Stablecoins break into top 3 growth drivers for Web3 gaming: BGA 2025 report

cointelegraphОпубліковано о 2025-12-10Востаннє оновлено о 2025-12-10

Анотація

According to the Blockchain Gaming Alliance's 2025 report, stablecoin adoption has emerged as a top-three growth driver for Web3 gaming for the first time, alongside high-quality game launches and revenue-driven business models. This reflects a shift away from speculative token cycles and reliance on major Web2 brands, indicating the industry's growing focus on fundamentals, sustainable infrastructure, and commercially viable games. The report highlights a five-year evolution in developer priorities, moving from external catalysts like play-to-earn hype to improved user experience and now to polished gameplay and stablecoin-integrated payment systems. Stablecoins are seen as crucial for enabling frictionless, fiat-like transactions in game economies. Additionally, dependence on traditional gaming publishers has significantly decreased, with interoperability, AI integration, and creator economies gaining prominence.

Blockchain game builders are increasingly prioritizing fundamentals and infrastructure over token-fuelled growth cycles, with stablecoin adoption emerging as one of the top three catalysts for the first time, according to the latest report from the Blockchain Gaming Alliance (BGA).

On Wednesday, the BGA published its 2025 State of the Industry Report, which shows a shift in what builders believe will drive success in blockchain gaming.

According to the report, the top three growth drivers were high-quality game launches (29.5%), revenue-driven business models (27.5%) and stablecoin adoption in payments (27.3%).

The findings suggest the industry is stepping back from speculative cycles and reliance on big Web2 brands and instead prioritizing commercially viable games built on Web3-native transaction rails.

“What we’re seeing in the data is an industry becoming more global, more disciplined, and more focused on building great games for real players,” said Sebastien Borget, the co-president of the BGA and co-founder of The Sandbox.

*Key factors that are perceived to drive the growth of the blockchain gaming industry. Source: BGA Survey*

How blockchain gaming drivers have evolved in the last five years

The report reflected a notable five-year evolution in what blockchain gaming builders believe will move the sector forward.

From 2021 to 2023, survey participants heavily favored external catalysts, which include play-to-earn (P2E) hype and hopes that major Web2 publishers would validate the sector’s legitimacy by getting involved.

By 2024, sentiment shifted over to improving user experience, accessibility and onboarding after friction and repetitive game loops stalled Web3 gaming adoption.

This year, the survey suggested further maturity. Developers increasingly tied success to polished gameplay, sustainable monetization and infrastructure that supports spending.

Stablecoins, long a core component of decentralized finance, are now seen as instrumental to game economies, the report said.

It also suggests that frictionless payment experiences, similar to fiat, could contribute to the success of Web3 games.

Related: Animoca, Solv to help Japanese Bitcoin companies generate yield

Waning dependence on Web2 gaming giants

The survey also shows a sharp drop in perceived reliance on traditional gaming giants. Only about 17.2% of respondents now view legacy publishers as key growth catalysts, down from 35.8% in 2024.

Instead of this, interoperability (26.1%), artificial intelligence integration (25.9%) and player-driven creator economies (25.5%) followed closely behind the top three drivers.

Developers’ growing focus on stablecoin rails mirrors broader policy momentum.

Regulatory frameworks for stablecoins are advancing rapidly worldwide, with the United States leading the way with the GENIUS Act and Europe implementing its Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework.

Magazine: Koreans ‘pump’ alts after Upbit hack, China BTC mining surge: Asia Express

Трендові криптовалюти

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Пов'язані матеріали

It was revealed that 92.7% of institutional bitcoin (BTC) reserves are held by companies based in the USA

Institutional Bitcoin reserves held by publicly traded companies are overwhelmingly concentrated in the US, according to data from Unfolded. US-based firms hold 1.24 million BTC, accounting for a staggering 92.7% of the global total held by such entities. Over the past 12 months, these companies added 510,000 BTC to their portfolios, a purchasing rate that vastly outpaced new supply. Their acquisitions were more than triple the number of new BTC mined during the same period, significantly impacting the asset's supply dynamics. This trend, heavily influenced by firms like MicroStrategy, reflects a growing institutional adoption of Bitcoin as a long-term reserve asset across sectors like energy, technology, and finance. Analysts warn this sustained institutional demand, especially after the upcoming halving which will reduce new supply, could further strain the supply-demand balance and influence long-term price trends.

cryptonews.ru7 хв тому

It was revealed that 92.7% of institutional bitcoin (BTC) reserves are held by companies based in the USA

cryptonews.ru7 хв тому

Bank of Japan Signals Interest Rate Hike Despite Keeping Them at 1%

The Bank of Japan (BOJ) kept its benchmark interest rate at 1% on July 31, as widely expected, following a June hike to a 31-year high. The decision passed with an 8-1 vote, with board member Hajime Takata again dissenting in favor of a hike to 1.25%. Despite holding rates steady, the BOJ signaled a hawkish tilt, warning that underlying inflation is likely to accelerate and exceed 2% from the latter half of the fiscal year. While it slightly lowered its core inflation forecast for FY2026, officials expressed stronger confidence that an overshoot will occur later, driven by yen weakness, corporate pricing behavior, and lingering energy shock effects. Markets were focused on the BOJ's forward guidance. Analysts noted the central bank appeared to balance short-term caution with a long-term warning of tighter policy. Governor Kazuo Ueda faces the challenge of reconciling a government reluctant to tighten further with bond markets already pricing in additional hikes, with the timing of the next move debated. Adding complexity, the BOJ reportedly intervened in currency markets hours before the rate decision, buying yen to support the currency which had fallen to 40-year lows against the dollar. Yen weakness stems from the wide U.S.-Japan interest rate gap, high fuel prices, and market skepticism about the pace of BOJ policy normalization. The yield on Japan's 10-year government bonds fell to 2.8%, indicating investor expectations for future monetary tightening.

