Strive Buys Strategy Stock, Bitcoin Treasury Firms Begin Interlocking Dolls

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-03-12Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-12

Анотація

On March 11, Strive, a Bitcoin treasury company, announced it had purchased $50 million worth of preferred shares (STRC) issued by MicroStrategy (now Strategy)—another major corporate Bitcoin holder. This represents over one-third of Strive’s treasury. Both companies use raised capital to buy Bitcoin, and both issue high-yield preferred shares (SATA from Strive, STRC from Strategy) to fund these purchases. Strive’s Chief Risk Officer justified the move by claiming STRC offers better risk-adjusted returns than U.S. Treasuries. However, this creates a circular dependency: Strategy uses proceeds from STRC to buy Bitcoin, and Strive relies on Strategy’s Bitcoin performance to earn yield on its STRC investment—which it may use to buy more Bitcoin or pay dividends on its own SATA shares. Strive, founded in 2022, has rapidly accumulated 13,311 BTC (worth ~$930 million), making it a top-ten corporate Bitcoin holder. Its stock (ASST) has fallen 97% from its peak, trading far below its Bitcoin-backed NAV. Despite this, Strive continues to aggressively accumulate Bitcoin and raise dividends on SATA shares. This reflects a broader trend: over 200 companies now emulate MicroStrategy’s “Bitcoin treasury” strategy. As these firms begin investing in each other’s debt-like instruments, the ecosystem becomes increasingly interconnected—and vulnerable—to Bitcoin's price volatility.

Author: Curry, Deep Tide TechFlow

On March 11, a company called Strive announced several things.

It increased its Bitcoin holdings by 179 coins, bringing its total to 13,311 BTC, worth approximately $930 million. It raised the dividend yield on its own preferred stock, SATA, to 12.75%. And, it spent $50 million to buy Strategy's preferred stock, STRC.

$50 million—that's over one-third of Strive's corporate treasury.

What does Strive do? It hoards Bitcoin. What does Strategy do? It also hoards Bitcoin.

So this became: A company that hoards Bitcoin used one-third of its money to buy stock issued by another company that hoards Bitcoin.

Strive's Chief Risk Officer, Jeff Walton, posted a tweet saying STRC is a "high-quality credit product with good liquidity and a superior risk-reward ratio compared to traditional fixed income." Translation: We think this is better than government bonds.

He even did the math, saying that if this $50 million were used to buy U.S. Treasury bonds, the annual interest would be a few million. Buying STRC could yield an extra $3.9 million annually.

It sounds like a good deal.

But think about it: Where does the money from Strategy's STRC issuance come from?

Strategy raises funds by issuing STRC and uses that money to buy Bitcoin. STRC can pay you interest, provided Strategy's Bitcoin doesn't drop too much.

So the underlying logic of Strive's investment is: My hoarded Bitcoin will rise, his hoarded Bitcoin will also rise, and only if his Bitcoin rises can he pay me interest, which I then use to buy more Bitcoin.

This isn't called diversification; it's called nesting dolls.

In Case You Didn't Know Strive

Many people know about Strategy (the former MicroStrategy), but not many know about Strive.

But now this company holds 13,311 Bitcoin, worth about $930 million, just surpassing Tesla's holdings and ranking around tenth among global publicly listed companies.

Strive's founder is Vivek Ramaswamy, a second-generation Indian immigrant, Harvard undergraduate, Yale Law School graduate. In 2022, he and a high school classmate founded Strive in Ohio, focusing on asset management and issuing ETF funds.

Early investors included PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel and hedge fund manager Bill Ackman.

Within a year and a half of launch, its assets under management exceeded $1 billion. But Vivek didn't stay long; he resigned in early 2023 to run for U.S. President. He lost the Republican primary to Trump, and this year he switched to running for Governor of Ohio. Interestingly, both Trump and Musk showed support for him...

After Vivek left, the new CEO became Matt Cole, who previously managed $70 billion at the California Public Employees' Retirement System, coming from a traditional finance background. But last year he made a rather unconventional decision.

In September 2025, Cole announced Strive would transform from a fund company into a "Bitcoin treasury company." In one go, it spent $675 million to buy over 5,800 Bitcoin at an average price of $116,000. In the same month, it announced the acquisition of another listed company, Semler Scientific, merging to hold over 10,000 Bitcoin.

Half a year later, its holdings have now grown to 13,311 coins.

