The Truth About Global Payments, Revealed by Airwallex

链捕手Опубліковано о 2026-05-28Востаннє оновлено о 2026-05-28

Анотація

The article discusses Airwallex's approach to global payments, highlighting the key challenges and different strategic paths in the industry. It begins by addressing common user questions about platform reliability, cryptocurrency payments, and the necessity of Airwallex's "heavy" infrastructure model. The core argument is that while many payment platforms appear similar on the surface—offering features like global acquiring and multi-currency accounts—their underlying capabilities differ drastically. The piece identifies three primary paths for global payment providers: 1. **Bypassing Traditional Infrastructure (Web3/Crypto):** This path promises efficiency through stablecoins and on-chain settlements but faces significant regulatory hurdles and offers little advantage over established players for mainstream use, often serving only niche or non-compliant markets. 2. **Aggregating/Packaging Existing Infrastructure:** The most common route, where companies layer a better user experience over legacy banking and partner networks. While fast to market, this approach does not solve fundamental issues like dependency on intermediaries, correspondent banking risks, and compliance fragility. 3. **Building Proprietary Global Infrastructure:** The path chosen by Airwallex and similar firms. This involves obtaining local licenses, building direct regulatory relationships, establishing local teams, and controlling the compliance and technology stack. This is the most difficult and...

Author: Gang Ge

After the last article was published, many people messaged me privately, with questions mainly falling into the following categories:

"Such and such platform seems similar, is it reliable?"

"Is digital currency payment less troublesome?"

"Airwallex makes payment so heavy, is it necessary?"

To answer these questions, one can look at the popular article by Airwallex founder Jack Zhang on their official account and X.com (formerly Twitter), titled "The Path of Maximal Resistance: The Spectrum of Global Payments Infrastructure".

Figure 1 Jack Zhang's original tweet

This article not only explains why Airwallex chose the "heavy asset" path but also exposes a long-hidden problem in the global payments industry.

So, what exactly did he talk about? Let me break it down for you.
[Full text: 2966 words, estimated reading time: 10 minutes]

01 Superficial Homogeneity, Core Heterogeneity

When corporate clients choose a payment platform, they are often confused by one problem: the payment companies they talk to all seem to have similar capabilities.

For instance, nearly a hundred global payment companies use a similar script to describe their products: instant settlement, global coverage, serving modern enterprises. Even their features and interfaces are becoming more and more alike.

  • Everyone has global acquiring: By integrating a packaged Visa/MasterCard channel, they can claim to "support 200+ countries and regions";

  • Everyone has global accounts: By partnering with a few banks, they can claim to "collect payments globally with one account, covering 20+ major currencies".

The problem is, while surface-level features look increasingly similar, the underlying capabilities are worlds apart.

Figure 2 Superficial homogeneity masks vast underlying differences

Users also can't see the real differences between platforms in product descriptions, which is why they scrutinize payment institutions over and over regarding costs, background, licenses, and risks.

Ultimately, what corporate clients truly care about is not just the onboarding experience, but also the stability of the fund flow, the robustness of the compliance system, and whether they can operate smoothly after entering a new market.
Therefore, to judge whether a payment platform is reliable, one should not only look at the front-end appearance but also see whether the platform absorbs the complexity itself or passes it on to the client.

02 Three Paths in Global Payments

Since the front-end can't reveal core capabilities, we must return to the underlying layer and clarify the common paths in this industry.

Breaking down the mainstream players in the industry, there are roughly three paths.

Figure 3 Three divergent paths in the evolution of global payments

2.1 First Path: Bypassing Traditional Channels

First path: Web3 Digital Currency Payments

This path generally tells the same story: stablecoins, on-chain settlement, programmable payments, peer-to-peer payments. Compared to traditional payments, it promises a shorter path, faster speed, lower cost; and it hopes to penetrate the consumer retail scene with a low-value, high-frequency narrative.

