Tether-backed Northern Data sold mining firm to Tether execs: FT

cointelegraphОпубліковано о 2025-12-22Востаннє оновлено о 2025-12-22

Анотація

Northern Data, a Tether-backed data center operator, sold its Bitcoin mining business, Peak Mining, for up to $200 million to three companies run by Tether executives, including its co-founder and CEO. The sale occurred just before Rumble, a video-sharing platform in which Tether holds a major stake, agreed to acquire Northern Data. This is the second attempt to sell the mining unit to a Tether-linked entity. Northern Data is under investigation in Europe for suspected tax fraud and has a complex financial relationship with Tether, including a €610 million loan. The sale highlights Tether's expanding interests beyond stablecoins into mining, AI, and other ventures.

The Tether-backed data centre operator Northern Data reportedly sold its Bitcoin mining business, Peak Mining, to three companies run by Tether executives.

Northern Data was sold for up to $200 million to Highland Group Mining, Appalachian Energy, and an Alberta-based company, run by Giancarlo Devasini, Tether co-founder and chair, and its CEO, Paolo Ardoino, the Financial Times reported on Friday.

Filings reportedly show that Highland Group’s directors are Devasini and Ardoino, and the sole director of the Alberta company is Devasini, while it remains unclear who runs Delaware-based Appalachian Energy.

Northern Data initially announced the Peak Mining divestment in November, but did not identify the buyers, as it was not required by German regulators.

The deal also happened just before video-sharing platform Rumble, in which Tether holds nearly a 50% stake, agreed to acquire Northern Data.

Tether’s complex web of financial ties. Source: The Financial Times

Web of complex financial ties

It is also the second attempt to sell Peak Mining to a Devasini-controlled company. The first deal announced in August was with Elektron Energy for $235 million, but it fell through amid whistleblower allegations.

Northern Data faces investigation by European prosecutors for suspected tax fraud, and its offices were raided in September.

Related: Tether deepens AI bet, backs Italian firm’s humanoid robots

Tether has also agreed on a $100 million advertising deal with Rumble and plans to buy $150 million worth of GPU services from it as it delves deeper into Bitcoin mining.

Northern Data also currently has a 610 million euro ($715 million) loan from Tether.

The stablecoin issuer will receive half of the loan balance in Rumble stock as part of the acquisition, with the rest paid in the form of a new loan from Tether to Rumble, secured against Northern Data assets, the FT reported.

Tether branching out from stablecoins

Tether remains the world’s dominant player in the stablecoin sector with a 60% market share and $187 billion in circulating supply of USDT.

In addition to Bitcoin mining, AI, and video-sharing platforms, it is also eyeing sports teams.

On December 12, Tether launched a $1.1 billion bid to acquire the Italian professional soccer club, Juventus Football Club, but it was rejected by the club’s owners.

Magazine: Big questions: Would Bitcoin survive a 10-year power outage?

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the name of the Bitcoin mining business sold by Northern Data, and to whom was it sold?

ANorthern Data sold its Bitcoin mining business, Peak Mining, to three companies run by Tether executives: Highland Group Mining, Appalachian Energy, and an Alberta-based company.

QWho are the key Tether executives involved in the purchase of Peak Mining, according to the Financial Times report?

AThe key Tether executives involved are Giancarlo Devasini, Tether's co-founder and chair, and its CEO, Paolo Ardoino. Devasini is a director of Highland Group and the sole director of the Alberta company.

QWhat significant event happened just before Rumble agreed to acquire Northern Data?

AJust before Rumble agreed to acquire Northern Data, the deal to sell Peak Mining to the Tether executives' companies took place.

QBesides stablecoins, what other industries is Tether investing in, as mentioned in the article?

ATether is investing in Bitcoin mining, artificial intelligence (AI), video-sharing platforms (through its stake in Rumble), and has also made a bid to acquire the Italian soccer club Juventus.

QWhat is the nature of the financial relationship between Tether and Northern Data beyond the recent sale?

ANorthern Data currently has a 610 million euro ($715 million) loan from Tether. As part of Rumble's acquisition of Northern Data, Tether will receive half of this loan balance in Rumble stock, with the rest paid as a new loan from Tether to Rumble, secured against Northern Data's assets.

Пов'язані матеріали

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

Podcast Summary: Dialogue with GSR's Head of Asset Management: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Check Lending Rates on Aave Andy Baehr, Managing Director of Asset Management at GSR, discusses the current crypto market, characterizing it as stuck in a state of "ambivalence" with short-lived, unsustainable rallies. He outlines a simple framework: the market moves between "ambivalence" and "conviction" (sustained upward momentum). Currently, every rally resembles a single-stage rocket booster that quickly fizzles out. Baehr identifies three key signals to watch: 1) DeFi lending rates, 2) the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, and 3) the market forming a consensus on the "Fed hawkish peak." He emphasizes that the most immediate indicator for the sustainability of the recent CPI-triggered rally is the USDC borrowing rate on Aave, currently around 3.75%—close to U.S. Treasury yields. The absence of a credit spread indicates low leverage demand and a lack of market energy. He explains that a healthy, sustained rally requires layered buying pressure. Last year's rally progressed from an ETH short squeeze to crypto-native trader influx and finally to ETF inflows. Currently, this structure is missing. Other potential structural buyers like Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies are absent, and ETF flows have proven transient. Baehr notes that while small-cap crypto tokens outperformed large caps in Q2—a potential sign of capitation in major assets—capital is also flowing to more exciting opportunities like AI stocks and tech IPOs, leaving crypto sidelined. Regarding DeFi, he highlights that platforms like Aave provide a clear, real-time signal of leverage demand through their supply/demand-driven interest rates. A significant, sustained rate increase would signal genuine market conviction. He also observes the quiet emergence of fixed-income-like products and vaults in DeFi. On regulation, the probability of the CLARITY Act passing before the August 7th deadline has dropped linearly from 75% to below 40% on Polymarket. Baehr suggests its passage would be treated as a bullish surprise, a potent driver for price movement. However, political hurdles, including ethical clause debates and disclosures about the First Family's crypto profits, remain significant obstacles. Ultimately, the market awaits clarity on the Fed's terminal rate under Chair Warsh. Until the "Fed Solstice"—the point where the market collectively understands the peak of hawkish policy—sustained conviction will be difficult to achieve.

marsbit5 хв тому

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

marsbit5 хв тому

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报1 год тому

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报1 год тому

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News1 год тому

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片