Stablecoins See Largest Conversion Spreads In Africa, Research Shows

bitcoinistОпубліковано о 2026-02-12Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-12

Анотація

Research from Borderless.xyz reveals that Africa has the highest median conversion spreads for stablecoin-to-fiat transactions globally, reaching nearly 300 basis points (3%) in January. This is significantly higher than Latin America's 1.3% and Asia's 0.07%. Within Africa, costs vary widely; South Africa has a low rate of 1.5% due to competition, while Botswana and Congo saw spreads exceeding 19% and 13%, respectively. The high costs are attributed to local market structure and lack of liquidity rather than blockchain technology. While stablecoins offer potential for cheaper remittances, the final conversion cost depends heavily on local competition and infrastructure, limiting savings in many African corridors.

Africa’s promise of cheaper remittances via stablecoins is clashing with reality in many places. According to data from Borderless.xyz, January’s median spread for stablecoin-to-fiat conversions across Africa reached nearly 300 basis points — about 3% — far higher than Latin America’s roughly 1.3% and Asia’s tiny 0.07%. That gap matters. It hits wallets where people send money home.

Conversion Costs Vary By Market

Reports note huge differences inside the continent. South Africa showed one of the lowest conversion costs at about 1.5%, where several providers compete and markets have deeper liquidity.

At the other extreme, Botswana’s median spread climbed to almost 19.4% in January, although pricing eased later that month. Congo also saw conversion levels above 13%. The dataset covered 66 currency corridors and nearly 94,000 rate observations, so these are not isolated blips.

Average regional spreads for stablecoin transactions. Source: Borderless.xyz

Competition And Liquidity Shape Rates

The numbers point to a simple takeaway: who sits between the stablecoin and the local cash matters. Where multiple payment providers operate, conversion costs generally sit between about 1.5% and 4%.

Where a single outfit dominates, spreads can top 13%. The “spread” here is the gap between what a provider will buy and sell a stablecoin for — like a bid-ask gap in traditional markets — and it is the execution cost a sender ultimately pays.

Based on reports, it appears these frictions come from local market structure and liquidity more than from the underlying blockchain tech.

Table shows mid-market stablecoin rates, local Tradfi rates, and the resulting BPS premium per currency. Source: Borderless.xyz

Stablecoins Compared With Traditional FX

Borderless.xyz also measured how stablecoin mid-rates stack up against interbank FX mid-market rates, a metric the company calls the TradFi premium.

Across 33 currencies globally, the median difference was about five basis points, or 0.05%, meaning stablecoins and traditional mid-market rates were largely aligned in many places.

In Africa, however, the median gap widened to close to 120 basis points, or about 1.2%. That larger premium helps explain why stablecoins do not automatically translate into big savings for every corridor.

BTCUSD trading at $67,018 on the 24-hour chart: TradingView

What This Means For Senders And Markets

Economists say stablecoins are cutting remittance costs in Africa, noting that legacy services often charge around $6 for every $100 sent.

The recent data adds nuance: faster settlement and lower fees are possible, but only when local on-ramps and off-ramps work well. For consumers, that means potential savings in some corridors and frustratingly high costs in others.

For regulators and market entrants, the signal is clear — boosting competition and liquidity at the local level is as important as improving cross-border rails.

Stablecoins have opened a route that can be cheaper and quicker. Yet in practice, the last mile — turning crypto into local money — still depends on local players, pricing models, and market depth.

Featured image from andBeyond, chart from TradingView

Пов'язані питання

QWhich continent has the highest median spread for stablecoin-to-fiat conversions according to the research?

AAfrica has the highest median spread for stablecoin-to-fiat conversions at nearly 300 basis points (about 3%), which is far higher than Latin America's 1.3% and Asia's 0.07%.

QWhat factors are identified as the primary drivers of high conversion costs for stablecoins in certain African countries?

AThe primary drivers are local market structure and liquidity. High conversion costs occur where a single payment provider dominates, leading to spreads that can top 13%, whereas areas with multiple competing providers see lower costs between 1.5% and 4%.

QHow does the median TradFi premium for stablecoins in Africa compare to the global median?

AThe median TradFi premium in Africa is about 120 basis points (1.2%), which is significantly wider than the global median of approximately 5 basis points (0.05%).

QWhat was the median spread for stablecoin conversions in Botswana in January, according to the report?

ABotswana's median spread for stablecoin conversions climbed to almost 19.4% in January, although the pricing eased later that month.

QWhy don't stablecoins automatically translate into big savings for every remittance corridor despite their potential?

AStablecoins do not automatically translate into big savings because the final cost depends on the efficiency of local on-ramps and off-ramps. High spreads charged by local providers, due to lack of competition and liquidity, can erase the potential benefits of faster settlement and lower base fees.