However, you will find that very few digital currency payment players on this path have survived.

The core reason is not that this path lacks efficiency, but that compared to mainstream payment platforms, new entrants have no substitution advantage, and too much regulatory friction is difficult to resolve in the short term.

Figure 4 First Path: On-chain settlement bypasses traditional channels

Now, mainstream global payment platforms not only possess global payment networks but also deeply integrate into local ecosystems worldwide, building operational teams, forming comprehensive advantages over digital currency payments in technology, service, compliance, and products.
  • Technology: Global payments settle in seconds; merchant settlement to card D1/D0 available;

  • Service: Highly competitive payment costs, mature local operations teams serving clients' last mile;

  • Compliance: Regulatory concerns persist across jurisdictions, leading to significant friction;

  • Product: Mainstream platforms also focus on stablecoin payments; once regulations are clear, they can readily integrate and substitute.

Thus, new players on this path often find themselves left with only fragmented markets mainstream payment institutions are unwilling to serve, and clients in gray/black markets they dare not serve.

This is why many entrepreneurs with Web3 payment dreams ultimately have to bow out.

2.2 Second Path: Wrapping Traditional Infrastructure

This is the most traveled path in the industry: relying on partners, intermediaries, to wrap a layer of packaging around the complex and antiquated underlying architecture, then using better product experience and faster marketing to drive market expansion.

The advantages of this path are also obvious: quick results, fast business development, rapid coverage expansion, making it the natural choice for most players.

But the problem is, it mostly optimizes the front-end rather than rewriting the underlying layer.

Jack Zhang's judgment on this point is straightforward: The core problems remain unchanged—correspondent bank chains, bilateral partnerships, compliance dependency risks, they're all still there.
He also believes: "A sleek interface is already a standard feature, but this doesn't shake the underlying operational logic of global payments."

Figure 5 Second Path: Aggregated gateways wrap infrastructure

Actually, Stripe, with the fastest-growing global market value, tried to acquire Airwallex in 2019 (rejected), and in 2026, there were rumors of acquiring PayPal (also reportedly rejected).

This at least indicates one thing: even the international payment giants that grew rapidly through "tech + light asset connectivity" eventually have to go back and learn the lesson of building infrastructure.

Often, the seemingly lighter path doesn't avoid infrastructure; it just postpones it.

2.3 Third Path: Self-building Global Financial Infrastructure

This is the path chosen by companies like Airwallex, Ant International, Pingpong, LianLian Global: obtaining licenses in jurisdictions where they operate, doing localized operations, maintaining regular communication with regulators, and keeping compliance, technology, and underlying networks as much as possible in their own hands.

This path is the most difficult because it offers almost no shortcuts. It requires sustained high investment, longer cycles, and also implies heavier responsibility.

But Airwallex has been even more resolute in this regard, self-developing full-stack infrastructure, never relying on agents or intermediaries.
This means they must invest heavily to acquire licenses globally, and as a licensed entity, engage in deep communication with local regulators, continuously connect to local compliance institutions, establish local teams, and serve clients to the last mile.

Figure 6 Third Path: Self-building global infrastructure

This heavy-asset investment obviously makes many think it's "not clever enough." Who wouldn't want to take shortcuts? It's just a matter of what value you want to deliver to your clients. If the underlying capabilities are still in someone else's hands, the ones ultimately bearing the uncertainty will definitely be the clients.

03 Platform's "Heaviness" in Exchange for Client's "Lightness"

For corporate clients going global, the most expensive cost is never a payment processing fee, but the fund flow risks that are usually invisible but fatal when problems arise.

For example, a market that was already running smoothly might suddenly have its accounts frozen by banks; a client who already paid for goods might have the funds stuck halfway by a correspondent bank, unable to arrive for a long time; regulatory rule upgrades might require submitting additional documents, collateral, or processes.

These problems may not occur daily, but just one occurrence is enough to disrupt a company's rhythm.

