"Stock Market Maestro" Trump Lifts Up the Entire Quantum Computing Sector

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2026-05-27Востаннє оновлено о 2026-05-27

Анотація

U.S. President Trump's administration, adopting an "active investor" approach, has announced $2 billion in funding for nine quantum computing companies in exchange for minority, non-controlling equity stakes. The funding, sourced from the 2022 CHIPS and Science Act, targets firms like IBM, GlobalFoundries, D-Wave, Rigetti, and several private companies to advance various quantum modalities and overcome key engineering hurdles. This move mirrors the administration's earlier strategic investments, such as the highly profitable stake in Intel, and shifts from pure subsidies to an equity-for-funding model under the same legislation. The announcement triggered significant stock gains for the quantum sector. The strategy is part of a broader "America First" industrial policy aimed at securing U.S. technological leadership, reducing foreign dependencies, and providing credibility and policy support alongside capital. The administration indicates continued openness to similar investments across semiconductors, critical minerals, defense, and other strategic sectors.

Original|Odaily Planet Daily(@OdailyChina)

Author|Wenser(@wenser 2010 )

Last August, driven by Trump, the U.S. government converted funds through the "Chips Act," directly purchasing nearly 10% of Intel's newly issued shares (approximately 433.3 million shares) at $20.47 per share. At that time, it was worth less than $9 billion; by early May, less than a year later, as Intel's stock price hit a record high, the total value of these shares had reached $54.1 billion, appreciating by over $45 billion in just seven months.

Mentioning this, Trump couldn't hide his pride and posted: "I made America $45 billion in the last 8 months."

As a capital maestro who doesn't hesitate to "move the stock market by posting," Trump exerts an extraordinary influence on the rise and fall of U.S. stocks. Recently, he has started his performance again—providing a total of $2 billion in funding to 9 quantum computing companies through the U.S. Department of Commerce in exchange for equity. Odaily Planet Daily will provide a brief analysis in this article.

U.S. Government Acts Again, Investing $2 Billion in Quantum Computing

On May 21, the Trump administration announced it would provide a total of $2 billion in funding to 9 quantum computing companies through the U.S. Department of Commerce, in exchange for partial equity. The specific allocation plan is as follows:

  • $1 billion will be granted to IBM (IBM) for the operation and development of its independent subsidiary, Anderon;
  • $375 million is allocated to chip manufacturer GlobalFoundries (GFS);
  • Publicly listed companies D-Wave (QBTS), Infleqtion (INFQ), Rigetti (RGTI) each receive $100 million;
  • Private companies Atom Computing, PsiQuantum, Quantinuum (an independent subsidiary of Honeywell-HON) each receive $100 million;
  • Startup Diraq is expected to receive $38 million.

According to official documents, this is part of the Trump administration's "active investor" industrial policy, with funding sourced from the R&D allocation of the 2022 CHIPS and Science Act. The Commerce Department emphasized that this is a "portfolio" strategy, covering two quantum wafer foundries and 7 quantum computing companies. It targets various quantum modalities including neutral atom, silicon spin, superconducting, photonic, and trapped ion, addressing key engineering bottlenecks such as device reproducibility, error rates, optical complexity, and cryogenic system integration.

On the day the news was released, the U.S. stock quantum computing sector surged sharply at the market open. Among them, D-Wave Quantum rose 16%, Rigetti Computing rose 14%, Infleqtion's stock rose 25%, Quantum Computing rose 9%, and IonQ rose 3.1%.

It's worth mentioning that among these companies receiving funds, only GlobalFoundries Inc. (GFS) revealed that the equity swap ratio is about 1%. For other companies, whether public or private, it's a minority non-controlling equity stake, and the specific ratios have not been disclosed. Final ratios await formal agreement signing and SEC filing disclosure.

Capital Operations Under the "America First" Strategy

Looking closely at this "investment for equity" operation, it remains an action by the Trump administration under the "America First" strategy.

Previously, U.S. government investments in Intel (INTC), the only fully integrated U.S. rare earth producer MP Materials (MP), Trilogy Metals (TMQ), Lithium Americas (LAC), U.S. Steel, and others were also strategic moves to maintain the advantage of the domestic semiconductor industry chain.

