy prices triggered by geopolitical conflicts, U.S. inflationary pressures rebounded noticeably, further dampening market expectations for the Federal Reserve's interest rate cut path within the year. According to data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the CPI rose 0.5% month-over-month (seasonally adjusted) in May, slightly slower than April's 0.6% increase, but rose 4.2% year-over-year (unadjusted), accelerating significantly from 4.2% in April and reaching the highest level since April 2023. Core CPI (excluding food and energy) rose 0.2% month-over-month, below market expectations of 0.3% and April's 0.4%; it rose 2.9% year-over-year, slightly up from the previous reading of 2.8%, in line with market expectations.


Energy prices were the core driver of this month's inflation rebound. The energy index rose 3.9% month-over-month and surged 23.5% year-over-year. Among them, gasoline prices rose 7.0% month-over-month, soaring 40.5% year-over-year; fuel oil rose 58.9% year-over-year. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics explicitly stated that the energy index contributed to over 60% of the month-over-month increase in the overall CPI for May. Geopolitical conflicts involving Iran and related tensions have continued to push up international oil prices since February, with WTI crude once breaking above $100 per barrel, directly transmitting to U.S. domestic gasoline and energy service costs.


Following the data release, by the close on June 11th, the S&P 500 index fell approximately 1.62%, and the Nasdaq index declined 1.98%. The U.S. dollar index strengthened, and the U.S. Treasury yield curve shifted upward overall.



As a typical risk asset, the crypto market also faced clear pressure—Bitcoin price fluctuated between $61,000 and $62,000 around the data release, with market concerns that hot data could further squeeze liquidity expectations.


No Fed Rate Cuts This Year?


More crucial was the repricing in the interest rate derivatives market. According to the CME FedWatch Tool, the probability of the FOMC meeting on June 16-17 maintaining the federal funds rate unchanged in the current 3.50%-3.75% target range exceeds 96%. The probability of rate cuts for the entire year has significantly decreased, with some traders even starting to price in the possibility of the first rate hike at the end of 2026 or in 2027. The market had previously anticipated 1-2 rate cuts of 25 basis points in 2026, but this path has now been substantially delayed or canceled.


Most institutions believe that this CPI reinforces the expectation of 'higher-for-longer' interest rates, but there is still some distance from truly restarting a rate hike cycle.


Olu Sonola, Chief U.S. Economist at the international credit rating agency Fitch, said: "Headline inflation is indeed hot and heating up, but this isn't yet a story of panic-style rate hikes." He believes that core inflation remains relatively contained, providing the Fed with room to continue holding steady. What will truly determine the policy direction moving forward will be the upcoming months' core inflation and inflation expectation data.


Seema Shah, Chief Global Strategist at Principal Asset Management, stated that while headline inflation above 4% remains unsettling, energy is the primary driving force, and housing inflation is moderating, with no broad "second-round inflation effects" seen yet. Therefore, the Fed still has reason to remain patient.

She also pointed out that the market's current pricing for further rate hikes may be on the high side.


J.P. Morgan Asset Management believes this data may be close to a cyclical peak in this round of inflation. David Kelly, the firm's Chief Global Strategist, said that although inflation levels remain above the target range, "the most likely decision for the Fed at the upcoming policy meeting is to keep rates unchanged" and continue observing subsequent data changes.


The latest data from Kalshi shows the market's bet on the Fed holding rates steady this year has surged to 72%, while the probability of a single 25-basis-point cut has dropped to 18%.




This stands in stark contrast to market expectations at the beginning of the year. In early 2026, the market generally believed the Fed would start a rate-cutting cycle against the backdrop of persistently declining inflation. April's CPI year-over-year had already risen to 3.8%, and the May data further confirmed the inflation rebound trend, making the high-interest-rate policy environment a mainstream narrative once again. While the external shock from energy prices has some temporary nature, if it transmits to core service prices, it will force the Fed to reassess the neutral interest rate level.


For the new Chair Wash, the June meeting is an important debut. Wash was formally sworn in as Fed Chair in late May 2026, succeeding Jerome Powell whose term ended. The June meeting will release a new Summary of Economic Projections and dot plot, and the market will closely watch officials' latest assessments of the inflation path, labor market, and policy rates.


Analyzing at a deeper level, the slowdown in core CPI month-over-month to 0.2% in May provided some relief signals, indicating underlying inflation pressures are not spiraling out of control broadly. However, the Fed historically places more emphasis on the "trend" of core indicators rather than single-month fluctuations, especially against a backdrop of volatile energy prices. The persistent stickiness of housing costs, potential second-round effects (energy costs pushing up other goods and services prices), and geopolitical uncertainties all add complexity to policy formulation.