A fund company founded in 2022 transformed into one of the world's top ten corporate Bitcoin holders in just three years. The speed is so rapid it makes one ask a question:

What money was used to buy these Bitcoins?

Nesting Doll Stock Issuance

Where did Strive get the money to buy Bitcoin? It raised it by issuing stock.

Last November, Strive issued a type of preferred stock called SATA. Investors buy it, and Strive pays quarterly interest, currently at an annualized rate of 12.75%. The money raised is used by Strive to buy Bitcoin.

Strive didn't invent this playbook. The inventor is Michael Saylor.

Saylor's company, Strategy, holds over 730,000 Bitcoin, making it the world's largest corporate Bitcoin holder. Last year, he launched a similar product called STRC. Investors buy it, Strategy pays interest, currently at an annualized 11.5%. The money raised is also used by Strategy to buy Bitcoin.

Up to this point, the two companies were playing their own games, following the same logic, unrelated.

But the transaction on March 11 connected these two lines. Strive used $50 million to buy STRC.

The chain now looks like this:

Strategy issues STRC to raise money to buy Bitcoin. Strive buys their STRC to earn interest. Strive then issues its own SATA to raise money to continue buying Bitcoin and STRC.

Layers upon layers, each layer paying investors double-digit interest, each layer's confidence to pay that interest stemming from the same thing: Bitcoin must not fall sharply.

If Bitcoin rises, everyone makes money. If Bitcoin falls, everyone's interest payments are at risk, but no single layer can stop losses independently because your asset is someone else's liability.

Three layers of products, three layers of interest, three layers of investors. Underneath it all, one asset: BTC, which must not fall.

Meanwhile, Strive's own stock, ASST, had a 52-week high of $268 and is now trading at less than $9, down 97%. On the day it announced the STRC purchase (March 11), the stock price only rose 5.52%.

At the end of October last year, ASST once fell below $0.80, nearly 50% below its net asset value in Bitcoin.

So the picture is this: A company holding $930 million worth of Bitcoin has a market capitalization of just over $500 million. Its stock price is down 97% from its high. But management is doubling down—buying more Bitcoin, buying STRC, raising the SATA dividend.

However, Strategy's own stock, MSTR, has been falling for eight consecutive months this year. Bitcoin has also pulled back significantly from last year's highs.

But everyone in this chain is increasing their bets.

Strategy bought 66,000 new Bitcoins in the first two months of this year, more than in any full year before. Strive is increasing its Bitcoin holdings while also spending $50 million on STRC. SATA's dividend yield has been raised from 10% at issuance to 12.75%. STRC's dividend yield has also been raised from 10% to 11.5%.

Rising interest rates mean it's getting harder to retain investors—they have to pay more.

Data shows that there are now over 200 publicly listed companies globally that have announced adopting the "Bitcoin treasury strategy." Before 2025, this number was less than 30.

Saylor invented a new game, and 200 companies copied the homework. Now, they're starting to buy each other's issued products.

When everyone's bet is on the same table, the difference between "structured financing" and "concentrated gambling" might just be a few extra arrows on a PowerPoint slide.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat did Strive announce on March 11th regarding its Bitcoin holdings and investment activities?

AOn March 11th, Strive announced it had purchased an additional 179 bitcoins, bringing its total holdings to 13,311 BTC (worth approximately $930 million). It also raised the dividend yield on its preferred stock (SATA) to 12.75% and invested $50 million in Strategy's preferred stock (STRC).

QWhat is the core business model of both Strive and Strategy, and why is Strive's investment in STRC considered a 'nested doll' strategy?

ABoth Strive and Strategy are Bitcoin treasury companies, meaning their core business is accumulating and holding Bitcoin. Strive's investment in Strategy's STRC stock is considered a 'nested doll' or circular strategy because Strive is using capital (raised from its own SATA stock) to buy a financial product (STRC) whose returns are dependent on Strategy's Bitcoin holdings performing well. This creates a layered financial structure where the success of each company's debt payments is ultimately tied to the same underlying asset (Bitcoin) not decreasing in value.

QWho is the founder of Strive, and what notable shift did the company undergo in 2025?

AStrive was founded by Vivek Ramaswamy. In September 2025, under new CEO Matt Cole, the company underwent a significant shift, transforming from an asset management firm into a 'Bitcoin treasury company.' It purchased over 5,800 bitcoins for $675 million and later merged with Semler Scientific, pushing its total holdings above 10,000 bitcoins.

