Strong jobs report shakes the market – Could Bitcoin drop below $60K next?

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-02-12Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-12

Анотація

The strong January U.S. jobs report, which far exceeded expectations, has significantly impacted market sentiment and expectations for Federal Reserve interest rate cuts. The probability of a near-term cut fell sharply, increasing volatility. This shift is particularly relevant for Bitcoin, which dipped following the data release. The article argues this reinforces the importance of the upcoming March FOMC meeting in setting the tone for risk assets. Technically, Bitcoin is described as fragile, trapped in a volatile range between $65k and $70k. It has repeatedly failed to turn key resistance levels into support, putting pressure on its current floor. This setup, combined with the macro uncertainty over interest rates, reduces the incentive for short-term holders to remain invested. The mounting headwinds increase the likelihood of a wave of selling (capitulation), which could break the $65k support level and put the $60k threshold at risk.

The March FOMC meeting carries added weight this year. After a bearish Q1, in which high-cap assets logged their weakest quarterly returns in years, this meeting is likely to set the tone for risk assets heading into Q2.

Recent data seemed to reinforce that significance. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the U.S added 130k jobs in January, far above the 55k expected, while the unemployment rate fell to 4.3% – Beating forecasts of 4.4%.

In short, the labor market came in “stronger than expected,” reinforcing the idea that investors had been pricing in slower growth. Bitcoin’s [BTC] 2.54% dip following the release was further evidence of this shift in expectations.

Notably, the repricing didn’t stop there. The probability of a near-term rate cut fell sharply, from 20.1% before the data release to 6.4% at press time, highlighting how quickly sentiment adjusted to firmer economic signals.

However, the question remains – Has sentiment truly adjusted? Well, U.S. President Donald Trump welcomed the report, saying it could lower the country’s interest burden and support a more balanced fiscal outlook.

Skeptics, however, took a different positon. The Kobeissi Letter argued that “the Fed pause will continue,” arguing that a strong labor market reduces the urgency for rate cuts and keeps monetary policy restrictive for longer.

In short, volatility around rate-cut expectations remains.

On one hand, this reinforces AMBCrypto’s view that the March FOMC carries added weight. The bigger question for Bitcoin, however, is whether this uncertainty will weaken its ability to hold the prevailing tight range.

Bitcoin remains fragile against mounting macro headwinds

A textbook volatility-trap setup can be seen for Bitcoin.

This week, BTC has been chopping between $65k–$70k, a range that usually reflects speculative positioning as traders bet on the next move. Notably, BTC’s long/short ratio flipped negative over the same period.

Technically, this could be a sign of crowded short-term positioning. If bulls defend this range, a squeeze could push BTC towarda higher resistance. That said, STHs have been losing patience, with BTC still trading 30% below their cost basis.

In setups like this, holding support is critical to avoid a wave of capitulation. However, key factors suggest the road ahead will be challenging, with rate-cut volatility standing out as a major bearish catalyst.

Meanwhile, on the technical side, fragility remains clear. Bitcoin has twice failed to flip resistance into support since the January peak of $97k. First around $85k–$90k, then near $75k, which puts pressure on the $65k-floor.

Taken together, this setup clearly reduces the incentive for STHs to hold. Instead, with volatility still elevated, capitulation will be increasingly likely, raising the odds of Bitcoin breaking the third floor and putting the $60k-level at risk.


Final Thoughts

  • Strong January jobs data pushed markets to repricing rate-cut expectations, increasing volatility and uncertainty for Bitcoin.
  • Bitcoin remains technically fragile, with repeated resistance failures heightening the risk of capitulation.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was the immediate market reaction to the stronger-than-expected January jobs report, specifically for Bitcoin?

ABitcoin's price dipped by 2.54% following the release of the jobs report.

QHow did the probability of a near-term Fed rate cut change after the jobs data was released?

AThe probability of a near-term rate cut fell sharply from 20.1% before the data release to 6.4%.

QWhat is the 'textbook volatility-trap setup' mentioned for Bitcoin, and what is the key price range?

AThe volatility-trap setup refers to Bitcoin chopping between the $65k–$70k range, which reflects speculative positioning as traders bet on the next move.

QAccording to the article, what is a major bearish catalyst creating challenges for Bitcoin's price?

ARate-cut volatility is highlighted as a major bearish catalyst creating challenges for Bitcoin's price.

QWhat are the two key technical failures that have put pressure on Bitcoin's $65k support floor?

ABitcoin failed to flip the $85k–$90k resistance into support after its January peak, and it subsequently failed to flip the $75k level into support.