Crypto and U.S. Stocks


The Fed's policy path is the core anchor for the global liquidity environment. A high-interest-rate or delayed-rate-cut environment is typically accompanied by a stronger dollar, rising U.S. Treasury yields, and pressure on valuations of risk assets. The correlation between crypto assets like Bitcoin and growth-oriented assets like Nasdaq has significantly increased over the past few years. Marginal changes in liquidity expectations are often first reflected in BTC prices and ETF fund flows.


Data from SoSoValue shows that since May this year, Bitcoin spot ETFs have seen significant and continuous net outflows, putting pressure on Bitcoin's price. BTC once fell below the $60,000 mark, later fluctuating around $62,000, with the risk of breaking down again at any time.



Although the current crypto ecosystem is much more mature than during the 2022-2023 bear market, in the short term, CPI data could still trigger a pullback in risk appetite, leverage unwinding, and amplification of short-term volatility.


The latest weekly report data from Glassnode shows that Bitcoin continues to exhibit characteristics of a later-stage correction, with recent buyers suffering significant losses, realized losses remaining high, and several major sources of demand substantially weakened. Bitcoin's price drop to around $60,000 triggered a significant deleveraging event, clearing a large number of speculative positions in the market. While this helps reset leverage levels, spot demand has not yet shown substantive recovery. The options market remains in a defensive posture, implied volatility stays elevated, demand for downside protection is strong, and dealer positioning is concentrated around current spot levels. Combined with declining institutional participation and slowing corporate treasury accumulation, these data points indicate that risk appetite remains low.



Overall, the market appears to be progressing further into a capitulation phase. Although leverage has largely been reset and valuation metrics have reached historically low levels, the demand response typically associated with long-term market lows has not yet materialized.


Historical experience shows that when inflation is mainly driven by supply-side factors like energy and core data remains relatively controlled, markets often gradually repair expectations for a "soft landing" after digesting the initial shock.


As for U.S. stocks, major investment banks maintain optimistic expectations. J.P. Morgan Asset Management believes this data may be close to a cyclical peak in this round of inflation. David Kelly, the firm's Chief Global Strategist, said that although inflation levels remain above the target range, "the most likely decision for the Fed at the upcoming policy meeting is to keep rates unchanged" and continue observing subsequent data changes.


J.P. Morgan indicates that "one-off shocks" like energy shocks may become the new normal. The AI investment cycle continues, but it also warns that inflation is higher than pre-pandemic, the correlation between stocks and bonds may structurally increase, and the 60/40 portfolio faces greater pressure.


Goldman Sachs recently raised its year-end target for the S&P 500 to 8,000 points (previously 7,600), expecting 24% EPS growth in 2026. It believes earnings growth remains the main driver of the stock market, though it noted in recent comments that the probability of Fed rate cuts this year has significantly decreased.

Пов'язані питання

QAccording to the article, what was the primary driver behind the unexpected rise in the US CPI for May 2026, and by how much did it contribute to the monthly increase?

AThe primary driver was energy prices, specifically due to geopolitical conflicts. The energy index contributed over 60% of the overall CPI's monthly increase.

QHow did the market's expectation for Federal Reserve monetary policy in 2026 change after the release of the May CPI data?

AMarket expectations shifted dramatically. The probability of the Fed holding rates steady for the entire year rose sharply to around 72%, while expectations for 1-2 rate cuts earlier in the year were largely abandoned. Some traders even began pricing in the possibility of a rate hike by late 2026 or 2027.

QWhat contrasting signals does the May CPI report present when comparing the 'Headline CPI' and the 'Core CPI'?

AThe report presents a contrast. The Headline CPI rose sharply by 4.2% year-over-year, a three-year high, driven by surging energy costs. However, the Core CPI (excluding food and energy) rose at a slower-than-expected pace of 0.2% month-over-month and 2.9% year-over-year, indicating that underlying, broader inflationary pressures were more contained.

QWhat impact did the CPI data have on Bitcoin and related crypto market indicators, according to on-chain data firm Glassnode?

AThe data contributed to a bearish environment. Bitcoin experienced significant deleveraging near $60,000, clearing out speculative positions. On-chain data showed severe losses for recent buyers, weakened demand, high implied volatility for downside protection, and a general lack of recovery in spot demand, indicating the market was in a 'capitulation phase'.

QDespite the hot inflation data, why do several cited economists and institutions believe the Fed is unlikely to panic and restart a hiking cycle immediately?

AThey point to the relatively controlled Core CPI figures as providing room for patience. They argue that the inflation surge is primarily driven by temporary energy shocks (supply-side) and has not yet translated into broad-based 'second-round effects' across other goods and services. Therefore, the most likely immediate action is for the Fed to hold rates steady and observe future data.

Пов'язані матеріали

AI Investors' 2026 Anxiety: When Models Devour Everything, What Moat Is Left for Startups?