QHow does the financial structure involving SATA and STRC create risk for investors?

AThe structure creates significant concentration risk. Both SATA (from Strive) and STRC (from Strategy) pay high dividend yields (12.75% and 11.5% respectively), which are funded by the companies' Bitcoin holdings. If the price of Bitcoin falls substantially, it could jeopardize both companies' ability to service their debt and pay these dividends. Since Strive is investing in Strategy's debt, the risk is interconnected; a failure at one company could impact the other, and all investors are ultimately exposed to the volatility of a single asset.

QWhat does the 97% decline in Strive's stock price (ASST) indicate about market sentiment towards its strategy?

AThe massive decline in Strive's stock price (ASST), from a 52-week high of $268 to under $9, indicates extremely negative market sentiment. It suggests that investors are skeptical of the company's Bitcoin-focused business model and its high-yield financing strategy (SATA), valuing the company significantly below the net asset value of its Bitcoin holdings.

Пов'язані матеріали

When the World Cup Collides with Agents: From Web2 to Web3, How Are Wallets Evolving into Agentic Wallets?

World Cup as a Catalyst for Agentic Wallets: From Web2 to Web3 This article explores how the World Cup provides a real-world scenario for observing the evolution of digital wallets from simple asset managers towards "Agentic Wallets"—intelligent, AI-powered interfaces. Using the example of prediction markets like Polymarket, it illustrates how AI Agents can lower the barrier to Web3 interaction. Instead of navigating complex DApps, users can express intent in natural language (e.g., "I think Portugal will win") within platforms like Discord or web pages. The Agent then interprets this intent, finds the relevant market, and seamlessly guides the user through the on-chain transaction via their wallet. The core shift is from wallets as mere "function menus" for signing transactions to "intent interpreters" that understand user goals. The article highlights parallel developments in traditional finance, such as Mastercard's "Agent Pay" and WeChat Pay's AI tests, which focus on granting AI controlled, authorized, and auditable payment capabilities. This underscores a broader trend of AI entering the financial layer. However, the article emphasizes that the primary challenge for Agentic Wallets in Web3 is not automation but establishing clear security boundaries. Unlike traditional systems with chargebacks, on-chain transactions are often irreversible. Therefore, future wallets must ensure users retain ultimate control and comprehension. They need to transparently communicate an Agent's permissions, spending limits, authorized durations, and provide easy ways to pause or revoke access. The World Cup experiments represent early steps toward wallets that are not just applications but ubiquitous, intelligent interfaces that simplify Web3 while keeping users securely in control.

marsbit1 год тому

When the World Cup Collides with Agents: From Web2 to Web3, How Are Wallets Evolving into Agentic Wallets?

marsbit1 год тому

Options Don't Work in DeFi? Vitalik Might Not Agree

For years, the prevailing view has been that options struggle to gain traction in DeFi due to complexity, fragmented liquidity, and lack of natural demand compared to products like perpetual futures. However, a recent algorithmic stablecoin design proposed by Vitalik Buterin presents a different perspective, using options not as a standalone trading product, but as foundational infrastructure for other financial instruments. In this design, one unit of ETH is split into two components: a "stable" side (P) that retains value up to a specified strike price, and an "upside" side (N) that captures all appreciation above that strike. Combined, they always equal one ETH, eliminating debt, margin, and liquidation risks inherent in typical collateralized debt position (CDP) stablecoins. The stable component essentially mimics the payoff of a covered call option. To function as a stablecoin, this structure requires continuously rolling deep in-the-money calls, which introduces challenges like rollover slippage, predictable transaction flow vulnerable to front-running, and persistent liquidity needs. A core hurdle is finding consistent buyers for the leveraged ETH upside exposure (N). While it offers leverage without funding rates or liquidation, it must compete with simpler alternatives like direct call options or perpetuals. The system's scalability depends on a sustained demand for this specific form of leverage. The author draws parallels to their experience with Rysk, where earlier versions of DeFi options protocols struggled. The breakthrough came with Rysk V12, which aligns incentives: asset holders generate yield by selling covered calls against their holdings, while market makers efficiently acquire the desired option exposure. This demonstrates that options can find product-market fit when embedded as a risk distribution and pricing engine within structured products, stablecoins, or yield-generating assets, rather than marketed as a complex direct trading instrument. Vitalik's proposal reinforces this architectural approach—using fully collateralized, non-custodial, and physically settled options as a fundamental building block. The real opportunity for options in DeFi may lie not in becoming the next perpetual swap, but in powering the next generation of on-chain financial products.

