The Second Half of Stablecoins No Longer Belongs to the Crypto World

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-03-21Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-21

Анотація

The article discusses the shift in the stablecoin market from the crypto sector to traditional finance, highlighted by Mastercard's acquisition of BVNK for up to $1.8 billion in March 2026. This move came after Coinbase abandoned a $2 billion deal for BVNK months earlier, signaling intensified competition for stablecoin infrastructure. BVNK specializes in cross-border payments using a "stablecoin sandwich" model: converting fiat to stablecoins like USDC for blockchain transfer, then back to local currency, reducing transaction times and costs. Its key asset is a suite of global licenses, including EMI from the UK FCA and CASP under EU MiCA, enabling compliance across 130+ countries. Mastercard's acquisition aims to integrate BVNK into its Multi-Token Network (MTN), a private blockchain for tokenized assets, addressing MTN's lack of connectivity with public chains. This enables atomic settlements, 24/7 B2B transactions, and programmable payments. The strategy contrasts with Visa’s partnership-focused approach, emphasizing direct control over infrastructure. The U.S. GENIUS Act (July 2025) provided regulatory clarity, defining stablecoins as non-securities under OCC oversight, which facilitated Mastercard’s move. The deal pressures players like Ripple and traditional correspondent banks, as Mastercard’s global network could disrupt cross-border payment fees. Ultimately, stablecoin evolution is becoming invisible to users—embedded in traditional finance for efficienc...

Author:白话区块链

March 17, 2026, Mastercard announced the acquisition of BVNK for up to $1.8 billion.

This name is almost unheard of outside the crypto circle. But four months ago, Coinbase was willing to pay $2 billion for it, reaching the due diligence stage before pulling out at the last moment.

What a crypto exchange giant just abandoned, a traditional payment giant immediately picked up, and at a 10% discount.

The signal from this deal couldn't be clearer:The battle for stablecoin infrastructure has spread from within the crypto world to the heart of traditional finance.

What Coinbase Didn't Want, Mastercard Rushed to Buy

First, the failed acquisition.

In October 2025, Coinbase and BVNK signed an exclusive negotiation agreement, with an offer of approximately $2 billion. After entering due diligence, both parties announced in November that they would not proceed further. The reasons were not made public, but industry speculation points in several directions:As a crypto exchange, Coinbase faces much higher regulatory pressure for mergers and acquisitions than traditional financial institutions; and Coinbase itself is also investing more resources in the endogenous growth of the Base chain. Spending $2 billion to buy a payment intermediary might not be the optimal choice.

Mastercard entered the scene almost simultaneously as Coinbase withdrew. The process from介入谈判 to locking in the deal was extremely fast.

The deal structure was $1.5 billion in upfront cash plus a $300 million performance-based earn-out. Considering BVNK's valuation was only $750 million during its Series B funding round in December 2024, the $1.8 billion price tag意味着 the value more than doubled in just over a year.This premium isn't for technology, it's for licenses and pipelines.

An interesting comparison: In October 2024, Stripe acquired the stablecoin company Bridge for $1.1 billion. A year and a half later, Mastercard offered $1.8 billion for BVNK. The value of stablecoin infrastructure continues to rise.Pricing power in this sector is shifting from crypto VCs to the CFOs of traditional finance.

What Exactly is BVNK Selling?

For example:

An export老板 in Guangzhou making plush toys needs to receive payment from a buyer in Nigeria every quarter.The traditional path is through correspondent banks:Money starts from a Nigerian bank, passes through at least two intermediary banks, deducting several layers of fees, arrives in 2-3 days, and the exchange rate is also marked down. If it coincides with a weekend or African bank system maintenance, add another two days.

What BVNK does is called the "stablecoin sandwich":It takes in local fiat currency at the front end, automatically converts it to USDC in the backend, transmits it via blockchain, and converts it back to local currency at the destination. The entire process can be compressed to minutes, with fees an order of magnitude lower than traditional wire transfers.

But this isn't the most valuable part of BVNK. There are other companies doing similar things; Fireblocks does it, Circle does it too.BVNK's real moat is that stack of licenses.

In the UK, it acquired an Electronic Money Institution (EMI) license issued by the FCA through its acquisition of System Pay Services. In the EU, it obtained a CASP license under the MiCA framework from the Malta Financial Services Authority, allowing it to operate throughout the European Economic Area. Add to that coverage for fiat currency exchange in over 130 countries, an annual processing volume of approximately $30 billion, and clients including Worldpay, Flywire, and dLocal—all major players in the payments industry.

