The Fall of Crypto Actually Has Little to Do with Scamming Retail Investors

比推Опубліковано о 2026-03-12Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-12

Анотація

The decline of Crypto is not primarily due to "scamming retail investors," but stems from deeper structural issues, according to a seasoned Crypto OG. Key problems include: 1. **Misunderstanding of Bitcoin’s Whitepaper**: The core concept is not "decentralization" (a term absent in the whitepaper) but "distributed trust architecture" — eliminating the need for trusted third parties. Many projects fail to achieve even basic distributed systems while overusing decentralized rhetoric. 2. **Loss of Incremental Users**: Grand narratives (Web3, Metaverse, GameFi, etc.) have oversold the technology’s capabilities, leading to repeated user disappointment and eroded trust. The market now suffers from a lack of new participants. 3. **Erosion of Community Belief**: Many communities engage in "narrative engineering" — using complex jargon to attract new users while insiders anticipate selling at peaks. This creates a cycle of hype, pump, and dump, damaging overall market credibility. 4. **Premature Financialization**: Crypto prioritized token launches and financialization before establishing robust infrastructure or mature applications. This led to overvaluation and repeated failures when technology couldn’t support inflated prices. 5. **Shift in Attention**: Human attention is moving from social and community interactions (like Telegram and Discord) toward AI-driven engagement. As an attention-dependent market, Crypto is naturally declining as interest wanes. The OG concludes that...

Source: Jiayan Kea


Some time ago, I had coffee with friends from Stanford, and the topic of Crypto came up at the table.

This kind of gathering is quite typical: VCs, engineers, entrepreneurs, and a few seasoned players. A young man suddenly said:

"Crypto is failing now because retail investors were scammed too hard."

Many at the table nodded. Sitting next to me was an old OG who had been in the Crypto space for over a decade. He had been silent until then.

Hearing this, he smiled, put down his coffee, and said:

"The fall of Crypto actually has little to do with scamming retail investors." Everyone was a bit surprised. Because the mainstream narrative nowadays is almost always: projects are too greedy, scams are too harsh, and the market has been ruined.

The old OG shook his head and said:

"Scamming retail investors has never been the problem; financial markets have been doing it for centuries. The real issue is—the underlying logic is wrong."

He said Crypto has at least a few fundamental issues.

First Point: Many People Have Never Seriously Read Satoshi's Whitepaper

The old OG shared something interesting observation.

He said he sometimes asks people working on projects: "Have you read the Bitcoin whitepaper?"

Many say they have. But if he follows up with: "What is the most core word in it?" Most people would say:

Decentralization.

He directly shook his head and said: "The word 'decentralization' doesn’t appear even once in the whitepaper." Someone at the table checked on their phone—it was true.

The old OG continued: The word that actually appears repeatedly in the whitepaper is:

Distributed


Mentioned about 6 times.

And the real problem it aimed to solve was captured in one sentence:

remove the need for a trusted third party

Eliminate the need for a trusted third party.

He said this is the soul of Crypto, not "decentralization," but a distributed trust structure.

Now, many projects haven’t even achieved the most basic distributed architecture.

Nodes are fake.

Governance is fake.

The network is fake.

And then they talk nonstop about:

Decentralization.

He said something particularly harsh:

"Talking about decentralization without even achieving distributed architecture is like building a skyscraper on sand."

Second Point: Crypto Has Lost Its Growth Market

The old OG said the biggest problem with Crypto isn’t actually technology.

It’s that the narrative has透支 (overdrawn) the future.

Over the past decade, the one thing Crypto projects have been best at is: manufacturing expectations.

Every new narrative is grand: Web3, Metaverse, GameFi, SocialFi, DeFi—each story sounds like it’s going to rebuild the world.

The problem is, the technical capabilities of the vast majority of projects can’t support these narratives.

So a classic thing happened: expectations were severely透支 (overdrawn).

Users came in, time and again.

And were disappointed, time and again.

Slowly, it became a story everyone is familiar with:

The boy who cried wolf.

When the market stops believing your story, new users disappear.

The biggest problem with Crypto isn’t actually the bear market.

It’s that:

No new people are coming in.

Third Point: The Community Stopped Believing Long Ago

The old OG said many Crypto communities nowadays are quite interesting.

On the surface, everyone is enthusiastic, posting in groups daily: GM, WAGMI, To the moon

But in reality, many core participants are well aware of one thing:

They don’t even believe in this narrative themselves.