marsbit1 год тому

Options Don't Work in DeFi? Vitalik Might Not Agree

marsbit1 год тому

Conversation with Investor Zheng Di: MicroStrategy's Coin Sale Experiment, AI Economy, and Opportunities in US Stocks

Frontier tech investor Zheng "Didier" Di discusses the recent Bitcoin price drop, the financial strategy shift at MicroStrategy, the AI-driven surge in U.S. stocks, and the evolving role of crypto exchanges. Didier posits that the recent BTC decline stems less from macro factors or ETF outflows, and more from market repricing due to MicroStrategy's new financial structure. Following a wave of preferred stock and debt issuance (STRC, STRZ, etc.), MicroStrategy must now manage cash flow to pay dividends, potentially leading to a market expectation of sustained, small-scale BTC sales to maintain its "per-share bitcoin neutral" principle. Didier views this as a financial "experiment" testing market capacity for such recurring sell pressure, which, while creating near-term structural headwinds, likely avoids a true "death spiral" absent major new external shocks. Shifting to AI, Didier argues that tokens are becoming the new form of labor, with AI models and compute (tokenized inputs) increasingly replacing human roles in execution and middle-management. This drives enterprise efficiency and higher margins, fueling the sustained rally in U.S. semiconductor, data center, and infrastructure stocks. He foresees an emerging "machine economy" where automated agents transact and collaborate on-chain. Regarding crypto exchanges offering U.S. equities, Didier sees this as a natural evolution. With few crypto-native assets generating lasting value, exchanges are pivoting towards real-world assets (RWAs) like stocks and bonds. This doesn't necessarily cannibalize crypto but reflects a maturing industry focusing on blockchain's core utilities: decentralized choice and efficient settlement. He notes that trading logic for crypto natives doesn't need to drastically change, as meme-driven and fundamentalist strategies find analogs in U.S. markets. The "1011 event" (likely referring to a major market crash) severely damaged crypto market liquidity, marking a probable end to the altcoin speculative cycle, with capital flowing towards the deeper liquidity of U.S. markets. For the macro outlook, Didier is cautious about near-term market pressure from potential mega-IPOs (e.g., SpaceX) and the U.S. midterm elections, which could bring more regulatory scrutiny. Long-term, he remains bullish on AI's productivity gains and its convergence with blockchain/Web3, predicting a shift from speculative frenzy to a more institutionalized, industrial phase for the crypto sector.

marsbit2 год тому

Conversation with Investor Zheng Di: MicroStrategy's Coin Sale Experiment, AI Economy, and Opportunities in US Stocks

marsbit2 год тому

Playnance’s $GCOIN Lists on KoinBX Amid Rapid Growth in India

Playnance's native token, $GCOIN, has been listed on the cryptocurrency exchange KoinBX as of June 18. This move aims to enhance accessibility for its rapidly growing community, particularly in India, where the blockchain-powered Web3 iGaming ecosystem has gained significant traction. Over 130 partners in Playnance's "Be the Boss" program have built communities engaging thousands of active players in the region. The "Be the Boss" model allows participants to create and manage their own gaming communities, earning rewards tied to community activity. CEO Pini Peter noted India's high engagement, with community leaders successfully building player networks. One partner, Dr. Nicolas, reported earning over $57,000 through the program in recent months, highlighting both the financial rewards and the opportunity to grow an engaged community. $GCOIN serves as the ecosystem's core utility token, incentivizing participation and aligning the interests of players and community leaders ("Bosses"). The listing on KoinBX is part of Playnance's strategy to expand globally, increasing the token's utility and accessibility by combining community ownership, gamified engagement, and blockchain-based incentives. Founded in 2020, Playnance is a Web3 iGaming infrastructure company focused on creating live, non-custodial, on-chain products to onboard mainstream users. It currently processes approximately one million transactions daily, aiming to simplify the user experience while maintaining full on-chain transparency.

TheNewsCrypto2 год тому

Playnance’s $GCOIN Lists on KoinBX Amid Rapid Growth in India

TheNewsCrypto2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片