Stablecoins Seen Powering Future AI-Driven Machine Payments

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-03-23Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-23

Анотація

Bernstein analysts highlight the growing potential for stablecoins, particularly USDC through the collaboration of Circle and Coinbase, to power future AI-driven machine payments. These transactions are fully automated, programmatic, and executed by software or autonomous devices without human intervention. Stablecoins are deemed ideal for this use case due to their programmability, speed, micro-payment capability, and global accessibility. They enable real-time decision-making, instant settlements, and eliminate the need for traditional banking infrastructure like SWIFT or FX conversion. Companies such as Coinbase, Circle, and Stripe are already developing infrastructure to support these agentic payments, with early protocols showing initial transaction volumes. This represents a significant future growth driver for stablecoins.

Bernstein analysts noted Circle and Coinbase as prominent vehicles for stablecoin exposure, highlighting the USDC collaboration between the two companies and the emerging role of stablecoins in agentic machine payments as a potential upside driver.

The analysts headed by Gautam Chhugani wrote in a note to clients on March 23 that “we see agentic machine payments as an upside optionality for stablecoins. And this is not a ‘here and now’ material influence on stablecoin demand but some potential role of stablecoins in the agentic machine economy.”

The analysts marked out machine payments as transactions started, authorised and settled completely by software or autonomous devices instead of humans. Dissimilar to automated bill payments or repeating subscriptions, these payments are naturally programmatic, permitting real-time decision-making, price negotiation, and settlement without human interference.

Bernstein mentioned stablecoins are mainly suited to this environment, as they are programmable, quick, micro-payment-friendly, and accessible all over the globe. Payment logic like escrow, conditional release, or revenue cutting can be rooted directly in stablecoins, permitting agents to transact without calling a bank or waiting for confirmations.

The Contribution To The Future

According to the note, transfer settlements can be done in seconds, permitting AI agents to pay for compute or data in real time. To make it financially efficient, high-throughput blockchains and state channels can be used to perform microtransactions at scale.

Also, stablecoins are borderless, eliminating the need for SWIFT, correspondent banking or FX conversion, the analysts mentioned. A lot of companies have started making infrastructure to operationalise these capabilities.

Coinbase is making the x402 agent payments protocol, which sets payments into the HTTP layer of the internet, while Circle rolled out nano-payment infrastructure for agents. Meanwhile, Stripe, via its blockchain investment in Bridge and Privy, rolled out the Machine Payments Protocol on the Tempo blockchain.

Bernstein mentioned that the traction on machine payments protocols has already been restricted, highlighting that Stripe’s MPP registered $5,000 in volume in its first week of launch. Coinbase’s x402 protocol has generated around $25 million in volume in the past month.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

SIREN Meme Coin, Based on BNB Chain, Marks a Significant Surge

TagsAICoinbaseStablecoin

Пов'язані питання

QWhat are the two companies highlighted by Bernstein analysts as prominent vehicles for stablecoin exposure?

ACircle and Coinbase.

QAccording to the analysts, what is the emerging role of stablecoins that is seen as a potential upside driver?

ATheir emerging role in agentic machine payments.

QWhat are the four key attributes that make stablecoins particularly suited for the agentic machine economy?

AThey are programmable, quick, micro-payment-friendly, and accessible globally.

QWhich two specific machine payment protocols are mentioned in the article and which companies developed them?

ACoinbase developed the x402 agent payments protocol, and Stripe rolled out the Machine Payments Protocol (MPP).

QWhat volume did Coinbase's x402 protocol generate in the past month, according to the Bernstein note?

AAround $25 million in volume.