Simply put,BVNK is a stablecoin plumber that already has a global passport. In today's increasingly strict regulatory environment, this passport is more valuable than any technology.

Mastercard's Real Intent: The Missing Piece for MTN

Mastercard's purchase of BVNK is not a whim.

For the past two years, Mastercard has been building something called the Multi-Token Network (MTN)—a private, permissioned blockchain specifically for settling tokenized bank deposits, regulated stablecoins, and tokenized assets. JPMorgan and Standard Chartered have already conducted tests on it.

But MTN has a critical weakness: it is a closed network, lacking efficient bridges to the public链 world.You can think of MTN as a newly built highway, but without on-ramps and off-ramps connecting it to city streets.

BVNK is that ramp.

After the acquisition, Mastercard can suddenly do much more. Atomic settlement—payment and ownership transfer simultaneously, no longer waiting for ACH or SWIFT's 2-3 day delay. 24/7 cross-border B2B settlement, regardless of whether banks are closed.And programmable payments:For example, a supplier payment where stablecoins are automatically released by a smart contract only after the system confirms shipment and an on-chain Oracle verifies it.

Mastercard also has a system called Crypto Credential, which uses human-readable aliases (similar to email addresses) instead of complex wallet addresses, ensuring every transaction complies with the FATF Travel Rule.BVNK's infrastructure directly integrates with this authentication, allowing merchants to receive stablecoins without touching private keys.

It's worth noting the divergence in strategies between Mastercard and Visa here.Visa is taking the "make friends" route—partnering with Solana, deeply integrating with Circle, and building a platform called VTAP for tokenized assets, focusing on the retail end and USDC.Mastercard, on the other hand, has chosen to "buy out"—spending heavily to swallow core infrastructure directly, building its own multi-chain, multi-asset network, focusing on heavy-duty B2B settlement.

Which path is right? Unknown. But Mastercard's path is more expensive and also more irreversible.

The GENIUS Act: The True Catalyst for This Deal

Mastercard dared to spend $1.8 billion based on one prerequisite:In July 2025, the U.S. President signed the《GENIUS Act》.

This is the first comprehensive federal legislation on stablecoins in U.S. history. It does several key things:Clarifies that "payment stablecoins" are neither securities nor commodities, falling under the jurisdiction of bank regulators (OCC); requires issuers to maintain 1:1 highly liquid reserves and undergo monthly audits; even if the issuer goes bankrupt, holders have priority claim rights to the reserve assets.

Translation:Stablecoins are finally out of the gray area.For a publicly traded company like Mastercard, this means the board can approve large acquisitions without worrying about the SEC knocking on the door in the middle of the night.

By acquiring BVNK, an entity licensed in multiple countries, Mastercard essentially bought a "regulated seat." Under the GENIUS Act framework, it can more freely manage and issue payment stablecoins, with compliance costs largely pre-digested.

This is also why Coinbase couldn't close the deal while Mastercard could—As a licensed bank service provider, the regulatory certainty for Mastercard to integrate BVNK is far higher than for a crypto exchange.

Who Should Be Nervous?

The most direct impact falls on Ripple. Cross-border payments are a story Ripple has been telling for nearly a decade, but it始终 lacked Mastercard's network covering 150 million merchants worldwide. Now that Mastercard itself possesses on-chain settlement capabilities, Ripple's narrative becomes awkward—Your technology might have been earlier, but their pipeline is thicker.

Traditional correspondent banks aren't doing well either.If Mastercard can route high-value B2B payments directly through the on-chain轨道, those banks that rely on cross-border remittance intermediary fees may see their commission income plummet.

However, there are also different voices within the crypto community. Stablecoins were originally a product of the decentralized world, but now the流量 is running on Mastercard's permissioned链 and licensed nodes—how is this different from traditional finance?The Bank of England is already worried about something else:If stablecoins become too easy to use, and consumers move bank deposits to stablecoin accounts, what happens to commercial banks' credit supply?

Summary

Ultimately,stablecoins are transforming from "crypto products" into "financial pipelines."As Mastercard's Chief Product Officer Jorn Lambert said, most financial institutions and fintech companies will迟早 offer digital currency services—what Mastercard aims to do is become that pipeline.

