StarkWare Makes Drastic Cuts to Survive, L2 'Technical Faith' Liquidated by the Market

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-04-14Востаннє оновлено о 2026-04-14

Анотація

StarkWare, the infrastructure company behind Starknet, has announced a major restructuring, including layoffs and splitting into two separate business units. This move comes as the Layer 2 network faces a severe decline, with monthly revenue plummeting over 95% from its late 2023 peak to just tens of thousands of dollars. CEO Eli Ben-Sasson stated the company had become "too big and inefficient" and must return to a startup mentality. The new structure creates a Starknet development unit, focused on the core protocol, and an applications unit, tasked with direct revenue generation by building products that leverage StarkWare's unique tech stack, potentially in quantum security and Bitcoin-related areas. This reflects a wider crisis in the L2 sector triggered by Ethereum's EIP-4844 upgrade, which drastically reduced data availability fees and shattered the core business model of profiting from gas差价. The market has since polarized. Base and Arbitrum now dominate, capturing the majority of value and fees, while Starknet's TVL sits at a fraction of Base's and its native token STRK trades below its total historical fundraising amount. The article concludes that technical superiority is no longer enough to win; distribution power and strategic alliances are now the key drivers. StarkWare's shift from an infrastructure provider to a product-focused company is a strategic retreat in this consolidating market, forcing it to prove it can build and sell products, not just invent adv...

Original Author: Sanqing, Foresight News

On April 13th, Eli Ben-Sasson, CEO of the ZK-Rollup infrastructure company StarkWare (behind Starknet), announced at an all-hands meeting that the company would undergo layoffs and restructure into two separate business units, focusing on revenue generation and Starknet development. The company initially launched the StarkEx scaling engine and introduced Starknet as an Ethereum Layer 2 Validity Rollup to the mainnet in late 2021. It developed its own Cairo programming language, Sierra intermediate representation layer, and a post-quantum proof system, establishing itself as a technical benchmark in the ZK Rollup field. In 2022, it completed multiple funding rounds, totaling approximately $260 million, with its valuation once reaching as high as $8 billion, making it one of the highest-valued ZK projects in the crypto industry at the time.

According to DefiLlama data, the Starknet network's on-chain monthly revenue peaked at nearly $6.3 million in November 2023. However, since April 2024, its monthly revenue has been only tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars, a drop of over 95%.

Starknet Chain Fees (Monthly)

Retreating from 'Infrastructure' to 'Independent Applications'

Facing a shift in identity from a 'platform infrastructure company' to a 'product-oriented technology company', Ben-Sasson admitted that the past StarkWare was "too big, too inefficient," and stated that it must now return to a startup mode, using small teams for rapid iteration to find Product-Market Fit (PMF).

Image Source: Eli Ben-Sasson's Tweet

In this industry-wide contraction, StarkWare is not an isolated case. OP Labs (the core development team behind Optimism) laid off about 20 people in March (approximately 20% of its staff), aiming to focus on core priorities, accelerate decision-making, and reduce coordination costs; Polygon Labs conducted an organizational integration after an acquisition in January, laying off about 60 people across multiple teams, although the company stated that net headcount remained unchanged.

Additionally, the exchange Crypto.com laid off 12% of its staff, the L1 Algorand Foundation laid off 25%, and several other companies or projects, including the crypto research firm Messari, underwent a new round of human resource adjustments.

After the restructuring, Chief Financial Officer Ran Grinshtein will oversee backend functions such as finance and human resources, while the frontend business will be split into two units, each with its own independent BD, engineering, and GTM (Go-To-Market) teams.

Starknet Development Department: Led by Product Lead Tom Brand, continuing the underlying work on the core protocol.
Applications Department: Led by Chief Product Officer Avihu Levy, tasked with the crucial responsibility of direct revenue generation, dedicated to building products that "can only be realized with the StarkWare technology stack and have minimal external dependencies."

Although the official specific product lines have not been announced, considering Levy's recent paper on achieving quantum-secure transactions (QSB) without modifying the Bitcoin protocol, and Starknet's launch of Zcash-like privacy features, quantum security and Bitcoin-related products are highly likely to be among its first trial directions.

The Impact of EIP-4844 and the Polarization of L2s

Starknet's predicament essentially reflects the collective growing pains of the entire L2 sector following the protocol upgrade.

In March 2024, Ethereum introduced EIP-4844, which significantly reduced Blob data costs, directly destroying the business model L2s relied on—"profiting from the Gas price difference between L1 and L2."

Subsequently, Ethereum continued to expand Blob supply through multiple upgrades. The Pectra upgrade in May 2025 increased the target from 3 per block to 6 per block (maximum 9); after the Fusaka upgrade in late 2025, it was further increased to a target of 14 per block and a maximum of 21 per block.

Ethereum still intends to continue gradually scaling Blob capacity through more BPO mechanisms and technologies like PeerDAS in the future, which will keep the data availability costs for L2s at an extremely low level in the long term.

When data availability costs are significantly reduced, the moat of network value is no longer cheapness, but rather its own user density and capital沉淀能力 (capital sedimentation ability).

Despite suffering the same EIP-4844 impact, the performance of the L2 market is highly polarized.

According to DefiLlama data, Base, leveraging Coinbase's strong user引流 (user diversion) and fiat on-ramp channels, garnered $75.4 million in revenue in 2025 (62% of total L2 revenue) and processed over 60% of the total network transaction volume; Arbitrum, relying on the composable financial stack formed by leading protocols like GMX and Pendle, maintained its TVL stably at the $2 billion level.