cryptonews.ru7 хв тому

Bank of Japan Signals Interest Rate Hike Despite Keeping Them at 1%

cryptonews.ru7 хв тому

Reddit Triples Profit to $253 Million, But Notes Search Query Volatility

Reddit reported second-quarter 2026 net income of $253 million, roughly triple the $89 million from a year earlier. Revenue surged 61% year-over-year to $805 million, marking the eighth consecutive quarter of over 60% growth. Advertising revenue jumped 64% to $762 million, driven by higher ad prices and increased impressions. The company's weekly active unique users surpassed 500 million for the first time, reaching 514.6 million. However, executives flagged a concern: traffic from search engines became volatile toward the end of the quarter, creating headwinds for converting its large audience into daily users. CEO Steven Huffman noted that "AI overviews have not yet had a similarly positive impact" on search referrals compared to traditional links. Other highlights include adjusted EBITDA rising 43% to $343 million, operating cash flow of $262 million for the quarter, and the launch of Reddit's first shareholder return program with $235 million spent on share repurchases. For the current quarter, Reddit forecasts revenue between $860 million and $870 million.

cryptonews.ru9 хв тому

Reddit Triples Profit to $253 Million, But Notes Search Query Volatility

cryptonews.ru9 хв тому

Why Are Leveraged ETFs like 7709 Inherently Negative EV Products?

This article argues that the SK H力士 2x Leveraged ETF (7709) is fundamentally a negative expected value (EV) product, rather than simply a "double SK H力士" investment. Its core issue stems from its daily rebalancing mechanism to maintain a 2x leverage target. After a price move, the fund must buy more after a rise or sell after a fall to readjust its leverage, creating a systematic pattern of buying high and selling low. This introduces a "delay loss": it always reacts to past price changes, missing potential gains from adjusting earlier during an uptrend and suffering greater losses from adjusting later during a downtrend. While more frequent intraday rebalancing would improve returns in strong, smooth trending markets by reinvesting profits or cutting losses sooner, it also dramatically increases volatility drag (frictional losses) during choppy, oscillating markets due to more frequent high-buy/low-sell trades. The author draws a parallel to an option seller who delta hedges (short gamma), which involves similar "buy high, sell low" dynamic hedging. However, unlike an option seller who receives upfront premium (IV and theta) as compensation for this risk, the leveraged ETF investor receives no such compensation. Instead, they bear all the path-dependent volatility decay, plus additional costs like swap/derivatives financing, management fees, and trading slippage. Thus, the product's return profile can be framed as: 2x directional return minus realized variance drag minus financing costs minus derivatives costs minus management fees minus transaction costs. For the investor to profit, SK H力士's price must not only rise significantly but do so in a strong, sustained, and smooth trend to overcome these inherent structural costs. High volatility and frequent price reversals are particularly damaging. The article also notes that while the ETF has no explicit liquidation line like perpetual futures, avoiding a sudden "blow-up," its net asset value can still decay towards zero over time through this combination of volatility drag and fees. For experienced traders, directly managing leverage via perpetual contracts may offer more control and potentially lower costs than this packaged, mechanistic product.

marsbit14 хв тому

Why Are Leveraged ETFs like 7709 Inherently Negative EV Products?

marsbit14 хв тому

'Backstabbing' or 'Win-Win'? How Likely Is TradeXYZ to Break Away from Hyperliquid and Go Solo?

The article discusses the growing debate over whether TradeXYZ, which dominates Hyperliquid's HIP-3 market with over 90% of its volume, might break away to build its own independent trading platform. This possibility is fueled by TradeXYZ's immense market influence and the common industry trend of successful projects seeking more control and profit capture. Key arguments for a potential split include TradeXYZ's overwhelming contribution to Hyperliquid's metrics and the financial incentive to retain all transaction fees, as it currently splits them 50/50 with Hyperliquid. The piece draws parallels to other cases, like Anthropic's "Claude Code" competing with its former partner Cursor, suggesting "betrayal" can occur when business leverage shifts. However, strong counterarguments suggest a split is unlikely or would be detrimental. TradeXYZ relies on Hyperliquid's high-performance infrastructure and its platform as a primary user acquisition channel. Building a comparable system would be challenging. Furthermore, the founders of both projects share a history of trust and mutual admiration. The analysis concludes that a separation would likely be a lose-lose scenario: Hyperliquid would lose a major growth narrative and trading volume, while TradeXYZ would face technical hurdles, user migration issues, and reputational damage, potentially allowing competitors to seize market share. The most rational path is seen as continued collaboration, with TradeXYZ potentially negotiating better terms while leveraging Hyperliquid's established strengths.

marsbit24 хв тому

'Backstabbing' or 'Win-Win'? How Likely Is TradeXYZ to Break Away from Hyperliquid and Go Solo?

marsbit24 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни TOP (TOP).

Stablecoins break into top 3 growth drivers for Web3 gaming: BGA 2025 report

Анотація

How blockchain gaming drivers have evolved in the last five years

Waning dependence on Web2 gaming giants

Трендові криптовалюти

Пов'язані матеріали

It was revealed that 92.7% of institutional bitcoin (BTC) reserves are held by companies based in the USA

Bank of Japan Signals Interest Rate Hike Despite Keeping Them at 1%

Reddit Triples Profit to $253 Million, But Notes Search Query Volatility

Why Are Leveraged ETFs like 7709 Inherently Negative EV Products?

'Backstabbing' or 'Win-Win'? How Likely Is TradeXYZ to Break Away from Hyperliquid and Go Solo?

Торгівля

Популярні статті

Як купити TOP

Обговорення