Users swipe cards at the front end, while USDC might be running in the backend. They don't perceive the blockchain; they only perceive faster and cheaper.

This is the true face of stablecoin mainstreaming: not making everyone use crypto wallets, but making everyone use stablecoins unknowingly.

$1.8 billion—Mastercard isn't buying a company; it's buying the toll booth for the next-generation payment system.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was the key signal from the Mastercard-BVNK acquisition regarding the stablecoin infrastructure battle?

AThe acquisition signaled that the battle for stablecoin infrastructure has expanded from within the crypto industry to the heart of traditional finance.

QWhy did Coinbase abandon its planned acquisition of BVNK, and why was Mastercard able to proceed?

ACoinbase likely faced higher regulatory scrutiny as a crypto exchange and chose to focus resources on its Base chain. Mastercard, as a licensed traditional financial services provider, had greater regulatory certainty and could integrate BVNK's licensed operations more easily.

QWhat is BVNK's core business model and its main competitive advantage (its 'moat')?

ABVNK's core business is the 'stablecoin sandwich' model, facilitating fast, low-cost cross-border payments by converting local fiat to stablecoins like USDC for transfer. Its main competitive advantage is its portfolio of global licenses (e.g., UK EMI, EU CASP under MiCA), which act as a regulatory moat.

QHow does the GENIUS Act serve as a catalyst for deals like Mastercard's acquisition of BVNK?

AThe GENIUS Act provided the first comprehensive U.S. federal legislation for stablecoins, clarifying they are not securities, establishing clear regulatory oversight, and ensuring consumer protections. This regulatory clarity gave public companies like Mastercard the confidence to pursue major acquisitions in the space without fear of sudden regulatory action.

QWhat is the ultimate vision for stablecoins as illustrated by Mastercard's strategy, according to the article?

AThe ultimate vision is for stablecoins to transition from a 'crypto product' to a 'financial pipeline.' Users will experience faster, cheaper payments without needing to interact directly with blockchain technology or crypto wallets, using them seamlessly in the background of traditional financial services.

Пов'язані матеріали

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

The pre-IPO stock token market is experiencing significant turmoil following strong statements from AI giants Anthropic and OpenAI. Both companies have updated their official policies, declaring that any transfer of their company shares—including sales, transfers, or assignments of share interests—without prior board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized in their corporate records. This means buyers in such unauthorized transactions would not be recognized as shareholders and would have no shareholder rights. A major point of contention is the use of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), which are legal entities commonly used by pre-IPO token platforms to pool investor funds and indirectly acquire shares from employees or early investors. The companies explicitly state they do not permit SPVs to acquire their shares, and any such transfer violates their restrictions. They warn that third parties selling shares through SPVs, direct sales, forward contracts, or stock tokens are likely engaged in fraud or are offering worthless investments due to these transfer limits. This stance directly threatens the core model of many pre-IPO token platforms, which rely on SPV structures. The announcement revealed additional risks within this model, such as complex "SPV-within-SPV" layering that obscures legal transparency, increases management fees, and creates a chain reaction risk of invalidation. Following the news, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). The market reaction highlights a divergence: while asset-backed pre-IPO tokens plummeted, purely speculative pre-IPO futures contracts, which are bilateral bets on future IPO prices with no claim to actual shares, remained relatively stable as they are unaffected by the transfer restrictions. The industry is split on the implications. Some believe the fundamental logic of pre-IPO token trading is broken if leading companies reject SPV-held shares, potentially causing a domino effect. Others, like Rivet founder Nick Abouzeid, argue that buyers of such unofficial tokens always knowingly accepted the risk of non-recognition by the company. The statements serve as a stark risk warning and a corrective measure for a market where valuations for some AI-related pre-IPO tokens had soared to irrational levels, far exceeding recent funding round valuations.