Пов'язані матеріали

NVIDIA Begins Adding Soap to the Bubble

NVIDIA is taking on a dual role: not just as a leading chip supplier, but as a massive capital allocator across the entire AI supply chain. In 2026, the company has committed over $40 billion in investments within five months, targeting everything from optical fiber manufacturing and data center operations to foundational AI model development. This investment spree, described as a systematic "sprinkler" approach, primarily funds companies that are major buyers of NVIDIA's own GPUs. Critics, including analysts from Goldman Sachs, label this a "circular revenue" loop—comparable to a supplier financing a customer to buy more of its products. A prominent example is NVIDIA's investment in OpenAI, which is expected to generate around $13 billion in revenue for NVIDIA, much of which may be reinvested back into OpenAI. While CEO Jensen Huang dismisses the "circular financing" critique as "absurd," arguing the investments are confidence votes in long-term generational shifts, some analysts express discomfort. They note that while investments in critical supply chain components like optics are strategically sound, funding new cloud providers like CoreWeave feels like "pre-paying for your own GPUs." The strategy carries significant risks. If the AI investment cycle turns, the market may question how much demand is genuine versus artificially sustained by NVIDIA's own balance sheet. Despite posting record-breaking earnings—$215.9 billion in annual revenue and $120 billion in net profit for FY2026—NVIDIA's stock fell after its report, signaling that "beating expectations" may no longer be enough to assure investors about the duration of the AI spending boom. The article concludes that while a bubble isn't necessarily a fraud, NVIDIA's actions resemble adding soap to a bubble—making it appear more robust and durable. This creates a complex scenario requiring extreme冷静 from investors to distinguish between real structural growth and financial engineering.

marsbit13 хв тому

NVIDIA Begins Adding Soap to the Bubble

marsbit13 хв тому

Short Positions Have Been Squeezed Out: Will the Next Leg of the U.S. Stock AI Rally Continue in Seoul?

"Short Squeeze Exhausted: Will the Next Leg of the AI Rally Continue in Seoul?" A Nomura report suggests the US AI stock rally, which saw the S&P 500 rise ~16.6% in 28 days largely driven by 10 key stocks, may be pausing. The fuel from short covering, CTA fund positioning, and volatility-control strategies is nearing its limit. For the rally to continue, new momentum from retail and sentiment-driven FOMO (Fear Of Missing Out) is needed. South Korea's market provided a potential answer on the very day the report was published. The KOSPI index surged 4.32%, triggering a buy-side circuit breaker, led by massive gains in chip giants SK Hynix (+11.98%) and Samsung. This surge is characterized by retail "hynix FOMO" and overseas funds precisely buying into AI themes via chip-focused ETFs, shifting from broad Korean market ETFs. The Korean rally is a high-beta extension of the US AI capital expenditure story, as major cloud providers plan massive infrastructure spending, directly benefiting memory chip leaders. However, this linkage also implies vulnerability. The sustainability of this next leg depends on whether US tech stocks correct, the trajectory of US inflation (with upcoming CPI data key), and geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz. Seoul has emerged as the new epicenter of the AI trade, but its fate remains tied to these broader macro and market dynamics.

marsbit18 хв тому

Short Positions Have Been Squeezed Out: Will the Next Leg of the U.S. Stock AI Rally Continue in Seoul?

marsbit18 хв тому

Borrowing Money from a Hundred Years Later, Building Incomprehensible AI

Tech giants like Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Microsoft are undergoing a radical financial transformation due to AI. Their traditional "light-asset, high-free-cash-flow" model is being dismantled by staggering capital expenditures on AI infrastructure—data centers, GPUs, and power. Combined 2026 guidance exceeds $700 billion, a 4.5x increase from 2022, causing free cash flow to plummet (e.g., Amazon's fell 95%). To fund this, they are borrowing unprecedented sums through long-dated, multi-currency bonds (e.g., Alphabet's 100-year bond). The world's most conservative capital—pensions, insurers—is now funding Silicon Valley's most speculative bet. This shift makes these companies resemble heavy-asset industrials (railroads, utilities) rather than software firms, threatening their premium valuations. Historically, such infrastructure booms (railroads, fiber optics) followed a pattern: genuine technology, overbuilding fueled by competitive frenzy, aggressive debt financing, and a crash triggered by financial conditions—not technology failure. The infrastructure remained, but many original builders and financiers did not survive. The core gamble is a "time arbitrage": using cheap debt today to build scale and lock in customers before AI capabilities commoditize. They are betting that AI revenue will materialize before debt comes due. Their positions vary: Amazon is under immediate cash pressure; Meta's path to monetization is unclear; Alphabet has a robust core business buffer; Microsoft has the shortest path from infrastructure to revenue. The contract is set: the most risk-averse global capital has lent its time to Silicon Valley, awaiting a future that is promised but uncertain.

marsbit1 год тому

Borrowing Money from a Hundred Years Later, Building Incomprehensible AI

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片