SwissBorg Launches Withdrawal Protection to Counter Physical Crypto Extortion

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-02-10Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-10

Анотація

SwissBorg, a leading European crypto investment app, has introduced a new security feature called Withdrawal Protection to combat physical extortion attacks. This feature imposes a non-bypassable time delay of 1 to 90 days on all external cryptocurrency withdrawals, preventing immediate asset transfers even if a user is coerced into initiating a transaction. The delay is designed to remove the incentive for real-world "wrench attacks" by eliminating the possibility of instant access to funds. According to SwissBorg CEO Cyrus Fazel, the feature provides users with additional real-world security alongside existing digital safeguards. Once enabled, the delay applies to all external withdrawals and cannot be bypassed—even by SwissBorg support. Trading, portfolio management, and internal transfers remain unaffected. The update is part of SwissBorg’s broader security strategy, which includes MPC keyless technology and Proof of Liabilities. Withdrawal Protection is available in the latest version of the SwissBorg app.

The prominent leading app in Europe for investing and earning cryptocurrency, SwissBorg, just made an announcement on the availability of Withdrawal Protection. This new security feature protects users against the increasing number of physical “wrench” assaults by imposing a time-lock that cannot be bypassed on all cryptocurrency withdrawals. This prevents the immediate transfer of assets out of a user’s account.

In light of the growing number of extortion attempts in the real world that include gaining unauthorized access to cryptocurrency wallets, there is a pressing need for additional protective measures on the human level. Withdrawal Protection is a strategy that was developed to confront and protect against this new and rising issue. A required, non-bypassable time-lock is applied to all cryptocurrency withdrawals when the feature is engaged. This prevents the immediate transfer of assets out of a user’s account during the withdrawal process. Users are able to choose a delay period that may last anywhere from one to ninety days, during which time they are unable to withdraw funds.

Physical assaults that are based on fear and a sense of urgency are discouraged by Withdrawal Protection because it eliminates the potential of rapid rewards. Even in the event that a user is compelled to unlock their device and start a withdrawal, the application will still impose the waiting time, which will theoretically prevent the user from having rapid access to their assets.

“Security must go beyond simply protecting accounts from hackers,” said Cyrus Fazel, Co-Founder and CEO of SwissBorg. “Crypto is reaching a point of widespread adoption, so it’s equally important to protect people in real-world situations. Withdrawal Protection is designed to give users time, control, and peace of mind in circumstances when digital safeguards alone may not be sufficient.”

The function is intended to be a “set and forget” safety protection once it is activated. After being activated in the security settings of the application, the delay that was determined will apply to all cryptocurrency withdrawals. There is no way to circumvent the wait, not even by SwissBorg support, which guarantees that the feature will continue to serve as an advantageous deterrent. At any moment, users have the ability to remove the Withdrawal Protection feature; nevertheless, the same wait period will apply until withdrawals are returned to immediately accessible status.

Within the SwissBorg app, trading and asset management are not impacted by the Withdrawal Protection feature. As usual, users are able to continue exchanging assets, managing portfolios, and making use of internal services. However, cryptocurrency withdrawals made outside of the SwissBorg ecosystem will continue to be time constrained. Also unaffected are internal transfers such as Smart Send, which necessitates the recipient’s Know Your Customer (KYC) documents.

SwissBorg has spent years developing a solid digital security architecture, which includes MPC keyless technology and visible Proof of Liabilities. As a result, the app is now considered to be one of the most secure places for the management of crypto assets. The implementation of Withdrawal Protection is a supplementary measure to SwissBorg’s more comprehensive “defense in depth” security approach. This strategy incorporates MPC keyless technology, Proof of Liabilities, and now a specific precaution against physical coercion.

It is possible to enable Withdrawal Protection by going to the Security section of a user’s profile, which is accessible in the most recent version of the SwissBorg app.

SwissBorg is the most prominent cryptocurrency wealth management platform that is driven by the community. It was developed in Switzerland and is licensed in the European Union. SwissBorg is not only dedicated to trust and transparency, but it is also on a mission to democratize the future of finance in order to make it possible for everyone to access financial independence. At the heart of it all is the revolutionary Meta-Exchange, which establishes a seamless connection to a number of different centralized and decentralised exchanges in order to provide consumers with the greatest possible opportunities for liquidity and pricing. In addition to trading, SwissBorg provides customers with tailored yield strategies via its DeFi platform. Additionally, the Alpha Pre-Sales platform gives users the ability to access early Web3 prospects. The Swissborg token, known as BORG, is at the center of the company’s ecosystem and offers its holders a wide range of financial and other advantages.

TagsAltcoinBlockchain

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main purpose of SwissBorg's new Withdrawal Protection feature?

AThe main purpose of SwissBorg's Withdrawal Protection is to protect users against physical extortion and 'wrench' assaults by imposing a non-bypassable time-lock on all withdrawals, preventing the immediate transfer of assets.

QHow long can a user set the withdrawal delay period for in the Withdrawal Protection feature?

AUsers can choose a withdrawal delay period that lasts anywhere from one to ninety days.

QAccording to CEO Cyrus Fazel, why is it important to protect users in real-world situations?

ACyrus Fazel stated that as crypto reaches widespread adoption, it is equally important to protect people in real-world situations, giving users time, control, and peace of mind when digital safeguards alone may not be sufficient.

QCan the withdrawal delay be bypassed by SwissBorg support or the user?

ANo, the withdrawal delay is non-bypassable, even by SwissBorg support, guaranteeing it serves as an effective deterrent.

QWhat activities within the SwissBorg app are NOT affected by the Withdrawal Protection feature?

ATrading, asset management, portfolio management, internal services, and internal transfers like Smart Send are not affected by the Withdrawal Protection feature.

Пов'язані матеріали

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit30 хв тому

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit30 хв тому

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit49 хв тому

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit49 хв тому

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit58 хв тому

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit58 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片