Пов'язані матеріали

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

In recent months, the rapid growth of the AI industry has attracted significant talent from the crypto sector. A persistent question among researchers intersecting both fields is whether blockchain can become a foundational part of AI infrastructure. While many previous AI and Crypto projects focused on application layers (like AI Agents, on-chain reasoning, data markets, and compute rentals), few achieved viable commercial models. Gensyn differentiates itself by targeting the most critical and expensive layer of AI: model training. Gensyn aims to organize globally distributed GPU resources into an open AI training network. Developers can submit training tasks, nodes provide computational power, and the network verifies results while distributing incentives. The core issue addressed is not decentralization for its own sake, but the increasing centralization of compute power among tech giants. In the era of large models, access to GPUs (like the H100) has become a decisive bottleneck, dictating the pace of AI development. Major AI companies are heavily dependent on large cloud providers for compute resources. Gensyn's approach is significant for several reasons: 1) It operates at the core infrastructure layer (model training), the most resource-intensive and technically demanding part of the AI value chain. 2) It proposes a more open, collaborative model for compute, potentially increasing resource utilization by dynamically pooling idle GPUs, similar to early cloud computing logic. 3) Its technical moat lies in solving complex challenges like verifying training results, ensuring node honesty, and maintaining reliability in a distributed environment—making it more of a deep-tech infrastructure company. 4) It targets a validated, high-growth market with genuine demand, rather than pursuing blockchain integration without purpose. Ultimately, the boundaries between Crypto and AI are blurring. AI requires global resource coordination, incentive mechanisms, and collaborative systems—areas where crypto-native solutions excel. Gensyn represents a step toward making advanced training capabilities more accessible and collaborative, moving beyond a niche controlled by a few giants. If successful, it could evolve into a fundamental piece of AI infrastructure, where the most enduring value in the AI era is often created.

marsbit10 год тому

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

marsbit10 год тому

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

A US researcher's visit to China's top AI labs reveals distinct cultural and organizational factors driving China's rapid AI development. While talent, data, and compute are similar to the West, Chinese labs excel through a pragmatic, execution-focused culture: less emphasis on individual stardom and conceptual debate, and more on teamwork, engineering optimization, and mastering the full tech stack. A key advantage is the integration of young students and researchers who approach model-building with fresh perspectives and low ego, prioritizing collective progress over personal credit. This contrasts with the US culture of self-promotion and "star scientist" narratives. Chinese labs also exhibit a strong "build, don't buy" mentality, preferring to develop core capabilities—like data pipelines and environments—in-house rather than relying on external services. The ecosystem feels more collaborative than tribal, with mutual respect among labs. While government support exists, its scale is unclear, and technical decisions appear driven by labs, not state mandates. Chinese companies across sectors, from platforms to consumer tech, are building their own foundational models to control their tech destiny, reflecting a broader cultural drive for technological sovereignty. Demand for AI is emerging, with spending patterns potentially mirroring cloud infrastructure more than traditional SaaS. Despite challenges like a less mature data industry and GPU shortages, Chinese labs are propelled by vast talent, rapid iteration, and deep integration with the open-source community. The competition is evolving beyond a pure model race into a contest of organizational execution, developer ecosystems, and industrial pragmatism.

marsbit11 год тому

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

marsbit11 год тому

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

Corning, a 175-year-old glass company, is experiencing a dramatic revival as a key player in AI infrastructure, driven by surging demand for high-performance optical fiber in data centers. AI data centers require vastly more fiber than traditional ones—5 to 10 times as much per rack—to handle high-speed data transmission between GPUs. This structural demand shift, coupled with supply constraints from the lengthy expansion cycle for fiber preforms, has created a significant supply-demand gap. Nvidia has invested in Corning, along with Lumentum and Coherent, in a $4.5 billion total commitment to secure the optical supply chain for AI. Corning's competitive edge lies in its expertise in producing ultra-low-loss, high-density, and bend-resistant specialty fiber, which is critical for 800G+ and future 1.6T data rates. Its deep involvement in co-packaged optics (CPO) with partners like Nvidia further solidifies its position. While not the largest fiber manufacturer globally, Corning's revenue from enterprise/data center clients now exceeds 40% of its optical communications sales, and it has secured multi-year supply agreements with major hyperscalers including Meta and Nvidia. Financially, Corning's optical communications revenue has surged, doubling from $1.3 billion in 2023 to over $3 billion in 2025. Its stock price has risen nearly 6-fold since late 2023. Key future catalysts include the rollout of Nvidia's CPO products and the scale of undisclosed customer agreements. However, risks include high current valuations and potential disruption from next-generation technologies like hollow-core fiber. The company's long-term bet on light over electricity, maintained even through the telecom bubble crash, is now being validated by the AI boom.

marsbit12 год тому

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

marsbit12 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片