The Biggest Airdrop for Crypto Enthusiasts Comes from Yuanbao

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2026-02-04Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-04

Анотація

The article "The Biggest Airdrop for Crypto Enthusiasts is Given by Yuanbao" discusses the recent trend of cryptocurrency traders turning to a Web2 cash reward campaign by Tencent's AI product Yuanbao, following significant market losses in both traditional finance and crypto markets. In early February, global markets experienced sharp declines, with Bitcoin dropping below $75,000 and Ethereum and Solana also seeing substantial losses. This led to widespread liquidations, leaving many crypto investors seeking alternative ways to cope with losses. Yuanbao's cash红包 (red envelope) campaign, offering small but guaranteed cash rewards for simple user interactions, became a popular distraction. The author contrasts this with typical crypto airdrops, which often involve high costs (time, research, opportunity costs, and potential financial losses) and uncertain returns. Examples include Infinex, a decentralized perpetual trading platform, where some users faced significant losses despite long-term participation, and other projects where promised rewards were not delivered. The piece highlights a structural shift in crypto airdrops: from sharing future value with early users to becoming a growth tool for project exits or funding, often resulting in reduced rewards and user frustration. Unlike Web2 campaigns like Yuanbao's, which are backed by reliable cash flow and legal frameworks, crypto airdrops lack certainty and often fail to retain users post-distribution. The conclusion e...

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Golem (@web 3_golem)

"xxx has sent you a cash red envelope!"

After Yuanbao's cash red envelope campaign began on February 1st, many long-dead project/research exchange groups have completely turned into "Yuanbao羊毛 (薅羊毛, meaning 'to grab benefits')" mutual assistance groups.

Transitioning from esteemed crypto traders to羊毛党 (those who seek small benefits) grabbing Yuanbao red envelopes is also a helpless move for people in the crypto circle.

Starting January 31st, global financial markets plummeted. Previously surging precious metals crashed rapidly, with spot silver nearly erasing its yearly gains, and spot gold once falling below $4500. The crypto market didn't fare much better. On February 2nd, Bitcoin broke below the $75,000 support level, hitting a low of $74,604. ETH dropped to a low of $2157.14, and SOL even fell below $100, touching a low of $95.95.

According to Coinglass data, the crypto market saw a total liquidation of $2.5615 billion on January 31st, setting a record for the highest single-day liquidation since the "10.11 crash." Thus, "too亏损 (loss) to speak" became the true psychological state of many in the crypto circle (like the silent Yi Lihua).

For crypto enthusiasts who just experienced a bloodbath, grabbing Yuanbao red envelopes, though a drop in the bucket for recouping losses, offers some psychological comfort and a temporary escape from the harsh market reality.

Jokes in group chats

Crypto Airdrops: From Swallowing Losses to Passionate Rights Protection

Calling Yuanbao's cash red envelopes the biggest airdrop for crypto people today is not just a gimmick.

The amount of cash red envelopes Yuanbao can distribute to each user isn't large, mostly ranging from a dozen to a few dozen RMB, but its value lies in its simplicity and truly zero cost. Users only need to spend a little time recruiting people and systematically experiencing product features to get cash red envelopes. The task cycle is short, allowing for quick returns.

In contrast, airdrops from crypto projects are first distributed in token form. Profit is only realized after the tokens are sold. Although the nominal amount received is often much larger than Yuanbao's, after deducting the costs of time, research, opportunity, wear and tear, and potential risk of being stuck with worthless tokens, how much is really left?

A user who accompanied Infinex for 406 days deeply feels this. On January 31st, the decentralized perpetual contract trading platform Infinex announced its TGE (Token Generation Event) and airdrop claims. The project team successfully landed, but the community was collectively反撸 (fǎn lū, meaning 'reverse-screwed' or 'exploited instead').

一千万是只猫 (X: @RXu107) is a typical example of being反撸. On February 1st, he posted that he spent over $11,900 (approximately 82,000 RMB) participating in this project (4400 U for NFT, 7500 U for public sale) and deeply accompanied it for 406 days as a community member. But by TGE day, not only had he not recovered his costs, but his paper loss also exceeded 100,000 RMB (2900 U + 11,284 locked INX tokens).

Faced with this反撸, the blogger had no choice but to repeatedly express his distress to friends.

The exploited blogger expresses distress to a friend about Infinex

At TGE, Infinex's fully diluted valuation was only $150 million. The total investment for Yuanbao's New Year red envelope event is approximately $140 million USD. What does this mean? It's equivalent to Tencent directly buying Infinex at its maximum valuation and giving it away for free to the whole nation.

Faced with the pain of being反撸 and deceived, most people in the community choose the same approach as "一千万是只猫"—swallowing the loss silently. But some choose to stand up and confront the project team.

Crypto blogger Ice Frog (X: @Ice_Frog666666) is a typical representative. He started by撸毛 (lū máo, 'wool hunting' or airdrop farming), but ironically, in 2025, Ice Frog was either engaged in airdrop rights protection or on his way to do so. He is still negotiating with the prediction market project Space (Odaily Note: Space raised $20 million publicly, the team privately took $13 million) and has even taken legal measures.

Web2 Can Afford Airdrops, Web3 Can't Fulfill Promises

The most ironic point is that today's imbalance between "input and return" in crypto airdrops is not due to the "moral bankruptcy" of a single project, but the result of a整套 (zhěng tào, 'complete set') of structural changes in the industry.

In 2020, Uniswap opened the era of crypto project airdrops. Since then, there have been constant major airdrops (大毛, dà máo) in the crypto space. Stories of getting a car from an airdrop, swapping an airdrop for a house, or reaching A8 (a net worth of 10 million) through airdrops attracted batch after batch of people into the撸毛赛道 (lū máo sài dào, 'wool hunting track'), presenting an aesthetic of "the industry is on the rise."