The function of the community gradually devolved into one thing:

Downward compatibility with new retail investors.


Using a bunch of jargon:

Tokenomics/Layer2/Modular/Restaking/Intent/etc

To surround new entrants.

Many newcomers don’t really understand what these terms mean.

But in such an atmosphere, people easily get brainwashed.

The old OG said this is essentially a form of narrative engineering.

But the problem is, those setting up the game know it’s a game too.

So everyone is waiting for the right moment:

Sell on the high.


This creates a vicious cycle:

Keep telling new stories → Attract new people → Pump the price → Cash out → Tell new stories again.

In the long run, the entire market’s credit gets透支 (overdrawn).

Fourth Point: Financialization Rushed Before Technical Maturity

The old OG said Crypto has another fatal flaw. Financialization started before the technical phase was complete. The normal path of technological development should be:

First, build the "infrastructure."

Then, develop "applications."

Finally, comes "financialization."


But Crypto took the reverse route:

Issue tokens first.

Do finance first.

Focus on trading first.

Patch up the technology slowly.


The result is: Many things weren’t even mature yet but were already priced by the capital market.

Once the real capabilities can’t keep up with the price,

Projects continuously get disproven.

The market might forgive it once or twice.

But when disproval becomes the norm, trust vanishes.

Fifth Point: Attention is Fleeing Crypto, Unnoticed

Finally, he mentioned something many haven’t realized: Human attention is migrating.

Over the past decade, the biggest attention structure on the internet was:

Human-to-human interaction, social media, communities, DAOs.


But a shift is happening now:

More and more attention is turning towards

Human-AI interaction.

Look where people spend their time now: not in Telegram groups, not on Discord.

But talking to AI.


When the structure of attention migrates,

Many ecosystems that originally relied on community heat,

Will naturally decline.

Crypto is largely an

Attention-driven market. When attention decreases, growth naturally disappears.

As the dinner was ending, someone asked:

"So do you think Crypto is finished?"

The old OG thought for a moment and said something很有意思 (interesting):

"Crypto isn’t finished, but this generation’s narrative has ended."


Then he added:

"The real problem was never scamming retail investors."

Financial markets will always scam retail investors.

Stocks do it, forex does it, AI will do it in the future too.

Scamming isn’t the problem.

Having no new retail investors is the problem.


He said the biggest tragedy of Crypto is actually very simple:

When the technology wasn’t mature,

They told twenty years’ worth of stories

In just three years.

The stories are finished.

And so the people disperse.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7619255

Пов'язані питання

QAccording to the article, what is the core concept emphasized in Satoshi Nakamoto's Bitcoin whitepaper instead of 'decentralization'?

AThe core concept emphasized in the whitepaper is 'Distributed' (mentioned about 6 times) and the key problem it aims to solve is to 'remove the need for a trusted third party' (distributed trust structure).

QWhat does the article identify as the main reason for Crypto's decline, beyond just 'cutting leeks' (scamming investors)?

AThe main reasons are: the underlying logic is flawed, narrative has outpaced technical reality, loss of incremental market/new users, premature financialization before technical maturity, and migration of human attention to AI interactions.

QHow does the article describe the current state of many Crypto communities regarding their belief in the projects?

AThe article states that many core participants in Crypto communities don't actually believe in the narratives themselves. Communities have become primarily focused on 'downward compatibility with new韭菜 (newbies)' - using complex terminology to encircle and onboard new entrants while waiting for the right time to sell high.

QWhat problematic development pattern does the article highlight regarding Crypto's technological and financial progression?

ACrypto followed a reverse development path: it financialized first (issuing tokens, enabling trading) before the underlying technology was mature, rather than building infrastructure first, then applications, and finally financialization. This led to assets being priced by the market before their real capabilities were proven, resulting in constant disproof and loss of trust.

QWhat major shift in human attention does the article suggest is negatively impacting Crypto market?

AHuman attention is migrating from human-to-human interactions (social media, communities, DAOs) to human-to-AI interactions. As Crypto is an attention-driven market, this reduction in attention leads to a natural decline and loss of incremental users.

Пов'язані матеріали

Trump Family-Backed Bitcoin Miner Posts Losses for Three Consecutive Quarters, Shares Plummet Over 90% from Peak

American Bitcoin, a bitcoin mining company co-founded by Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr., reported a net loss of $57 million for Q2, marking its third consecutive quarterly loss. Although the loss narrowed from the previous quarter's $82 million and revenue slightly increased to $67 million, the prolonged crypto bear market has eroded the value of its assets, causing its stock price to fall roughly 95% from its peak. In July, the company executed a 1-for-15 reverse stock split to maintain its Nasdaq listing. The company holds approximately 8,000 bitcoins, but the declining price of bitcoin, down about 45% year-over-year, continues to pressure its asset valuations. Eric Trump, the chief strategy officer, emphasized the company's commitment to its core mining business, distinguishing it from other firms that simply buy bitcoin at market prices. He highlighted that American Bitcoin's mining costs are approximately half the market price, positioning it as a pure-play miner amid an industry trend toward diversifying into AI infrastructure. The report underscores the high-risk nature of a strategy concentrated solely on bitcoin exposure. While the company points to improving operational efficiency and growing hash rate, its ability to navigate the bear market relying on its cost advantage remains to be seen. The Trump family has broader crypto interests, with former President Donald Trump reportedly earning over $1.4 billion from his crypto ventures last year.

华尔街日报7 хв тому

Trump Family-Backed Bitcoin Miner Posts Losses for Three Consecutive Quarters, Shares Plummet Over 90% from Peak

华尔街日报7 хв тому

Bitcoin at a Critical Juncture: Analysts Report Significant Technical Consolidation! Here's What to Expect

Cryptocurrency analyst Benjamin Cowen analyzed Bitcoin's current market situation based on technical indicators and historical cycles. According to Cowen, Bitcoin has entered a critical phase of technical consolidation that will determine its near-term direction. Two key technical levels are highlighted on Bitcoin's chart: the Bear Market Resistance Band, which continues to decline near $69,000, and the 200-week moving average, which continues to rise near $63,700. Cowen stated that as these levels converge, the price is becoming increasingly compressed, forcing the market to choose a breakout direction before the final quarter of the year. He predicts that once a decision is made, market volatility will increase significantly. Reviewing historical cycles in midterm election years, Cowen noted that July typically sees gains (e.g., +20% in 2022, ~+40% in 2018, ~+7% in 2024), while August often brings declines (e.g., -15% in 2022, -15% in 2018, -18% in 2014). He warns that a new "window of weakness" could open from mid-August, with a potential ~10% correction possibly pushing the price below $60,000. Cowen also observed that the MVRV ratio, an on-chain indicator, has not yet reached its historical low below zero. He concluded that while a Dollar-Cost Averaging (DCA) strategy remains sensible for the latter half of the year, investors should prepare for short-term volatility.

cryptonews.ru23 хв тому

Bitcoin at a Critical Juncture: Analysts Report Significant Technical Consolidation! Here's What to Expect

cryptonews.ru23 хв тому

US and Japan's Unprecedented Joint Action in 30 Years Marks End of Yen Carry Trade Era

Japan and the U.S. conducted a rare coordinated intervention in the foreign exchange market around August 3rd to stem the yen's sharp depreciation. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessette's notepad, photographed by Reuters, revealed plans for a $5-10 billion yen-buying operation. Following official confirmation, the USD/JPY pair plunged from near 164 to around 155-156. The intervention marks a significant shift as the U.S. moved from verbal support to practical coordination. While the core carry trade logic—exploiting the higher U.S. interest rates—remains intact, the risk structure has changed. Traders must now account for potential repeated bilateral actions, altering the risk-reward calculation for yen shorts. The intervention's immediate effect is forcing leveraged positions to unwind, amplifying the yen's rebound. However, analysts note this does not signal the end of the yen carry trade. The fundamental driver—the wide interest rate differential between the U.S. (3.50%-3.75%) and Japan (1%)—persists. The action is seen more as buying time for the Bank of Japan's gradual policy normalization while mitigating imported inflation pressures. To avoid destabilizing the U.S. Treasury market during intervention, authorities utilized the Fed's FIMA repo facility, allowing Japan to obtain dollar liquidity using its Treasury holdings as collateral instead of selling them. The move aims to contain spillover risks. While creating short-term volatility and compressing leverage for yen bears, the long-term trend for the yen will ultimately depend on the convergence of U.S. and Japanese monetary policies, not unilateral market operations. The current action is narrower in scope than historical agreements like the Plaza Accord, focused on curbing excessive yen weakness rather than engineering a broad-based dollar decline.

marsbit47 хв тому

US and Japan's Unprecedented Joint Action in 30 Years Marks End of Yen Carry Trade Era

marsbit47 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片