The Person Who Made $69 Million from NFTs Four Years Ago Is Still Making Money

marsbitОпубліковано о 2025-12-09Востаннє оновлено о 2025-12-09

Анотація

Four# 1st-Project This is my first project

Author: Cookie

Beeple, the man who sold one NFT for a staggering $69 million, has long been seen as a symbol of the golden age of NFTs that once was.

Although the glory of NFTs has faded, Beeple and his team have remained active in the NFT circle. At this year's Art Basel, he brought another "golden dog" to the currently quiet NFT market—Regular Animals.

Yesterday, multiple Regular Animals sold for over 10 ETH (approximately $35,000) on OpenSea, and these works were given away for free at Art Basel, with a total of 256 pieces. At this price, Beeple essentially gave away nearly ten million dollars worth of NFTs at Art Basel.

The project that Beeple and his team brought to this Art Basel is precisely Regular Animals. These are a bunch of robot dogs, as shown in the image below. They look a bit eerie because these robot dogs have human faces, and they are faces of well-known figures like Musk, Andy Warhol, Zuckerberg, Picasso, and even Beeple himself.

Of course, it's not just the eerie visual effect; these robot dogs use the cameras on their heads to observe their surroundings and employ an evolving visual algorithm to create artworks.

The celebrities these robot dogs portray were not chosen arbitrarily. The reason for selecting the aforementioned figures is that they have influenced how humans view the world, whether through algorithms, art, or politics. As humans, we observe the world through these perspectives, and so do these robot dogs. At Art Basel, these robot dogs and humans observed each other, and the moments of observation became the artworks created by these robot dogs—artworks that also serve as autobiographies for these machines.

Interestingly, Regular Animals also has a physical series, with a total of 1,024 pieces. On eBay, someone has already listed one for sale at a fixed price of $6,500. The market's valuation suggests that NFTs are far more valuable than physical paintings, reminiscent of Damien Hirst's "The Currency" series years ago, which forced owners to choose between the physical and the NFT.

Before achieving great success in the NFT field, Beeple had been creating art every day since 2007 but had never sold anything for more than $100. After achieving fame and fortune, Beeple did not splurge like some artists or crypto project teams. He acquired a studio/gallery of about 460 square meters, assembled a team of dozens of 3D artists, engineers, and researchers (even including a former Boeing engineer), invited Carolyn Christov-Bakargiev, the former director of the Castello di Rivoli Museum of Contemporary Art, as an advisor, continuously exhibited at art shows around the globe, and created new artworks.

This exhibition of Beeple's robot dogs has not only gained attention in the crypto circle due to its price but has also been covered by traditional media like the WSJ.

Пов'язані питання

QWho is the artist that sold an NFT for $69 million four years ago?

ABeeple.

QWhat is the name of the new NFT project Beeple launched at the Art Basel exhibition?

ARegular Animals.

QHow many Regular Animals NFTs were given away for free at Art Basel, and what was their estimated total value based on secondary market sales?

A256 NFTs were given away, with an estimated total value of nearly $9 million based on sales of over 10 ETH (approx. $35,000) each.

QWhat unique feature do the Regular Animals robot dogs have that allows them to create art?

AThey use cameras in their heads to observe their surroundings and a continuously evolving visual algorithm to create artworks.

QBesides the NFT collection, how many physical pieces are in the Regular Animals series, and what was one listed price for a physical piece on eBay?

AThere are 1024 physical pieces, and one was listed for sale on eBay at a fixed price of $6,500.

Пов'язані матеріали

Behind HYPE's Repeated Record Highs, the 'Minions' in the Ecosystem Can't Keep Up

While HYPE, the native token of the Hyperliquid ecosystem, surges to new all-time highs above $76 and attracts significant institutional ETF inflows, a starkly different reality unfolds within its HyperEVM application layer. Multiple core DeFi protocols across lending, NFTs, stablecoins, and DEXs have announced shutdowns between May and June. The article argues HYPE functions more like an "application stock" than a traditional ecosystem token. Its value is anchored to the trading fees from Hyperliquid's core perpetual contracts platform (HyperCore), which boasts a diversified revenue stream from crypto, commodities, and indices. Approximately 97% of protocol fees fund buybacks and burns of HYPE. This means HYPE's price is largely decoupled from the health of projects built on HyperEVM. The closures of significant projects like lending protocol HypurrFi (peak TVL >$300M) and NFT marketplace Drip.Trade highlight a structural tension. Hyperliquid's minimalist philosophy offers infrastructure without official grants, liquidity support, or marketing coordination for HyperEVM projects. This forces protocols into a fiercely competitive environment from day one. Furthermore, the success of HyperCore creates a liquidity vacuum, and mechanisms like HIP-3 (allowing direct perpetual market deployment) divert user attention and capital away from application-layer projects. The stronger the core perpetual trading business becomes, the more difficult it is for peripheral "DeFi lego" projects to survive and capture value, despite the flagship token's rising price.