Especially the nearly $9 billion investment in Intel, the Trump administration explicitly stated that this move was to support domestic advanced semiconductor manufacturing in the U.S. and reduce reliance on TSMC. Therefore, the U.S. government's related holdings are passive, with no board seats, and no participation in the company's daily operations or management. They largely follow board votes on most matters.

However, the U.S. government's "equity investment" is not just financial support; it also includes credit endorsement and multi-faceted policy support (such as export licenses, tariff protection). Previously, Intel received strong support from U.S. Commerce Secretary Loutnik after obtaining the government investment. Over the past year, he has repeatedly met with Apple CEO Tim Cook, Tesla CEO Elon Musk, and NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang, persuading them to cooperate with Intel. With Apple joining, Intel has now established relevant collaborations with all three companies mentioned above.

Shift in Operational Approach Under the CHIPS and Science Act: From Grants to Equity Swaps

The $2 billion in funding for quantum computing-related companies comes from the CHIPS and Science Act, a landmark bipartisan bill introduced by the U.S. government in 2022, officially named the "CHIPS and Science Act of 2022." The total authorized funding of the act is approximately $280 billion over 10 years, for supporting semiconductor industry development and basic science and technology R&D. Its main purpose is to revitalize U.S. semiconductor manufacturing, strengthen scientific research and innovation capabilities, and address competition from other countries in high-tech fields through large-scale investment.

But different from the grant or pure subsidy model during the Biden administration, the Trump administration's operational model is the aforementioned "active investor" model—switching to funding in exchange for minority non-controlling equity stakes. As of May this year, the act has attracted over $645 billion in private investment in semiconductor manufacturing, with over 140 projects and the creation of 525,000 new jobs.

It must be said, while personally calling shots and moving stocks like Dell (DELL), Micron (MU), and Palantir (PLTR), Trump is also promoting U.S. stock market prosperity in the name of U.S. government departments, which is why he repeatedly boasts, "The stock market highs are mainly because of me."

Additionally, it's worth noting that a previous investment announcement from the U.S. Department of Commerce stated, "The CHIPS Research and Development Office continues to solicit proposals from eligible applicants for research, prototyping, and commercial solutions for microelectronics technology in the United States. Eligible applicants should submit applications via Notice 2025-NIST-CHIPS-CRDO-01 on the www.grants.gov website." In other words, the U.S. government's "investment door" remains open. For more information and funding announcements, please refer to official sources.

Of course, the U.S. government invests in a wide range of company fields, also involving critical minerals like electricity and rare earths, new energy sources like lithium batteries, medical supplies, and communication infrastructure. Examples include Westinghouse Electric, Lithium Americas, Trilogy Metals, USA Rare Earth, Vulcan Elements, XLight, L3 Harris Technologies, etc.

Furthermore, U.S. Commerce Secretary Loutnik once revealed to the media that the current administration might take equity stakes in major defense contractors like Lockheed Martin (LMT).

In summary, the various publicly listed companies, critical mineral/rare earth/battery material supply chains, nuclear/small modular reactor (SMR) and advanced nuclear fuel, and other quantum computing targets mentioned above may become the focus of continued investment by the Trump administration in the second half of the year.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat specific action did the Trump administration take to support the quantum computing sector, and how much funding was announced?

AOn May 21, the Trump administration announced that it would provide a total of $2 billion in funding to 9 quantum computing companies through the U.S. Department of Commerce, in exchange for partial equity stakes in those companies.

QWhich publicly listed quantum computing companies received $100 million each from the funding announced by the U.S. Department of Commerce?

AThe publicly listed quantum computing companies that each received $100 million are D-Wave Quantum (QBTS), Infleqtion (INFQ), and Rigetti Computing (RGTI).

QWhat is the source of the $2 billion funding for the quantum computing companies, and how does this Trump-era approach differ from the previous administration's policy?

AThe $2 billion funding comes from the research and development appropriations of the 2022 CHIPS and Science Act. Unlike the Biden administration's approach of grants or pure subsidies, the Trump administration's model is that of an 'active investor,' providing funding in exchange for minority, non-controlling equity stakes.