Figure 7 Platform's "heaviness" exchanged for client's "lightness"

Therefore, building solid infrastructure is essentially about keeping as much of the complexity that would otherwise fall on the client within one's own system to digest, using one's own "heaviness" to exchange for the client's "lightness."

04 What Clients Truly Gain

Corporate clients are very pragmatic; they never buy concepts but the value they receive. In cross-border payments, the so-called value boils down to three things: more stable, more cost-effective, more certain.

Figure 8 The value corporate clients truly need

  • More stable, because enterprises don't need to adapt to a new set of partnerships every time they enter a market.

  • More cost-effective, not just saving on processing fees, but also eliminating massive duplicated system costs, communication costs, and compliance costs.

  • More certain, because when market conditions change or regulatory rules tighten, clients rely not on a temporarily patched-together channel, but on a more complete, durable, and cycle-transcending underlying capability.

This is also why Airwallex's growth logic is more like compound interest than explosive growth.

Figure 9 Compound growth brought by infrastructure investment

According to public information, Airwallex took 9 years to achieve $500 million in annualized revenue (ARR), but only one year to grow from $500 million to $1 billion. The initial "slowness" wasn't inefficiency but rather accumulating underlying potential for later acceleration.

05 Final Words

Returning to the initial question, why does Airwallex build its own global financial infrastructure?

Because, the hardest part is precisely the part that cannot be outsourced, is most worthy of long-term investment, and creates the most value for clients.

Figure 10 Underlying capability is the true watershed

For corporate clients, choosing a global payment platform is essentially choosing a long-term partner, a foundation that can help digest complexity and allow you to operate your business more stably.

For the global payments industry, shortcuts may help you run faster, but only by making the hardest part your own capability can you go further.

[References]

[1] Airwallex Official Article: The Path of Maximal Resistance

https://www.airwallex.com/cn/blog/the-path-of-max-resistance-the-spectrum-of-global-payments-infrastructure

[2] Airwallex Official Article: The Last Mile of Global Payments

https://www.airwallex.com/cn/blog/the-last-mile-of-global-payments

[3] Sina: Reshaping the Future of Finance

https://finance.sina.com.cn/cj/2025-10-11/doc-inftnpwr8889861.shtml

Пов'язані питання

QAccording to the article, what are the three main paths in the global payment industry landscape?

AThe article outlines three main paths: 1) Web3/Digital Currency Payments, which seeks to bypass traditional financial infrastructure. 2) Wrapping Traditional Infrastructure, where companies layer a better user experience on top of existing, often complex, partner networks. 3) Building Global Financial Infrastructure, which involves obtaining local licenses, building in-country operations, and owning the underlying technology and compliance frameworks.

QWhat is the core argument for why Airwallex and similar companies choose the 'heavy' path of building their own global infrastructure?

AThe core argument is that by building and owning the foundational infrastructure—including licenses, local operations, and compliance networks—the platform absorbs complexity and risk. This allows the company to 'use its own "heaviness" to exchange for the customer's "lightness,"' providing clients with more stability, lower long-term operational costs, and greater certainty when navigating different markets and regulatory changes.

QWhat key problem does the article identify with the 'Wrapping Traditional Infrastructure' approach taken by many payment platforms?

AThe key problem is that this approach primarily optimizes the front-end user experience but does not fundamentally change the underlying payment logic. Core issues like reliance on correspondent banking networks, dependencies on bilateral partnerships, and compliance risks are still present and managed by third parties, meaning the complexity and potential instability are merely masked, not eliminated.

QWhy does the article suggest Web3/digital currency payment startups have struggled to compete with mainstream payment platforms?

AThe article suggests they struggle because mainstream platforms already offer highly efficient services (e.g., fast global payments, low costs, local support) and possess a comprehensive advantage in technology, service, and product. Furthermore, digital currency payments face significant unresolved compliance and regulatory friction. This leaves new Web3 players often serving only fragmented markets or high-risk clients that mainstream platforms avoid.