Foresight News8 хв тому

Behind HYPE's Repeated Record Highs, the 'Minions' in the Ecosystem Can't Keep Up

Foresight News8 хв тому

Conversation with Arthur Hayes: AI Has Drained Market Liquidity, BTC Will Be Below 100k by Year-End

In this June 2026 podcast interview, BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes explains his decision to sell his major crypto holdings (HYPE, NEAR, Worldcoin, Zcash). His rationale is based on a macro view linking oil prices, the Iran conflict, US politics, and an impending AI bubble burst. Hayes argues that high oil prices, driven by the ongoing war, will pressure domestic US inflation. To salvage the Republican Party's chances in the midterm elections, he believes Donald Trump may pivot to a populist, anti-AI stance—advocating for taxes and regulation—which would deflate the AI investment narrative. He sees the AI sector, particularly massive capital expenditure on data centers, as having absorbed nearly all excess market liquidity (around $1.5 trillion in debt issuance since 2025), starving other assets like Bitcoin. He highlights the upcoming SpaceX IPO at a ~$1.8 trillion valuation and 100x price-to-sales ratio as a potential tipping point. If these hyped IPOs underperform, it could shatter market confidence in AI. In such a scenario, all risk assets, including crypto, would fall together as correlations converge to 1 during a broad correction. Hayes has moved his portfolio into Treasuries and energy stocks (like ExxonMobil), predicting Bitcoin will be below $100k by year-end. He sees a potential crypto bull market only after the AI frenzy cools, liquidity stops flowing exclusively into AI, and possibly after a significant market downturn prompts new monetary stimulus.

marsbit19 хв тому

Conversation with Arthur Hayes: AI Has Drained Market Liquidity, BTC Will Be Below 100k by Year-End

marsbit19 хв тому

Fed's Internal Doves Flock to Hawkish Stance, Warsh's Debut "Between a Rock and a Hard Place"

U.S. Federal Reserve officials who previously advocated for rate cuts, including Governor Christopher Waller, have recently shifted their stance, with many now not ruling out the possibility of future rate hikes. This sets a challenging stage for new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh's first policy meeting. Appointed by President Trump based on his dovish views, Warsh now faces a committee where the debate has pivoted from "when to cut" to "whether to hike," driven by persistent inflation above 3%, a strong labor market, and supply-side pressures from AI infrastructure demands and geopolitical tensions. Key figures illustrate the shift. Governor Waller, once concerned about employment, now says data has pushed him toward considering rate increases. Even moderate voices like Governor Lisa Cook, while expecting inflation to ease, have indicated readiness to hike if it fails to do so. Long-time hawks such as regional Fed presidents Beth Hammack, Lorie Logan, and Neel Kashkari have grown more vocal, arguing that the real policy rate is effectively falling and that action may soon be needed. The upcoming Fed meeting is expected to keep rates steady but will likely remove the "easing bias" from its statement, signaling a neutral stance between cuts and hikes. The quarterly "dot plot" is anticipated to show most officials projecting no cuts this year, with some potentially indicating hikes. Chair Warsh, a critic of the Fed's reliance on forward guidance like the dot plot, must navigate communicating this pivot using tools he has questioned, all while steering policy in a direction counter to the preferences of the president who appointed him. The consensus suggests the Fed's next move could well be a rate increase.

marsbit1 год тому

Fed's Internal Doves Flock to Hawkish Stance, Warsh's Debut "Between a Rock and a Hard Place"

marsbit1 год тому

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

The article analyzes the three leading Chinese optical module companies, collectively nicknamed "Yi Zhong Tian": Xinyisheng, Zhongji Innolight, and TFC Optical Communication. It evaluates their "cost-performance" not by current stock price, but through three lenses: PEG ratio (growth vs. valuation), earnings quality, and premium/discount for certainty. Xinyisheng shows the most attractive PEG ratio and high profitability, but its valuation reflects discounts for risks like high customer concentration and reliance on overseas markets. Zhongji Innolight, the most expensive, commands a premium for its market leadership, dominant share in key products like 800G/1.6T modules, and higher earnings certainty, though it faces geopolitical risks. TFC Optical, as an upstream component supplier ("water seller"), has the highest gross margin and bets on the long-term CPO/NPO architecture trend, but trades at a high valuation with more stable, less explosive growth. The core argument is that while these companies dominate module assembly, the true profit pool and technological moat lie upstream in laser and switch chips, currently controlled by U.S. firms like Lumentum and Coherent. The long-term "cost-performance" for these Chinese leaders hinges on whether the domestic industry, exemplified by companies like Yuanjie Technology, can successfully move up the value chain into high-power laser chips. Otherwise, their high growth may remain confined to the lower-margin assembly segment.

marsbit1 год тому

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片