Telegram Moves Toward Built-In Crypto Payments With TON Pay Launch

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-02-09Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-09

Анотація

TON Foundation has launched TON Pay, a new payments SDK designed to integrate crypto payments into Telegram’s ecosystem. The wallet-agnostic system enables merchants and Mini App developers to accept Toncoin and Tether’s USDt, aiming to reduce friction in wallet management, settlement, and checkout flows. It targets sub-second transaction times with fees under one cent on average, potentially reaching Telegram’s 1.1 billion monthly users. The system aims to mainstream crypto payments within chats by simplifying adoption. Future updates may include subscriptions and gasless transactions. TON Pay enters a competitive landscape alongside platforms like X and Coinbase’s Base, leveraging Telegram’s vast user base and ease of integration. The open, permissionless network operates under Telegram’s platform policies, with plans to expand beyond Mini Apps and support broader Web3 strategies.

TON Foundation has rolled out TON Pay, a new payments SDK designed to incorporate crypto payments into the Telegram ecosystem. TON Pay’s aim is to turn Telegram into a crypto payment system for Toncoin and other cryptocurrencies. TON Pay is a wallet-agnostic payment system for merchants and Mini App developers. It enables developers to accept Toncoin and Tether’s USDt currencies within Telegram’s Mini Apps.

TON Pay aims to cut down on friction involving wallet management, settlement, and checkout flows. Per the TON Foundation, this SDK makes integration with Telegram Mini Apps simple for everyday commerce. The system aims for sub-second transaction times and fees below one cent on average. TON Pay intends to cover more than 1.1 billion monthly active users on Telegram. The widespread user base of Telegram might enable crypto payments to become mainstream inside chats. To be sure, the project seeks to reduce the barrier to adoption by placing checkout functions directly into the messaging app.

Friction points related to the frequent user, complicated checkouts, and gas fees could be reduced. TON Pay is designed to feel native within Telegram and will support optional merchant tools such as analytics and advanced wallets that are currently in development. For now, TON Pay operates within Telegram Mini Apps, with broader expansion planned. Future updates will probably add support for subscriptions and gasless transactions.

TON Pay Enters Competitive Integrated Payments Landscape

TON Pay’s launch comes at a time when several major platforms are seeking to incorporate crypto payments. Elon Musk’s X has announced a plan for its X Money financial services. Coinbase’s Base is a new app combining social elements with payments and trading. Telegram’s ecosystem also has the ability to incorporate TON Pay to compete with other “everything apps.” TON Pay’s main advantage for merchants will be the ease of development for the ecosystem. There are also concerns by some people about the skepticism surrounding TON, given their previous connections with Telegram.

The TON Foundation argues that, by definition, this network is open and permissionless. Merchants who use the TON Pay system must abide by Telegram’s platform policies. The merchant rules will likely change as the SDK develops. TON Pay’s malleable structure could potentially facilitate compatibility between crypto and fiat payments. Renowned analysts have great expectations that integrated checkouts can potentially accelerate on-chain spend. The proposed rollout strategies include web development beyond Telegram Mini Apps. The rollout of TON Pay can be related to Telegram’s strategy for Web3. It is a wallet-agnostic system aiming to simplify various crypto transactions. TON Pay has originated from Telegram’s potential for developing into a digital payments system.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Vitalik Buterin Says ETH-Backed Algorithmic Stablecoins Qualify as ‘True DeFi’

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main purpose of TON Pay's new payments SDK?

AThe main purpose of TON Pay is to incorporate crypto payments into the Telegram ecosystem, turning it into a payment system for Toncoin and other cryptocurrencies, and enabling developers to accept these currencies within Telegram's Mini Apps.

QWhat are some key features and goals of the TON Pay system?

ATON Pay aims to reduce friction in wallet management, settlement, and checkout flows. It targets sub-second transaction times, fees below one cent on average, and plans to serve Telegram's over 1.1 billion monthly active users. It also supports optional merchant tools like analytics and advanced wallets.

QHow does TON Pay fit into the broader competitive landscape of integrated payments?

ATON Pay enters a competitive field where platforms like Elon Musk's X (with X Money) and Coinbase's Base are also incorporating crypto payments. Its main advantage is the ease of development within the Telegram ecosystem, positioning it to compete with other 'everything apps'.

QWhat potential benefits does TON Pay offer for reducing barriers to crypto adoption?

ATON Pay seeks to reduce adoption barriers by integrating checkout functions directly into the Telegram messaging app, simplifying the user experience, and potentially reducing issues like complicated checkouts and gas fees.

QWhat future developments are mentioned for TON Pay beyond its current capabilities?

AFuture updates for TON Pay are planned to include support for subscriptions and gasless transactions, with a broader expansion beyond Telegram Mini Apps into web development, aligning with Telegram's Web3 strategy.

Пов'язані матеріали

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit6 хв тому

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit6 хв тому

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit21 хв тому

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit21 хв тому

United Stables Crosses $1B As Chainlink Data Feeds Secure U Token Collateral

United Stables' U token has surpassed $1 billion in market capitalization, with Chainlink Data Feeds providing the critical pricing and collateral data infrastructure across its deployment chains. This milestone highlights that robust oracle infrastructure is essential for stablecoin credibility, as DeFi protocols require reliable data for integration. Chainlink's role is foundational, enabling automated collateral auditing and pricing verification, which helps make the U token safer for the broader market to evaluate and use. While this strengthens Chainlink's position in the stablecoin infrastructure narrative, it does not directly guarantee increased fees or value for LINK token holders. The growth of U indicates both widening competition in the stablecoin sector and the increasing dependence of scalable stablecoins on dependable external data services.

bitcoinist1 год тому

United Stables Crosses $1B As Chainlink Data Feeds Secure U Token Collateral

bitcoinist1 год тому

BonkDAO Treasury Drain Shows Solana Governance Risk Is Real

The BonkDAO treasury suffered an approximately $20 million drain due to a malicious governance proposal passed through the Realms platform on Solana. This incident highlights governance as a critical attack surface for DAOs, distinct from smart contract exploits. The attack leveraged the DAO's own voting mechanics to move funds, demonstrating that flawed governance design—such as weak proposal rules or voter weight calculations—can be exploited even when the underlying blockchain functions correctly. The event serves as a warning for Solana DAOs to rigorously review and strengthen their governance safeguards, including quorum thresholds, timelocks, and execution permissions. While damaging to community trust, especially for the prominent BONK meme ecosystem, the issue is not a failure of the Solana base layer but a widespread application-level risk common across blockchain ecosystems.

bitcoinist1 год тому

BonkDAO Treasury Drain Shows Solana Governance Risk Is Real

bitcoinist1 год тому

Midnight Token Falls After $13M Wanchain Bridge Exploit

Midnight's NIGHT token plummeted roughly 30% following a $13.2 million exploit on a Wanchain cross-chain bridge. The attacker drained 515 million NIGHT tokens by exploiting a signature reuse flaw in the bridge's infrastructure, not the core Cardano or Midnight networks. This incident highlights the persistent vulnerability of cross-chain bridges, which are critical for asset transfers but introduce complex security risks. While the underlying blockchains remained secure, the token's price suffered due to liquidity disruption and lost market confidence. The response from Wanchain, including pausing the affected bridge and providing clear communication on recovery efforts, will be crucial for stabilizing the situation. The event serves as a reminder for traders to factor in bridge-related risks when evaluating tokens reliant on cross-chain liquidity.

bitcoinist2 год тому

Midnight Token Falls After $13M Wanchain Bridge Exploit

bitcoinist2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот