TAO, NEAR, and Other AI Cryptocurrencies Record Heavy Losses

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-03-19Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-19

Анотація

TAO and NEAR, along with other major AI cryptocurrencies, have recorded significant losses in the past 24 hours. TAO dropped nearly 10.12% to $247.80, while NEAR declined by 5.53%. Other AI tokens like ICP and RENDER also fell by 4.16% and 7.02%, respectively. Despite these daily losses, some, including TAO and RENDER, still show weekly gains. Both TAO and NEAR are forecasted to decline further in the next three months. The broader market downturn coincides with reports that Iran is considering imposing transit fees on ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz, raising concerns about rising shipping costs and their potential economic impact.

TAO and NEAR have lost significant values in the last 24 hours. Their decline aligns with the general downtrend across the crypto market. However, many more AI cryptocurrencies have also shed their respective values. This comes at a time when Iran is considering imposing transit fees via the Strait of Hormuz – triggering high price concerns.

TAO and NEAR

TAO has lost almost 10.12%, going down to $247.80 when the article is being drafted. Even the hourly loss comes to 1.24% for a significant level. However, the Bittensor token has added 16.28% in gains over the last 7 days. It remains in the top position with a market cap of more than $2.67 billion.

Sailing on the same ship is the NEAR Protocol token, NEAR. It is down by 5.53% over a day and 0.10% over an hour. The AI crypto seems to have held its ground strongly compared to TAO at the moment. It still lags when talking about the weekly gain because the addition is only 2.05%.

Interestingly, TAO and NEAR are forecasted to decline in the next 3 months as well. The former could plunge by 23.08% to around $191.08. The latter could plummet by approximately 11.99% to $1.19 from $1.35.

Other AI Cryptocurrencies

Other top AI cryptocurrencies that are down are ICP and RENDER. They have lost 4.16% and 7.02%, respectively, in a single day. Their values now translate to $2.52 and $1.65, applicable in the same order. ICP stands out among the top 4 AI tokens, as it has recorded a weekly loss of 2.85%. RENDER, like TAO and NEAR, has recorded a gain of 3.09%.

FIL, the Filecoin token, also stands out with an hourly gain of 0.05%. Its weekly gain is decent at 5.34%, and loss over the last 24 hours stands at 3.95%.

Transit Fees by Iran

Iran is reportedly considering the imposition of transit fees for ships that pass through the Strait of Hormuz. If imposed, every passage will have to pay tolls and taxes to Iran, which could add to the total shipping cost.

This seems to be applicable to states that have sanctioned it. An official confirmation or update regarding the matter is awaited. The report, anyway, remains a concern, given that Crude Oil price and Brent have already reached $97.41 and $113.71, respectively.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

US Court Dismisses Coinbase User’s IRS Summons Challenge

TagsAI CRYPTOFILICPNEARRENDERTAO

Пов'язані питання

QWhat are the percentage losses for TAO and NEAR in the last 24 hours?

ATAO has lost almost 10.12% and NEAR is down by 5.53% in the last 24 hours.

QWhat is the forecasted price decline for TAO and NEAR over the next 3 months?

ATAO is forecasted to plunge by 23.08% to around $191.08, and NEAR could plummet by approximately 11.99% to $1.19.

QWhich other top AI cryptocurrencies, besides TAO and NEAR, have recorded losses?

AOther top AI cryptocurrencies that are down are ICP, which lost 4.16%, and RENDER, which lost 7.02% in a single day.

QWhat global event is mentioned as a potential factor contributing to market concerns?

AIran is reportedly considering imposing transit fees for ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz, which could increase shipping costs and is a market concern.

QWhich AI token mentioned in the article has recorded a weekly loss?

AICP stands out among the top AI tokens as it has recorded a weekly loss of 2.85%.

Пов'язані матеріали

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbit1 год тому

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbit1 год тому

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

OpenAI is shifting its business strategy away from promoting its most expensive, flagship models for every task. Recent price cuts—80% for GPT-5.6 Luna and 20% for Terra—signal a deeper change: the company now actively advises users that many tasks don't require the most powerful model. Instead, OpenAI recommends a tiered approach: use the high-end GPT-5.6 Sol for complex planning and analysis, then delegate execution to cheaper models like Luna. This mirrors moves by Anthropic, which recently launched Claude Opus 5 at half the price of its top model, Fable 5. Both companies are de-emphasizing flagship models as primary revenue drivers, using them instead for brand prestige and technological showcases. The industry is entering a "mass-market" phase, similar to automotive, where high-volume, cost-effective models handle daily operations and drive scale. OpenAI's price reductions are partly enabled by AI models themselves optimizing underlying code and infrastructure, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of efficiency gains and cost reduction. Competition is shifting from "who is smartest" to "who offers the best value." The goal is no longer selling individual models but fostering widespread API adoption and ecosystem lock-in. By making AI calls cheap and ubiquitous, companies like OpenAI aim to become the indispensable, utility-like infrastructure powering automated workflows—the "water and electricity" of software, quietly embedded everywhere.

marsbit1 год тому

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片