‘Stablecoin ordinance has taken effect’ – Hong Kong pushes for crypto regulation

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-02-01Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-01

Анотація

Hong Kong has activated a licensing regime for fiat-backed stablecoin issuers, with the Stablecoin Ordinance taking effect in August. Financial Services Secretary Christopher Hui stated that the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) is currently processing license applications. The government views crypto as a "new growth area" to strengthen the city’s status as an international financial hub. Regulatory details for trading platforms, custody services, and advisory providers are being developed, alongside enhanced anti-money laundering measures. The first approved issuers are expected in Q1 2026. Financial Secretary Paul Chan emphasized the need for strong safeguards to protect investors and ensure market stability, aligning with global regulatory trends like those in the U.S. and U.K.

Hong Kong has revealed that it has activated licensing for issuers of fiat-based stablecoins amid a broader push for crypto regulatory clarity.

During a policy briefing with the Legislative Council’s Finance Committee, Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury, Christopher Hui, said,

“The Stablecoin Ordinance was officially implemented last August, introducing a licensing system for fiat-denominated stablecoin issuers in Hong Kong. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) is currently processing relevant license applications.”

Hui framed crypto as a ‘new growth area’ that could further reinforce the city as an international finance center.

The official noted that regulators are working on the details of the relevant regulatory regime for virtual asset trading and custody service providers, as well as other aspects of digital asset markets.

He added,

“The Financial Services and the Treasury, and the SFC are also further consulting the public on establishing a regulatory regime for service providers offering advice on virtual assets and virtual asset management service providers...”

Additionally, to combat tax evasion in the sector and strengthen anti-money laundering efforts, the official said they were collecting feedback on the same.

Issuer approvals expected in Q1

The first batch list of approved licensed stablecoin issuers in Hong Kong is expected in Q1 2026, according to the city’s Financial Secretary Paul Chan Mo-po.

During the annual World Economic Forum in Davos, the finance chief billed digital assets as,

“Financial innovation that we should embrace proactively. We also believe digital assets should serve the real economy.”

Mo-po pressed that the city must build strong guardrails to mitigate crypto market-related risks that could undermine broader financial stability, the overall market integrity, and protect investors.

Indeed, Hong Kong’s stablecoin bill requires strict standards for reserves, redemption, and risk measures.

Similarly, it tightened rules on custodians and dealers, laying the groundwork for a broader crypto regulatory framework.

The trend mirrors regulatory approaches in the U.K. and the U.S to offer clear rules for the growing sector. Notably, the U.S. passed its stablecoin bill last year, marking a significant step for digital assets.

However, the broader market structure bill, the CLARITY Act, still faces uncertainty. Contentious issues, such as yield and tokenized stocks, continue to stall its progress.

In the U.K., Parliament recently launched a stablecoin inquiry to review the proposed regulatory regime that is set to be finalized by the end of 2026.


Final Thoughts

  • Hong Kong is gearing up to list its first batch of approved and licensed stablecoin issuers in Q1.
  • Top officials believe crypto is a ‘new growth’ area to position Hong Kong as an international finance center.

Пов'язані питання

QWhen did the Stablecoin Ordinance officially take effect in Hong Kong?

AThe Stablecoin Ordinance officially took effect in August of last year.

QWhat is the expected timeline for the first batch of approved licensed stablecoin issuers in Hong Kong?

AThe first batch of approved licensed stablecoin issuers is expected in the first quarter (Q1) of 2026.

QAccording to the Financial Secretary, what role should digital assets serve?

AFinancial Secretary Paul Chan Mo-po stated that digital assets should serve the real economy.

QWhich two regulatory bodies are consulting the public on establishing a regime for virtual asset advisory and management services?

AThe Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau and the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) are conducting the public consultation.

QWhat are some of the key areas the Hong Kong stablecoin bill imposes strict standards on?

AThe bill imposes strict standards on reserves, redemption processes, and risk management measures for stablecoin issuers.

Пов'язані матеріали

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

**Title: Has the "Digital Gold" Narrative for Bitcoin Failed?** The article argues that Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative remains valid despite a recent sharp price decline (from a peak near $126k in Oct 2025 to briefly under $61k in Feb 2026). It presents a long-term investment framework based on three core points: **1. Viewing Bitcoin as an Asset:** Bitcoin is presented as a superior potential store of value compared to gold. Key arguments are its absolute scarcity (21 million cap), superior portability, and transparent auditability via its public ledger. While acknowledging its current use in early, volatile stages (~3-4% global adoption), the author draws parallels to the early, disruptive phases of the internet and e-commerce. **2. Understanding the Recent Downturn:** The current ~50% correction is framed as a predictable, consensus-driven cycle following its post-halving peak (the 2024 halving preceded the Oct 2025 high). A crucial factor is a historic "changing of hands": the influx of new institutional buyers via ETFs allowed early, low-cost holders (miners, OG believers) to take profits. The author notes that while severe, Bitcoin's historical drawdowns (e.g., 93% in 2011, 77% in 2021-22) have been progressively smaller, suggesting maturing holder structure and decreasing volatility over time. **3. The Long-Term Perspective:** The long-term thesis hinges on Bitcoin capturing a portion of gold's market value. With Bitcoin's market cap at ~$1.4 trillion (at $70k) versus gold's ~$20 trillion, significant upside potential exists if the "digital gold" narrative is partially realized. However, the author strongly cautions that short-term risks remain, the bottom is unpredictable, and high volatility is inherent. The real risk is not Bitcoin failing but poor personal position management (over-leverage, wrong capital) and a lack of deep understanding, which can force investors out during severe downturns. The conclusion uses Amazon's 95% crash post-2000 dot-com bubble and subsequent 42x recovery as an analogy. The ultimate question is not if Bitcoin's price will rise, but if an investor's strategy and conviction can withstand the volatility to see the long-term play out. The recent divergence (gold up, Bitcoin down) is posed not as a narrative failure, but as potential evidence of this ongoing, painful transition from a speculative asset to a mainstream allocation.