But by 2025, this changed. Market narratives dried up, primary financing weakened, secondary buying power was insufficient. Airdrops were no longer about sharing the future with early users, but more like mortgaging the future for present data, creating an exit path for the project team itself or securing the next round of financing. Thus, major airdrops disappeared, small airdrops shrank, and "being反撸" became the industry norm.

So-called airdrops are essentially rewriting advertising budgets into reward pools, bypassing third parties to directly establish growth relationships with users. Whether it's the 1 billion RMB from Web2's Yuanbao or the fixed airdrop allocation in Web3 project tokenomics, the essence is this same logic.

The difference is that Web2 giants use cash to buy user certainty, while Web3 offers token returns as a promise that might be fulfilled. This results in the same tactic leading to two different destinies.

The certainty of Yuanbao's cash red envelopes comes from cash flow and约束机制 (yuēshù jīzhì, 'binding mechanisms'). Tencent's strong cash flow ensures Yuanbao "can pay," and the binding mechanisms under mature laws ensure Yuanbao "cannot renege." Coupled with the "brain-dead simple" zero-threshold interaction, users naturally perceive it as a "welfare benefit."

In contrast, crypto participants not only incur costs several times higher than Web2羊毛党 (time, funds, energy) but also worry about being sybil attacked, token lock-up periods, and ever-changing airdrop rules. The most ironic part is that the returns from all this effort might ultimately be less than from Yuanbao.

Therefore, airdrops in the crypto space today have long degenerated from direct growth rewards into promises with constantly deferred fulfillment responsibilities, or even unfulfilled promises. If this situation does not change in 2026, user retention will be sacrificed along with it.

From User Growth to Retention, Airdrop Utility Can Only Last the First Half

Using airdrops for user growth has always been the most common and direct method in the business world to compete against powerful rivals.

Tencent invested 1 billion RMB cash to support Yuanbao because its competitor Doubao is strong enough—by the end of 2025, Doubao was the first AI product in China to reach 100 million daily active users. The same goes for Web3. In the prediction market赛道 (sài dào, 'track' or 'sector'), Polymarket dominates. To grab users, Opinion, predict.fun, and Limitless also use points airdrops for user growth, directly pulling users into their products.

In the short term, airdrops can indeed create a huge user influx entry point. But in the long run, what determines user retention is still product-market fit, user experience, and ecological linkages. In Web3's business history, there are no shortage of project cases that were bustling before the airdrop but deserted afterward. Therefore, both Web2 and Web3 face the same "post-airdrop problem": how to retain users.

Ten years ago, Tencent, a company adept at imitating and then surpassing, used "WeChat Red Packets" to push WeChat Pay into a national-level入口 (rùkǒu, 'entry point'), proving its familiarity with the "user growth → retention → habit" chain. Whether they can create another miracle for Yuanbao in the same way is still debated, but they at least have ample experience in "how to convert airdrops into retention."

To this end, Odaily Planet Daily contacted an internal Yuanbao staff member and asked, from a product perspective, how Web3 project airdrops should be improved. The answer was very practical:

"As one of the internet companies with the largest market cap, Tencent's experience might not be directly applicable to Web3 projects. But the core of user growth methods like airdrops is still improving retention. This requires a series of post-airdrop linkages. For example, PR and marketing need to think about how to further spread the玩法 (wán fǎ, 'gameplay' or 'mechanics'), and the product side also needs to take more actions to achieve this."

From the perspective of Web3 practitioners, merely discussing traffic tactics feels shallow. What product features, beyond the token, can truly retain users is worth more scrutiny.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main reason cryptocurrency enthusiasts are turning to Yuanbao's cash red envelope event according to the article?

AAfter a significant market crash that caused heavy losses, cryptocurrency enthusiasts are seeking psychological comfort and a temporary escape from the harsh market reality by participating in Yuanbao's simple, no-cost cash red envelope event.

QHow does the article contrast the 'cash red envelope' from Yuanbao (a Web2 product) with typical airdrops in the cryptocurrency (Web3) space?

AThe article contrasts them by highlighting that Yuanbao's cash red envelopes offer simple, immediate, and guaranteed cash rewards with no cost to the user, while Web3 airdrops often involve high costs (time, capital, effort), provide uncertain future returns in the form of tokens, and carry risks like being sybil-ed or changes to airdrop rules.

QWhat specific example does the article use to illustrate the concept of being 'counter-farmed' or suffering losses in a Web3 airdrop?

AThe article uses the example of a user named '一千万是只猫' (Ten Million is a Cat) who participated in the Infinex project for 406 days, spending over $11,900, but ended up with a paper loss of over 100,000 RMB at the Token Generation Event (TGE), failing to recoup his initial investment.

QWhat fundamental structural change in the cryptocurrency industry does the article blame for the current imbalance in 'effort-reward' for airdrops?

AThe article blames a combination of market narrative depletion, weak primary financing, and insufficient secondary buying pressure. This has transformed airdrops from a means of sharing future success with early users into a tool for project teams to create an exit path or secure the next round of financing, leading to the disappearance of large rewards and the normalization of being 'counter-farmed'.

QAccording to the Yuanbao insider quoted in the article, what is the core challenge for both Web2 and Web3 projects after conducting an airdrop campaign?

AThe core challenge is user retention. The insider stated that the key is a series of post-airdrop initiatives where public relations and marketing need to further propagate the campaign's玩法 (play/mechanics), and the product side must take more actions to improve retention and convert the initial user growth into lasting engagement.

Пов'язані матеріали

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报43 хв тому

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报43 хв тому

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News1 год тому

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News1 год тому

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit1 год тому

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片