Пов'язані матеріали

North Korean Hackers Loot $500 Million in a Single Month, Becoming the Top Threat to Crypto Security

North Korean hackers, particularly the notorious Lazarus Group and its subgroup TraderTraitor, have stolen over $500 million from cryptocurrency DeFi platforms in less than three weeks, bringing their total theft for the year to over $700 million. Recent major attacks on Drift Protocol and KelpDAO, resulting in losses of approximately $286 million and $290 million respectively, highlight a strategic shift: instead of targeting core smart contracts, attackers are now exploiting vulnerabilities in peripheral infrastructure. For instance, the KelpDAO attack involved compromising downstream RPC infrastructure used by LayerZero's decentralized validation network (DVN), allowing manipulation without breaching core cryptography. This sophisticated approach mirrors advanced corporate cyber-espionage. Additionally, North Korea has systematically infiltrated the global crypto workforce, with an estimated 100 operatives using fake identities to gain employment at blockchain companies, enabling long-term access to sensitive systems and facilitating large-scale thefts. According to Chainalysis, North Korean-linked hackers stole a record $2 billion in 2025, accounting for 60% of all global crypto theft that year. Their total historical crypto theft has reached $6.75 billion. Post-theft, they employ specialized money laundering methods, heavily relying on Chinese OTC brokers and cross-chain mixing services rather than standard decentralized exchanges. Security experts, while acknowledging the increased sophistication, emphasize that many attacks still exploit fundamental weaknesses like poor access controls and centralized operational risks. Strengthening private key management, limiting privileged access, and enhancing coordination among exchanges, analysts, and law enforcement immediately after an attack are critical to improving defense and fund recovery chances. The industry's challenge now extends beyond secure smart contracts to safeguarding operational security at the infrastructure level.

marsbit23 хв тому

North Korean Hackers Loot $500 Million in a Single Month, Becoming the Top Threat to Crypto Security

marsbit23 хв тому

Circle CEO's Seoul Visit: No Korean Won Stablecoin Issuance, But Met All Major Korean Banks

Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire's recent activities in Seoul indicate a strategic shift for the company, moving away from issuing a Korean won-backed stablecoin and instead focusing on embedding itself as a key infrastructure provider within Korea’s financial and crypto ecosystem. Despite Korea accounting for nearly 30% of global crypto trading volume—with a market characterized by high retail participation and altcoin dominance—Circle has chosen not to compete for the role of stablecoin issuer. Instead, Allaire met with major Korean banks (including Shinhan, KB, and Woori), financial groups, leading exchanges (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone), and tech firms like Kakao. This approach reflects a broader industry transition: the core of stablecoin competition is shifting from issuance rights to systemic positioning. With Korean regulators still debating whether banks or tech companies should issue stablecoins, Circle is avoiding regulatory uncertainty by strengthening its role as a service and technology partner. The company is deepening integration with trading platforms, building connections, and promoting stablecoin infrastructure. This positions Circle to benefit regardless of which entity eventually issues a won stablecoin. Allaire also noted the potential for a Chinese yuan stablecoin in the next 3–5 years, underscoring a regional trend of stablecoins becoming more regulated and integrated with traditional finance. Ultimately, Circle’s strategy highlights that future influence in the stablecoin market will belong not necessarily to the issuers, but to the foundational infrastructure layers that enable cross-system transactions.

marsbit51 хв тому

Circle CEO's Seoul Visit: No Korean Won Stablecoin Issuance, But Met All Major Korean Banks

marsbit51 хв тому

SpaceX Ties Up with Cursor: A High-Stakes AI Gambit of 'Lock First, Acquire Later'

SpaceX has secured an option to acquire AI programming company Cursor for $60 billion, with an alternative clause requiring a $10 billion collaboration fee if the acquisition does not proceed. This structure is not merely a potential acquisition but a strategic move to control core access points in the AI era. The deal is designed as a flexible, dual-path arrangement, allowing SpaceX to either fully acquire Cursor or maintain a binding partnership through high-cost collaboration. This "option-style" approach minimizes immediate regulatory and integration risks while ensuring long-term alignment between the two companies. At its core, the transaction exchanges critical AI-era resources: SpaceX provides its Colossus supercomputing cluster—one of the world’s most powerful AI training infrastructures—while Cursor contributes its AI-native developer environment and strong product adoption. This synergy connects compute power, models, and application layers, forming a closed-loop AI capability stack. Cursor, founded in 2022, has achieved rapid growth with over $1 billion in annual revenue and widespread enterprise adoption. Its value lies in transforming software development through AI agents capable of coding, debugging, and system design—positioning it as a gateway to future software production. For SpaceX, this move is part of a broader strategy to evolve from a aerospace company into an AI infrastructure empire, integrating xAI, supercomputing, and chip manufacturing. Controlling Cursor fills a gap in its developer tooling layer, strengthening its AI narrative ahead of a potential IPO. The deal reflects a shift in AI competition from model superiority to ecosystem and entry-point control. With programming tools as a key battleground, securing developer loyalty becomes crucial for dominating the software production landscape. Risks include questions around Cursor’s valuation, technical integration challenges, and potential regulatory scrutiny. Nevertheless, the deal underscores a strategic bet: controlling both compute and software development access may redefine power dynamics in the AI-driven future.

marsbit1 год тому

SpaceX Ties Up with Cursor: A High-Stakes AI Gambit of 'Lock First, Acquire Later'

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片