marsbit55 хв тому

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

marsbit55 хв тому

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

The article discusses Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative, its recent price drop, and long-term outlook through the perspective of "Jason". It argues the narrative is not a failure but that Bitcoin represents a superior, new asset class due to its fixed supply (21 million), portability, and auditability. The piece compares its current ~3-4% global adoption rate to early internet/e-commerce, suggesting significant growth potential. Regarding the 2025-2026 price decline (from ~$126k to briefly under $61k), the author views it as a predictable, consensus-driven sell-off within Bitcoin's ~4-year cycle post-halving, exacerbated by a major "handover" from early, low-cost holders to new institutional buyers via ETFs. A key observation is that historical peak-to-trough drawdowns have lessened over time (e.g., 93% in 2011 to ~50% in 2026), indicating maturing volatility as holder structure changes. For the long term, the author uses a simple framework: Bitcoin's total market cap (~$1.4T at $70k) is only about 7% of gold's (~$20T). Even capturing 30-50% of gold's value would imply substantial upside. However, the article strongly cautions against viewing this as investment advice, emphasizing extreme volatility and the critical importance of risk management, position sizing, and deep fundamental understanding to survive severe drawdowns. It concludes by drawing a parallel to Amazon's 95% crash in 2000 and subsequent 42x recovery, stressing that the key is surviving market cycles to realize long-term potential.

链捕手1 год тому

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

链捕手1 год тому

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

"From Code to Cognition: The Evolution of Robot Brains" The journey of robotic intelligence has shifted dramatically from manually coded systems to AI-driven brains. For decades, robots relied on layered software stacks—perception, state estimation, planning, control—each handcrafted. While predictable, they lacked adaptability. The 2010s saw deep learning revolutionize perception (e.g., object detection) and control (via reinforcement learning), but learned skills remained narrow. The arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) marked a turning point. LLMs acted as high-level planners, interpreting natural language instructions and generating sequences of actions for traditional robotic systems to execute. However, true integration came with Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models, which fused vision, language, and motion prediction into a single network. Pioneered by models like RT-2 and open-source projects like OpenVLA, VLAs enable robots to reason and act directly from visual input and commands. The most advanced humanoid robots now employ a "dual-brain" architecture: a slow-thinking, large VLA (System 2) for reasoning and planning, and a fast-reacting, small network (System 1) for high-frequency motion control, sometimes with an even lower-level System 0 for balance. This split balances cognition with the physics of real-time movement. Computation is split between onboard hardware (e.g., NVIDIA Jetson) for safety-critical control loops and cloud/edge servers for non-critical tasks like learning and interfaces. A crucial driver is the open-source ecosystem—models like GR00T and OpenVLA allow startups to build upon pre-trained brains and fine-tune them with their own data, accelerating development. Despite progress, current systems struggle with recovery from errors, sample inefficiency, and long-horizon tasks. This has spurred the rise of **World Models**—neural networks that predict the consequences of actions. By simulating possible futures before acting (like NVIDIA Cosmos or Meta V-JEPA), robots can plan, recover, and generalize better. This represents the next frontier: shifting intelligence from learned reactions to an internal model of physics and cause-and-effect. The field is rapidly evolving. While not yet at its "ChatGPT moment," the convergence of cheaper hardware, scalable simulation, and world models points toward robots that are increasingly capable, adaptive, and useful. The question is shifting from "what can robots do?" to "what *should* they do?"

marsbit1 год тому

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

marsbit1 год тому

AI Bubble Is Bursting

The AI Bubble is Bursting: A Necessary Purge on the Path to Ubiquitous Intelligence Market volatility has reignited debates about an AI bubble, with figures like Ray Dalio pointing to high valuations. However, this parallels the dot-com bubble, which, despite its crash, laid the physical infrastructure for today's internet era. The current AI investment frenzy, with tech giants planning trillions in infrastructure spending far outstripping current AI application revenues, appears similarly imbalanced. This 'bubble' is seen as an inevitable phase for a disruptive technology, paying the "innovation tax." Critically, AI inference costs have plummeted over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence nearly free at the margin. This hasn't reduced spending but has instead unlocked massive new demand, as seen in enterprise AI cloud expenditure tripling. This follows the Jevons Paradox: efficiency gains lead to greater total consumption. The market is now entering a cleansing phase, weeding out speculative ventures lacking real moats. The deeper shift is a move from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to value creation in operational expenditure (OpEx) through AI applications that solve real industry problems. While infrastructure valuations are high, rapid earnings growth from widespread AI adoption across sectors—from manufacturing and finance to law and healthcare—may digest these valuations over time. Ultimately, this creative destruction will leave behind robust infrastructure and optimized models, cheaply powering an AI-augmented future for all industries, much as the internet became indispensable after its own bubble burst. The core productive potential remains undiminished.

链捕手1 год тому

AI Bubble Is Bursting

链捕手1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片