In 2026, a wave of investor anxiety questions the defensibility of AI startups as models improve, fearing that most companies are just "thin wrappers" destined to be absorbed by foundation models or chipmakers. The author argues against this despair, positing that true moats lie not in benchmark performance but in areas models cannot easily reach. The logic of despair is that if models excel at all measurable tasks, only compute and cutting-edge model weights hold lasting value. However, the essay contends that the most valuable work is inherently "untrainable." Benchmarks measure what can be measured and thus optimized for, but real-world correctness often resides in private, complex systems. Examples include legacy codebases, intricate legal transactions, or hospital workflows. This kind of correctness is proprietary, costly to establish, and cannot be validated quickly—it requires time and trust within an organization. As models commodify visible, measurable tasks from both above (labs absorbing scaffolding) and below (saturation by cheaper models), value shifts to "untrainable ground." This encompasses work where correctness is a private truth, locked behind integration barriers, licenses, liability frameworks, and entrenched user habits. Trust and adoption are slow, human-centric processes that smarter models cannot accelerate. Successful companies defend their position by embedding deeply into client operations, owning the definition of "good" within a specific domain (e.g., Harvey in law, OpenEvidence in medicine), and pricing on outcomes rather than tokens. While labs compete fiercely, they are incentivized to keep the application layer vibrant. The future belongs not to those competing on generic benchmarks but to those navigating unscoreable terrain, doing the "unsexy work" of translation between models and messy human realities. The most cited benchmark scores are thus maps of territory about to become worthless, signaling who will lose the right to define what counts as good.

marsbit1 год тому

AI Investors' 2026 Anxiety: When Models Devour Everything, What Moat Is Left for Startups?

marsbit1 год тому

Trump's Crypto Empire: A $2.3 Billion Wealth Transfer Experiment

In June 2026, Reuters investigations revealed that since Donald Trump's return to the White House, his family has accumulated roughly $2.3 billion in profits from four core crypto ventures: World Liberty Financial (WLFI), the $TRUMP meme coin, American Bitcoin, and ALT5 Sigma (later renamed AI Financial). Coincidentally, overall investor losses in these projects were estimated to be a similar amount. The businesses, spanning DeFi, stablecoins, meme coins, Bitcoin mining, and digital payments, largely relied not on technological innovation but on converting the political influence and notoriety of the Trump brand into financial assets sold to the market. This marks a dramatic shift from Trump's earlier skepticism of cryptocurrencies. The ventures operated on a similar logic: leveraging the Trump name to generate market hype and trust, attracting investment through token sales or public listings, and enabling the family to capture profits upfront through equity, token allocations, and fees, while later entrants often bore the brunt of the risk as markets cooled. WLFI, the most profitable venture, generated an estimated $1.6 billion for the family, primarily through sales of its locked, illiquid governance token and its USD1 stablecoin. The $TRUMP meme coin, a direct monetization of the presidential IP, brought in over $600 million for Trump-linked entities before its price crashed nearly 97% from its peak. American Bitcoin gained a "Trump stock" premium for its mining operations, and ALT5 Sigma/AI Financial combined Trump, AI, and crypto themes for a temporary valuation surge. The episode underscores how political influence can be packaged into financial assets, creating substantial wealth for promoters while highlighting the risks for investors who base decisions on hype and brand allegiance over fundamental business models and cash flows.

marsbit1 год тому

Trump's Crypto Empire: A $2.3 Billion Wealth Transfer Experiment

marsbit1 год тому

CFTC Proposes New Rules for Prediction Markets, Redefining Which Events Can Be Listed and Who Can Participate

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has proposed new rules to establish a clearer regulatory framework for prediction markets. The proposal aims to modify how "event contracts" are reviewed, creating a structured process to determine if contracts involving terrorism, assassination, war, or illegal activities violate the public interest. This moves away from a blanket ban toward a case-by-case assessment of whether a contract's subject matter is acceptable for financial trading. A key focus is distinguishing between predicting the impact of risks and predicting the occurrence of harm. The proposal suggests that many sports-based prediction markets—such as those on game outcomes, scores, or season standings—may be permissible as they can provide price discovery and meaningful information. However, markets on easily manipulated events like specific player injuries, referee calls, or outcomes of youth sports would face stricter scrutiny. The rules directly target insider trading and manipulation risks, highlighting cases where individuals with non-public information or the ability to influence an event's outcome could unfairly profit. This underscores a shift toward ensuring market fairness. The proposal does not end the regulatory debate, particularly with state gambling regulators who argue that sports prediction markets are essentially sports betting and should fall under state jurisdiction. Nonetheless, the CFTC's action signals a move toward formalizing prediction markets, pushing the industry from a phase of rapid, often unregulated expansion into a more institutionalized, rule-based environment that more closely resembles traditional financial markets.

marsbit1 год тому

CFTC Proposes New Rules for Prediction Markets, Redefining Which Events Can Be Listed and Who Can Participate

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片