QWhat three concrete values do enterprise customers ultimately seek from a global payment platform, as stated in the article?

AEnterprise customers seek three concrete values: 1) More Stability ('geng wen'), meaning a consistent operational framework across different markets. 2) More Savings ('geng sheng'), which refers not just to transaction fees but reduced costs for system integration, communication, and compliance. 3) More Certainty ('geng que ding'), which is the assurance of a robust, long-term underlying capability that can withstand market and regulatory shifts.

Пов'язані матеріали

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbit17 хв тому

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbit17 хв тому

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

In 2026, the crypto industry is undergoing a profound infrastructure-level transformation—TradFi assets are migrating on-chain at an unprecedented pace. According to CoinGecko's Q1 2026 report, the total value locked (TVL) of tokenized real-world assets (RWA) has surpassed $31 billion, a nearly 4x increase from $7.8 billion at the beginning of 2025, with the sector’s aggregate market capitalization reaching $19.3 billion. Among these, the market cap of tokenized stocks surged from $2 million to $486 million, with Q1 spot trading volume reaching $15.1 billion—a single quarter already surpassing the entire second half of 2025. RWA perpetual contract Q1 trading volume reached a staggering $524.8 billion, far exceeding the $313 billion for all of 2025. Meanwhile, BlackRock's BUIDL fund has reached $2.3 billion in scale and has filed for two new tokenized funds, signaling that the world's largest asset manager's tokenization strategy is evolving from pilot to product suite expansion. HTX, as a core participant in the crypto exchange sector, officially launched TradFi perpetual futures products including NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, META, and SPY in 2026, enabling crypto users to gain 24/7 trading access to core U.S. equities. Boston Consulting Group predicts that global tokenized asset scale could reach $16 trillion by 2030, while McKinsey offers a conservative estimate of approximately $2 trillion. The on-chain migration of TradFi assets is no longer a "future narrative" but a structural transformation unfolding in real time, as crypto exchanges evolve from single crypto asset trading platforms toward "multi-asset-class trading infrastructure."

HTX Learn20 хв тому

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

HTX Learn20 хв тому

Blocked Its Own Treasure, WeChat AI Steps Up

Tencent's stock surged over 10% on June 2nd amid reports that WeChat, with 1.43 billion monthly users, is finalizing tests for a native AI Agent. The reported feature, accessible by swiping right from the main interface, allows users to issue commands in natural language. The AI then decomposes tasks and automatically calls upon relevant Mini Programs within WeChat to complete actions like ordering food, booking tickets, or making payments, creating a closed-loop service execution system. This strategic shift follows the internal conflict and subsequent "blocking" of Tencent's standalone AI app, Yuanbao, by WeChat for violating sharing rules during a 2026 Spring Festival promotion. The incident highlighted a lack of internal consensus and exposed the weakness of competing in the standalone AI assistant arena against rivals like ByteDance's Doubao (345M MAU) and Alibaba's Qianwen. The new WeChat AI Agent aims to leverage WeChat's unique assets—its massive user base, standardized Mini Program APIs, WeChat Pay, and identity system—to move from simple content generation to actual task execution. Analysts note this changes the competitive landscape from model benchmarks to which AI can connect to more real-world services. However, success depends on key variables: the capability of Tencent's underlying Hunyuan model, managing massive inference costs, and redesigning incentives for Mini Program developers whose traffic might be bypassed. The move is seen as an attempt to keep user service intent within WeChat's ecosystem as AI begins to redefine how users access services.