marsbit40 хв тому

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

marsbit40 хв тому

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

The pre-IPO token market has been rocked by strong statements from Anthropic and OpenAI. Both AI giants have updated official warnings, declaring that any sale or transfer of their company shares without explicit board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized on their corporate records. This directly targets Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), the common legal structure used by pre-IPO token platforms. These platforms typically use an SPV to acquire shares from employees or early investors, then issue blockchain-based tokens representing a claim on the SPV's economic benefits. Anthropic and OpenAI's position means that if an SPV's share purchase lacked authorization, the underlying asset could be deemed worthless, nullifying the token's value. Anthropic explicitly warned that any third party selling its shares—via direct sales, forwards, or tokens—is likely fraudulent or offering a valueless investment. The crackdown highlights risks in the popular SPV model, including complex multi-layered "Russian doll" SPV structures that obscure legal ownership, add fees, and concentrate risk. If one layer is invalidated, the entire chain could collapse. Following the announcements, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). In contrast, purely speculative pre-IPO prediction contracts remained stable, as they involve no actual share ownership. The move is seen as a corrective measure amid a market frenzy where some pre-IPO token valuations (e.g., Anthropic's token hitting a $1.4 trillion implied valuation) far exceeded recent official funding rounds. Opinions are split: some believe this undermines the core logic of pre-IPO token trading if top companies reject SPVs, while others argue buyers always assumed this legal risk when accessing unofficial channels. The statements serve as a stark warning and a potential catalyst for market de-leveraging and clearer boundaries.

Odaily星球日报43 хв тому

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

Odaily星球日报43 хв тому

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

"AI Membership: The Hidden Cost Pushing Workers Toward 'Poverty'" The widespread corporate push for AI adoption is creating a hidden financial burden for employees. Companies, from giants like Alibaba to small firms, are mandating AI use, often tying token consumption to KPIs, but frequently refuse to cover the costs. Workers are forced to pay for subscriptions out of pocket to stay competitive and avoid being replaced. Front-end developer Long Shen spends up to 2000 RMB monthly on tools like Cursor and ChatGPT Plus, seeing it as a necessary 3% salary investment to handle 90% of his coding tasks. While it boosted his performance and led to promotions, he now faces idle time at work, pretending to be busy. Designer Peng Peng navigates strict company firewalls by using personal devices and accounts for AI image generation tools like Midjourney, spending hundreds monthly without reimbursement, while her boss demands faster, more numerous revisions. The pressure creates workplace anxiety and suspicion. Programmer Li Huahua, after a friend's experience of raised KPIs following AI success, fears being branded a "traitor" for using it yet worries about falling behind if she doesn't. The dynamic allows management to demand results without understanding the tools or covering expenses, treating employees like AI "agents." While some, like entrepreneur Jin Tu, find high value in paid AI, building entire systems and winning competitions, for most, it's a trap. Free tools like Kimi and Doubao are introducing fees, closing off alternatives. The initial efficiency gains individual advantage, but as AI becomes ubiquitous, the personal edge disappears, workloads increase, and a cycle of dependency begins. Workers like Long Shen realize they cannot maintain AI-generated code without AI, making stopping harder than continuing to pay. The tool promising liberation is instead becoming a compulsory, costly chain in the modern workplace.

marsbit1 год тому

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

marsbit1 год тому

SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire: The Successors

"SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire and Its Heirs" explores the unconventional succession narrative within SK Group, South Korea's second-largest conglomerate, following SK Hynix's dramatic market rise. Unlike traditional chaebol scripts prioritizing the eldest son, ownership, and political marriages, Chairman Choi Tae-won's three children from his first marriage are charting distinct paths. The eldest daughter, Choi Yun-jeong, is considered the most visible candidate. With a background in biology, consulting, and a PhD, she holds executive roles at SK Bioscience and SK Inc.'s growth strategy unit, focusing on biopharma and new businesses. Her marriage is to an AI infrastructure entrepreneur, not a traditional chaebol heir. The second daughter, Choi Min-jeong, took a unique route by voluntarily serving as a South Korean naval officer, including a tour in the Gulf of Aden. She later worked on policy and strategy for SK Hynix in Washington D.C. before co-founding an AI-driven healthcare startup in San Francisco. She married a former U.S. Marine Corps officer, connecting the family to U.S. defense and policy networks. The son, Choi In-geun, who has Type 1 diabetes, followed a more classic preparatory path with a physics degree and a stint at SK E&S but left to join McKinsey's Seoul office. He remains publicly silent and holds no SK shares, defying the traditional "crown prince" archetype. Their paths unfold against the backdrop of their parents' high-profile, contentious divorce and a record-setting asset division lawsuit. The article argues that as SK Hynix becomes a geopolitical asset in the AI era, the conventional rules of chaebol inheritance are changing. The heirs are being groomed not simply to take over, but to navigate a complex global landscape defined by AI, biotech, geopolitics, and policy, forging legitimacy through their own expertise and networks rather than birth order alone.

marsbit1 год тому

SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire: The Successors

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片