QAccording to the article, what was a key strategic reason behind the U.S. government's investment in Intel, and what terms govern its stake?

AA key strategic reason for the U.S. government's investment in Intel was to support advanced domestic semiconductor manufacturing and reduce dependence on TSMC. The government's stake is passive, meaning it holds no board seats, does not participate in daily operations, and generally follows the board's votes on most matters.

QWhat broader areas or sectors, beyond quantum computing, does the article suggest the U.S. government under Trump has invested in or may invest in?

ABeyond quantum computing, the article suggests the U.S. government has invested or may invest in areas including critical minerals/rare earths, battery materials, nuclear energy/Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), advanced nuclear fuel, electrical infrastructure, medical supplies, communications infrastructure, and major defense contractors like Lockheed Martin.

Пов'язані матеріали

Agentized OS: It's Not About AI, It's About the Foundation

The Agentic OS: Beyond AI, It's About the Foundational Stack In 2026, major operating systems like Android, iOS, HarmonyOS, and Windows are entering the "Agentic" era, integrating proactive AI assistants deeply into the system layer. However, the real competition lies not in the flashy AI features showcased at events, but in the three-layer foundational stack that enables them: the system-level AI Runtime, proprietary/controllable chips, and the on-device/cloud model matrix. The AI Runtime acts as the central scheduler, managing model inference, resource allocation, and exposing capabilities to apps. Controllable chips (e.g., Apple Silicon, Google Tensor, Huawei Kirin) are crucial for deep hardware-software co-optimization, determining the efficiency and experience limits of on-device Agents. The on-device/cloud model matrix provides the "intelligence," with proprietary, chip-optimized small models (like Gemini Nano, Apple's ~3B model) handling daily tasks locally for low latency, privacy, and reliability, while cloud models tackle complex requests. Deep synergy between these three layers enables key Agent differentiators: ultra-low latency and power efficiency, genuine "on-device first" privacy, access to system-level personal context across apps, and reliable performance as a system service even offline. OS vendors with strong integration across this stack (like Apple, Google, and Huawei) build a deeper moat. Beyond this core stack, long-term competitiveness depends on variables like structured App integration (e.g., App Intents/AppFunctions) for reliable multi-step workflows, and robust privacy frameworks that build user trust. This shift towards Agentic OS extends beyond phones and PCs to IoT, cars, and XR glasses via existing multi-device ecosystems. The race is won not in a keynote, but through generations of meticulously co-developed chips, models, and system software.

marsbit1 год тому

Agentized OS: It's Not About AI, It's About the Foundation

marsbit1 год тому

Why Sam Altman's 'Water and Electricity Theory' Sparks Copyright Controversy

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman's recent statement that "intelligence will become a utility like electricity or water" has sparked significant controversy, primarily around copyright issues and the nature of AI development. While positioning AI as a utility serves as a compelling narrative for infrastructure investors, critics argue the analogy is flawed in three key areas. First, there's a fundamental "property gap." Traditional utilities like water and power create new, physical infrastructure from scratch. In contrast, major AI models are trained by reorganizing vast amounts of existing human-created content—books, articles, code, etc.—often scraped from the web without explicit permission or compensation to creators. This "free acquisition, paid resale" model is seen by many as ethically problematic. Second, there's a "pricing gap." True public utilities are typically regulated to ensure universal service with non-discriminatory, cost-plus pricing. AI's token-based pricing, however, involves significant price discrimination (e.g., output tokens costing much more than input tokens) and is designed for revenue maximization, not equitable access. Third, a "governance gap" exists. Utilities operate under public oversight, while AI pricing and development are currently controlled by a few private companies. Furthermore, the industry's own shift toward buying licensed training data (e.g., deals with Reddit or news publishers) undermines its previous legal reliance on "fair use" for freely scraped data. In conclusion, while AI is indeed becoming a foundational technology, calling it a public utility remains contentious. The title requires not just scale and a pay-per-use model, but also credible solutions for data provenance, equitable pricing, and public governance.

marsbit1 год тому

Why Sam Altman's 'Water and Electricity Theory' Sparks Copyright Controversy

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片