Optimism once relied on the OP Stack and Superchain ecosystem, but currently, the Superchain's TVL is highly dependent on Base (over 80%), with OP Mainnet itself accounting for only a single-digit percentage. Its TVL and on-chain fee revenue also declined significantly in 2025-2026. Making matters worse, Base announced in February 2026 that it would break away from OP Stack and transition to its own unified technology stack, further weakening Optimism's hub status in the L2 ecosystem.

Left: Superchain Chain TVL Pie Chart | Right: OP Mainnet TVL and Chain Fees (Monthly)

Starknet's situation is even more severe. Its TVL is currently only about $241 million, less than one-twentieth of Base's; its native token STRK has plummeted from the airdrop high in February 2024 to $0.033, with a total market capitalization of approximately $187 million—even lower than the company's historical total funding of $260 million.

Starknet TVL, STRK Price, and STRK Market Cap

Distribution Capability Determines Who Stays at the Table

"Infrastructure alone doesn't win the race." This statement by Ben-Sasson is a reflection on StarkWare's past eight-year strategy of "build the network and wait for users to come."

StarkWare's investment in cryptographic engineering far exceeded its peers; its from-scratch construction of the Cairo language and quantum-resistant STARK system is extremely hardcore. However, in reality, its technical purism in refusing to be EVM-compatible created a very high migration barrier for developers, which is a factor limiting ecosystem prosperity.

The core driver of L2 growth has long ceased to be technical differentiation, but rather distribution capability and strategic alliances. Currently, Base and Arbitrum together lock in nearly 75% of the total L2 value.

21Shares predicts that the L2赛道 (L2 track) will consolidate into "a slimmer, more resilient set of networks" by the end of the year. In this winner-takes-all淘汰赛 (elimination contest), retreating to self-developed applications is one of the few remaining differentiated paths for StarkWare.

Technical储备 (technical reserves) are just the entry ticket, not the finish line. What StarkWare now needs to prove to the market is no longer what cutting-edge technology it can "invent," but what products it can actually "sell."

Пов'язані питання

QWhat major strategic shift did StarkWare announce on April 13th, and what was the reason behind it?

AStarkWare announced a company restructuring involving layoffs and splitting into two separate business units focused on revenue and Starknet development. CEO Eli Ben-Sasson stated the company had become 'too big, too inefficient' and needed to return to a startup mode with smaller teams to iterate quickly and find Product-Market Fit (PMF).

QHow did the implementation of EIP-4844 on Ethereum impact the Layer 2 (L2) business model, specifically for Starknet?

AEIP-4844, introduced in March 2024, drastically reduced the cost of Blob data on Ethereum. This destroyed the core business model for L2s like Starknet, which relied on profiting from the gas fee difference between L1 and L2 transactions.

QAccording to the article, which two L2 networks currently dominate the market in terms of value and revenue?

ABase and Arbitrum dominate the L2 market. Together, they locked in nearly 75% of the total L2 value. In 2025, Base alone accounted for 62% of all L2 revenue.

QWhat are the two new independent business units that StarkWare was reorganized into, and what are their respective goals?

AStarkWare was reorganized into: 1) The Starknet Development unit, led by Tom Brand, which continues core protocol development. 2) The Applications unit, led by Avihu Levy, which is tasked with direct revenue generation by building products that leverage StarkWare's unique tech stack.

QWhat does the article suggest is the primary driver for L2 growth and survival now, rather than technical differentiation?

AThe article states that the core driver for L2 growth and survival is no longer technical differentiation, but rather distribution capability and strategic alliances. The ability to attract users and capital is now the key factor.

Пов'язані матеріали

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit2 хв тому

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit2 хв тому

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit6 хв тому

marsbit6 хв тому

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbit12 хв тому

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbit12 хв тому

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbit13 хв тому

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbit13 хв тому

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

In today's TechFlow Intelligence Briefing, several major tech stories highlight a growing theme of trust and credibility gaps across AI, crypto, and finance. AI company Anthropic has publicly called for a global pause in AI development, citing risks from Claude's "recursive self-improvement." Ironically, this coincides with reports the company is preparing for a massive IPO targeting a near $1 trillion valuation. This perceived hypocrisy, coupled with widespread user complaints about Claude's declining performance, is sparking debate over whether the safety warning is genuine or a competitive tactic. Meanwhile, in a substantive security move, Anthropic open-sourced a framework for AI-powered vulnerability discovery. In the crypto market, Bitcoin's price drop below $61,000 triggered over $1.16 billion in liquidations, flipping the market into a state where more BTC is held at a loss than at a profit, a historical bearish signal. On the corporate front, SpaceX's highly anticipated IPO is generating immense Wall Street excitement, with Goldman Sachs projecting 100x revenue growth by 2030. However, the S&P 500 has refused to fast-track the company's inclusion post-IPO, potentially limiting immediate institutional demand. Separately, ByteDance's AI app Doubao lost over 6 million monthly active users after introducing a subscription model, highlighting the challenges of AI monetization. Other notable developments include Nvidia certifying HBM4 memory from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron; Cloudflare's acquisition of front-end tooling company VoidZero; and its CEO warning that bot traffic now exceeds human traffic online. The underlying narrative connects these events: a trust crisis. From AI firms' contradictory actions and crypto volatility to the clash between SpaceX's hyped narrative and institutional rules, a pattern is emerging where stated intentions and actual practices are increasingly misaligned.

marsbit28 хв тому

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

marsbit28 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни T (T).