marsbit1 год тому

Blocked Its Own Treasure, WeChat AI Steps Up

marsbit1 год тому

ByteDance Adopts Arm CPUs, Jensen Huang: So Sad I Didn't Buy Arm

**Summary:** At Computex 2026, Arm CEO Rene Haas announced that ByteDance and Oracle have adopted Arm's self-designed Arm AGI data center CPU. The company expects significant revenue growth from this product, projecting $20 billion in demand for the 2027/2028 fiscal years. Haas noted that restricting AI-capable CPUs from the US to China is nearly impossible due to their widespread applications. Arm's stock has surged dramatically this year, notably rising 16% after NVIDIA's Arm-based Vera CPU and RTX Spark announcements. A highlight was the informal, humorous on-stage conversation between Haas and NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang. Huang joked about NVIDIA's failed attempt to acquire Arm and playfully lamented selling his Arm shares. Both executives showed a clear sense of camaraderie and shared regret over the missed merger. Key technical topics were discussed: 1. **AI PC Design:** Huang explained NVIDIA's RTX Spark superchip (with a 20-core Arm CPU) is designed for future AI agents that will autonomously run and use tools on PCs, blending local and cloud processing. 2. **Agent vs. OS:** Huang emphasized the operating system remains crucial, as AI agents rely on its APIs and tools to function. 3. **Growth Constraints:** He identified the shift to "useful AI" that generates profitable tokens as a primary driver for immense, almost limitless, computational demand. Haas outlined Arm's strategy across PC and data centers. For PCs, Arm collaborates with partners like NVIDIA and MediaTek, offering its compute subsystem (CSS) for custom SoCs. In data centers, its Arm AGI CPU (built on TSMC's 3nm process) has gained major partners including OpenAI, Meta, and now ByteDance and Oracle. Arm presented a multi-year roadmap for its in-house CPU line. The article concludes that while GPUs dominated the AI training race, the explosion of AI agents is shifting significant focus to CPUs for inference, state management, and tool orchestration. The industry is trending towards vertical integration, with companies like cloud providers designing chips and chip/IP firms offering full solutions, all competing to deliver more efficient computing per watt.

marsbit1 год тому

ByteDance Adopts Arm CPUs, Jensen Huang: So Sad I Didn't Buy Arm

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси

Популярні статті

Як купити PEOPLE

Ласкаво просимо до HTX.com! Ми зробили покупку ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) простою та зручною. Дотримуйтесь нашої покрокової інструкції, щоб розпочати свою криптовалютну подорож.Крок 1: Створіть обліковий запис на HTXВикористовуйте свою електронну пошту або номер телефону, щоб зареєструвати обліковий запис на HTX безплатно. Пройдіть безпроблемну реєстрацію й отримайте доступ до всіх функцій.ЗареєструватисьКрок 2: Перейдіть до розділу Купити крипту і виберіть спосіб оплатиКредитна/дебетова картка: використовуйте вашу картку Visa або Mastercard, щоб миттєво купити ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE).Баланс: використовуйте кошти з балансу вашого рахунку HTX для безперешкодної торгівлі.Треті особи: ми додали популярні способи оплати, такі як Google Pay та Apple Pay, щоб підвищити зручність.P2P: Торгуйте безпосередньо з іншими користувачами на HTX.Позабіржова торгівля (OTC): ми пропонуємо індивідуальні послуги та конкурентні обмінні курси для трейдерів.Крок 3: Зберігайте свої ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE)Після придбання ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) збережіть його у своєму обліковому записі на HTX. Крім того, ви можете відправити його в інше місце за допомогою блокчейн-переказу або використовувати його для торгівлі іншими криптовалютами.Крок 4: Торгівля ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE)Легко торгуйте ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) на спотовому ринку HTX. Просто увійдіть до свого облікового запису, виберіть торгову пару, укладайте угоди та спостерігайте за ними в режимі реального часу. Ми пропонуємо зручний досвід як для початківців, так і для досвідчених трейдерів.

479 переглядів усьогоОпубліковано 2024.12.12Оновлено 2026.06.02

Як купити PEOPLE

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни PEOPLE (PEOPLE).

活动图片